SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 issue3Allergic contact dermatitis to cobalt and nickel in a metal industry worker. Case report and literature reviewCartilage-hair hypoplasia. A case report author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista alergia México

On-line version ISSN 2448-9190

Rev. alerg. Méx. vol.66 n.3 Ciudad de México Jul./Sep. 2019  Epub Feb 19, 2020

https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v66i3.540 

Clinical cases

Delayed aminopenicillin reaction associated to human herpes virus 6 infection mimicking DRESS syndrome

Reacción tardía a aminopenicilina asociada con infección por el virus del herpes humano 6 que simula síndrome DRESS

Laura Míguez-Martín1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-9728

Helena Higelmo-Gómez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-891X

Ángela Gómez-Farpón2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-6837

Francisco Álvarez-Caro2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3049-960X

1Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Servicio de Pediatría, Gijón, Spain

2Hospital Central de Asturias, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Oviedo, Spain


Abstract

Background:

DRESS syndrome (rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) is an uncommon and severe drug-induced reaction.

Clinical case:

An 8-year-old boy was diagnosed with tonsillopharyngitis, and treatment with amoxicillin was started. One day later, he presented bilateral malar rash which evolved to generalized erythroderma in two days. He was referred to the emergency room and then he was discharged after the treatment with amoxicillin was discontinued. Five days later, he still had fever, progressive facial and acral edema, and ecchymotic lesions. The laboratory studies showed 6220 leukocytes/mm3 (970 eosinophils/mm3). The pharyngeal culture tested positive to human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6). The fever, rash and edema disappeared with supportive measures. Based on the results of the allergy tests, a diagnosis of delayed reaction to aminopenicillin associated to HHV-6 mimicking DRESS syndrome was made, with the recommendation to avoid penicillin antibiotics.

Conclusions:

The diagnosis of delayed reactions to aminopenicillin and DRESS syndrome requires a high index of suspicion in order to promptly withdraw the offending medication and to avoid delays in the diagnosis.

Keywords: DRESS syndrome; Amoxicillin; Human herpesvirus 6; Eosinophilia

Resumen

Antecedentes:

El síndrome DRESS (erupción que cursa con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos) es una reacción inducida por fármacos poco frecuente y grave.

Caso clínico:

Niño de ocho años a quien se prescribió tratamiento con amoxicilina debido a diagnóstico de amigdalofaringitis. Un día después del inicio del medicamento, el paciente presentó erupción malar bilateral que evolucionó a eritrodermia generalizada en dos días. Fue derivado al servicio de urgencias donde se interrumpió el tratamiento con amoxicilina y fue dado de alta. Cinco días después, todavía tenía fiebre, edema facial y acral progresivo y lesiones equimóticas. Los estudios de laboratorio mostraron 6220 leucocitos/mm3 (970 eosinófilos/mm3). El cultivo faríngeo fue positivo al virus de herpes humano 6. La fiebre, la erupción y el edema desaparecieron con medidas de apoyo. Con base en los resultados de las pruebas de alergia, se realizó un diagnóstico de reacción tardía a la aminopenicilina asociada con herpesvirus de humano 6 que simulaba síndrome DRESS. La recomendación fue evitar los antibióticos con penicilina.

Conclusiones:

El diagnóstico de reacciones tardías a la aminopenicilina y el síndrome DRESS requieren un alto índice de sospecha para retirar rápidamente la medicación desencadenante y evitar retrasos en el diagnóstico.

Palabras clave: Síndrome de DRESS; Amoxicilina; Herpesvirus humano 6; Eosinofilia

Background

DRESS syndrome (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) is a severe and uncommon drug-induced reaction and it is usually characterized by a long latency between the intake of the causative drug and the onset of the disease (2 to 6 weeks).1 Although it can be caused by several agents (like antibiotics),2 it was first and mainly reported to be linked to anti-epileptic agents.1,3 Amoxicillin is not usually reported as the primary causative agent despite its wide use in both adults and children.

Case report

An 8 year old boy with fever and a sore throat was diagnosed with acute tonsillopharyngitis, and treatment with amoxicillin was started (it had been previously well tolerated). One day later, he presented bilateral malar rash which evolved to generalized erythroderma in two days, with joint inflammation and a persistent fever. He was referred to the emergency room and then he was discharged after the treatment with amoxicillin was discontinued. Five days later, the patient still had a fever (39 °C) and increasing erythroderma, and he also presented progressive facial and acral edema, and linear ecchymotic lesions in the neck, armpits and groin. His body weight increased 1.2 kilograms in 2 days. The laboratory studies showed 6220 leukocytes/mm3 (970 eosinophils/mm3), with normal liver and renal function (alanine aminotransferase 19 IU/L, urea 17 mg/dL, creatinine 0.33 mg/dL). The pharyngeal culture tested positive to human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) (127.527 copies/100 cells by polymerase chain reaction). The patient was admitted in the hospital for two days, during which the fever, rash and edema disappeared with supportive measures Ten days later, his blood tests were normalized (8150 leukocytes/mm3, 430 eosinophils/mm3). Specific IgE to penicillin G, penicillin V, ampicillin and amoxicillin was < 0.1 kU/L. An immediate reading of the skin prick test and the intradermal test (IDT) to benzylpenicilloyl-polylysine (PPL), minor determinant mixture (MDM), ampicillin (20 mg/mL), amoxicillin (20mg/mL) and cefuroxime (25 mg/mL), turned out to be negative. A delayed reading of IDT (48 hours) tested positive to ampicillin (4 mm) and amoxicillin (6 mm), but negative to cefuroxime (0 mm). A patch test (with vaseline) turned out to be positive to amoxicillin 10% (+), ampicillin 10% (+), cefuroxime 20% (+), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 10% (+), but it tested negative to cefuroxime 10% (−) at 48 and 96 hours (figure 1). According to these results, our patient was diagnosed with delayed reaction to aminopenicillin; and the recommendation was to avoid penicillin altogether.

Figure 1 Patch test (vaseline). Presence of wheal and erythema indicating a positive reaction to amoxicillin 10% (number 1), ampicillin 10% (number 2), cefuroxime 20% (number 3), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 10% (number 4), but negative to cefuroxime 10% (number 5) at 96 hours.  

Discussion

DRESS syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition. It is a non-IgE mediated hypersensitivity reaction to a drug that includes severe eruption of the skin, fever, hematologic abnormalities (eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytosis), lymphadenopathy, and the involvement of internal organs (liver, kidney, lung).4 Its estimated incidence ranges from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10 000 exposures to drugs.5 Although there have been some reports of cases in children,6 most cases occur in adults.

The pathogenesis of DRESS syndrome includes drug-specific immune response and the reactivation of herpesvirus infection, up to the point that the detection of HHV-6 reactivation has been recently proposed as a diagnostic maker.7 In our patient, both mechanisms were shown; the specific immune response to amoxicillin (shown by the positivity of delayed reading of IDT and patch test), and the reactivation of HHV-6 infection (shown by the positivity of pharyngeal culture to HHV-6). In spite of these facts, our case did not completely meet the diagnostic criteria of definitive DRESS syndrome according to the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) score,8 so a diagnosis of delayed reaction to aminopenicillin was made.

In most patients, the reaction is characterized by a long latency between the intake of the offending medication and the onset of the disease (2 to 6 weeks),1 however, earlier outbreaks can occur, especially in previously sensitized patients. Our patient had an atypical outbreak; the symptoms initiated just one day after receiving amoxicillin, making the diagnosis more challenging. Despite its common uses, amoxicillin without clavulanic acid has been seldom reported as the primary instigator. Nevertheless, it has mainly been involved as a cause of relapse of DRESS syndrome since this drug often acts as an aggravating factor due to the direct effect on herpesvirus replication.9 Thus, in patients with suspected DRESS syndrome, shortly after the initiation of amoxicillin, it is important to search for other possible drugs that have been recently introduced within the last few weeks. In our case, amoxicillin was the only causative drug since no other drugs had been introduced in the previous months.

The diagnosis of delayed aminopenicillin reactions and DRESS syndrome is difficult; because the pattern of the skin involvement and the types of affected organs are diverse. Multiple diagnostic criteria for DRESS syndrome have been proposed in order to standardize the diagnosis. The European RegiSCAR has devised a scoring system based on: clinical features, the extent of the skin involvement, organ involvement, and clinical course.8 According to the final score, it rates DRESS cases as “no”, “possible”, “probable” or “definite” cases. In addition, other authors include HHV-6 activation in the diagnostic criteria.10

The skin eruption and visceral involvement is usually resolved after drug cessation in an average time of six to nine weeks,3 although there have been reports of persistence or aggravation of the symptoms despite the discontinuation of the causative drug.3,4 A prompt withdrawal of the offending drug is the mainstay of the treatment of both delayed aminopenicillin reaction and DRESS syndrome. Patients without severe involvement can be treated symptomatically. For severe cases, systemic corticosteroids are commonly used.3 In our case, the use of corticosteroids was not necessary since the patient showed an early recovery with supportive measures only.

Conclusions

Our findings are compatible with a delayed aminopenicillin reaction associated to HHV-6 infection mimicking DRESS syndrome present with a very short latency period. Given the high variability of the clinical presentation, which began just one day after the causative drug had been initiated, the diagnosis of DRESS syndrome is improbable. In the other hand, an immune mechanism and a viral reactivation were shown; which is why the prompt withdrawal of the offending medication was an appropriate measure. Clinicians should not underestimate the potential complications of amoxicillin and they should be aware of this potentially life-threatening condition of this commonly prescribed drug in both adults and children in order to avoid delay in management and diagnosis.

References

1. Kardaun SH, Sekula P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Liss Y, Chu CY, Creamer D, et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(5):1071-1080. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12501 [ Links ]

2. Cacoub P, Musette P, Descamps V, Meyer O, Speirs C, Finzi L, et al. The DRESS syndrome: a literature review. Am J Med. 2011;124(7):588-597. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.017 [ Links ]

3. Schlienger RG, Knowles SR, Shear NH. Lamotrigine-associated anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome. Neurology. 1998;51(4):1172-1175. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.51.4.1172 [ Links ]

4. Bocquet H, Bagot M, Roujeau JC. Drug-induced pseudolymphoma and drug hypersensitivity syndrome (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: DRESS). Semin Cutan MedSurg. 1996;15(4):250-257. [ Links ]

5. Fiszenson-Albala F, Auzerie V, Mahe E, Farinotti R, Durand-Stocco C, Crickx B, et al. A 6-month prospective survey of cutaneous drug reactions in a hospital setting. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(5):1018-1022. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2003.05584.x [ Links ]

6. Ahluwalia J, Abuabara K, Perman MJ, Yan AC. Human herpesvirus 6 involvement in paediatric drug hypersensitivity syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1090-1995. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13512 [ Links ]

7. Tohyama M, Hashimoto K, Yasukawa M, et al. Association of human herpesvirus 6 reactivation with the flaring and severity of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(5):934-40. [ Links ]

8. Kardaun SH, Sidoroff A, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side-effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: does a DRESS syndrome really exist? Br J Dermatol 2007;156(3):609-611. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07704.x [ Links ]

9. Mardivirin L, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Branlant-Redon, Beneton N, Jidar K, Barbaud A, et al. Amoxicillin-induced flare in patients with DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms): report of seven cases and demonstration of a direct effect of amoxicillin on human herpesvirus 6 replication in vitro. Eur J Dermatol 2010;20(1):68-73. DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2010.0821 [ Links ]

10. Shiohara T, Iijima M, Ikezawa Z, Hashimoto K. The diagnosis of a DRESS syndrome has been sufficiently established on the basis of typical clinical features and viral reactivations. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(5):1083-1084. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07807.x [ Links ]

How to cite this article: Míguez-Martín L, Higelmo-Gómez H, Gómez-Farpón Á, Álvarez-Caro F. Delayed aminopenicillin reaction associated to human herpes virus 6 infection mimicking DRESS syndrome. Rev Alerg Mex. 2019;66(3):375-378

Abbreviations and acronyms

HHV-6

human herpesvirus 6

IDT

intradermal test

MDM

minor determinant mixture

PPL

benzylpenicilloyl-polylysine

RegiSCAR

Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

Received: August 16, 2018; Accepted: January 15, 2019

*Correspondence: Laura Míguez Martín. lmiguez90@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License