SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 issue2In vitro effect of diets for growing lambs supplemented with dried distillers grains on rumen fermentation and gas emissionsAgronomic response to osmotic stress of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Agrociencia

On-line version ISSN 2521-9766Print version ISSN 1405-3195

Agrociencia vol.52 n.2 Texcoco Feb./Mar. 2018

 

Food Science

Flour quality of three banana cultivars (Musa spp.) resistant to black Sigatoka disease in Tabasco

Judith Espinosa-Moreno1  * 

Dora Centurión-Hidalgo1 

Alberto Mayo-Mosqueda1 

Carolina García-Correa1 

Arturo Martínez-Morales1 

Pedro García-Alamilla1 

Laura M. Lagunes-Gálvez1 

1División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. 86298. Km 25 Carretera Villahermosa-Teapa, Ranchería La Huasteca 2ª Sección, Centro, Tabasco.


Abstract

Some cultivated varieties of banana (Musa spp.) -resistant to black Sigatoka disease, caused by Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet- have been subject to agronomical studies; however, the approval of these varieties is not successful because they are rejected for fresh consumption. An alternative for their use is to transform them into flour. The objective of this study was to determine the chemical and microbiological quality of banana flour from three cultivars resistant to this disease: Yangambi km 5 (AAA), FHIA-18 hybrid (AAAB), and Pisang Awak (ABB). The bunch and the fruit were characterized during the postharvest stage, and the chemical quality of the fruits was evaluated when the fruit reached its physiological maturity. In order to make flour, the bananas were washed with a chlorine solution, the peel was removed, the fruits were sliced, dehydrated at 60 °C -until a constant weight was achieved-, crushed, and sieved using a No. 70 sieve (212 µm). The flour was subject to proximate chemical and microbiological analysis. The experimental design was fully randomized with three treatments (the flour from each one of the three cultivars), all the evaluations were done in triplicate, the results were analyzed using the GLM procedure, and the means were compared using the Tukey test (p≤0.05). The Yangambi km 5 cultivar had the lightest bunches (14.66±2.65 kg); the FHIA-18 hybrid presented the heaviest fruits (120.67±11.1 g) and the thickest peels (0.33±0.02 cm); and the Pisang Awak cultivar had the highest pulp-shell ratio (2.16±0.24). The fruit of the Pisang Awak cultivar presented less moisture (64.02±0.54 %), more dry matter (35.97±0.96 %), and less total soluble solids (0.80±0.17 °Brix); the evaluated cultivars showed no differences in pH and titratable acidity. The Pisang Awak cultivar had the highest flour yield (35.73±1.24 %), less protein (2.79±0.06 %), and higher ethereal extract (0.67±0.01 %). The FHIA-18 hybrid had the highest protein (3.53±0.05 %) and ash content (2.06±0.16 %). The characteristics in physiological maturity of bananas bunches allowed to obtain flour with good quality variables.

Key words: flour quality; Musa spp.; Yangambi km 5; FHIA-18; Pisang Awak; Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet

Resumen

Algunas variedades cultivadas de banano (Musa spp.) resistentes a la enfermedad de Sigatoka negra, causada por Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet, se han estudiado agronómicamente, pero la adopción de estas variedades no es efectiva pues son rechazadas para su consumo fresco. Una alternativa para su aprovechamiento es transformarlas en harina. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la calidad química y microbiológica de la harina de banano de tres cultivares resistentes a esta enfermedad: Yangambi km 5 (AAA), híbrido FHIA-18 (AAAB) y Pisang Awak (ABB). La caracterización poscosecha se realizó al racimo y al fruto, y la calidad química de los frutos se evaluó en madurez fisiológica. Para obtener harina, los frutos se lavaron con una solución clorada, la cáscara se eliminó, se rebanaron, deshidrataron a 60 °C hasta peso constante, se trituraron y tamizaron (tamiz de 212 µm; N° 70). En la harina se realizaron análisis químico proximal y microbiológico. El diseño experimental fue completamente al azar con tres tratamientos (la harina de cada uno de los tres cultivares), todas las evaluaciones se hicieron por triplicado, los resultados se analizaron con el procedimiento GLM y las medias se compararon con la prueba de Tukey (p≤0.05). El cultivar Yangambi km5 presentó el peso menor de racimo (14.66±2.65 kg), el híbrido FHIA-18 presentó el peso mayor de fruto (120.67±11.1 g) y el grosor mayor de cáscara (0.33±0.02 cm), y el cultivar Pisang Awak tuvo la relación mayor pulpa-cáscara (2.16±0.24). El fruto del cultivar Pisang Awak presentó menor humedad (64.02±0.54 %), mayor materia seca (35.97±0.96 %) y menos sólidos solubles totales (0.80±0.17 °Brix); en pH y acidez titulable no hubo diferencias entre los cultivares evaluados. El cultivar Pisang Awak tuvo el rendimiento mayor de harina (35.73±1.24 %), menos proteína (2.79±0.06 %) y extracto etéreo mayor (0.67±0.01 %). El híbrido FHIA-18 presentó el mayor contenido de proteína (3.53±0.05 %) y de cenizas (2.06±0.16 %). Las características en madurez fisiológica del racimo de banano permitieron obtener harina con buenas variables de calidad.

Palabras clave: calidad harina; Musa spp.; Yangambi km 5; FHIA-18; Pisang Awak; Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet

Introduction

Banana (Musa spp.) is the main crop in humid and warm regions. Its production is distributed in 20 countries, out of which Mexico holds the 10th place (FAOSTAT, 2012). The State of Tabasco is the second domestic producer of banana (SIAP, 2015). Black Sigatoka disease -caused by Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet fungus- is a phytosanitary problem that affects the banana commercial production in most of the producing regions. Fruit losses can be total and represent up to 30 % of production costs (Marín et al., 2003). A strategy to solve this problem is to select natural genotypes or those coming from breeding programs that are resistant or tolerant to this disease, and present good agronomic characteristics (Dadzie, 1998). These programs have included the use of the Yangambi km 5 dessert banana cultivar (AAA). In the Democratic Republic of Congo, its country of origin, its name means “many small fruits” (Daniells and Bryde, 1995; Daniells et al., 2001). Another cultivar is Pisang Awak (ABB) -which means bananas in Malay-; its peel is light green and waxy when it is unripe, and pale yellow and slightly waxy when it is ripe. These distinctive colors can often be enough to identify the Pisang Awak fruits (Wang and Kepler, 2009) that are used in all East African countries to brew beer (FHIA, 2003). The genetic improvement program of Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agrícola (FHIA) has had great success in the creation and scattering of hybrids of all types, resistant or tolerant to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Panama disease) and Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet (Black Sigatoka) fungi, and to Pratylenchus spp. and Radopholus similis nematodes. Some of those hybrids are: dessert bananas (FHIA-17, FHIA-23), French type plantains (FHIA-20, FHIA-21), sweet and sour bananas (FHIA-01, FHIA-18, FHIA-26), and cooking bananas (FHIA-03, FHIA-25). The FHIA-18 is consumed both fresh and processed. A special characteristic of this hybrid is that the unripe and mature pulp does not turn brown, making it ideal for processing. When cooked green, it has an attractive creamy color, with excellent texture and flavor. Fruit processed while it is still unripe (tajaditas) has a creamy color, is crunchy, and has a concentrated bittersweet flavor (FHIA, 2014).

Banana has a special place in the daily diet of millions of people, and is a basic food consumed fresh or cooked. This fruit can be transformed into products that can be packed and stored for various periods, such as banana purée, dehydrated bananas, flour, starch, banana chips, juice, flakes, cereal, vinegar, alcoholic beverages, canned slices, essence, bread, cookies, cakes, jam, jelly, and crystallized cubes (Mohapatra et al., 2011).

The production of green banana flour is an excellent alternative to minimize postharvest losses and to retain the nutritional value of fresh bananas. This flour is rich in resistant starch and dietary fiber that helps to keep the colon healthy (Pragati et al., 2014). Flour can be made from banana pulp or skin as a result of the drying procedure. The flour keeps its original vitamin, protein, and mineral salt properties intact, and its weight decreases by one third (which facilitates its transportation and storage). This product does not depend on crop seasonality, and losses caused by excess ripening are avoided. In addition, its powdery form facilitates its industrial handling (Robles, 2007). Banana flour is incorporated into cookies (Aparicio-Sanguilán et al., 2007), high-fiber bread (Juárez-García et al., 2006), and edible films (Rungsinee and Natcharee, 2007), making them slowly digestible. According to the Colombian Technical Standard 2799 -published by the Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC, 2002) for the banana flour industries-, the use of sweeteners, flavoring, or coloring, and any other additive is not allowed in the flour. Flour must be free of dust particles or any other strange pollutant material, and it must be free of toxic materials (such as pesticides and herbicides).

Resistant banana cultivars face a lack of acceptance by consumers as fresh fruit, because the peel of some of them presents unpleasant spots, and the taste of others is different to commercial varieties. Therefore, it is necessary to find processing alternatives that encourage its consumption. In Mexico, the sanitary or nutritional requirements of banana flour are not regulated. Consequently, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of banana flour of three cultivars in physiological maturity that are resistant to black Sigatoka disease (Yangambi km 5, FHIA-18, Pisang Awak).

Materials and Methods

In this study, banana bunches in physiological maturity from FHIA-18 (AAAB), Yangambi km 5 (AAA), and Pisang Awak (ABB) cultivars were used. The plot where they were obtained was located in the community of Cumuapa (Cunduacán, Tabasco, Mexico), 18° 01’ 03” N, 93° 07’ 39” W, at 10 m altitude. The research was conducted in two harvest cycles (September 2014 and October 2015). The plants were set up in a fully randomized block design with four replicates, and all the cultivars were randomly assigned in the plots within the blocks. Each plot had six plants with 2.5 m x 3 m spacing between them, and a local cultivar was used between rows. Fertilization was carried out twice a year using Triple 17. The bagging was carried out two weeks after the appearance of inflorescence. No shoring of the plants whatsoever was required.

The evaluation of the postharvest characteristics of the fruit in physiological maturity was carried out using five bunches per cultivar. In order to determine the bunch weight, the hands were separated from the stalks, and each stalk and each hand were weighed in a Torrey digital control scale (Model L-EQ 5/10, 10 kg capacity, Mexico). The hands were placed in tanks with chlorine water (125 mg L-1 sodium hypochlorite) to favor the coagulation of the latex that flows from the breaking point, as well as its elimination (Arias and Toledo, 2000). In order to evaluate the fruit characteristics, the middle finger of the second hand was selected to reduce the variation. Pulp and peel were separated and weighed in order to determine their ratio. The finger was subject to a cross section at the central point, the fruit was peeled, and the peel and pulp thickness were measured using a digital caliper (Caldi-6MP, China) (Dadzie and Orchard, 1997).

Moisture, dry matter (DM), total soluble solids, pH, and titratable acidity were determined in order to characterize the quality of the fruit in physiological maturity. The samples were placed in an oven (Yamato Model DX400, USA), with temperature control, and air circulation, at 100 °C for 24 h in order to determined its moisture, the samples were cooled to 26 °C in a desiccator, and weighed on an analytical balance (Adam Equipment, USA) (Dadzie and Orchard, 1997).

The total soluble solids were measured based on the refractive index of the pulp juice using a digital refractometer (Hanna Instruments, USA) following the instructions described in the method 940.31 of AOAC (2000). For this evaluation, 30 g of pulp tissue -taken from a cross section of the middle part of the fruit- were homogenized for 2 min, in 90 mL of distilled water (ratio 1:3, p:v), using a hand blender (Cuisinart Model HB-154PC, France); subsequently, the juice was filtered through a sieve (Dadzie and Orchard, 1997).

The titratable acidity was measured according to AOAC (2000), 30 g of pulp tissue were weighed, 90 mL of distilled water were added, the mixture was homogenized for 2 min, and the juice was filtered. Twenty-five mL of the filtrate were transferred to a 125-mL Erlenmeyer flask; then 25 mL of distilled water and 5 drops of 1 % phenolphthalein indicator in alcohol solution were added. The acidity of the filtrate was titrated with 0.1 N NaOH. The results were expressed as malic acid meq per 100 g of sample.

The pH of the pulp juice was measured with a pH-meter (Hanna Instruments, USA). In order to achieve this, 30 g of banana pulp were weighed, 90 mL of distilled water were added, the mixture was homogenized for 2 min, and it was filtered to obtain the juice (AOAC, 2000).

To make the flour, a hand in the first stage of maturity was weighed and separated from each banana cultivar, the fingers were peeled, and the peel was eliminated. The pulp was cross cut into 3-4 mm thick slices (average) and placed in the trays of the tray dryer (Polinox, Mexico, capacity 8 kg) with integrated automatic temperature control. Internal temperature was controlled at 60 °C for 18 h and the dried slices were weighed to calculate the yield. A Siemens pulverizing mill (with a 5 HP motor, Germany) was used to reduce the particle size. A No. 70 sieve (212 µm) was used to homogenize particle size (method 925.22, AOAC, 2000). Then, the flour was packed in heat sealed cellophane bags to keep it from absorbing moisture from the environment while it was kept in storage awaiting analysis.

The sample was prepared for its microbiological analysis in accordance with NOM-110-SSA1-1994. In order to quantify aerobic mesophilic bacteria, the samples were incubated for 24 h at 31±1 °C, using Tryptone Glucose Yeast Extract Agar (Bioxon Standard Method Agar). Total coliform bacteria were quantified in plates with 30-300 colonies (NOM-092-SSA1-1994), using Violet Red Bile Dextrose Agar, (VRBD, Bioxon), incubating the sample for 24 h at 31±1° C in a bacteriological oven (Thelco, USA) (NOM-113-SSA1-1994). The fungi and yeasts were quantified on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Bioxon), incubating the sample for 48 h at 25 °C (NOM-111-SSA1-1994).

In the proximate chemical analysis of the flour, the percentage of total nitrogen was determined by the Kjeldahl method using a factor 6.5 to obtain the percentage of crude protein (AOAC, 2000). Ash determination was carried out by the incineration method (AOAC, 2000) using a Felisa muffle furnace (Model Fe-340, Mexico). The ethereal extract was determined using the Soxhlet technique according to the official method of AOAC (2000). Crude fiber was quantified using the procedure of the NMX-F-090-S-1978 Standard.

The experimental design was fully randomized with three treatments: one per each of the three banana cultivars from which the flour was made. All the evaluations were done in triplicate. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA with the GLM procedure and the means were compared with the Tukey test (p=0.5) using SAS 9.2 for Windows (SAS Institute, 2009). In addition, the Pearson test (p≤0.05) was used to correlate the physical and chemical variables of the three treatments.

Results and Discussion

Bunch weight-number of hands-stalks weight ratio

In order to establish the banana flour yield, the ratio of the bunch weight to the number of hands and the stalk weight had to be determined. The FHIA-18 and Pisang Awak cultivars had the heavier bunches. The number of hands and the stalk weight per bunch were not statistically different among cultivars (Table 1). In Honduras, the average bunch weight of the FHIA-18 cultivar varies from 20 to 25 kg, with 120 to 160 fingers per bunch in 8 to 10 hands (FHIA, 2014); meanwhile, the bunch weight of the Yangambi km 5 cultivar ranges from 8.1 to 11.7 kg and the stalk weight from 0.9 to 1.2 kg, with 5.9 to 8.3 hands (Vargas and Sandoval, 2005).

Table 1 Postharvest characteristics of banana bunches. 

Cultivar Peso de racimo (kg) Número de manos por racimo Peso de raquis (kg)
Pisang Awak 19.34 ± 4.4 a 13.5 ± 3.4 a 2.12 ± 0.48 a
FHIA-18 23.21 ± 2.41 a 11.5 ± 1.9 a 1.96 ± 0.63 a
Yangambi km5 14.66 ± 2.65 b 10.6 ± 1.3 a 1.29 ± 0.17 a

Mean ± SD with different letters in each column are statistically different (p≤0.05).

For the production of green banana flour as an alternative to minimize postharvest losses, the cultivar with the highest flour yield is selected. The amount of flour depends on the size of the bunch and the fruits, as well as on the cultivation tasks and the pre and postharvest handling.

Postharvest indexes

Among the characteristics of the fruit in physiological maturity, the middle finger weight of the second hand of FHIA-18 significantly exceeded Pisang Awak and Yangambi km 5 (Table 2). Regarding the pulp-peel ratio, Pisang Awak surpassed FHIA-18 and Yangambi km 5. Peel thickness depended on the cultivar: FHIA-18 showed greater thickness than the other cultivars, which implies that FHIA-18 has greater mesocarp protection from mechanical damage that degrades the final flour quality. There were no significant differences between the cultivars’ pulp thickness.

Table 2 Characteristics of banana fruit in physiological maturity. 

Cultivar Peso del fruto (g) Relación pulpa-cáscara Grosor de la cáscara (cm) Grosor de la pulpa (cm)
Pisang Awak 66.67 ± 18.5 b 2.16 ± 0.24 a 0.26 ± 0.01 b 2.89 ± 0.37 a
FHIA-18 120.67 ± 11.1 a 1.43 ± 0.32 b 0.33 ± 0.02 a 2.47 ± 0.19 a
Yangambi. km 5 67.00 ± 10.8 b 1.66 ± 0.33 b 0.28 ± 0.03 b 2.49 ± 0.07 a

Mean ± SD with different letters in each column are statistically different (Tukey, p≤0.05).

Aguilar et al. (2004) reported that peel thickness and pulp thickness of FHIA-18 were 0.2 cm and 2.35 cm, respectively. These values are similar to those found in our study. In the case of the Pisang Awak cultivar, the closest to the AAB group found in the bibliography was the Cardaba cultivar, whose pulp-peel ratio, peel thickness, and pulp thickness values are 1.9 cm, 0.38 cm, and 3.8 cm, respectively (Belayneh et al., 2013). These values are greater than those of our study, except the pulp-peel ratio. This characteristic of FHIA-18 -whose fruit weight is almost twice as the fruits of the other two cultivars- make it more advantageous with regard to flour production.

Physical and chemical variables

In the fruits evaluated in physiological maturity, moisture content, DM, and total soluble solids were statistically higher in Pisang Awak, in relation to the other varieties studied (Table 3). The physical and chemical variables of these banana cultivars indicate that moisture and DM are directly related to the fruit weight, demonstrating that Pisang Awak is ideal for flour production.

Table 3 Quality characteristics of banana fruit in physiological maturity (wet basis). 

Cultivar Humedad (%) Materia seca (%) Sólidos solubles totales (°Brix) Acidez titulable
(meq NaOH 100 g-1)
pH
Pisang Awak 64.02 ± 0.54 b 35.97 ± 0.96 a 0.80 ± 0.17 b 0.93 ± 0.6 a 6.70 ± 0.62 a
FHIA-18 76.45 ± 3.90 a 23.50 ± 3.9 b 1.70 ± 0.17 a 1.0a ± 0.7 a 5.73 ± 0.70 a
Yangambi km 5 73.06 ± 0.96 a 26.94 ± 0.96 b 1.60 ± 0.45 a 1.30 ± 0.7 a 6.06 ± 0.75 a

Mean ± SD with different letters in each column are statistically different (Tukey, p≤0.05).

For the characteristics of FHIA-18 green fruit (in physiological maturity), Aguilar et al. (2004) reported 70.7 % moisture and 29.3 % DM, and while the first was higher than that found in our study for the same cultivar, the second was lower. Abano and Sam-Amoah (2011) found 75 to 77 % moisture and 25 to 27 % DM in Gros Michel green bananas (AAA); the latter is very close to that found in the Yangambi km 5 cultivar. Belayneh et al. (2013) reported 29.0 % DM in the Cardaba variety, which is less than that of the Pisang Awak cultivar. Kaddumukasa et al. (2005) determined 0.5±0.2 °Brix in East African Highland green bananas, which is lower than the value for Pisang Awak. In addition, Belayneh et al. (2013) reported 1.6 °Brix in Kitawira and Matoke, a value similar to that found in Yangambi km 5. Borges et al. (2009) reported a 0.63 % titrable acidity in the Prata variety, which is lower than that of the three cultivars in our study, while Belayneh et al. (2013) found 1.9 % titratable acidity in Cardaba, which almost doubles the value for Pisang Awak in our study. Finally, Belayneh et al (2013) determined a 6.3 pH in the Cardaba variety, while Ojure and Quadri (2012) established a 6.1 pH; these values are close to those found in our study for Yangambi km 5 and Pisang Awak, respectively.

The flour pH values are within the accepted range for commercial flours (above 5.6) (COVENIN, 1985). The flour titratable acidity of the three banana varieties ranged from 0.93 to 1.30 meq NaOH 100 g-1. That acidity is much higher than the one established by the NTE INEN 616 (0.2 %) for high-quality wheat flour. This difference is probably the result of using different vegetable sources.

Flour yield

Regarding flour yield, Pisang Awak surpassed Yangambi km 5 and FHIA-18 (Table 4). Suntharalingam and Ravindran (1993) reported an average flour yield of 31.3 % and 25.5 % for the Monthan (ABB) and Alukehel (ABB) cultivars, respectively; however, in our study, the Pisang Awak cultivar -which belongs to the same group- had a greater yield.

Table 4 Flour yield. 

Cultivar %
Pisang Awak 35.73 ± 1.24 a
FHIA-18 27.50 ± 0.49 b
Yangambi km 5 26.96 ± 0.93 b

Mean ± SD with different letters are statistically different (Tukey, p≤0.05).

Proximate chemical analysis

Table 5 presents the chemical composition of banana flour from the three cultivars. The cultivars showed contrasting yields: FHIA-18 surpassed Yangambi km 5 and Pisang Awak in crude protein content; there were no differences in crude fiber; with regard to ashes, FHIA-18 only exceeded Pisang Awak; in ethereal extract content, Pisang Awak surpassed both FHIA-18 and Yangambi km 5. The carbohydrates results were very similar in the three cultivars (p˃0.05).

Table 5 Proximate chemical analysis of banana flour (dry basis). 

Cultivar Proteína cruda (%) Fibra cruda (%) Extracto etéreo (%) Cenizas (%) Hidratos de carbono (%)
Pisang Awak 2. 97 ± 0.06 c 1.30 ± 0.15 a 0.67 ± 0.01 a 1.72 ± 0.03 b 83.99 a
FHIA-18 3.53 ± 0.05 a 1.37 ± 0.04 a 0.61 ± 0.04 b 2.06 ± 0.16 a 83.96 a
Yangambi km 5 3.13 ± 0.04 b 1.27 ± 0.06 a 0.59 ± 0.02 b 1.87 ± 0.05 ab 83.89 a

Mean ± SD with different letters in each column are statistically different (Tukey, p≤0.05).

Vieira et al. (2013) reported 4.14 % protein, 0.453 % lipids, 1.084 % ash, and 86.92 % carbohydrates in Cavendish green banana flour (AAA); the protein and carbohydrates values are higher than those found in Yangambi km 5, but lipids and ashes values are lower in the same cultivar. Ojure and Quadri (2012) analyzed the banana flour of the Musa paradisiaca normalis variety and reported 2.20 % ash, 3.40 % protein, 1.40 % crude fiber, and 89.50 % carbohydrates, and ash, protein, and fiber values similar to those of the FHIA-18 cultivar studied. Pragati et al. (2014) found 0.5 % lipids and 5.52 % ashes in the Cavendish banana flour (AAA) and the value of lipids was similar to that of the Yangambi km 5 cultivar. Borges et al. (2009) found 0.70 % lipids, 4.73 % protein, 90.72 % carbohydrates, 1.17 % fiber, and 2.68 % ashes in the Prata cultivar; these values are higher than those of the three cultivars, excepted with regard to fiber. Wenzel et al. (2011) analyzed the Nanicão green banana flour (AAA) and reported 3.6 % protein, 3.14 % ash, and 0.89 % lipids, while the values of ashes and lipids are higher than those found in the FHIA-18 cultivar studied.

The correlation between moisture and pH (r=0.639), protein and ash (r=0.833), protein and total soluble solids (r=0.700), and pH and titratable acidity (r=0.711) was positive. However, the correlation between moisture and total soluble solids (r=-0.810), ash and ethereal extract (r=-0.740), ethereal extract and total soluble solids (r=-0.685), and pH and total soluble solids (r=-0.830) was negative. Therefore, the crude protein and crude fiber percentage is an important factor in the quality of banana flour and it would improve the nutritional quality of the various food products made from that flour.

Microbiological analysis

The microbiological analysis of the flour of the three cultivars showed no significant differences (p˃0.5) between the three microbial groups analyzed (Table 6). Ojure and Quadri (2012) studied the Musa paradisiaca normalis banana flour and reported 2.1x102 CFU g-1 of total mesophilic bacteria, and 1.1x102 CFU g-1 of fungi and yeast but did not detect total coliforms.

Table 6 Microbiological analysis of banana flour of three cultivars. 

Cultivar Bacterias mesófilas aerobias (UFC g-1) Hongos y levaduras (UFC g-1) Coliformes totales (UFC g-1)
Pisang Awak 5.1x105 3.9x102 18.3
FHIA-18 3.8x105 0.90x102 21.7
Yangambi km 5 2.1x105 0.42x102 106.3

There were no statistical differences between cultivars (Tukey, p˃0.05).

Although Mexico does not have a banana flour standard, the Official Mexican Standard NOM-247-SSA1-2008 specifies the microbiological limits for cereals and cereal flour: the presence of microorganisms in the ranges of 100000 CFU g-1 (aerobic mesophilic bacteria), 100 CFU g-1 (total coliforms), and 1000 CFU g-1 (fungi and yeasts) for wheat flour. The flour obtained from the three cultivars had values above the limits for aerobic mesophilic bacteria, while the Pisang Awak cultivar showed more fungi and yeasts than those accepted in the criteria for wheat flour; meanwhile, the Yangambi km 5 cultivar flour had a greater number of total coliforms. Those differences may be mainly the result of the way that the fruit was handled during the making of the flour, which could be reduced by improving the hygienic conditions of the process site.

The Colombian Technical Standard for banana flour (ICONTEC, 2002) establishes a range of 2x105 CFU g-1 aerobic mesophilic bacteria, 2x103 CFU g-1 fungi and yeasts, and a maximum of 150 CFU g-1 total coliforms. The flour of the three varieties studied is higher than the criterion established for total mesophilic bacteria, but within the range for total coliforms and fungi and yeasts.

Conclusion

The characteristics of banana bunches in physiological maturity resulted in a flour with good quality parameters, fulfilling most of the chemical and microbiological requirements established in the Colombian Technical Standard 2799. These values are a little higher than those allowed for crude fiber and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria. This opens a potential for the industrial use of these three cultivars whose consumption as fresh fruit is not fully accepted. Based on the results obtained, the FHIA-18 cultivar has the best characteristics for flour production.

Literatura Citada

Abano, E. E., and L. K. Sam-Amoah. 2011. Effects of different pretreatments on drying characteristics of banana slices. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 6: 121-129. [ Links ]

Aguilar, H., S. Mendoza, and H. Banegas. 2004. Evaluación poscosecha de materiales híbridos de banano y plátano. Informe Técnico 2003. Programa de Banano y Plátano. Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agrícola. La Lima, Cortés, Honduras, C.A. pp: 72-78. http://www.fhia.org.hn/dowloads/informes_tecnicos/it2003banano.pdf . (Consulta: marzo 2015). [ Links ]

AOAC. 2000. Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis 17th Edition. Gainthersburg, MD, USA. [ Links ]

Aparicio-Sanguilán, A., S. G. Sáyago-Ayerdi, A. Vargas-Torres, J. Tovar, T. E. Ascencio-Otero, and L. A. Bello-Pérez. 2007. Slowly digestible cookies prepared from resistant starch-rich lintnerized banana starch. J. Food Compos. Anal. 20: 175-181. [ Links ]

Arias, V., C., y J. Toledo H. 2000. Manual de manejo postcosecha de frutas tropicales (papaya, piña, plátanos, cítricos). Roma, FAO. 136 p. [ Links ]

Belayneh, M., T. S. Workneh, and D. Belew. 2013. Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of some cooking banana (Musa spp.) for boiling and frying process. J. Food Sci. Technol. 51: 3635-3646. [ Links ]

Borges, A. M., J. Pereira, and E. M. P. Lucena. 2009. Caracterizacao da farinha de banana verde. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. (Campinas, Braz.). 29: 333-339. [ Links ]

COVENIN. 1993. Harina de arroz. Nº 2300-93. Comisión Venezolana de Normas Industriales. Caracas. Venezuela. 9 p. [ Links ]

Dadzie, B. K. 1998. Post-harvest characteristics of black Sigatoka resistant banana, cooking banana and plantain hybrids. Technical Guidelines INIBAP 4. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy; International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, Montpellier, France. 74 p. [ Links ]

Dadzie, B. K., y J. E. Orchard. 1997. Evaluación rutinaria postcosecha de híbridos de bananos y plátanos: criterios y métodos. Guías técnicas INIBAP 2. Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos, Roma, Italia; Red Internacional para el Mejoramiento del Banano y el Plátano, Montpellier, Francia. 76 p. [ Links ]

Daniells J., y N. Bryde. 1995. Un mutante semienano de ‘Yangambi km 5’. INFOMUSA 4: 16-17. [ Links ]

Daniells J., C. Jenny, D. Karamura, and K. Tomekpe. 2001. Diversity of the genus Musa. Cultivated varieties AAA. In: Arnaud, E., and S. Sharrock (eds). Musalogue. A Catalogue of Musa Germplasm. Montpellier, France: IPGRI/INIBAP, CTA, Cirad-Flhor. p. 72. [ Links ]

FAOSTAT. 2012. Agriculture Data Base, Crops. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx . (Consulta: junio 2015). [ Links ]

FHIA. 2003. Programa de Banano y Plátano. Informe Técnico 2002. Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agrícola. La Lima Cortés, Honduras, C.A. http://www.fhia.org.hn/dowloads/informes_tecnicos/itecnicobyp2002.PDF . (Consulta: mayo 2015). 102 p. [ Links ]

FHIA. 2014. Banano FHIA-18. Programa de Banano y Plátano. Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agrícola. San Pedro Sula, Cortés, Honduras, C.A. http://www.fhia.org.hn/dowloads/info_hibridos/fhia-18.pdf . (Consulta: mayo 2015). 4 p. [ Links ]

ICONTEC. 2002. Norma Técnica Colombiana 2799. Industrias alimentarias. Harina de banano. Descriptores Producto Alimenticio; harina de plátano; harina, contenido de grasa. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación. http://tienda.icontec.org/brief/NTC2799.pdf . (Consulta: febrero 2015). 6 p. [ Links ]

Juárez-García, E., E. Agama-Acevedo, S. G. Sáyago-Ayerdi, S. L. Rodríguez-Ambriz, and L. A. Bello-Pérez. 2006. Composition, digestibility and application in breadmaking of banana flour. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 61: 131-137. DOI: 10.1007/s11130-006-0020-x. [ Links ]

Kaddumukasa, P., W. Kyamuhangire, J. Muyonga, and F. I. Muranga. 2005. The effect of drying methods on the quality of green banana flour. Afr. Crops Sci. Conference Proc.7: 1267-1271. [ Links ]

Marín, D. H., R. A. Romero, M. Guzmán, and T. B. Sutton. 2003. Black Sigatoka: an increasing threat to banana cultivation. Plant Dis. 87: 208-222. [ Links ]

Mohapatra, D., S. Mishra, B. C. Singh, and S.D. Jayas. 2011. Post-harvest processing of banana: Opportunities and challenges. Food Bioprocess Technol. 4: 327-339. [ Links ]

NMX-F-090-S-1978. Determinación de Fibra Cruda en Alimentos, México. 3 p. [ Links ]

NOM-092-SSA1-1994. Bienes y Servicios. Método para la cuenta de Bacterias Aerobias en placa. México. 5 p. [ Links ]

NOM-110-SSA1-1994. Bienes y servicios. Preparación y dilución de muestras de alimentos para su análisis microbiológico. México. 5 p. [ Links ]

NOM-111-SSA1-1994, Bienes y Servicios. Método para la cuenta de Mohos y Levaduras en alimentos. México. 6 p. [ Links ]

NOM-113-SSA1-1994. Bienes y Servicios. Método para la Cuenta de Microorganismos Coliformes Totales en Placa. México. 7 p. [ Links ]

NOM-247-SSA1-2008. Productos y servicios. Cereales y sus productos. Cereales, harinas de cereales, sémolas o semolinas. Alimentos a base de: cereales, semillas comestibles, de harinas, sémolas o semolinas o sus mezclas. Productos de panificación. Disposiciones y especificaciones sanitarias y nutrimentales. Métodos de prueba. México. 117 p. [ Links ]

NTE INEN. 616. 2015. Norma Técnica Ecuatoriana. Harina de trigo. Requisitos. Cuarta revisión. 2015-01. http://www.normalizacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/nte-inen-616-4.pdf . (Consulta: marzo de 2017). 11 p. [ Links ]

Ojure, M. A., and J. A. Quadri. 2012. Quality evaluation of noodles produced from unripe plantain flour using Xhanthan Gum. IJRRAS.13: 740-752. [ Links ]

Pragati, S., I. Genitha, and K. Ravish. 2014. Comparative study of ripe and unripe banana flour during storage. J. Food Process. Technol. 5: 1-6. [ Links ]

Robles, K. 2007. Harina y productos de banano. Documento. Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle. pp: 11-33. [ Links ]

Rungsinee, S., and P. Natcharee. 2007. Oxygen permeability and mechanical properties of banana films. Food Res. Int. 40: 365-370. [ Links ]

SAS Institute. 2009. SAS/SAT 9.2. User’s Guide. Second Edition. Cary, N.C., USA. SAS Institute Inc. [ Links ]

SIAP. 2015. Resumen Nacional de la Producción Agrícola, Octubre de 2015. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=296 (Consulta: noviembre 2015). [ Links ]

Suntharalingam, S., and G. Ravindran. 1993. Physical and biochemical properties of green banana flour. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 43: 19-27. [ Links ]

Vargas, A., and J. A. Sandoval. 2005. Agronomic evaluation of production and quality of ‘Yangambi km 5’ (AAA) and ‘Dátil’ (AA). INFOMUSA 14: 6-10. [ Links ]

Vieira, B. C., R. A. M. Da Cruz, E. R. Amante, and D. S. L. H. Meller. 2013. Nutritional potential of Green banana flour obtained by drying in spouted bed. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 35: 1140-1146. [ Links ]

Wang, K., and A. Kepler. 2009. Brief Description of Banana Cultivars Available from the University of Hawaii Seed Program. Available from the University of Hawaii Seed Program. http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/sustainag/Downloads/Description_of_banana_available_at_ADSC.pdf . (Consulta: enero 2015). 11 p. [ Links ]

Wenzel, M. E., C. C. Tadini, B. T. Tribess, A. Zuleta, J. BinaghiPak, N. Pack, G. Vera, M. C. Tanasov, A. C. Bertolini, B. R. Cordenunsi, F. M. Lajolo, 2011. Chemical composition and nutritional value of unripe banana flour (Musa acuminata, var. Nanicão). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 66: 231-237. [ Links ]

Received: February 01, 2016; Accepted: September 01, 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons