SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue1The retarded potential of a non-homogeneous wave equation: introductory analysis through the Green functionsEvaluation of experimental errors in Boyle’s experiment author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de física E

Print version ISSN 1870-3542

Rev. mex. fís. E vol.64 n.1 México Jan./Jun. 2018

 

Education

Some remarks on the Bel-Robinson tensor and gravitational radiation

S. Hacyana 

aInstituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 20-364, Cd. de México, 01000, México.


Abstract

The asymptotic form of the Bel-Robinson tensor in the gravitational radiation-zone is obtained in terms of the mass quadrupole of the source. A comparison is made with the standard formula for the gravitational power emission. The problem of a fully covariant description of gravitational radiation in terms of this tensor is briefly discussed.

Keywords: Gravitational waves

PACS: 04.30.Db; 04.30.Tv

1. Introduction

Though the existence of gravitational waves is now well established, a manifestly covariant formulation of the energy density and flux of gravitational radiation, produced by a physically realistic system, is still lacking. The standard approach is based on the definition of a pseudo-tensor of energy-momentum 1,2. This approach, however, being coordinate dependent, has been the subject of decades of discussions (see Kennefick’s book 3 for an historical account). Finally, the discovery of the Hulse-Taylor pulsar 4 came as a dramatic confirmation of the standard formulation.

From a theoretical point of view, the “wave zone" of gravitational radiation can be defined covariantly, together with its corresponding Poynting-vector 5, but the problem of relating it in a fully covariant form to the structure of its source, as in electromagnetism, remains open. An interesting approach is through the definition of the Bel-Robinson tensor (Bel 6), a fourth rank tensor that has been extensively studied by many authors (see, e.g., references 7 to 17). In all cases, the underlying idea is that the Weyl tensor Cαβγδ that describes the purely gravitational part of the space-time curvature is, in some sense, analogous to the electromagnetic field tensor fαβ. Since the energy-momentum tensor of the latter is a second rank tensor quadratic in fαβ, the analogue of the energy-momentum tensor of the former could be the Bel-Robinson tensor, which is quadratic in Cαβγδ. Following the original work of Bel 6, who proposed a definition of “super-energy” (and “super-Poynting”) for the gravitational field, most of the previously cited authors attempted to relate this tensor to some appropriately defined concept of energy. However, an application to concrete problems, such as the generation of gravitational radiation by a binary pulsar, has not been achieved yet.

In the present paper, we calculate the asymptotic form of the Bel-Robinson tensor in the linear approximation of general relativity, in order to shed some light on its physical significance and compare with standard results. Since energy conservation is related to the existence of a time-like Killing vector, one can define a “super-energy-momentum” current in terms of this vector and the Bel-Robinson tensor, as in Ref. 13,15,16. In analogy with the electromagnetic case, we deduce in Section 2 the explicit form of the super-Poynting vector in the asymptotic limit. In section 3, a comparison is made with electromagnetic radiation and the standard result for gravitational radiation. As briefly discussed in the last section, there are some basic difficulties in relating the present approach to the well tested pseudo-tensor formalism, basically due to the dimensions of the Bel-Robinson tensor.

2. Basic equations

In the weak field limit, the metric tensor is gμν=ημν+hμν. Defining h¯μνhμν-(1/2)ημν(ηρσhρσ), the metric is related to the energy-momentum tensor Tμν through the equation 1,2

h¯μν=-16πGc4Tμν, (1)

together with the gauge condition

μh¯μν=0. (2)

In the radiation zone, at large distance r from the source, the solution of Eq. (1) has the asymptotic form

h¯ij=-2πGc4ω2F(t,r)Mij, (3)

where

F(t,r)e-iωt+ikrr (4)

and the mass quadrupole is

-ω2Mijd2dt2ρ(t,r)xixjdV=2TijdV (5)

(this last relation follows from the condition μTμν=0). A sinusoidal time dependence of the source with frequency ω and wave number k=ω/c is assumed for simplicity.

The time-like components of h¯αβ can be obtained from the gauge condition (2):

-ikh¯a0+nh¯an=0k2h¯00+mn2h¯mn=0. (6)

In the radiation zone, kr1, we have

xαFxμ=ik nαFxμ (1+O(1/kr)), (7)

where nα=1, n^, and n^=rr. Thus we can set

h¯αβ=-2πGc4ω2Mαβ(n^)F(t,r), (8)

in the understanding that

M00=Mijnin^j

M0k=-Mkrnr. (9)

Notice, in particular, that Mαβnβ=0 and therefore

αh¯βγ=ik nαh¯βγ. (10)

2.1. Bel-Robinson tensor

In the linear approximation of general relativity the Riemann tensor reduces quite generally to

R   γδαβ=-2[α[γhδ]β]. (11)

In vacuum, the Ricci tensor is identically zero and the Riemann tensor reduces to the Weyl tensor Cαβγδ. The Bel-Robinson tensor Tαβγδ is defined as

Tαβγδ=Cα     γμ   νCμβνδ+*Cα    γμ  ν *Cμβνδ, (12)

where *Cαβγδ=(1/2)-gϵαβμνC     γδμν. It is completely symmetric in its four indices, Tαβγδ=T(αβγδ), traceless T   αβγγ=0, and divergence-free

δTαβγδ=0 (13)

in vacuum.

Using the condition (10), it follows from the definition (12), with some lengthy but straightforward algebra,

Tαβγδ=ω82c42πGc4r2 W nαnβnγnδ, (14)

where

W=M  βαM  αβ. (15)

Defining M¯=Mnn and the trace-free quadrupole tensor Qij=Mij-(1/3)δijM¯, we can express W in terms of purely spatial components:

W=(Qijn^in^j)2-23M¯Qijn^in^j-2QikQjkn^in^j+QijQij+29M¯2. (16)

3. From electromagnetism to gravitation

Let us compare the electromagnetic and gravitational fields and see how the definition of the energy of the former can be extended to the latter.

3.1. Electromagnetic field

In the dipole approximation, the electromagnetic field fαβ=2[αAβ] is given en terms of the four-vector Aα whose space-like components, in the radiation zone kr1, are

A=-ik pFt,r (17)

with p the electric dipole (see, e.g., Jackson 18). In this approximation, we can set Aμ=-ikpμF(t,r) in four-dimensional notation, where pμ=p0, p. Due to the Lorentz condition μAμ=0, we have nμpμ=0 and therefore p0=n^p. It then follows that the electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor is

TEMαβ=k24πr2pμpμ nαnβ,

with pμpμ=n^×n^×p2.

If the space-time admits a time-like Killing vector ξα such that (αξβ)=0, the four-vector Jα=TEMαβξβ is conserved if βTEMαβ=0, that is αJα=0. In Minkowski space-time, such Killing vector can be simply ξα=1, 0 and thus, in the radiation zone, J 0 is the energy density and J=cJ0n^ is the Poynting vector. The electromagnetic power emitted by the dipole is cJ0r2dΩ.

3.2. Gravitational field

For the gravitational field in vacuum admitting a time-like Killing vector in the flat-space background, the four-vector

Jαλ' Tαβγδ ξβξγξδ

is conserved, αJα=0, due to the properties of the Killing vector and the Bel-Robinson tensor; a constant factor λ' has been included for later convenience. Thus, with ξα=1, 0, we can interpret J 0 as the “super-energy” density and J=cJ0n^ as the “super-Poynting vector”.

The angular integrals over products of the rectangular components of n^ are

n^in^j dΩ=4π3δij, (18)

n^in^jn^kn^l dΩ=4π15(δijδkl+δikδjl+δilδjk), (19)

from where it follows that

W dΩ=4π(715QijQij+29M¯2). (20)

Accordingly the “super-power” sP radiated is

sP=λGc5ω84πW dΩ, (21)

redefining λ'=λ c6/8π3G for comparison purposes. Observe that sP/λ has dimensions (energy / time3).

4. Discussion of results

Compare the above formula for sP with the well-known (and tested) standard formula for the total gravitational radiated power 1,2:

Pstandard=G45c5ω6QijQij (22)

with dimensions (energy / time) as it should be. The difference (beside the trace M¯) is that the super-power is proportional to ω8 while the standard power is proportional to ω6. In order for the two quantities to coincide (or at least be proportional), one could choose λω-2, but then the proportionality factor would not have a universal character since it would depend on the physical parameters of each particular system. This problem with dimensions has been noticed by most previous authors (for instance, a quantum of “super-energy” should be proportional to ω3 14).

In order to further clarify this point, let us remind how an equivalent problem is treated in electromagnetism. A distribution of electric charges and currents defines a four-vector Jmatterβ, and the electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor TEMαβ is not conserved since

βTEMαβ=c-1fαβJmatterβ.

On the other hand, the charged particles producing the currents define an energy-momentum tensor Tmatterαβ of matter such that

βTmatterαβ=-c-1fαβJmatterβ

due to the Lorentz force on the particles (see Landau and Lifshitz 1, Sect. 33). The net result is that the total energy-momentum tensor, electromagnetic plus matter, is conserved.

As for the Bel-Robinson tensor, its divergence does not vanish in the presence of matter 6. Accordingly, in order to relate the emitted super-power to some mechanical properties of a physical system (such as a binary pulsar), an independent definition of mechanical super-energy would be required (for instance, for a distribution of point-masses). Such definitions for an electromagnetic field 7 or a Klein-Gordon field has been proposed in the past 13,14. However, a useful definition should be obtained directly from the dynamical equations of motion for massive particles, analogous in general relativity to the Lorentz force equation. As far as this author knows, no such definition is known, and therefore a fully covariant formalism based on the Bel-Robinson tensor and applicable to practical problems, such as gravitational radiation, is still an open problem.

References

1. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields 4th ed., Sect. 67 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980) [ Links ]

2. M. Maggiore, Gravitational Wave s, Vol. 1. Sect. 3.1. (Oxford, Oxford U. Press, 2008) [ Links ]

3. D. Kennefick, Travelling at the Speed of Thought: Einstein and the Quest for Gravitational Waves (Princeton U. Press, USA, 2016) [ Links ]

4. J.H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, Astroph. J. 253 (1982) 908. [ Links ]

5. R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C.W. Misner, Phys. Rev. 121 (1961) 1556. [ Links ]

6. L. Bel, C.R. Acad. Sci. 246 (1958) 3015; C.R. Acad. Sci. 247 (1958) 2096; Gen. Rel. Grav. 32 (2000) 2047. [ Links ]

7. M. Chevreton, Nuovo Cimento 34 (1964) 901. [ Links ]

8. D.H. Tchrakian, Gen. Rel. Grav. 5 (1974) 379; Gen. Rel. Grav. 6 (1975) 151. [ Links ]

9. G.T. Horowitz and B.G. Schmidt, Proc. R. Soc. A 381 (1982) 215. [ Links ]

10. I. Krishnasamy, Gen. Rel. Grav. 17 (1985) 621. [ Links ]

11. M.A.G. Bonilla and J.M.M. Senovilla. Gen. Rel. Grav. 29 (1997) 91. [ Links ]

12. S. Deser, J.S. Franklin, and D. Seminara, Class. Quan. Grav. 16 (1999) 2815. [ Links ]

13. J.M.M. Senovilla. Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 2799. [ Links ]

14. P. Teyssandier, Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 26 (2001) 459. [ Links ]

15. R. Lazkoz, J.M.M. Senovilla, and R. Vera, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 4135. [ Links ]

16. I. Eriksson, Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2279. [ Links ]

17. L. B. Szabados, Living Rev. Relativ. 12 (2009) 4. [ Links ]

18. J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition, Sect. 9.2 (Wiley, USA, 1998) [ Links ]

Received: August 23, 2017; Accepted: September 11, 2017

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License