SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue1Quantitative analysis of internal wave detection variability in the Northern Gulf of California using Synthetic Aperture Radar author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tecnología y ciencias del agua

On-line version ISSN 2007-2422

Tecnol. cienc. agua vol.9 n.1 Jiutepec Jan./Feb. 2018  Epub Nov 24, 2020

https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2018-01-10 

Notes

Detection of annual meteorological droughts in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico, based on standardized anomaly indices

Daniel Francisco Campos-Aranda1 

1Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, México, campos_aranda@hotmail.com


Abstract

Meteorological droughts (MD) are a temporary decrease in the normal rainfall received by a location or a region. In order to formulate plans for mitigation of damages, it becomes necessary to study the droughts to estimate related features. In this work the occurrence of annual MD is detected and its severity is estimated through the Pedj drought index (PDI), defined as the difference between the standardized anomalies of the mean temperature and of precipitation, both annual estimates. Sixteen PDI series were calculated, in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico, whose common period was 65 years in the lapse from 1950 to 2014. After verifying their homogeneity, such series were analyzed with various statistical methods, to establish their local and regional behavior. At the local level the most severe sequences of five years are detected and analyzed, as well as the ten most extreme droughts. The regional analysis helped finding the drought years that affected a large number of climatological stations, in each of the three geographical areas analyzed. As the PDI dates from mid-seventies was contrasted with a recent index, the RDIST. Based on all analyzes, it is concluded that the PDI is a simple technique that allows the accurate detection at local and regional level of annual MD; therefore its systematic application is recommended. This implementation will allow the verification of results of other indices of drought and make it possible to know the MD as time series, the latter oriented to forecasting.

Keywords Standard deviation; standardized anomaly index; Pedj drought index; statistical tests; moving averages; major droughts

Resumen

Las sequías meteorológicas (SM) son un decremento temporal en la precipitación normal que recibe una localidad o región. Para formular planes de mitigación de sus daños, es necesario estudiarlas para estimar sus características. En este trabajo se detecta la ocurrencia de las SM anuales y se estima su severidad a través del índice de sequías de Pedj (ISP), que se define como la diferencia entre las anomalías estandarizadas de la temperatura media y de la precipitación, ambas anuales. Se calcularon 16 series del ISP, en el estado de Zacatecas, México, cuyo periodo común fue de 65 años en el lapso de 1950 a 2014. Después de verificar su homogeneidad, tales series se analizaron con varios métodos estadísticos, para establecer su comportamiento local y regional. A nivel local se detectan y analizan las secuencias más severas de cinco años, así como las diez sequías más extremas. El análisis regional buscó los años con sequía que afectaron un mayor número de estaciones climatológicas, en cada una de las tres zonas geográficas analizadas. Como el ISP data de mediados de los años setenta se contrastó con un índice reciente, el RDIST. De todos los análisis realizados se concluye que el ISP es una técnica simple que permite la detección precisa a nivel local y regional de las SM anuales; por ello se recomienda su aplicación sistemática. Además, permitirá verificar los resultados de otros índices de sequías y hará posible conocer las SM como serie cronológica, orientado esto último a su pronóstico.

Palabras clave desviación estándar; índice de anomalía estandarizada; índice de sequías de Pedj; pruebas estadísticas; promedios móviles; sequías importantes

Introduction

Abnormal extreme climatological and climate phenomena, such as floods and droughts, as well as their associated particularities, storms and heat waves, are generally harmful for a society and its infrastructure, for ecosystems and wildlife (Kunkel, Pielke, & Changnon, 1999).

A drought, in general, is defined as a decrease in water availability and is characterized by three crucial aspects: duration, severity and encompassed area. This concept of drought involves two types of evaluators of water deficiency. The first is associated with the direct effects of the elements of the water cycle, such as precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration, runoff in rivers, etc. The second type includes the indicators of water resources, which estimate severity in terms of the impact on the supply for water uses, such as urban, industrial, agricultural and ecological (Mawdsley, Petts, & Walker, 1994).

Drought indexes commonly reflect drought conditions based on hydro-climatic variables but are not capable of quantifying economic damage. The indexes that quantify climate variability, however, are useful for drought detection, follow-up and indirect estimation of impacts, all of which are necessary for drawing up prevention and contingency plans to deal with these events (Mishra & Singh, 2010; Lobato-Sánchez, 2016).

The objective of this study was to describe in detail the Pedj drought index (ISP-its abbreviation in Spanish), which is defined by the difference between standardized anomalies of mean annual temperature and of mean annual precipitation. The 65-year (1950 to 2014) registers common to 16 climatological stations in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico, were processed to obtain their ISP series, which were analyzed statistically to verify their homogeneity and obtain the fundamental characteristics of yearly droughts at the local level and in three geographic regions of the state.

Methods and materials

Indexes of climate variability monitoring

Measurements of precipitation and temperature are the most abundant, both temporally and spatially. For this reason, these data have been used individually or together to characterize the climate of a region or territory. Moreover, the correlation, usually negative, between temperature and precipitation has been verified by many authors. That is, dry periods are generally warm and warm periods are usually dry. Also, annual variability of the registers or series of mean precipitation and temperature can be detected through their standardized anomaly indexes (IAE-its abbreviation in Spanish) defined (Elagib & Elhag, 2011) as:

IAEPA=PA-PMADEP (1)

And

IAETM=TM-TMADET (2)

where PA is the annual precipitation in millimeters, PMA its mean value, and DEP its unbiased standard deviation, estimated with equation (3). TM is the mean value of annual temperature in °C, TMA its average value, and DET its unbiased standard deviation evaluated with equation (4).

DEP=i=1nPAi-PMA2n-1 (3)

DET=i=1nTMi-TMA2n-1 (4)

In the above expressions, n is the number of years of the register or processed series.

Drought detection index

Pedj, in 1975 in the USSR, proposed an index for detecting annual droughts, which are defined by the difference between the IAE of the mean temperature minus that of precipitation (Elagib & Elhag, 2011); that is:

ISP=IAETM-IAEPA (5)

The ISP is the Pedj Drought Index, whose annual value classifies atmospheric weather as humid or drought, according to table 1. Elagib and Elhag (2011) verified equation (5) empirically, finding that the ISP correlates negatively with precipitation anomaly and varies directly with mean temperature anomaly, but most importantly, it captures both directions or tendencies. This index has been used by several authors for territorial characterization around the world, for example, Gruza, Rankova, Razuvaev and Bulygina (1999); Qian and Zhu (2001), and Potop and Soukup (2009).

Table 1 Classification of years as wet or drought, according to the ISP value (Potop and Soukup, 2009; Elagib and Elhag, 2011). 

ISP interval Type or category Abbreviation ISP inteval Type or category Abbreviation
-1 ≤ ISP < 0 Lightly humid HL 0 < ISP < 1 Light drought SL
-2 ≤ ISP < -1 Moderately humid HM 1 ≤ ISP < 2 Moderate drought SM
-3 ≤ ISP < -2 Severely humid HS 2 ≤ ISP < 3 Severe drought SS
ISP < -3 Extremely humid HE ISP ≥ 3 Extreme drought ES

Reconnaissance Drought Index

The Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) is perhaps the simplest index that has been proposed recently (Tsakiris & Vangelis, 2005; Tsakiris, Tigkas, Vangelis, & Pangalou, 2007; Campos-Aranda, 2014). It is calculated initially as the quotient (a i ) of monthly accumulated precipitation over the respective potential evapotranspiration (ETP), in the k months considered as the duration of drought for each i year of the processed register. When k = 12 in the lapse from January to December, the RDI is an annual index; that is,

ai=PAiETPi (6)

Since the magnitudes of a i can be represented probabilistically by the Log-Normal distribution. The standardized RDI values are then obtained easily with the equation:

RDIsti=yi-y-σy (7)

in which:

yi=ln(ai) (8)

In equation (7), y- is the arithmetic mean and σy is the standard deviation of the yi values. The positive RDIST values indicate wet years and negative values are annual droughts, with the following severity: light, up to -1.00; moderate, fluctuating from -1.00 to -1.50; severe, varying from -1.50 to -2.00; and finally, extreme, less than -2.00.

To estimate annual potential evapotranspiration ( ETPi ) in millimeters, from equation (6), the Hargreaves-Samani method can be used. This method is based exclusively on annual mean temperature (TM i ) expressed in degrees Fahrenheit and on annual mean daily incident solar radiation ( Rsil ) expressed in millimeters depth of evaporated water ( l ). Its formula (Hargreaves & Samani, 1982; Campos-Aranda, 2005) is:

ETPi=2.7375Rsil(1.8TMi+32) (9)

Average incident solar radiation (Rs i ) was obtained from the annual map for Mexico presented by Almanza and López (1975), whose value for the city of Zacatecas is 495 cal/cm2/d. To transform Rs i to depth of evaporated water per day, the following formula is used:

Rsil=10RsiHvi (10)

in which Hvi is the latent evaporation heat, or the energy in calories necessary to evaporate 1 g or 1 cm3 of water, and is estimated with the following expression, with the mean annual temperature (TM i ) in ºC:

Hvi=595.9-0.55TMi (11)

Annual climate registers used

Campos-Aranda (2015) studied the annual precipitation of the state of Zacatecas, Mexico, and observed that 16 rain gauging stations could be selected with a maximum common period of 63 years, the period from 1950 to 2012. These data were expanded to 2014 based on the information provided by the Local Zacatecas Office of the National Water Commission (Conagua). Following a procedure identical to that described for precipitation in the cited references, the 16 yearly registers of mean temperature during the common 65 year period (1950-2014) were integrated. The general characteristics of these 16 climatological stations are presented in table 2 by geographic regions and in progressive order of MAP. Figure 1 shows their location in the state of Zacatecas.

Table 2 General data of the 16 processed climatological stations in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico.  

No. Station name (No. of AC1) Latitude N. Long. W.G. Altitude (2) RH3 Region PMA (mm) DEP (mm) TMA (°C) DET (°C) ISP4
Minimum Maximum
1 Cañitas de Felipe Pescador (9) 23° 36’ 102° 44’ 2025 37 Norte 371.3 132.52 16.02 1.057 -3.415 3.460
2 Río Grande (73) 23° 48’ 103° 02’ 1890 36 Norte 384.7 128.36 16.92 0.481 -3.452 3.845
3 Fresnillo (30) 23° 11’ 102° 53’ 2195 37 Norte 415.9 125.59 16.91 1.136 -4.309 4.003
4 Leobardo Reynoso (El Sauz) (25) 23° 11’ 103° 12’ 2090 36 Norte 418.3 121.79 16.08 0.471 -4.433 2.648
5 Villa de Cos (98) 23° 17’ 102° 21’ 2050 37 Norte 426.4 165.01 17.51 0.658 -5.111 4.331
6 Santa Rosa (69) 22° 56’ 103° 07’ 2240 36 Norte 459.3 149.28 14.75 0.545 -3.981 2.730
7 San Pedro Piedra Gorda (83) 22° 27’ 102° 21’ 2032 12 Centro 411.5 135.24 16.85 0.828 -3.611 2.793
8 Villa García (99) 22° 10’ 101° 57’ 2102 12 Centro 443.3 126.41 16.33 0.813 -3.235 2.634
9 Pinos (65) 22° 17’ 101° 35’ 2408 37 Centro 448.3 151.37 16.29 1.026 -4.107 3.503
10 Zacatecas (103) 22° 46’ 102° 35’ 2485 37 Centro 463.2 133.21 15.70 0.598 -3.280 3.084
11 Villanueva (102) 22° 22’ 102° 53’ 1920 12 Centro 470.9 145.91 16.89 0.575 -3.048 3.230
12 Presa El Chique (68) 22° 00’ 102° 53’ 1620 12 Sur 543.6 117.21 20.92 0.884 -3.259 3.873
13 Juchipila (42) 21° 23’ 103° 07’ 1270 12 Sur 691.7 143.39 21.72 1.483 -3.297 3.242
14 Nochistlán (58) 21° 22’ 102° 51’ 1850 12 Sur 700.2 162.05 18.61 0.721 -4.527 3.412
15 Tlaltenango (94) 21° 47’ 103° 18’ 1700 12 Sur 701.5 157.22 18.05 1.176 -4.411 2.615
16 Excamé (27) 21° 39’ 103° 20’ 1740 12 Sur 736.5 154.47 18.53 0.493 -3.662 3.330

1, 2, 3, 4 Files of conagua meters above sea level hydrological region Pedj drought index

Figure 1 Geographic location of the 16 processed climatological stations in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico.  

Results and discussion

Calculation of the series of the Pedj drought index

By applying equations (1) through (5) to the 16 annual registers of precipitation and mean temperature to be processed, we obtain the Pedj drought index (ISP) series, whose extreme values are cited in table 2. Table 3 presents the annual data and results for each of the climatological stations considered representative of the three geographical regions defined. These stations were Leobardo Reynoso, Zacatecas and Nochistlán. The first and the last have homogeneous registers, according to the results of table 4 of the following section, while Zacatecas, the state capital, only has persistence.

Table 3 Annual data and calculations of droughts based on ISP at three climatological stations in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico.  

Values Leobardo Reynoso (El Sauz) Zacatecas Nochistlán
PMA DEP 418.334 mm 121.793 mm 463.220 mm 133.206 mm 700.160 mm 162.052 mm
TMA DET 16.083 °C 0.471 °C 15.703 °C 0.598 °C 18.608 °C 0.721 °C
No. Year PA TM ISP TS PA TM ISP TS PA TM ISP TS
1 1950 397.3 16.7 1.484 SM 396.7 16.6 1.998 SM 654.9 18.9 0.684 SL
2 1951 431.6 16.7 1.202 SM 437.6 16.3 1.190 SM 616.5 17.9 -0.465 -
3 1952 305.9 16.7 2.234 SS 364.8 15.9 1.068 SM 379.6 17.0 -0.250 -
4 1953 453.2 15.7 -1.100 - 441.7 15.6 -0.011 - 609.5 17.1 -1.531 -
5 1954 292.4 16.5 1.920 SM 284.2 16.2 2.174 SS 762.5 19.3 0.575 SL
6 1955 467.6 16.0 -0.581 - 584.7 15.8 -0.750 - 880.9 19.3 -0.156 -
7 1956 281.2 15.8 0.524 SL 389.7 16.0 1.048 SM 730.8 18.5 -0.338 -
8 1957 278.3 16.2 1.398 SM 252.1 16.6 3.084 SE 530.5 19.0 1.591 SM
9 1958 807.3 15.5 -4.433 - 682.7 15.7 -1.653 - 977.9 17.7 -2.972 -
10 1959 595.5 15.7 -2.269 - 481.5 15.9 0.192 SL 509.0 20.1 3.248 SE
11 1960 306.9 16.2 1.163 SM 321.8 16.4 2.226 SS 480.8 19.0 1.897 SM
12 1961 412.8 16.2 0.294 SL 334.7 16.5 2.297 SS 850.6 19.0 -0.385 -
13 1962 310.4 16.6 1.985 SM 309.4 16.8 2.988 SS 697.6 19.1 0.698 SL
14 1963 434.2 16.8 1.393 SM 326.3 16.5 2.360 SS 1001.3 18.4 -2.146 -
15 1964 470.3 16.3 0.034 SL 447.7 15.7 0.111 SL 739.7 18.1 -0.948 -
16 1965 435.3 15.9 -0.528 - 510.9 15.6 -0.530 - 784.4 18.4 -0.808 -
17 1966 478.8 15.9 -0.886 - 514.3 15.3 -1.057 - 739.7 18.3 -0.671 -
18 1967 455.2 16.0 -0.479 - 590.9 15.7 -0.964 - 1049.0 19.0 -1.609 -
19 1968 463.0 15.3 -2.031 - 635.1 14.7 -2.967 - 681.7 18.4 -0.174 -
20 1969 241.9 16.5 2.335 SS 169.3 15.2 1.366 SM 550.2 19.1 1.608 SM
21 1970 524.7 15.7 -1.687 - 549.4 15.2 -1.488 - 811.7 19.2 0.133 SL
22 1971 508.1 16.1 -0.701 - 764.3 15.5 -2.600 - 856.8 18.8 -0.700 -
23 1972 344.4 16.5 1.493 SM 414.4 15.9 0.696 SL 712.4 19.6 1.300 SM
24 1973 762.9 15.4 -4.281 - 521.7 15.5 -0.778 - 888.0 19.0 -0.615 -
25 1974 286.9 16.0 0.903 SL 415.9 15.6 0.183 SL 723.2 19.0 0.402 SL
26 1975 412.0 15.4 -1.400 - 367.6 15.5 0.378 SL 643.9 18.6 0.337 SL
27 1976 565.9 15.0 -3.513 - 570.0 14.8 -2.311 - 808.5 18.5 -0.818 -
28 1977 314.0 15.7 0.043 SL 405.7 15.4 -0.075 - 799.7 18.7 -0.486 -
29 1978 285.3 16.2 1.341 SM 278.3 15.4 0.882 SL 696.7 19.1 0.704 SL
30 1979 294.4 15.9 0.629 SL 300.1 15.6 1.052 SM 541.2 19.1 1.663 SM
31 1980 418.4 16.5 0.885 SL 377.0 15.6 0.475 SL 780.1 19.6 0.882 SL
32 1981 429.6 16.5 0.794 SL 588.5 15.4 -1.447 - 694.7 19.0 0.578 SL
33 1982 286.2 16.8 2.608 SS 299.6 16.3 2.226 SS 723.1 19.5 1.095 SM
34 1983 394.6 15.8 -0.407 - 533.0 14.9 -1.866 - 827.1 18.5 -0.933 -
35 1984 565.1 16.6 -0.107 - 560.1 15.4 -1.234 - 773.7 19.0 0.090 SL
36 1985 498.7 16.7 0.651 SL 542.0 14.2 -3.103 - 797.1 19.2 0.223 SL
37 1986 481.1 16.3 -0.054 - 511.3 14.8 -1.870 - 677.7 19.4 1.237 SM
38 1987 565.5 16.1 -1.172 - 632.6 14.6 -3.115 - 684.6 19.0 0.640 SL
39 1988 502.5 16.1 -0.655 - 489.7 14.9 -1.541 - 639.4 17.9 -0.606 -
40 1989 371.6 16.7 1.695 SM 412.8 15.3 -0.295 - 336.0 19.0 2.791 SS
41 1990 507.3 17.0 1.218 SM 721.4 14.9 -3.280 - 901.4 19.0 -0.698 -
42 1991 494.5 16.3 -0.164 - 669.6 15.2 -2.390 - 797.4 17.6 -1.997 -
43 1992 413.7 15.8 -0.564 - 537.1 14.9 -1.897 - 1117.5 17.2 -4.527 -
44 1993 347.2 16.6 1.683 SM 468.3 15.5 -0.377 - 704.8 17.7 -1.287 -
45 1994 333.1 17.0 2.648 SS 554.1 16.1 -0.019 - 579.0 18.3 0.321 SL
46 1995 380.3 16.5 1.198 SM 342.8 15.9 1.233 SM 806.0 18.0 -1.496 -
47 1996 446.4 15.9 -0.619 - 568.8 15.6 -0.965 - 571.4 17.6 -0.602 -
48 1997 310.0 15.5 -0.350 - 354.0 14.9 -0.522 - 810.6 19.0 -0.138 -
49 1998 299.4 16.6 2.075 SS 473.0 16.6 1.425 SM 497.3 19.0 1.796 SM
50 1999 250.2 15.8 0.779 SL 343.5 16.0 1.395 SM 415.1 17.7 0.501 SL
51 2000 306.4 16.0 0.743 SL 339.0 16.1 1.596 SM 532.3 16.8 -1.470 -
52 2001 285.8 15.6 0.062 SL 481.9 15.5 -0.480 - 409.0 17.6 0.400 SL
53 2002 537.7 16.2 -0.732 - 693.3 15.7 -1.732 - 868.1 17.5 -2.572 -
54 2003 475.3 16.0 -0.644 - 559.9 15.7 -0.731 - 769.4 18.4 -0.715 -
55 2004 540.9 15.5 -2.245 - 718.3 15.9 -1.586 - 904.9 19.0 -0.720 -
56 2005 380.0 16.3 0.776 SL 358.7 16.7 2.451 SS 415.1 19.8 3.412 SE
57 2006 442.7 15.9 -0.589 - 520.3 16.8 1.404 SM 634.8 19.0 0.947 SL
58 2007 399.2 15.6 -0.869 - 408.8 16.2 1.239 SM 742.6 18.6 -0.273 -
59 2008 643.3 15.3 -3.511 - 591.3 15.7 -0.967 - 705.0 19.0 0.514 SL
60 2009 386.5 16.0 0.085 SL 502.9 16.4 0.867 SL 524.4 19.1 1.767 SM
61 2010 346.9 15.1 -1.503 - 493.0 15.5 -0.563 - 575.4 17.9 -0.211 -
62 2011 183.5 16.2 2.177 SS 245.5 15.6 1.462 SM 493.9 19.1 1.955 SM
63 2012 301.2 16.0 0.785 SL 216.0 15.3 1.182 SM 675.0 19.0 0.699 SL
64 2013 640.2 15.9 -2.211 - 487.6 16.8 1.650 SM 695.2 18.7 0.159 SL
65 2014 409.0 15.6 -0.950 - 450.1 16.4 1.263 SM 722.1 17.6 -1.532 -
Sumas - - - 34 - - - 32 - - - 32

Symbols

PMA

mean annual precipitation, in millimeters

PA

annual precipitation, in millimeters

DEP

standard deviation of precipitation, in millimeters

TM

mean temperature of the year in °C

TMA

mean annual average temperature, in °C

ISP

Pedj drought index, adimensional

DET

TM standard deviation of TM, in millimeters

TS

drought type (SL light, SM moderate, SS severe and SE extreme)

Table 4 Serial correlation coefficient of first order (r 1) and results of the homogeneity tests on the 16 annual series of the Pedj drought index (ISP) processed for the state of Zacatecas, Mexico.  

No. Station r 1 Results of the homogeneity tests
1 Cañitas de Felipe Pescador 0.262 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence and an upward trend
2 Río Grande 0.044 Homogeneous
3 Fresnillo 0.291 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence
4 Leobardo Reynoso 0.029 Homogeneous
5 Villa de Cos 0.222 Homogeneous, exhibits persistence
6 Santa Rosa 0.209 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence and a downward trend
7 San Pedro Piedra Gorda 0.358 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence
8 Villa García 0.169 Not homogeneous, according to basic tests
9 Pinos 0.405 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence
10 Zacatecas 0.335 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence
11 Villanueva 0.224 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence and a slightly downward trend
12 Presa El Chique 0.354 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence.
13 Juchipila 0.321 Oscillates little according to basic tests, and exhibits persistence and a downward trend
14 Nochistlán 0.071 Homogeneous
15 Tlaltenango 0.324 Homogeneous, shows persistence
16 Excamé 0.102 Homogeneous

Figure 2 shows the annual ISP chronological series of the Cañitas de Felipe Pescador climatological station in bars and its curve of order 5 mobile averages. This station was not homogeneous, according to the basic tests. It has persistence and an ascending linear trend with a slope statistically different from zero, according to the Student t test (Campos-Aranda, 2015) since t = 2.462 and tc = 1.998. Figure 3 presents the annual ISP chronological series of the Nochistlán station, which was homogeneous.

Figure 2 Chronological series of the Pedj drought index (ISP) in bars, curve of order 5 mobile averages and trend line at the Cañitas de Felipe Pescador climatological station, Zacatecas, Mexico. 

Figure 3 Chronological series of the Pedj drought index (ISP) in bars, curve of order 5 mobile averages and trend line at the Nochistlán climatological station, Zacatecas, Mexico. 

Verification of homogeneity

Each annual ISP chronological series was analyzed for statistical quality, searching for deterministic components with three general tests (the Helmert, Sequence and Von Neumann tests) and six specific tests: two persistence tests (Anderson and Sneyers), two trend tests (Kendall and Spearman), one variability test (Bartlett) and one mean change test (Cramer). Most of these tests can be consulted in WMO (1971), Machiwal and Jha (2008, 2012) and Campos-Aranda (2015). Table 4 concentrates the results of these tests. It can be seen that only four registers are perfectly homogeneous, three show a downward trend, one an upward trend, and the rest exhibit persistence, which is a statistical characteristic of most chronological series of annual rainfall and temperature. Table 4 reveals that persistence is associated with the coefficient of first-order serial correlation (r 1), when the latter is greater than 0.200.

Regional analysis: evidence of climate change

According to the results of table 4, only six ISP series are homogenous; the rest are persistent and four of them exhibit trends: three downward and one upward. For this reason, it is convenient to search for evidence of climate change. For simplicity, the register was divided into two periods, 1950 to 1981 and 1982 to 2014, since this search was to be done by counting important drought events, which are shown below by station and period, moderate, severe and extreme (ISP(1.000) drought years. The results are shown in table 5.

Table 5 Number of major droughts (ISP ≥ 1.00) detected in the indicated periods by each of the climatological stations processed. 

Period Northern region stations Sum Northern Central region stations Sum Central Southern region stations Sum Sur
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1950-1981 6 8 5 11 7 11 48 8 11 7 12 11 49 4 10 8 6 10 38
1982-2014 10 9 8 8 6 11 52 10 8 11 12 7 48 12 2 5 7 6 32

From table 5, we deduce that the indicators of sums of important droughts (ISP(1.000) by region should be considered similar since, although there are differences, they were not generated by all of the stations of each region; rather, some stations had more droughts in the first period and other had more in the second, for example, stations 9 (Pinos) and 11 (Villanueva) in the central region. Moreover, in each geographic region there are stations with similar numbers of droughts per period, for examples stations 2, 5, 6, 10 and 15. Therefore, there is no regional evidence of climate change in the annual meteorological droughts of the state of Zacatecas, Mexico, according to the ISP.

Local analysis: 5-year minimum sequences

Based on the fifth order mobile averages technique, in the 16 ISP chronological series, three minimum sequences, their values and location were identified; details are presented in table 6. The most extreme sequences of the northern region are defined by the Fresnillo and Villa de Cos stations. The former occurred in the first time division 1979 to 1985 and the second in 1960 to 1966. In the central region, at the Pinos station, the most severe sequences occurred in the period 1999 to 2005. Finally, in the southern region, the most extreme five-year sequences occurred at several stations during the early 1950s and the late 1990s, for example, at the Presa El Chique station.

Table 6 Averages and lapses of the three five-year maximum sequences in the ISP chronological series, at the 16 climatological stations processed in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico. 

No. Station Region First sequence Second sequence Third sequence
1 Cañitas de Felipe Pescador North 1.671 (1997-2001) 1.516 (1974-1978) 1.510 (1977-1981)
2 Río Grande North 1.510 (2010-2014) 1.123 (2009-2013) 1.057 (1978-1982)
3 Fresnillo North 2.525 (1981-1985) 2.064 (1980-1984) 1.862 (1979-1983)
4 Leobardo Reynoso North 1.251 (1978-1982) 1.148 (1950-1954) 0.991 (1994-1998)
5 Villa de Cos North 2.030 (1961-1965) 1.735 (1962-1966) 1.513 (1960-1964)
6 Santa Rosa North 1.467 (1953-1957) 1.349 (1994-1998) 1.337 (1978-1982)
7 San Pedro Piedra Gorda Central 2.286 (1950-1954) 1.810 (1951-1955) 1.793 (2008-2012)
8 Villa García Central 1.349 (1961-1965) 1.345 (1962-1966) 1.194 (1978-1982)
9 Pinos Central 2.533 (2000-2004) 2.508 (2001-2005) 2.046 (1999-2003)
10 Zacatecas Central 2.012 (1959-1963) 1.996 (1960-1964) 1.445 (1961-1965)
11 Villanueva Central 1.811 (1978-1982) 1.519 (1979-1983) 1.429 (1977-1981)
12 Presa El Chique South 1.961 (1953-1957) 1.867 (1996-2000) 1.749 (1997-2001)
13 Juchipila South 1.445 (1953-1957) 1.429 (1950-1954) 1.344 (1965-1969)
14 Tlaltenango South 1.806 (1961-1965) 1.651 (1960-1964) 1.220 (1998-2002)
15 Nochistlán South 1.273 (2005-2009) 0.984 (1978-1982) 0.945 (2008-2012)
16 Excamé South 2.061 (1950-1954) 1.554 (1951-1955) 1.177 (1953-1957)

Local analysis: The ten driest years

From the series of ISP values ordered from highest to lowest, the ten highest were selected, and their years of occurrence were obtained. These ISP values and their respective years are concentrated in table 7. In the series of ordered ISP values, we detected that the number of droughts (ISP > 0) varied from 29 in Cañitas de Filipe Pescador to 40 in Tlaltenango, while the number of extreme, severe and moderate droughts (ISP ( 1.0) varied from 12 in Juchipila to 24 in Zacatecas. Furthermore, in table 7 we observe that the maximum extreme ISP values occurred in Villa de Cos and Fresnillo, with 4.331 and 4.003, respectively, but they can be as low as 2.615 and 2.634, which occurred in Tlaltenangeo and Villa García.

Table 7 Values of the ten highest annual Pedj drought indexes (ISP) and their respective years at 16 climatological stations processed in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico. 

No. Name Data Maximum ISP values in descending order of magnitude and their respective years
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1 Cañitas de Felipe Pescador ISP 3.460 2.925 2.512 2.424 2.379 2.213 2.152 1.961 1.866 1.690
Año 1974 1980 1975 1977 2012 1999 2001 1979 2009 2011
2 Río Grande ISP 3.845 3.304 3.192 2.637 2.447 2.353 1.810 1.804 1.745 1.625
Año 2011 1989 1982 2012 2014 1995 1977 1998 1957 1956
3 Fresnillo ISP 4.003 3.066 2.608 2.446 2.142 1.837 1.729 1.279 1277 1.195
Año 1982 2011 1981 1985 2012 1984 1983 1960 1964 1965
4 Leobardo Reynoso ISP 2.648 2.608 2.335 2.234 2.177 2.075 1.985 1.920 1.695 1.683
Año 1994 1982 1969 1952 2011 1998 1962 1954 1989 1993
5 Villa de Cos ISP 4.331 2.418 2.348 2.050 2.001 1.587 1.465 1.440 1.358 1.338
Año 1963 1964 1965 1954 1995 1989 1974 1998 1973 1956
6 Santa Rosa ISP 2.730 2.626 2.429 2.303 2.125 2.087 1.986 1.882 1.846 1.819
Año 1962 1957 2014 1956 1969 1996 1964 1994 1954 1950
7 San Pedro Piedra Gorda ISP 2.793 2.766 2.674 2.660 2.523 2.444 2.074 1.869 1.787 1.684
Año 1950 2011 1954 1969 1952 2009 1982 2012 1951 1979
8 Villa García ISP 2.634 2.580 2.481 2.198 2.190 2.063 1.958 1.721 1.697 1.651
Año 1954 1962 1965 2011 1982 1957 2009 2000 1969 1999
9 Pinos ISP 3.503 3.488 2.784 2.776 2.316 2.272 2.232 1.953 1.735 1.486
Año 1987 2001 2003 2004 2002 1962 1969 1977 1968 1954
10 Zacatecas ISP 3.084 2.988 2.451 2.360 2.297 2.226 2.226 2.174 1.998 1.650
Año 1957 1962 2005 1963 1961 1960 1982 1954 1950 2013
11 Villanueva ISP 3.230 2.410 2.403 2.237 2.005 1.929 1.87 1.553 1.486 1.646
Año 1969 1994 1982 1979 2012 2011 1963 1978 1981 1960
12 Presa El Chique ISP 3.873 3.642 2.952 2.772 2.512 1.955 1.935 1.884 1.777 1.775
Año 2011 1957 1953 1998 2009 2000 1961 1989 1999 1993
13 Juchipila ISP 3.242 3.151 2.623 2.229 2.217 2.086 2.021 1.984 1.739 1.614
Año 1957 1968 1994 2011 1956 1967 1952 1972 1950 1951
14 Tlaltenango ISP 2.615 2.612 2.177 2.028 1.835 1.769 1.662 1.637 1.454 1.441
Año 1962 1950 2011 1963 1972 1998 1964 2000 1965 1999
15 Nochistlán ISP 3.412 3.248 2.791 1.955 1.897 1.796 1.767 1.663 1.608 1.591
Año 2005 1959 1989 2011 1960 1998 2009 1979 1969 1957
16 Excamé ISP 3.330 2.962 2.845 2.661 2.501 2.493 2.323 2.164 2.097 1.982
Año 1994 1969 2011 1967 1957 1954 1951 1950 1952 1972

Regional analysis: affected climatological stations

To determine in what years the largest number of major, or extreme, droughts occurred (values in table 7), a tabulation was done by geographic region, with 65 rows relative to each year of the analyzed period (1950-2014) and ten columns for the orders of decreasing magnitude (10, 9, , , , 2, 1). After each of the ten years of each register (table 7), the data were transported to the tabulation of the respective region, marking only the occurrence of a drought in its corresponding row and column; the respective orders of magnitude were added together and designated by SUM.

The years in which three or more droughts occurred, that is, affected climatological stations (ECA) with the most extreme droughts are given in table 8. We observe that exclusively the 2011 drought extended over three geographic regions. In the northern region the most extreme droughts were those of 1982 and 2011, with SUM of 27 and 26, respectively. In contrast, in the central region the five years of the most extreme and most frequent droughts were of similar severity. Finally, in the southern region, the droughts in 2011 and 1957 are outstanding for their severity, according to the SUM. From table 8, we deduce that droughts are more frequent in the northern region.

Table 8 Years of major droughts with three or more affected climatological stations (ECA), by geographic regions in the state of Zacatecas, México.  

Northern Region (EC = 6) Central región (EC = 5) Southern region (EC = 5)
Year ECA SUM Year ECA SUM Year ECA SUM
1954 3 12 1954 4 22 1950 3 14
1956 3 9 1962 3 23 1957 4 26
1964 3 15 1969 4 23 1972 3 10
1982 3 27 1982 4 22 1998 3 17
1989 3 16 2011 3 21 2011 5 40
1998 3 11 - - - - - -
2011 4 26 - - - - - -
2012 3 19 - - - - - -

Contrast with RDIST

Because the Pedj index is one of the first drought-characterizing algorithms to use mean precipitation and temperature, we believed it convenient to contrast it with a more recent, simpler one that uses potential evapotranspiration as well as precipitation, the RDIST. This contrast was based on percentages of each type of drought defined by the two indexes and on the total number of these events (NTS), which have been concentrated in table 9.

Table 9 Percentages and total number of drought types, estimated with the Pedj index and with the RDIST, at 16 processed climatological stations in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico. 

No. Station Region Estimation with the Pedj drought index Estimation with RDIST
%SL %SM %SS %SE NTS %SL %SM %SS %SE NTS
1 Cañitas de Felipe Pescador Northern 44.8 31.0 20.7 3.4 29 62.1 13.8 20.7 3.4 29
2 Río Grande Northern 43.3 36.7 10.0 10.0 30 68.8 18.8 3.1 9.4 32
3 Fresnillo Northern 62.9 22.9 8.6 5.7 35 66.7 16.7 10.0 6.7 30
4 Leobardo Reynoso Northern 44.1 38.2 17.6 0.0 34 58.6 31.0 6.9 3.4 29
5 Villa de Cos Northern 62.9 22.9 11.4 2.9 35 74.2 12.9 9.7 3.2 31
6 Santa Rosa Northern 26.7 53.3 20.0 0.0 30 68.8 15.6 9.4 6.3 32
7 San Pedro Piedra Gorda Central 45.5 33.3 21.2 0.0 33 60.7 21.4 7.1 10.7 28
8 Villa García Central 42.4 39.4 18.2 0.0 33 57.1 21.4 14.3 7.1 28
9 Pinos Central 48.6 31.4 14.3 5.7 35 64.5 16.1 9.7 9.7 31
10 Zacatecas Central 25.0 50.0 21.9 3.1 32 62.1 24.1 6.9 6.9 29
11 Villanueva Central 40.0 43.3 13.3 3.3 30 62.1 17.2 10.3 10.3 29
12 Presa El Chique Southern 50.0 34.4 9.4 6.3 32 65.5 20.7 3.4 10.3 29
13 Juchipila Southern 57.1 17.9 17.9 7.1 28 69.2 19.2 0.0 11.5 26
14 Tlaltenango Southern 67.5 22.5 10.0 0.0 40 77.1 8.6 8.6 5.7 35
15 Nochistlán Southern 59.4 31.3 3.1 6.3 32 57.7 23.1 7.7 11.5 26
16 Excamé Southern 50.0 21.9 25.0 3.1 32 66.7 14.8 7.4 11.1 27
Minimum values 25.0 17.9 3.1 0.0 28 57.1 8.6 0.0 3.2 26
Maximum values 67.5 53.3 25.0 10.0 40 77.1 31.0 20.7 11.5 35

Symbols

%SL

percentage of light droughts

%SM

percentage of moderate droughts

%SS

percentage of severe droughts

%SE

percentage of extreme

NTS

total number of droughts

Based on the results of the 16 processed climate series of the state of Zacatecas, we observe that both indexes exhibit fluctuating results. The ISP results vary notably in extreme droughts and those of RDIST vary in the severe. Regarding the NTS, which should be 32 or 33, the RDIST index, in general, underestimates the value while the ISP is closer. Both indexes overestimate the magnitude in the Tlaltenango station. Table 10 presents the annual results of both indexes for contrast in the climatological station Cañitas de Felipe Pescador, one of the most discordant of the stations, according to what is observed or deduced from table 9. In table 10 we observed that both indexes detect 22 common years with drought, of the 29 total (table 9) and, of these, the 10 following years coincide in the type of drought identified: 1954, 1956, 1969, 1972, 1975, 1980, 1995, 1997, 1999 and 2010.

Table 10 Annual values of the Pedj and RDIST indexes and their drought types (TS) in the climatological station Cañitas de Felipe Pescador in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico. 

No. Year Cañitas de Felipe Pescador No. Year Cañitas de Felipe Pescador
ISP TS RDIST TS ISP TS RDIST TS
1 1950 -0.830 0.526 34 1983 -0.613 0.484
2 1951 -0.106 -0.203 SL 35 1984 -0.245 -0.350 SL
3 1952 0.824 SL -1.557 SS 36 1985 -0.693 0.322
4 1953 -2.123 1.486 37 1986 -0.692 0.060
5 1954 0.383 SL -0.834 SL 38 1987 -0.289 0.178
6 1955 -0.283 -0.007 SL 39 1988 -1.042 0.564
7 1956 0.308 SL -0.727 SL 40 1989 0.666 SL -1.128 SM
8 1957 -0.735 -1.501 SS 41 1990 -0.426 0.391
9 1958 -3.063 1.570 42 1991 -1.812 0.988
10 1959 -1.781 1.027 43 1992 -1.289 0.233
11 1960 -1.399 0.077 44 1993 -0.789 -0.220 SL
12 1961 -0.934 -0.152 SL 45 1994 0.430 SL 0.061
13 1962 -0.153 -0.827 SL 46 1995 0.898 SL -0.357 SL
14 1963 -0.870 0.486 47 1996 -3.415 2.507
15 1964 -1.351 0.459 48 1997 0.874 SL -0.656 SL
16 1965 -3.182 1.543 49 1998 1.581 SM 0.118
17 1966 -1.847 0.601 50 1999 2.213 SS -1.800 SS
18 1967 -1.860 1.024 51 2000 1.533 SM -0.186 SL
19 1968 -0.673 0.384 52 2001 2.152 SS -1.364 SM
20 1969 1.525 SM -1.217 SM 53 2002 -0.584 1.436
21 1970 -0.784 0.633 54 2003 -0.373 1.199
22 1971 -0.129 0.580 55 2004 0.050 SL 0.572
23 1972 0.973 SL -0.555 SL 56 2005 1.043 SM 0.053
24 1973 -0.876 1.149 57 2006 0.633 SL 0.580
25 1974 3.460 SE -1.603 SS 58 2007 1.415 SM -0.671 SL
26 1975 2.512 SS -1.680 SS 59 2008 -0.014 0.626
27 1976 -1.214 1.097 60 2009 1.866 SM -0.572 SL
28 1977 2.424 SS -1.089 SM 61 2010 0.813 SL -0.815 SL
29 1978 0.400 SL 1.067 62 2011 1.690 SM -2.233 SE
30 1979 1.961 SM -0.932 SL 63 2012 2.379 SS -0.776 SL
31 1980 2.925 SS -1.778 SS 64 2013 -2.652 1.614
32 1981 -0.160 0.383 65 2014 0.061 SL 0.336
33 1982 1.290 SM -0.623 SL - - - - - -

Symbols

TS

drought type

SL

light

SM

moderate

SS

severe

SE

extreme

Conclusions

The Pedj drought index (ISP), based on the difference in standardized anomalies between mean annual temperature and precipitation, is a quite simple technique that allows detection of annual meteorological droughts at the local and regional levels when these series are analyzed in a common period. For the presented case of the state of Zacatecas, Mexico, 16 ISP series were processed with a 65-year common lapse, from 1950 to 2015, in three geographic regions of the state: northern, central and southern.

Local detection of the droughts was illustrated in table 3, while the regional results of the years with three or more affected climatological stations, according to table 8, were 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1962, 1964, 1969, 1972, 1982, 1989, 1998, 2011 and 2012. Only the drought in 2011 had major generalized presence.

Because of the simplicity of calculating the ISP series and the implicit importance of the results of local and regional analyses for detection and follow-up of annual meteorological drought, we recommend its systematic application. This would permit verifying the results of other drought indexes, as shown in the section in which ISP and RDIST are contrasted. Moreover, it would make it possible to broaden understanding of the behavior of drought as a chronological series with the aim of forecasting (Mishra and Singh, 2011).

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Humberto Abelardo Díaz Valdez of the Local Zacatecas Office of CONAGUA for providing updates of the climatological information processed.

The author is grateful for the comments and suggestions of anonymous referees 1 and 2. The corrections of the first improved the presentation of the results and contributed to their interpretation. The suggestions of the second referee led to the contrast with RDIST.

REFERENCES

Almanza, R., & López, S. (1975). Radiación solar global en la república mexicana mediante datos de insolación (20 pp.). Series del Instituto de Ingeniería 357. México, DF: UNAM. [ Links ]

Campos-Aranda, D. F. (2005). Estimación de la evapotranspiración. Capítulo 3 (pp. 65-96). En: Agroclimatología cuantitativa de cultivos. México, DF: Editorial Trillas. [ Links ]

Campos-Aranda, D. F. (2014). Comparación de tres métodos estadísticos para detección y monitoreo de sequías meteorológicas. Agrociencia, 48(5), 463-476. [ Links ]

Campos-Aranda, D. F. (2015). Búsqueda de tendencias en la precipitación anual del estado de Zacatecas, México; en 30 registros con más de 50 años. Ingeniería. Investigación y Tecnología, 16(3), 357-370. [ Links ]

Elagib, N. A., & Elhag, M. M. (2011). Major climate indicators of ongoing drought in Sudan. Journal of Hydrology, 409(3-4), 612-625. [ Links ]

Gruza, G., Rankova, E., Razuvaev, V., & Bulygina, O. (1999). Indicators of climate change for the Russian Federation. Climatic Change, 42(1), 219-242. [ Links ]

Hargreaves, G. H., & Samani, Z. A. (1982). Estimating potential evapotranspiration. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 108(IR3), 225-230. [ Links ]

Kunkel, K. E., Pielke, R. A., & Changnon, S. A. (1999). Temporal fluctuations in weather and climate extremes that cause economic and human health impacts: A review. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80(6), 1077-1098. [ Links ]

Lobato-Sánchez, R. (2016). El monitor de la sequía en México. Tecnología y ciencias del agua, 7(5), 197-211. [ Links ]

Machiwal, D., & Jha, M. K. (2008). Comparative evaluation of statistical tests for time series analysis: Applications to hydrological time series. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53(2), 353-366. [ Links ]

Machiwal, D., & Jha, M. K. (2012). Methods for time series analysis (Chapter 4, pp. 51-84). In: Hydrologic time series analysis: Theory and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. [ Links ]

Mawdsley, J., Petts, G., & Walker, S. (1994). Assessment of drought severity (41 pp.). Occasional Paper No. 3. London: British Hydrological Society. [ Links ]

Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2010). A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology , 391(1-2), 202-216. [ Links ]

Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2011). Drought modeling-A review. Journal of Hydrology , 403(1-2), 157-175. [ Links ]

Potop, V., & Soukup, J. (2009). Spatiotemporal characteristics of dryness and drought in the Republic of Moldova. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 96(3-4), 305-318. [ Links ]

Qian, W., & Zhu, Y. (2001). Climate change in China from 1880 to 1998 and its impact on the environmental conditions. Climatic Change , 50(4), 419-444. [ Links ]

Tsakiris, G., & Vangelis, H. (2005). Establishing a drought index incorporating evapotranspiration. European Water, 9/10, 3-11. [ Links ]

Tsakiris, G., Tigkas, D., Vangelis, H., & Pangalou, D. (2007). Regional drought identification and assessment. Chapter 9 (pp. 169-191). In: Methods and tools for drought analysis and management. Rossi, G., Vega, T., & Bonaccorso, B. (eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer . [ Links ]

World Meteorological Organization, WMO. (1971). Standard tests of significance to be recommended in routine analysis of climatic fluctuations (Annexed III, pp. 58-71). InClimatic Change . Technical Note No. 79, WMO-No. 195. Geneva: Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization. [ Links ]

Received: October 12, 2015; Accepted: January 09, 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons