SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8Differences in lifestyles according to alcohol consumption in university students: Longitudinal studyCompliance with nursing interventions for central venous catheter maintenance in pediatric patients author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Sanus

On-line version ISSN 2448-6094

Sanus vol.8  Sonora Jan./Dec. 2023  Epub Sep 25, 2023

https://doi.org/10.36789/revsanus.vi1.389 

Investigation

Adolescent lifestyles and their relationship with the perception of their developmental contexts

Noemí Campos-Valenzuela1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-7116

Maritza Espinoza-Venegas2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2361-211X

Magdalena Celis-Bassignana3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8156-0215

Luis Luengo-Machuca4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9643-4334

Natalia Castro-Aravena5 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-2287

Sergio Cabrera-Melita6 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-2937

1Magister en Enfermería. Facultad de Enfermería. Universidad de Concepción. Chile.

2PhD en Enfermería. Facultad de Enfermería. Universidad de Concepción. Chile.

3Médico Pediatra. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Concepción. Chile.

4Magister en Estadística. Facultad de Enfermería. Universidad de Concepción. Chile.

5Magister en Nutrición humana. Facultad de Química y Farmacia. Universidad de Concepción. Chile.

6Médico Psiquiatra infanto-juvenil. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Concepción.


Abstract

Introduction:

Although lifestyles are generated and consolidated in adolescence, when these lifestyles are unhealthy, adolescents expose themselves to health risks.

Objective:

Identify the lifestyles of adolescents and its relationship with the perception of their development contexts.

Methodology:

A descriptive study was used, with bivariate analysis of comparison of means and correlation, carried out on a sample of 489 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years old from public schools of Biobío, Chile, excluding adolescents with cognitive deficits and/or sense organ disorders. Ethical aspects considered parental consent and the agreement from every adolescent. The "FANTÁSTICO" instrument, adapted Chilean version was used, which measures 8 dimensions related to health, mental wellbeing and perception, family affective relationships, and school environment. The analyses were descriptive and correlational.

Results:

Almost half of the sample reported lifestyles that require changes and/or interventions. The youngest ones showed healthier lifestyles with differences by sex. Healthy behaviors had a statistically positive relationship to mental well-being and to the perception of their developmental contexts such as family affective relationships and their school environment.

Conclusions:

The findings support the design of future intervention studies that consider early adolescent ages and differences by sex, especially aimed at improving the closest developmental contexts such as family, schools, and their neighborhoods.

Key words: Lifestyle; adolescent; health promotion; risk factors (DeCS)

Resumen

Introducción:

Los estilos de vida se generan y consolidan en la adolescencia; cuando estos son poco saludables, se exponen a riesgos en su salud.

Objetivo:

Identificar los estilos de vida de adolescentes y su relación con la percepción de sus contextos de desarrollo.

Metodología:

Estudio descriptivo, con análisis bivariado de comparación de medias y correlación, realizado a una muestra de 489 adolescentes de 10 a 19 años de establecimientos educacionales públicos del Biobío, Chile, se excluyeron adolescentes con déficit cognitivo y/o con alteraciones no corregidas de los órganos de los sentidos. Los aspectos éticos consideraron el consentimiento de los padres y asentimiento de cada adolescente. Se utilizó instrumento FANTÁSTICO versión chilena adaptada, que mide 8 dimensiones relacionadas con la salud, bienestar mental y percepción relaciones afectivas familiares y entorno escolar. Los análisis fueron descriptivos y correlacionales.

Resultados:

Casi la mitad de la muestra manifestaron estilos de vida que requiere modificaciones y/o intervenciones. Los más jóvenes presentaron estilos más saludables con diferencias por sexo. Los comportamientos saludables tuvieron relación estadísticamente positiva con bienestar mental y con la percepción de sus contextos de desarrollo como las relaciones afectivas familiares y el entorno escolar.

Conclusiones:

La evidencia sustenta el diseño de futuros estudios de intervención que consideren edades tempranas de la adolescencia, las diferencias por sexo, dirigidos especialmente a mejorar los contextos de desarrollo más próximos como la familia, los establecimientos educaciones y el barrio donde se desenvuelven.

