SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue4Short term determination of effectiveness and sustainability to fight halitosis of three commercial mouthwashesInnovative study on lactoferrin in periodontal disease author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista odontológica mexicana

Print version ISSN 1870-199X

Rev. Odont. Mex vol.15 n.4 Ciudad de México Oct./Dec. 2011

 

Original research

 

Calcium hydroxide influence and intrachannel medication in apical leakage

 

Jeanette Sanchez Ortega,* Jorge Guerrero,§ Haroldo Elorza,II Raul Luis Garcia Aranda

 

* Graduate, Endodontics specialty, National School of Dentistry, National University of Mexico.

§ Graduate School Professor, Dental Materials Laboratory, National School of Dentistry, National University of Mexico.

II Graduate School Professor. Statistics. National School of Dentistry, National University of Mexico.

Graduate School Professor, Endodontics, National School of Dentistry, National University of Mexico.

Correspondence

 

Received: 24 March 2010.
Accepted: 7 April 2010.

 

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of remaining Ca(OH)2 after three removal techniques as well as determining its influence on apical seal. Eighty extracted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper system®, dressed with Ca(OH)2 paste and stored 10% humidity at 37 °C for 7 days. Experimental groups according to the removal technique were: NaCIO 2.5% + EDTA (G1), NaCIO 2.5% + EDTA 18% and ultrasonic activation (G2); NaCIO and ultrasonic activation (G3). Forty teeth were longitudinally split in order to measure remaining Ca(OH)2. The other 40 specimens were obturated with ultrasonic condensation of gutta-percha technique. These teeth were cleared and apical leakage was measured. Statistical analysis showed difference among groups with respect to Ca(OH)2 removal (P < 0.03), Group G2 showed least amount of remaining Ca(OH)2. Likewise, leakage results showed statistical difference among groups (P < 0.01). Group 2 showed best results with respect to leakage. There was no statistical difference between groups 1 and 3. Conclusion: Irrigation with NaCIO 2.5% EDTA 18% and ultrasonic activation proved to be most effective in removing Ca(OH)2 from canal walls. Calcium hydroxide medication residuals inside canals might increase apical leakage.

Key words: Apical leakage, calcium hydroxide, intracanal medication, ultrasonic activation, sodium hypochloride, EDTA.

 

INTRODUCTION

In present endodontic therapy, calcium hydroxide (CaOH)2 is the most common internal canal medication. Its use as antibacterial and hard tissue stimulator justifies its being internally placed in the canals.1

It has been reported that, after use of some medications inside the canals, it is possible to observe their remains in 45% of canal walls, even after attempts are made to remove them.2,3

Before filling the root canal, the medication inside the canal must be removed with the aim of preparing dentine surface and propitiate optimal chemical and physical circumstances to achieve tridimensional seal, capable of avoiding filtration of bacteria and their toxins.3

Ca(OH)2 removal from the canal walls can imply a greater challenge today, since more efficient methods for placing it have been developed. These methods aim at having the paste making contact all along the dentin wall. Among them, we find application of Ca(OH)2 paste application with a lentulo, McSpadden compacters, placement with files and paper points, and placement with a syringe.4 In scientific literature there are many studies (Sigurdsson et al 1992, Cruz and Holland 2001) which grant the lentulo a better distribution of the Ca(OH)2 paste inside the canal.5,6

The most described method for the removal of Ca(OH)2 used in preparation of root canals is use of instruments with the last file in combination with abundant irrigation with sodium hypochloride (NaCIO) and EDTA.3 Nevertheless, it has been reported that irrigation and use of instruments by themselves do not completely cleanse the canals.7 Some irrigation protocols have incorporated passive ultrasonic irrigation component (PUI) with the purpose of removing dentin detritus. Ultrasonic irrigation is based on energy transmission from an oscillating instrument to the irrigating solution.8 Keene et al, 2006, have implemented an assessment of its effect with the purpose of increasing removal of Ca(OH)2. They report better results when compared to techniques where no ultrasound was applied.9

Ca(OH)2 remnants inside root canals can result in a thick, non homogeneous coating of sealing cement10 and could propitiate a chemical reaction with the canal sealer based on Zinc oxide and eugenol This can result in a reduction of work time due to the formation of calcium eugenolate.11

Margelos & Eliades, 1997, Cait & Serper 1999, and Kim & Kim, 2002, demonstrated that the presence of calcium hydroxide on the canal walls can affect penetration of sealants in the dentine tubules.10-12

The objectives of this study were to determine the amount of Ca(OH)2 after applying several irrigation techniques for their removal, as well as to determine the possible correlation of remaining Ca(OH)2 with apical leakage.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty single rooted lower human premolars were gathered and de-crowned with a diamond disk.

Two 1 mm deep grooves were performed with a fissure bur mesially and distally all along the root, to at a later point divide 40 specimens (those used for the Ca(OH)2 removal tests).

The 80 specimens were prepared with universal ProTaper system (Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Oklahoma USA®) according to manufacturer s specifications,13 up to file F4. Working length was determined to 1 mm from the canal apical foramen.

Irrigation protocol was carried out with 2.5% NaCIO and 80% EDTA (Ultradent®) during 3 minutes. Canals were dried with paper points. 

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE PLACEMENT

The Ca(OH)2 mix was made with powder and bi-distilled water to obtain a creamy consistence, this medication was placed with a number 35 lentulo (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaignes, Switzerland®). Access cavity was filled with Provisit® calcium phosphate based temporary obturation. All teeth were stored at 37 °C and 100% humidity during 7 days in an temperator oven (Felisa® Felisa oven, Guadalajara Mexico).

The sample was randomly divided in the following fashion: 3 experimental groups composed of 24 teeth and two control groups of four teeth each (positive and negative control). Each group received a different irrigation technique for removal of calcium hydroxide.

Group 1: 5 mL 2.5% NaCIO, EDTA 10% during 5 minutes, 5 mL NaCIO 2.5%.

Group 2: 5 mL NaCIO 2.5% and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) at 1 mm of working length during 60 seconds (E5 point (NSK®), EDTA 18% during 5 minutes and 5 ml of 2.5% NaCIO with PUI for 60 seconds.

Group 3: 5 mL of 2.5% NaCIO and PUI for 60 seconds.

Positive control: No removal technique was applied.

Negative control: No calcium hydroxide was placed.

The following tests were then applied:

TEST 1. CALCIUM HYDROXIDE REMOVAL

This test was carried out on half the experimental specimens (n = 36) and two control groups (n = 4). With the aid of a manual tube cutter, roots were divided according to the orientation of the clefts, two fragments were thus obtained (lingual and vestibular) with Lomo® stereoscopic microscope, digital pictures were taken at 20x, and with AutoCard 2009 (Autodesk®) program the area occupied by the Ca(OH)2 remnant in each third was measured.

TEST 2: APICAL LEAKAGE

This test was carried out with the other half of the experimental specimens (n = 36) and two control groups (n = 4). So as to differentiate them from the previous experiment, groups were named as follows: Group A, Group B and Group C. Each one corresponds to the aforementioned irrigation technique for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. After Ca(OH) removal from the canals, they were dried with paper points and obturated with gutta-percha non standardized Hygienic® cones and Roth 801 cement (Roth Root®, Roth Drug Company, Chicago, Ill. USA) with lateral compaction technique modified by ultrasound (ultrasonic obturation point E5 NSK®)

Coronary access was sealed with glass ionomer (Ketac Molar 3M ESPE®). The leakage test was carried out in the following fashion: Groups A, B, and C, as well as positive control groups had their root surface covered with paraffin wax, excepting the last three millimeters around the apex.

Negative control group specimens were totally covered with paraffin wax.

All samples were placed in black India ink (Pelikan® Pelikan Ink, Puebla, Mexico) on a grid, inside a 10 pound pressure per square inch (psi) vacuum bell. They were stored in that place for 72 hours at 37 °C. Later the roots were cleared with the Robertson & Leeb technique and examined with Lomo® stereoscopic microscope at 20x. Digital images were captured to be later measured with Transformer software (FO, UNAM, MX).

The surface showing higher microfiltration values in millimeters was recorded.

 

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Fisher parametric variance analysis was applied as well as the non parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Turkeys Post-hoc test in both experiments.

 

RESULTS

Ca(OH)2 mean removal results are shown in Table I. Apical leakage results are shown in Table II.

There is a statistically significant difference among the three groups with respect to the presence of Ca(OH)2 remnants in each third (P < 0.03) Group 2 shows a significant lesser amount of Ca(OH)2 remnants in all thirds (P ≤ 0.05). In the cervical third of this group a 5.87% mean of wall with remnants was observed, 0.16% in the middle third and 2.03 in the apical third (Figures 1 and 2). There was no statistically significant difference among thirds between groups 1 and 3 (P ≥ 0.7).

Statistical analysis of apical leakage test (Table II, Figures 3 and 4) shows there is a statistically significant difference among groups. Group B shows lower mean microfiltration (0.39 mm) when compared to Group A (4.78 mm) and Group C (4.78 mm). In turn, groups A and C did not show significant difference between them (P ≤ 0.5).

Figures 3 and 5 show that specimens of each group behave in a similar way in both experiments (Ca(OH)2 removal and apical leakage). The greater the amount of the Ca(OH)2 remnants on the canal walls, greater is lineal apical leakage.

 

DISCUSSION

The complete removal of Ca(OH)2 paste from the root canal system represents a challenge. It is necessary to determine whether the Ca(OH)2 remains have a positive or negative effect on the final obturation. Experimental studies carried out last decade, informed that apical leakage was lesser in groups where Ca(OH)2 had been applied in aqueous solution when compared to groups where no medication was applied.15,16 Holland et al (1995) explained that this leakage decrease was due to the fact that remnant Ca(OH)2 was incorporated to the sealing cement during obturation, which caused a decrease in cement permeability, or that Ca(OH)2 was mechanically forced into dentine tubules, blocking them , and thus causing this permeability decrease.16 It was also suggested that this better sealing was due to the formation of a Ca(OH)2 plug , which would operate as a matrix against which obturation material could be better condensed.

Nevertheless, in the present study, opposite results have been observed. Teeth with greater Ca(OH)2 remains showed higher leakage. This can be due to the fact that Ca(OH)2 presence could interfere in the adaptation of the dentinal walls.

In the previously mentioned studies, the staining used for leakage tests was methylene blue. It has been reported that Ca(OH)2 has a bleaching effect on methylene blue staining.17 Wu et al also studied this effect on six obturation materials, using 1% methylene blue; and found that bleaching effect reached a mean of 74%.7 This can be related to the high alkalinity presented by Ca(OH)2, and having this effect, modifies microfiltration results.

In the present study, India ink was used for leakage tests. The particles of this tincture are of a much larger size than methylene blue particles, but even so, are sufficiently small as to be able to penetrate into the obturation internal phase and dentinal walls in way comparable to that of bacteria found inside the channels.18

Recent research papers show results commensurate to those obtained in the present study. Goldberg et al (2002)19 assessed the influence that Ca(OH)2 medication between appointments could have in the obturation of accessory and lateral canals. The 20 teeth were worked with instruments and then simulated lateral canals were created. One group received Ca(OH)2 for seven days, while the other did not receive any medication inside the channel. Both groups were obturated with Ultrafil®. The group where no calcium hydroxide was applied significantly showed greater number of obturated lateral canals.19

Kim (2002)10 obtained similar results. With the use of stereomicroscopy, he observed that teeth which had not been medicated with Ca(OH)2 showed better sealing after performing leakage tests with India ink. The method to remove medication was to use a file larger than the one just used in the preparation, and irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. Filling of canals was carried out with conventional lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha and zinc oxide and eugenol sealer.10

Association of NaCIO and 17% EDTA for 3 minutes has proven to be effective to eliminate dentinal debris. Nevertheless, in this study EDTA importance does not only reside in its capacity to chelate calcium ions from the dentinal walls, it exerts the same effect on the Ca(OH)2 molecule facilitating the detachment and eviction of the material which is carried out with the activity of the ultrasonic energization. EDTA has also the capacity to neutralize Ca(OH)2 residues, which could prevent chemical reaction with the sealer cement.20

In this study it was observed that when EDTA was used in conjunction with 2.5% NaCIO and ultrasonic irrigation, there was an increase in the level of Ca(OH)2 removal in all three thirds. The walls of the canals were found to be almost free of Ca(OH)2 remnants (2% in the apical third). These results are comparable to those of a recent study wherein ultrasonic irrigation combined with 17% EDTA allowed the removal of Ca(OH)2 in almost a 98%.21 On the other hand, in the present study, when these three elements were not used in conjunction, the level of removed decreased, leaving in some specimens up to 80% dentinal walls covered with Ca(OH)2.

It has been demonstrated that traditional methods (hand instruments and irrigation with NaCIO and EDTA) are not efficient to remove all the material adhered to canal walls, leaving up to 45% of the surface covered with remnants.22 Salgado et al (2009)22 obtained similar results in a study carried out with scanning electronic microscopy . In this study, the worst result was obtained when Ca(OH)2 was removed with NaCIO irrigation only. The best cleansing was attained in groups where recapitulation with master file and irrigation with 0.5% NaCIO, 17% EDTA and Endo PTC® were used.

The use of ultrasound in combination with final irrigation protocol has been implemented from a few years back with the objective of removing dentin detritus resulting from the mechanical preparation of the canals. Kenee9 & AL, 2006, assessed the amount of Ca(OH)2 present in canals after removal following several techniques. Among these were included combinations of NaCIO and EDTA, rotary instruments, or ultrasound. It was found that none of the aforementioned techniques completely removed the material. Nevertheless, removal with rotary instruments and ultrasound irrigation significantly removed greater amounts of calcium hydroxide when compared to other techniques.9

A study by Van der Sluis & Versluis (2007)8 showed that the most effective Ca(OH)2 removal method was the use of ultrasonic irrigation and NaCIO. In that study a 63% average removal was achieved. This situation is similar to that presented in experimental group 3 in our study, where the same irrigation was used and apical level removal results were 80%. Nevertheless, this percentage can be raised if EDTA use is incorporated to the irrigation protocol, as can be observed in results of group 2 in our study (Figure 1).

During this study's experimental leakage process, it was decided to submit all specimens to a 10 psi pressure, to simulate intra osseous conditions, this would promote an active entry of the India ink towards the internal phase found between filling material and dentinal walls.

Results obtained in this study show that, the greater the amount of remnant Ca(OH)2 in the canal, greater will be apical leakage (Figures 3 and 5). This suggests that, even though this medication possesses beneficial antibacterial effects, if not removed, its presence can influence the sealing. This can be due to the ability Ca(OH)2 possesses to dissociate in the presence of water in Hydroxyl ions and calcium ions.23

The intense leakage observed in groups with larger amounts of Ca(OH)2 remnants can be due to the fact that theses remnants (calcium carbonate particles) can avoid the penetration of the sealing cement in the dentinal tubules, consequently impairing their sealing capacity and resulting thus in a potential decrease of the filling material itself.12

Some studies have observed fissures in the zinc oxide and eugenol cement coating when this compound is placed in the presence of retained Ca(OH)2. It has been associated with the formation of calcium eugenolate which increases the hardening speed of the sealing cement.10 In spite of all this, in the present study a eugenol and zinc oxide cement was used (Roth 801) since it the most commonly used in endodontics practice.

Future studies could be geared towards the determination of whether apical sealing is affected when using sealing cement of different nature (resinous or Ca(OH)2 in the presence of remnants of intrachannel medication.

 

CONCLUSION

Apical leakage is larger in canals which present greater remnants of calcium hydroxide.

The most efficient method to remove Ca(OH)2 paste from the canal walls is the use of a protocol of final irrigation combining sodium hypochloride as irrigating solution, EDTA as chelating agent, and ultrasonic energization. This favorably influences apical seal since it propitiates favorable conditions to achieve adaptation of filling materials to the root canal system.

 

REFERENCES

 

Mailing Address:
Jeanette Sanchez Ortega
Filosofía y Letras 80,
Copilco Universidad.
Del. Coyoacán,
México D.F.
Phone number: 5538473834
E-mail: janettsanchez@hotmail.com
rlga@servidor.unam.mx

 

Note

This article can be read in its full version in the following page: http://www.medigraphic.com/facultadodontologiaunam

1. Law A, Messer H. An evidence-based analysis of the antimicrobial effectiveness of intracanal medicaments. J Endod 2004; 30: 689-9.         [ Links ]

2. Evans MD, Baumgartner JC, Khemaleelakul S, Xia T. Efficacy of calcium hydroxide: Clorhexidine paste as an intracanal medication in bovine dentin. J Endod 2003; 29, 338-9.         [ Links ]

3. Lambrianidis T, Kosti E. Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/cholorhexidine medicaments from the root canal. Int Endodon J 2006; 39:55-61.         [ Links ]

4. Estrela C, Mamede-Neto I, Pécora JD. Root canal filling with calcium hydroxide using diferent techniques. Braz Dent J 2002; 13: 53-56.         [ Links ]

5. Sigurdson A, Stancil R, Madison S. Intracanal placement of Ca(OH)2: A comparison of techniques. J Endod 1992; 18: 367-70.         [ Links ]

6. Cruz GA, Holland R, Alfaro JF. Efecto de la colocación de pastas de hidróxido de calcio con diferentes vehículos, como medicación intraconducto, sobre el sellado apical de la obturación endodóncica. Braz Endod J 2001; 19: 284-92.         [ Links ]

7. Wu M-K, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Decoloration of 1% methylene blue solution in contact with dental filling materials. J Dentistry 1998; 26: 585-9.         [ Links ]

8. LW M van der Sluis, Versluis M. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Review. Int Endodon J 2007; 40 (6): 415-426.         [ Links ]

9. Kenee DM, Allemang JD, Johnson JD, Hellstein J, Nichol BK. A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Endodon 2006; 32 (6): 563-5.         [ Links ]

10. Kim S, Kim Y. Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication on apical seal. Int Endodon J 2002; 35: 623-628.         [ Links ]

11. Margelos J, Eliades G, Verdalis C, Palaghias G. Interaction of calcium hydroxide with zinc oxide eugenol type sealers: a potential clinical problema. J Endod 1997; 23: 43-8.         [ Links ]

12. Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endodon 1999; 25: 431-3.         [ Links ]

13. Robertson D, Leeb I, McKee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod 1980; (6): 421-24.         [ Links ]

14. Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper technique. Endodontic Topics 2005; 10(1): 187-90.         [ Links ]

15. Porkaew P, Retief DH, Barfield RD, Lacefield WR, Soong S. Effects of calium hydroxide paste as an intracanal medicament on apical seal. J Endod 1990; (16): 369-374.         [ Links ]

16. Holland R, Alexandre AC, Murata SS, Dos Santos CA, Dezan Jr. E. Apical leakeage following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995; 11: 261-263.         [ Links ]

17. Kontakiotis EG, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR. Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on seal of permanent root filling. Dental Traumatol 1997; 11: 261-4.         [ Links ]

18. Yoshikawa M, Noguchi K, Toda T. Effect of particle sizes in India ink onits use in evaluation of apical seal. Journal of Osaka Dental University 1997; 31: 67-70.         [ Links ]

19. Goldberg F, Artaza L. Inluence of calcium hydroxide dressing on the obturation of simulated lateral canals. J Endod 2002; 28 (2): 99-101.         [ Links ]

20. Teixeira CS, Felippe MCS, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endodon J 2005; (38): 285-290.         [ Links ]

21. Vehicle factor in calcium hydroxide removal. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 52: 40-47.         [ Links ]

22. Salgado R, Moura-Netto C. Comparison of different irrigants on calcium hydroxide medication removal: microscopic cleanliness evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Ora Pathol Oral Radiol Endodon 2009; 107 (4): 580-84.         [ Links ]

23. Peters OA, Peters C. Limpieza y conformación del sistema de conductos radiculares. En: Cohen S, Hargreaves K. Vías de la Pulpa . Novena Edición. Elsevier España: 2008: 300-309,548.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License