SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.86 issue1Moderate hypofractionation in prostate cancer: experience from Regional Hospital ISSSTE, MorelosAlternative methods of skull reconstruction for giant sarcomas author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista médica del Hospital General de México

On-line version ISSN 2524-177XPrint version ISSN 0185-1063

Rev. med. Hosp. Gen. Méx. vol.86 n.1 Ciudad de México Jan./Mar. 2023  Epub June 12, 2023

https://doi.org/10.24875/hgmx.22000027 

Original articles

Concha bullosa and nasal septum by tomographic study; experience at the General Hospital of Mexico Eduardo Liceaga

Susana I. Vargas-Hernández1 

Sanjuanita Flores-Limas1 

Raúl Romero-Cabello2  3  * 

Alejandro E. Vega-Gutiérrez1 

Víctor H. Ramos-Pacheco1 

Octavio Amancio-Chassin4 

1Radiology and Imaging Department, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga"

2Infectology Service, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga"

3School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

4Pharmacovigilance, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga". Mexico City, Mexico


Abstract

Introduction:

Nasal septal deviation is defined as any bending of the septal contour observable on coronal computed tomography (CT) scans and is present in more than half of the population. Concha bullosa (CB) is defined as persistent pneumatisation of the middle turbinate. The purposes of this study are to identify its frequency, as well as its relationship with the deviation of the nasal septum in the population that attends the HGMEL and to propose a radiological classification according to its size and location in relation to the degree of turbinate obstruction.

Method:

Osteomeatal CT scans performed during one year (January-December 2020) were analysed. All cases presented deviation of the nasal septum. We use the Bolger and Calvo-Henriquez classifications and propose a classification according to the maximum size of the extension in the coronal plane (General Hospital of Mexico Eduardo Liceaga [HGMEL] Classification).

Results:

Of 142 CT scans of nasal sinuses, 99 were excluded because they did not present CB; as for the remaining 43 (30.28%) subject to this analysis, 27 corresponded to women (62.7%). The incidence of unilateral type CB was 65.12% and that of the bilateral type of 34.88%, with left unilateral CB in 57.14% of cases. The most frequent forms were type 2 (lamellar) with the Bolger classification, type I with the Calvo-Henríquez classification, and grade 1 according to the HGMEL classification.

Conclusion:

The proposed classification is based on the involvement of the middle turbinate caused by the deviation of the septum due to its anatomical and physiological importance. It is important as a surgical reference and can be easily studied on the preoperative CT scan.

Keywords Concha bullosa; Septal deviation; Sinus tomography; Bolger Classification; Calvo-Henriquez Classification

Introduction

The nasal septum is a structure that provides physiological support to the nose and affects the intranasal airflow pattern1-4. A deviated nasal septum is any curvature of the septum contour and is identified on CT scans. According to various reports in the literature, this condition is found in up to half of the adult population5-13. Based on various evidence, trauma, particularly in childhood, is an important factor in the aetiology of septal deformity6-11, while non-traumatic deviation of the septum may occur due to pressure and expansion during septal growth from the ossification centres3-12.

The concha bullosa is the aeration (pneumatisation) of the vertical part of the middle turbinate8,9,11,13,14; this anatomical variation occurs in 24% to 55% of the population8-15. The mechanism and origin of this pneumatisation are not yet well defined8,9,11,13,14, although most authors suggest that it originates from the anterior ethmoidal sinus12-15. Two theories have been proposed: one postulates that the concha bullosa arises during compensatory changes in airflow caused by deviation of the nasal septum, while the second suggests that it is due to individual anatomical variations12,13,15-17.

Unilateral concha bullosa has been associated with contralateral septal deviation and hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate and obstruction of the osteomeatal complex8,9,12-17. In most cases, the concha bullosa is considered a normal and asymptomatic anatomical variant, but it can lead to impaired ventilation or drainage when it reaches a larger size8,12-15.

The objectives of this study are: (1) to identify the frequency of CB, (2) its relationship with the deviation of the nasal septum in the population attending the General Hospital of Mexico Eduardo Liceaga (HGMEL) and, (3) to propose a radiological classification according to its size and location in relation to the degree of turbinate obstruction (HGMEL Classification).

Materials and method

An observational and descriptive study was conducted in which 142 non-contrast osteomeatal complex CT scans performed during one year (January to December 2020) were analysed. All patients had only a deviated septum without other functional nasal obstruction, such as sinusitis or allergic rhinitis. Studies in persons under 18 years of age and those with significant distortion of the sinonasal anatomy (tumours, mucormycosis, and a history of facial fracture or post-operative sinonasal surgery) were excluded. Imaging studies were obtained using a 128-channel Somatom Definition AS CT scanner (Siemens®) with axial, coronal and sagittal reconstructions at each millimetre, all within a bone window. Nasal septal deviation was defined as any curvature of the septal contour identified on CT scans, and concha bullosa was defined as aeration of the middle turbinate in case of bilateral presentation; both sides were evaluated separately. Case images were extracted from the Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) of the HGMEL.

We used the Bolger classification of concha bullosa (Fig. 1)12, the Calvo-Henríquez classification by degree of pneumatisation of the middle turbinate body in the axial plane (Fig. 2)13, as well as the application of the classifications proposed by the team of the head and neck tomography department of the HGMEL Radiology Services. They are based on the size of the CB, whose extension is measured in the coronal plane from its medial to lateral edge perpendicular to its axis (Fig. 3) and based on the degrees of septal deviation in the coronal plane (Fig. 4).

Figure 1 Coronal plane CT images showing the types of CB according to the classification by extent of pneumatisation in its different elements (Bolger). 

Figure 2 Axial CT scan images showing the types of CB according to the classification by extent of pneumatisation in the anteroposterior direction within the nasal cavities (Calvo-Henriquez). Type I in the anterior third of the turbinate, type II in two anterior thirds or in the middle third, type III complete anteroposterior, type IV two posterior thirds and type V in the posterior third. 

Figure 3 Coronal plane CT scan images showing CB types according to size (HGMEL). 

Figure 4 Coronal plane CT scan images with respective illustration showing the types of septal deviation according to the classification by degrees of obstruction over the middle turbinate (HGMEL). 

To identify the association between CB and septal deviation, we compared whether the presence of pneumatisation of the middle turbinate was on the convex or concave side of the septum in the axial and coronal planes. A positive association was determined when the CB was present on the concave side of the deviated septum and a negative association when the concha bullosa was on the convex side. In cases of bilateral pneumatisation of the middle turbinate, the largest CB was used to define its association with the septal deviation.

Results

Of the 142 sinonasal CT scans, 99 (69.72%) were excluded because they did not show CB, so the final sample size were 43 cases. Table 1 shows the general features of the cases and the location of the concha bullosa. Table 2 shows the results based on the three classifications. The most common side of the septal deviations was to the left in 58.13% of the cases and the remaining percentage corresponded to right deviations. According to the HGMEL classification, the most frequent septal deviation was type 1, followed by type 2, the least frequent being type 3. No type 4 septal deviation was observed in the present study.

Table 1 Incidence of concha bullosa by gender and location 

Right n (%) Left n (%) Bilateral n (%)
Women (27) 8 (29.63%) 10 (37.04%) 9 (33.33%)
Men (16) 4 (25.00%) 6 (37.50%) 6 (37.50%)
TOTAL (43) 12 (27.91%) 16 (37.21%) 15 (34.88%)

Table 2 Results for concha bullosa based on different classifications 

Bolger classification n
Type 1 9.3
Type 2 25 58.14
Type 3 32.56
Calvo-Henriquez classification n %
Type I 21 48.84
Type II 39.53
Type III 9.3
Type IV 1 2.33
Type V 0 -
HGMEL classification n
Grade 1 23 53.49
Grade 2 32.56
Grade 3 13.95

HGMEL: Hospital General de México Eduardo Liceaga.

In this analysis, we found a positive relationship between concha bullosa media and nasal septal deviation in 74.42% (32 studies) and a negative relationship between these entities in 25.5% (11 studies). Of the cases without this association, seven had a small lamellar CB and 3 had increased hypertrophy of the contralateral middle and inferior turbinate.

Larger CB size (grade 3) was associated with a larger contact area with the nasal septum. There was a direct relationship between the size of the concha bullosa and the degree of septal deviation (Fig. 5).

Figure 5 Axial and coronal CT scan images showing the positive and negative association between CB and septal deviation. 

Discussion

Anatomical variants of the paranasal sinuses exist in the population worldwide1-8. In Mexico, we do not have data on this, thus in this study the overall incidence of CB was determined to be 30.2% using a simple bone window scan for the paranasal sinuses, data that coincide with those reported by Soo et al8. Nasal septal deviation was more common in females (62.7%), which is consistent with Mostafa et al15.

To classify septal deviation, a morphological reference based on the position where the deviation occurs and its types (Mladina’s classification)14,18 is used, which is not practical as it does not provide data on function. This led us to propose and use our own classification (HGMEL classification) based on the degree of involvement of the middle turbinate caused by the deviation of the septum and its anatomical and physiological relevance. This is because there is a lot of information that mentions the massive importance of the air passage in the middle turbinate4,5,12-15; thus, applying this classification, we found that the most common septal deviation was type I, in which no significant obstruction is generated.

In our study, the turbinate location of the concha bullosa showed the highest incidence, suggesting that these patients present greater resistance to airflow, compared to the lamellar location, which anatomically does not restrict inhaled airflow, which coincides with the results of other authors7,9,10,12-15,19. Regarding the size of the CB, we found that the most common is grade 1 (3 mm to 6 mm). These are small and do not influence the components of nasal resistance, and only influence the deviation of the nasal septum1,13, while the large ones (grade 3, 11 mm to 14 mm) have a larger surface area in contact with the septum and cause airflow resistance.

Based on this study, we also found that the maximum point of septal deviation is directly or concavely (positively) related to the presence and location of the CB, i.e. the angle of septal deviation, since when the septum deviates, it closes or decreases in front of the CB, as if it exerts pressure on the nasal septum.

Conclusions

Based on our results, we conclude that there is a direct association: the larger the concha bullosa, the greater the septal deviation, which supports our initial approach. It is not possible to determine whether the CB was formed by compensatory changes in airflow caused by the deviated septum, or whether the deviated septum was generated by the airflow resistance caused by the CB presence.

The radiologist should identify and report the anatomical variants of the paranasal sinuses (their location and size) in preoperative imaging studies, hence providing the most useful information to the surgeons for the development of their intervention.

The proposed classification (HGMEL) of septal deviation and concha bullosa size is more practical in quantifying the degree of obstruction, as there is an association between a larger concha bullosa and a larger nasal septal deviation.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mario Alfredo Rodríguez León for his editorial support, revision and adaptation of the manuscript, as well as his advice and support for its publication.

References

1. Polat C, Dostbil Z. Evaluation of the nasal mucociliary transport rate by rhinoscintigraphy before and after surgery in patients with deviated nasal septum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267:529-35. [ Links ]

2. Beale TJ, Madani G, Morley SJ. Imaging of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity:normal anatomy and clinically relevant anatomical variants. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009;30:2-16. [ Links ]

3. Pérez-Piñas I, SabatéJ, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera CJ, Jiménez-Castellanos J. Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT. J Anat 2000;197:221-7. [ Links ]

4. Shpilberg KA, Daniel SC, Doshi AH, et al. CT of anatomic variants of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity:poor correlation with radiologically significant rhinosinusitis but importance in surgical planning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:1255-60. [ Links ]

5. Aramani A, Karadi RN, Kumar S. A study of anatomical variations of osteomeatal complex in chronic rhinosinusitis patients-CT findings. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:KC01-KC04. [ Links ]

6. Wotman M, Kacker A. Should otolaryngologists pay more attention to nasal swell bodies?Laryngoscope 2015;125:1759-1760. [ Links ]

7. Yousem DM. Imaging of the sinonasal inflammatory disease. Radiology 1993;188:303-14. [ Links ]

8. Soo Kweon Koo, Jong Deok Kim, Ji Seung Moon, Sung Hoon Jung, Sang Hoon Lee. The incidence of concha bullosa, unusual anatomic variation and its relationship to nasal septal deviation:A retrospective radiologic study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017;44:561-70 [ Links ]

9. Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1613-8. [ Links ]

10. Salihoglu M, Cekin E, Altundag A, Cesmeci E. Examination versus subjective nasal obstruction in the evaluation of the nasal septal deviation. Rhinology 2014;52:122-6. [ Links ]

11. Ahn JC, Kim JW, Lee CH, Rhee CS. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic rhinosinusitus, allergic rhintis, and nasal septal deviation:result of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 2008-2012. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;142:162-7. [ Links ]

12. Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities:CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1991;101:56-64. [ Links ]

13. Calvo-Henríquez C, Mota-Rojas X, Ruano-Ravina A. Concha bullosa. A radiological study and a new classification. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2019;70:145-50. [ Links ]

14. Mariño-Sanchez F, Valls-Mateus M, Cardenas-Escalante P, Haag O, Ruiz-Echevarría K, Jiménez-Feijoo R, et al. Influence of nasal septum deformity on nasal obstruction, severity, and medical treatment response among children and adolescents with persistent allergic rhinitis:Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2017;95:145e-154e. [ Links ]

15. Mostafa E, Waleed A, Mohamad H. Coincidence of Concha Bullosa with Nasal Septal Deviation;Radiological Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;71(Suppl 3):S1918–S22 [ Links ]

16. Bahar K, Kayhan Ö, Deniz Ü. Is There any Relationship Between Nasal Septal Deviation and Concha Bullosa. Eur J Gen Med 2010;7:359-64. [ Links ]

17. Janovic N, Janovic A, Milicic B, Djuric M. Relationship between nasal septum morphology and nasal obstruction symptom severity:computed tomography study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88:663-8. [ Links ]

18. Teixeira J, Certal V, Chang E, Camacho M. Nasal septal deviations:A systematic review of classification systems. Plastic Surg Int 2016:7089123. [ Links ]

19. Fadda GL, Rosso S, Aversa S, Petrelli A, Ondolo C, Succo G. Multiparametric statistical correlations between paranasal sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012;32:pp. 244-251. [ Links ]

FundingThe authors declare that there was no funding for this article.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of people and animals. The authors declare that no experiments were carried out on humans or animals for this research.

Data confidentiality. The authors declare that no patient data appears in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appears in this article.

Received: June 03, 2022; Accepted: December 09, 2022

* Correspondece: Raúl Romero-Cabello E-mail: romerocabello@idisalud.com

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Sociedad Médica del Hospital General de Mexico. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license