Palabras clave: Estilo de vida; Adolescentes; Promoción de la salud; Factores de riesgo (DeCS)

Abstrato

Introdução:

Embora os estilos de vida sejam gerados e consolidados na adolescência, quando esses estilos de vida não são saudáveis, os adolescentes se expõem a riscos à saúde.

Objetivo:

Identificar os estilos de vida dos adolescentes e a sua relação com a percepção dos seus contextos de desenvolvimento.

Metodologia:

Foi utilizado um estudo descritivo, com análise bivariada de comparação de médias e correlação, realizado em uma amostra de 489 adolescentes de 10 a 19 anos de escolas públicas de Biobío, Chile, excluindo adolescentes com déficits cognitivos e/ou distúrbios dos órgãos dos sentidos. Os aspectos éticos consideraram o consentimento dos pais e assentimento de cada adolescente. Foi utilizado o instrumento FANTÁSTICO, versão chilena adaptada, que mede 8 dimensões relacionadas à saúde, bem-estar mental e percepção das relações afetivas familiares e do ambiente escolar. As análises foram descritivas e correlacionais.

Resultados:

Quase metade da amostra estudada apresentou estilos de vida que requerem modificações e/ou intervenções. Os mais jovens apresentaram estilos mais saudáveis com diferenças por sexo. Os comportamentos saudáveis relacionaram-se positivamente com o bem-estar mental e com a percepção dos seus contextos de desenvolvimento, como as relações afetivas familiares e o ambiente escolar.

Conclusões:

As descobertas apóiam o desenho de futuros estudos de intervenção que considerem as idades iniciais da adolescência e as diferenças por sexo, especialmente destinadas a melhorar os contextos de desenvolvimento mais próximos, como família, escolas e seus bairros.

Palavras-chave: Estilo de vida; Adolescente; Promoção da saúde; Fatores de risco (DeCS)

Introduction

Lifestyles are patterns of individual behavior based on the interaction of living conditions and sociocultural factors. Depending on the lifestyles that are adopted during adolescence and maintain certain consistency over time, they can become either risk factors or protective factors, and consequently have significant effects on health 1,2. Adolescence is the period of human growth and development that occurs between the ages of 10 and 19. It is one of the most important stages in the life of a person, and according to the social ecological model 3, its development, as well as the adoption of healthy or risky behaviors, it is conditioned by the influence and perception of the different developmental contexts in which the adolescent is involved, such as family, friends, and school community, in addition to biological and psychological factors. As regards biological factors, these are universal, although there may be some variability depending on the culture and the socioeconomic context 2.

Several reports reveal that unhealthy lifestyles are initiated during adolescence, and despite the health promotion efforts of different institutions, these lifestyles are maintained 4-6, leading to different health risks, such as high prevalence of cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, mental disorders and sexually transmitted diseases 2. Although there are studies regarding the lifestyle of adolescents in Chile, which show, for example, that 22% of adolescents smoke cigarettes, 12% are at risk due to alcohol consumption, 73% show sedentary behaviors, among others, these figures are very general 5,6 and centralized; therefore, they may not reflect the immediate and local reality 7. Thus, there is necessary to perform more specific diagnoses by schools with the help of simple, easy-to-apply, and self-managed instruments. This would make it possible to obtain updated and individualized information on adolescents that would subsequently lead to actions focused on local needs, also considering the perception of the contexts in which adolescents develop, and that will determine their lifestyles. From the aforementioned foundations, this research aims to identify the lifestyles of adolescents and their relationship with the perception of their development environments.

Methodology

This is a cross-sectional observational study, with descriptive-correlational scope. The population consisted of students from 5th grade of elementary school to 4th grade of secondary education, belonging to seven (7) municipal and subsidized schools in the region of Biobío, Chile, during the year 2019. A non-probabilistic convenience sample of 489 adolescents was obtained from this population. The inclusion criterion considered adolescents aged 10 to 19 years from educational institutions in Biobío, Chile, and the exclusion criterion was adolescents with cognitive deficits and/or sense organ disorders that prevented the completion of the instrument, who were informed by the coordinating teacher of the institution.

To measure lifestyles, the FANTÁSICO instrument 8 was used, translated and validated in Chile 9 and subsequently adapted to the adolescent population. The instrument is composed of 34 items divided into 8 dimensions. The first 5 dimensions address lifestyle behaviors such as physical activity (items 5, 6, 7), nutrition (items 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), sexuality (items 29, 30, 31, 32), alcohol and drug consumption (items 13, 14, 15, 16), safety actions (items 33, 34), and the last 3 dimensions refer to the perceptions they have about their relationships in the closest developmental environments, such as affective relationships with family and friends (items 1, 2, 3, 4, 17, 18, 19), mental well-being (items 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28), and school satisfaction (items 24, 25). The response options are Likert-type, where zero (0) is the least healthy, 1 is moderately healthy, and two (2) is the most healthy. The score for each dimension is obtained by adding the responses divided by the number of items. The total score is 68 and is obtained by adding all the items. The categorization of the scale proposed by the authors is: Excellent=68, Very Good= 60-67, Good= 52-59, Fair= 44-51, and Needs Improvement < 44 points. The psychometric tests in this study resulted in a Cronbach's Alpha reliability of 0.86 and Spearman's Rho criterion validity of 0.65 with the Health Promotion scale 10 and 0.73 with the Kidscreen scale 11.

Data were collected in accordance with the regulatory framework of Chilean Law 20120. Approval was requested from the Comité Ético Científico del Servicio de Salud Concepción (Concepción Scientific Ethical Committee of Health Service) (Code 18-11-99). Subsequently, authorization was requested from the respective school. Later, in a meeting with the parents and legal guardians, the purpose of the study was explained to them so that they could decide, by means of a written consent, whether their child would participate in the research. The adolescents were invited to participate by being informed before a lesson, and subsequently they freely and voluntarily decided to participate, confirming their participation by means of a written consent. The instrument was self-administered and supervised by the researchers, with privacy and confidentiality protected at all times.

Data processing was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15.0 (SPSS). The analysis used descriptive and inferential statistics of correlational type (Spearman's r), to establish the relationship between the sub-dimensions of the variable “lifestyle”. Adequate correlations above 0.3 (12) between the dimensions were considered. For the analysis of the sociodemographic variables, Student's T was applied. For the contrasts and confidence intervals, a significance of 5% was used.

Results

The sample was composed of adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years, with an average of 14 years (SD= 2.1), and 52.4% was comprised by female students. The mean and global average lifestyle score was 51.0 points (SD=7.6). The 50.3% had lifestyles between “regular” and “needs improvement”, and 13.3% had a “very good” lifestyle (Table 1).

Table 1 Categories, adolescent lifestyle scale scores, 2019 (n=489). 

Lifestyle category n %
Needs improvement 75 15.3
Regular 171 35.0
Good 178 36.4
Very good 64 13.1
Excellent 1 0.2
Total 489 100.0

Source: Own development.

According to Table 2, sociodemographic differences were seen according to sex; men presented an average that resulted in a significant statistical difference of 3.6 points, with a Confidence Interval (CI) (2.3 to 4.9) higher in global lifestyle than women (t=5.34; gl=487 p<0.0001). Scores were better in physical activity, diet, affective relationships, and mental well-being.

Table 2 Lifestyle dimensions, overall score and differences by sociodemographic variables in adolescents, 2019 (n=489) 

Sociodemographic variables Lifestyle (LS) dimension averages
FA D SX OH Dg AR S MW SS Total (LS) Student's T
Sex Men (233) 1.5 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 52.9 p<0.00
Women (256) 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.4 49.3
Age 10 to 14 (278) 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.5 51.7 -
15 to 19 (211) 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 50.2
Area Urban (416) 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 50.8 P<0.04
Rural (50) 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.5 52.6
School Municipal (389) 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.4 50.8 -
Subsidized (77) 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.4 52.0
Total Average 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 51.0

Institution, FA: Physical activity; D: Diet; SX: Sexuality; OH Dg: Alcohol and drugs; AF: Affective relationships; S: Safety; MW: Mental wellbeing; SS: School satisfaction. Source: Own development.

Likewise, adolescents belonging to the rural area presented better lifestyle scores than those living in the urban area (t=2.007; gl 70.91 p < 0.04). Adolescents between 10 and 14 years of age obtained better average scores regarding physical activity, diet, sexuality, and alcohol and drug consumption, as well as in the overall lifestyle score. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In addition, the average lifestyle scores were higher in adolescents from subsidized schools.

Table 3 shows the relevance of the associations of the dimensions of lifestyle behaviors with perceptions related to their developmental contexts.

Table 3 Spearman correlation of lifestyle scale dimensions in adolescents, 2019 (n=489) 

Lifestyle Dimensions Diet Sexuality Alcohol and drug use Affective relationships Safety actions Mental well-being School satisfaction
Physical activity .450** 0.071 0.051 .236** .167** .437** .175**
Diet .187** 0.074 .287** .202** .465** .251**
Sexuality -0.028 .344** .094* .214** .213**
Alcohol and drug use .099* .238** .107* .156**
Affective relationships .172** .526** .378**
Safety actions .220** .189**
Mental well-being .447**

*The correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (bilateral). ** The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (bilateral). Source: Own development.

The results show the positive and significant statistical association with Spearman > 0.3 of eating behaviors, physical activity, with perceptions of mental well-being. The latter, in turn, correlated significantly with the adolescent's perception of affective relationships with family and friends. The dimensions of school satisfaction were also found to be significantly associated with affective relationships and mental well-being.

Discussion

This study investigated the lifestyles of adolescents in activities such as physical activity, diet, alcohol and drug consumption, among others, and their perceptions of mental well-being, and their relationships with their closest developmental contexts such as family, school environment and friends. Half of the sample under the study reported lifestyles that require modifications and/or interventions. Although these results are only a rough approximation, they comprise a great vulnerability for an important group of adolescents who completed the survey. Results of similar studies conducted in public schools of Brazil 13 indicated that only 10.6% obtained high scores. Another Colombian study 14 showed a percentage of 22.5% of better lifestyle behaviors. The results of this study confirm differences in lifestyles according to sociodemographic characteristics, such as type of school, type of rural area, age and sex. These findings are consistent with several studies that consider them as predictors 3, i.e. the contexts in which adolescents develop have a favorable or negative influence on their behavior 3.

Older adolescents showed less healthy behaviors in several dimensions 2-3. These results are in agreement with Chilean national reports 15, which reveal that adolescents' physical performance in different endurance and muscular strength tests worsens with each passing year. The same occurs with alcohol and drug use, which increases in middle adolescence in less than a quarter of the population and peaks in late adolescence in almost half of the population. Similarly, international studies indicated that alcohol consumption increases with age 16,17.

As for the analysis by sex, a significant mean difference in lifestyles between male and female adolescents was seen in this study. Several studies showed better physical activity lifestyles in male adolescents compared to female adolescents 14,18; and at the national level in Chile, standardized physical education tests 23 agreed that males practice physical activity longer and at a higher intensity than female adolescents. Similarly, Latin American indicators of risk factors in adolescents 17 also indicate that male adolescents are significantly more physically active than female adolescents. These sex differences can be explained by the ecological differences surrounding adolescents, which are related to the environmental characteristics and family behavior of their parents 19-20.

Male adolescents also obtained better results in the diet dimension. This is consistent with international studies 17,21 and national reports, although not optimal, they indicate that males eat 28.6% of the recommended fruits and vegetables while females eat only 23.7% 16.

The perception of the contexts in which the adolescents develop that were evaluated by means of the lifestyle scale, was statistically and positively related to diet and physical activity behaviors. The foregoing confirms that the lifestyles adopted by adolescents could be influenced by their favorable or unfavorable life contextual relationships. Studies show 22,23 that external and internal support resources such as friends and personal well-being are positively associated with effective parenting practices. In this regard, studies 22,23,24 concluded that the close bond provided by the family, in addition to generating better stress management, enhances healthy behaviors of physical activity, mental well-being, self-esteem, and life satisfaction 25,26; moreover, they also act as protectors against alcohol and drug consumption 27. The former suggests that the mental well-being of adolescents depends on their relationships with their families, especially with their parents. This occurs even if there is a normal parental distance inherent to the psychosocial development of the adolescent 27.

The scale used to measure lifestyles in adolescents was quick and simple to use, and allowed a local diagnosis of health behaviors and the perceptions that influence them. Finally, it is considered that the limitations of the study correspond to the type of non-probabilistic convenience sampling, which exposes the study to the non-representativeness of the adolescent population and to the restriction of generalization of the results. The type of instrument used may entail biases related to social desirability.

Conclusions

From the sample under study, it is concluded that a low percentage of adolescents reported healthy lifestyles. The perception of their closest developmental contexts, such as family, educational institutions and their neighborhoods, are related to lifestyles, especially regarding diet and physical activity. The evidence of this type of study cannot establish causal inferences, but it can establish statistical relationships of great importance for public health research, thus, allowing us to support future intervention studies, where the nursing professional plays an important role in carrying out promotion and prevention programs for adolescents that contribute to the improvement of their lifestyles.

Conflict of interest

The authors stated that there was no conflict of interest.

Funding

Project N° 20174195 was funded by the Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Desarrollo, Universidad de Concepción.

Referencias bibliográficas

1. Health Promotion Glossary [Internet] Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998 [citado 01 jun 2018]. Estilo de vida. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/about/HPR%20Glossary%201998.pdfLinks ]

2. Salas F. Caracterización de factores implicados en las conductas de riesgo en adolescentes. ABRA [Internet]. 2018 [citado 04 mar 2021];38(56):1-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/abra/article/view/1049Links ]

3. Hu D, Zhou S, Crowley-McHattan ZJ, Liu Z. Factors that influence participation in physical activity in school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic review from the social ecological model perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [citado 24 jun 2022];18(6):3147. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph180631474 [ Links ]

4. Ministerio de Salud. Encuesta nacional de salud 2016-2017 primeros resultados. División de planificación sanitaria [Internet]. Santiago; 2017 [citado 01 jun 2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.minsal.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ENS-2016-17_PRIMEROS-RESULTADOS.pdfLinks ]

5. Ministerio de Salud. Encuesta de calidad de vida y salud (ENCAVI) 2015-2016.División de planificación sanitaria [Internet]. Santiago; 2017 [citado 05 nov 2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.minsal.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/PRESENTACION-ENCAVI-2016-11.02.2017.pdfLinks ]

6. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Salud de los adolescentes y jóvenes en en las Américas [Internet]. Chile; 2018 [citado 05 nov 2018]. Disponible: Disponible: https://www3.paho.org/informe-salud-adolescente-2018/Links ]

7. Ministerio de Educación. Hábitos de vida saludable. Currículum nacional [Internet]. Chile; 2022 [citado 02 oct 2022]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/614/articles-90157_recurso_2.pdfLinks ]

8. Wilson DM, Ciliska D. Lifestyle Assessment. Can Fam Physician [Internet]. 1984 [citado 31 mar 2022];30:1527-1532. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2153572/pdf/canfamphys00221-0095.pdfLinks ]

9. Lange I, Vio F. Guía para universidades saludables y otras instituciones de educación superior. Universidad de Chile. [Internet]. Santiago; 2006. [citado 05 nov 2018]: 51. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.gesundheitsfoerderndehochschulen.de/Inhalte/E_Gefoe_HS_internat/2006_Lange_Guia_Universidades_Saludables.pdfLinks ]

10. Rojas-Barahona C, Gaete J, Olivares E, Förster CE, Chandia E, Chen MY. Psychometric evaluation of the adolescent health promotion scale in Chile: Differences bysocioeconomic status and gender. J Nurs Res [Internet]. 2017 [citado 05 nov 2018];25(6):471-480. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0000000000000196 [ Links ]

11. Ravens-Sieberer U, Herdman M, Devine J, Otto C, Bullinger M, Rose M, et al. The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2014 [citado 07 nov 2018];23(3):791-803. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3 [ Links ]

12. Cataldo R, Arancibia M, Stojanova J, Papuzinski C. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: Observational studies with cross-sectional and ecological designs. Medwave [Internet]. 2019 [citado 24 junio 2022];19(8):e7698. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2019.08.7698 [ Links ]

13. Brito MF, Pinho L, Brito AB, Messias RB, Pinho S, Oliveira AA, et al. Fatores associados ao estilo de vida de estudantes do ensino médio de escolas públicas. Rev Gaúcha Enferm [Internet]. 2019 [citado 05 nov 2020];40:e20180168. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180168 [ Links ]

14. Guerrero de Caballero H, Contreras A. Estilos de vida y características sociodemográficas de adolescentes de cinco instituciones educativas. Rev. cienc. cuidad [Internet]. 2020 [citado 06 mayo de 2021];17(1):85-98. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/cienciaycuidado/article/view/1630Links ]

15. Agencia de la Calidad de la Educación. Informe de resultados estudio nacional educación física 2015. Agencia de la calidad de la Educación [Internet]. Santiago de Chile; 2016 [citado 10 enero 2021]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.24horas.cl/incoming/article2167653.ece/BINARY/Informe%20Nacional%20-%20EducacionFisica2015.pdfLinks ]

16. Servicio Nacional para la Prevención y Rehabilitación del Consumo de Drogas y Alcohol (SENDA). Cuenta pública diagnóstico de consumo de sustancias en Chile [Internet]. Chile; 2021 [citado 24 jun 2022]. Disponible en: http Disponible en: http https://www.senda.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Cuenta-Publica-SENDA-2021.pdfLinks ]

17. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Salud del adolescente y del joven adulto. Notas descriptivas [Internet]. 2021 [citado 24 jun 2022]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-risks-and-solutionsLinks ]

18. Palomino-Devia C, Reyes-Oyola F, Sánchez-Oliver A. Niveles de actividad física, calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, autoconcepto físico e índice de masa corporal: un estudio en escolares colombianos. Biomédica [Internet]. 2018 [citado 07 nov 2019];38(2):224-231. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v38i0.3964 [ Links ]

19. Hou X, Liu J-M, Tang Z-Y, Ruan B, Cao X-Y. The gender difference in association between home-based environment and different physical behaviors of chinese adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2020 [citado17 may 2022];17(21):8120. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218120 [ Links ]

20. Olfert MD, Barr ML, Charlier CC, Greene GW, Zhou W, Colby SE. Sex differences in lifestyle behaviors among U.S. college freshmen. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2019 [citado 10 ene 2020];16(3):1-10. Disponible en: doi:10.3390/ijerph16030482 [ Links ]

21. Gaete J, Rojas-Barahona C, Olivares E, Chen Mei-Yen. Influencia de las conductas promotoras de salud de los padres en la de sus hijos adolescentes. Rev. méd. Chile [Internet]. 2016 [citado 08 nov 2018];144:870-878. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872016000700007 [ Links ]

22. Grao-Cruces A, Loureiro N, Fernández-Martínez A, Mota J. Influencia de padres y amigos sobre la actividad física de tiempo libre en estudiantes españoles de 12-16 años: diferencias por sexo e intensidad. Nutr Hosp [Internet]. 2016 [citado 8 nov 2018];33(4):790-793. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.371 [ Links ]

23. Coppari N, Barcelata Bl, Bagnoli L, Codas G, López H, Martínez Ú. Influencia del sexo, edad y cultura en las estrategias de afrontamiento de adolescentes paraguayos y mexicanos. Universitas Psychologica [Internet]. 2019 [citado 09 nov 2020];18(1):1-13. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-1.isec [ Links ]

24. Pérez-Fuentes M, Molero JM, Gázquez LJ, Oropesa RN, Simón MM, Saracostti M. Parenting practices, life satisfaction, and the role of self-esteem in adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health [Internet]. 2019 [citado 05 mayo 2020];16(20):40-45. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16204045 [ Links ]

25. Mónaco E, Schoeps K, Montoya-Castilla I. Attachment styles and well-being in adolescents: How does emotional development affect this relationship? Int.J. Environ. Res. Public Health [Internet]. 2019 [citado 09 nov 2020];16(14):1-17. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142554 [ Links ]

26. Larm P, Aslund C, Raninen J, Nilsson KW. Adolescent non-drinkers: Who are they? social relations, school performance, lifestyle factors and health behaviours. Drug Alcohol Rev [Internet]. 2018 [citado 07 mayo 2019];37(1):S67-S75. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12640 [ Links ]

27. Moral-García JE, Urchaga-Litago JD, Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Maneiro R. Relationship of parental support on healthy Habits, school motivations and academic performance in adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020 [citado 10 enero 2021];17(3):1-15. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030882 [ Links ]

Received: July 09, 2022; Accepted: October 01, 2022

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons