Referencias

Aliprantis, A. D. y Carmona, G. (2003). “Introduction to an economic problem: a models and modelling perspective”, en Lesh y Doerr (eds.) Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 255-265. [ Links ]

Almudí, J.M. (2002). Introducción del campo magnético en primer ciclo de universidad: Dificultades de aprendizaje y propuesta de enseñanza alternativa de orientación constructivista, tesis doctoral, Departamento de Física Aplicada I, Universidad del País Vasco. [ Links ]

Beichner, R.J y Saul, J.M. (2003). “Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project”, Proceedings of the International School of Physics: Enrico Fermi, Varenna. [ Links ]

Buckley, B.C.; Boulter, C. y Gilbert, J. (1997). Towards a typology of models for science education, Reino Unido: Faculty of Education and Community Studies, The University of Reading. [ Links ]

Carey, S. y Smith, C. (1993). “On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge”, Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251. [ Links ]

Cartier, J. (2000). “Assessment of explanatory models in genetics: Insights into Students’ Conceptions of Scientific Models”, Report núm. 98-1, NCISLA/Mathematics & Science, Madison:University of Wisconsin [ Links ]

Czudkova, L. y Musilova, J. (2000). “The pendulum: A atumbling block of secondary school mechanics”, Physics Education 35(6), 428-435. [ Links ]

Denny, M. (2002). “The pendulum clock”, European Journal of Physics, 23(4), 449-458. [ Links ]

Dori, Y.J. y Belcher, J. (2004). “How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts?” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14(2). [ Links ]

Fazio, C.; Guastella, I.; Tarantino, G. (2005). “Designing and validating a teaching/learning sequence about elastic waves propagation; the role of pedagogical tools”, Proceedings of ESERA 2005 Conference, vol V, Barcelona, pp. 633-636. [ Links ]

Fazio, C.; Giangalanti, G. y Sperandeo-Mineo, R. (2002). “Modeling phenomena in various experimental fields: the framework of negative and positive feedback systems”, en Michelini y Cobal (eds.) Developing Formal Thinking in Physics, Forum Editrice, Udine: Universidad de Udine. [ Links ]

Felipe, E. A.; Gallarreta, S. y Merino, G., (2005). “La modelización en la enseñanza de la biología del desarrollo”, Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. 4, núm. 3. [ Links ]

Feurzeig, W. y Roberts, N. (1999). Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education, Nueva York: Springer. [ Links ]

Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ Links ]

Gil, D. et al. (1999) “¿Tiene sentido seguir distinguiendo entre aprendizaje de conceptos, resolución de problemas de lápiz y papel y realización de prácticas de laboratorio?”, Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17, 311-320. [ Links ]

Gil, D. y Martínez Torregrosa, J. (1984) “Problem solving in physiscs: A critical analysis”, Research on Physics Education, París: CNRS editors. [ Links ]

Gilbert, J.K. (2002). “Moving between the modes of representation of a model in science education: some theoretical and pedagogic implications”, conferencia en Philosophical, Psychological, Linguistic Foundations for Language and Science Literacy Research, Victoria: University of Victoria. [ Links ]

Gilbert, J.K. y Boulter, C. (1995). “Stretching models too far”, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. [ Links ]

Gilbert, J.K.; Boulter, C. y Rutherford, M. (1998). “Models in explanations, part. 1: Horses for courses?” International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83-97. [ Links ]

Gilbert, J.K., y Osborne, R.J. (1980). “The use of models in science and science teaching”, European Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 3-13. [ Links ]

Gobert, J. y Buckley, B. (2000). “Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education”, International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891-894. [ Links ]

Gobert, J. y Clement, J. (1994). “Promoting causal model construction in science through student-generated diagrams”, Proceedings of the annual meting of the American Educational Research Association, Nueva Orleans. [ Links ]

Goldin, G. A. (2004).”Representations in mathematical learning and problem solving” en English, L. (ed.) Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 517-547. [ Links ]

Grosslight, L., et al. (1991). “Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and expert”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (9), 799-822. [ Links ]

Guisasola, J. et al. (1998). “Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am J Phys, 66: 64-74. [ Links ]

Guisasola, J. et al. (2004). “La enseñanza universitaria de la física y las aportaciones de la investigación en didáctica de la física”, Revista Española de Física, 18 ( 2), 15-16. [ Links ]

Hake, R.R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement methods in introductory mechanics courses” (disponible en http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf). [ Links ]

Hake, R.R. (2002). “Lessons from the physics education reform effort,” Ecology and Society 2: 28-36. [ Links ]

Harrison, A. G. y Treagust, D. F. (1998). “Modeling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models?”, School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 420-429. [ Links ]

Harrison, A. y Treagust, D. (2000). “A typology of school science models”, International Journal of Science Education, 22 (9), 1011-1026. [ Links ]

Hoellwarth, C.; M. J. Moelter y R.D. Knight. (2005). “A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms”, American Journal of Physics 73(5): 459-463. [ Links ]

Ingham, A. y Gilbert, J. (1991). “The use of analogal models by students of chemistry at higher educations level”, International Journal of Science Education, 13 (2), 193-202. [ Links ]

Islas, S. M. y Pesa, M. A., (2002). “The learning of modeling: a scientist vision”, en Michelini y Cobal (eds.) Developing Formal Thinking in Physics, Forum Editrice, Udine: Universidad de Udine . [ Links ]

Jaque, F. (1995) “Deficiencias en los conocimientos de la física al llegar a laUniversidad”, Tarbiya 10, 121-126. [ Links ]

Justi, R. y Gilbert, J. (1999). “A case of a historical science teaching: the use of hibrid models”, Science Education, 83 (2), 163-177. [ Links ]

Kelly, A. E., y Lesh, R. A. (2001). Reconsidering Design Experiments: 3 yr Research Program of the NSF. Santa Fe, NM. [ Links ]

Kitcher, P. (1984). “1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences”, The Philosophical Review, 93, 335-373. [ Links ]

Lehrer, R., y Schauble, L. (2000). “Modeling in mathematics and science”, en Glaser (ed.) Advances in instructional psychology: volume 5. Educational design and cognitive science, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 101-159. [ Links ]

Lesh, R. et al. (2000) “Principles for developing thought revealing activities for students and teachers”, en Lesh y Kelly (eds.) Research design in Mathematics and Science Education, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 647-664. [ Links ]

Lesh, R. y Doerr, H. M. (2003) “Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning and problem solving”, en Lesh y Doerr (eds.) Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3-35. [ Links ]

Lesh, R. y English, L. (2005) “Trends in the evolution of models and modeling perspective on mathematical learning and problem solving”, International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 37(6), 487-489. [ Links ]

Lesh, R. y Kelly, A. (2000) “Multitiered teaching experiments”, en Lesh y Kelly (eds.) Research design in Mathematics and Science Education, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 197-230. [ Links ]

Manabu, S. (2004). “The reproduction of scientific understanding about pendulum motion in the public”, Science and Education, 13(4 y 5), 473-492. [ Links ]

Mathews, M. R. (2004). “Idealization and Galileo’s pendulum discoveries: historical, philosophical and pedagogical considerations”, Science and Education, 13 (7), 689-715. [ Links ]

McClain, K. (2003) “Task analysis cycles as tools for supporting students’ mathematical development”, en Lesh y Doerr (eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 175-191. [ Links ]

McDermott, L.C. (1990). “A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers”, American Journal of Physics 58, 734-742. [ Links ]

Mellar, H. y Bliss, J. (1994) “Introduction: modeling and education”, en Mellar et al. (eds.) Learning with Artificial Worlds: computer based modeling in the curriculum, Londres: The Falmer Press, pp. 1-7. [ Links ]

Michelsen, C. (2005). “Expanding the domain variables and functions in an interdisciplinary context between mathematics and physics”, Proceedings of the I International Symposium on Mathematics and its Connections to the Arts and the Sciences, Schwäbisch Gmünd: The University of Education, pp. 201-214. [ Links ]

Moreira, M. A. (1999). Modelos mentales, texto de apoyo núm. 8. Programa Internacional de Doctorado en Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Burgos: Universidad de Burgos. [ Links ]

Morgan, M. S. y Morrison, M., (1999). Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]

National Council of teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA. [ Links ]

Nersessian, N. (1992). “Constructing and instructing: the role of abstraction techniques” en Duschl y Hamilton (eds.) Creating and learning physics, philosophy of Sc. cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice, Nueva York, pp. 48-67. [ Links ]

Nola, R. (2004). “Pendula, models, constructivism and reality”, Science and Education, 13, 349-377. [ Links ]

Norman, D.A. (1983). “Some observations on mental models”, en Gentner y Stevens (eds.). Mental models, pp. 6-14. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [ Links ]

Pintó, R. y Surinach, S. (2004a). Physics teacher education beyond 2000, París: Elsevier. [ Links ]

Pintó, R. y Surinach, S. (2004b). “Puede ayudar la investigación en enseñanza de la física a mejorar su docencia en la universidad?” Rev Bras Ens Fis, vol. 26, núm 3, San Pablo. [ Links ]

Pollock, S. (2005). “No single cause: learning gains, student attitudes, and the impacts of multiple effective reforms, 2004 Physics Education Research Conference: AIP Conference Proceeding, vol. 790; J. Marx , P. Heron, & S. Franklin, eds., pp. 137-140. [ Links ]

Schwarz, C.; Meyer, J. y Sharma, A., (2004). “Creating epistemologically-rich learning environments: computer modeling tools for pre-service elementary and middle school science teachers”, Proceedings of AERA Conference. [ Links ]

Schwarz, C., y White, B., (2003). “Developing a model-centered approach to science education”, Cognition and Instruction, 23(2) 265-205. [ Links ]

Scott, P. H. y Driver, R. H. (1998). “Learning about science teaching: perspectives from an action research project”, en Fraser y Tobin (eds.), International survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am J. Physics, 66, 64-74. [ Links ]

Smith, C., Snir, J., y Grosslight, L. (1992). “Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation”, Cognition and Instruction, 9, 221-83. [ Links ]

Sperandeo-Mineo, R., (2002). “Learning phsysics via model construction”, en Michelini y Cobal (eds.) Developing Formal Thinking in Physics, Udine: Forum Editrice, Universidad de Udine. [ Links ]

Spitulnik, M., Krajcik, J., y Soloway, E., (1999). “Construction of models to promote scientific understanding” en Feurzeig y Roberts (eds.), Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education, Nueva York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 70-94. [ Links ]

Trigueros, M. (2004). “Innovación en evaluación: un enfoque basado en la perspectiva de modelos”, Enseñanza de la Química, vol. 15, pp. 129-141. [ Links ]

Trigueros, M. y Carmona, G. (2006) “Nuevas perspectivas de evaluación”, en Rojano (ed.), La tecnología en la enseñanza de las ciencias y las matemáticas con Tecnología: Modelos de transformación de las prácticas y la interacción social en el aula, México: Subsecretaría de Educación Básica-SEP, pp. 231-241. [ Links ]

Viennot, L. (1998) “Former en didactique, former sur le contenu? Principes d’élaboration et éléments d’évaluation d’une formation en didactique de la physique en deuxième année d’IUFM”, Didaskalia 10, 75-96. [ Links ]

Wolman, W. (1984). “Models and procedures: teaching for transfer of pendulum knowledge”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(4), 399-415. [ Links ]

Zawojewski, J. S.; Lesh, R. y English, L. (2003). “A models and modelling perspective on the role of small group learning activities”, en Lesh y Doerr (eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching, Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 337-358. [ Links ]