SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 issue2Evaluation of pulque sediment (xaxtle) as a starter culture in order to obtain a low glycemic index baked productLocalization of garlic apex by digital image analysis techniques author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Agrociencia

On-line version ISSN 2521-9766Print version ISSN 1405-3195

Agrociencia vol.50 n.2 Texcoco Feb./Mar. 2016

 

Crop science

Assessment of ten barley genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) sown on five planting dates in two agricultural cycles

Juan A. Pérez-Ruiz1  2  * 

Mauro Zamora-Díaz2 

José A. Mejía-Contreras1 

Adrián Hernández-Livera1 

Salomón Solano-Hernández3 

1 Postgrado en Producción de Semillas, Colegio de Postgraduados. 56230. km. 36.5 Carretera México-Texcoco. Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. (semillas@colpos.mx), (juan.perez@colpos.mx).

2 Campo Experimental Valle de México, INIFAP. 56250. Carretera Los Reyes-Lechería, km 18.5. Coatlinchan, Texcoco, Estado de México, México.

3 Campo Experimental Bajío, INIFAP. 38110. Carretera Celaya-San Miguel de Allende s/n, km 6.5. Colonia Roque, Celaya, Guanajuato, México.


Abstract:

The objective of this study was to evaluate agronomic characteristics, grain yield, and physical grain quality in malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes cultivated under irrigation. The study was carried out at the El Bajío region of Mexico. The variables evaluated were number of tillers (NM), number of nodes on the main stem (NN), plant height (AP), hectoliter weight (PHL), weight of one thousand grains (PMG) and grain yield (REN). The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with a 10x5x2 factorial arrangement of treatments: ten genotypes, five sowing dates and two agricultural cycles. The sowing dates were November 15 and 30, December 15 and 30 and January 15. The agricultural cycles were 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. The data were analyzed with an ANOVA, means were compared with Tukey test (p≤0.05) and correlations. The genotypes expressed higher NM, NN, AP, PHL, PMG and REN when sowing was at the end of autumn, while those established at the beginning of winter had lower values. The varieties Alina and Armida produced higher yields and better grain physical quality.

Keywords: Hordeum vulgare L.; El Bajío region; grain physical quality; sowing dates

Resumen:

El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar características agronómicas, rendimiento y calidad física de grano de genotipos de cebada maltera (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivados con riego. El estudio se realizó en la región de El Bajío, México. Las variables evaluadas fueron número de macollos (NM), número de nudos del tallo principal (NN), altura de planta (AP), peso hectolítrico (PHL), peso de mil granos (PMG) y rendimiento de grano (REN). El diseño experimental fue bloques completos al azar con un arreglo factorial 10x5x2: diez genotipos, cinco fechas de siembra y dos ciclos agrícolas. Las fechas de siembra fueron: noviembre 15 y 30, diciembre 15 y 30, y 15 de enero. Los ciclos agrícolas fueron: 2012-2013 y 2013-2014. Con los datos se realizó ANDEVA, pruebas de comparación de medias (Tukey, p≤0.05) y correlaciones. Los genotipos expresaron mayor NM, NN, AP, PHL, PMG y REN en las siembras establecidas a finales de otoño, y las establecidas a principios de invierno tuvieron los valores menores. Las variedades Alina y Armida mostraron rendimiento y calidad física de grano mayores.

Palabras clave: Hordeum vulgare L.; región Bajío; características agronómicas; calidad física de grano; fechas de siembra

Introduction

In Mexico, barley grain is used mainly as the raw material for brewing beer. In El Bajio, barley is cultivated under irrigation on an area of more than 54 thousand ha (SIAP, 2014). This region functions as the complementary grain supplier for the malt industry and is characterized by its high grain yields during the autumn-winter cycle (Steffen and Echánove, 2005).

High grain yields can be obtained with the proper combination of cultivar, environment and agronomic practices (Alam et al., 2007). With barley, cultivar has an important role in grain yield, and its agronomic characteristics such as yield potential, tillers per plant and grain physical quality allow better yield stability (Friedt et al., 2011). In a given area and region, yield potential will be defined mainly by climate since it will determine the variability up to the highest possible yields (Lobell et al., 2009). Often, grain yield is affected by environmental conditions during crop growth and development, mainly temperature (Mendoza et al., 2011).

Cultivars in contrasting environments frequently exhibit different grain yield since most have adaptations specific to given environmental conditions (Bolandi et al., 2012). Sowing date is a highly important aspect in agronomic management of the barley crop because it is directly related to the industrial quality of the grain (O’Donovan et al., 2012). Sowing date can have a positive or negative influence on grain weight, number of spikes per m2 and grain yield depending on the climatic conditions during crop development (Aslani and Mehrvar, 2012). In El Bajío, sowing wheat on November 15, or in environments that permitted a prolonged growth period, contributed to increasing grain yield (Solís et al., 2004).

One of the main problems during barley production in the El Bajío Region is selection of sowing dates. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic characteristics, yield and grain physical quality of ten barley genotypes sown on five dates and grown in two different agricultural cycles under the hypothesis that agronomic characteristics, grain yield and physical quality are in function of the cultivar and sowing date, which influence the level of expression.

Materials and Methods

In the study, ten barley genotypes from the National Barley Program of the National Institute of Research in Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock (INIFAP) were evaluated. These genotypes produce grain that is suitable for malt production; they have good potential for grain yield and are tolerant to the main diseases of the crop. Five of the genotypes are commercial varieties and the seed is available commercially. The other five are experimental lines. The commercial varieties are Alina, Armida, Esperanza, Adabella and Esmeralda; the first three were released for production in El Bajío and the other two for production in the High Valleys of central Mexico (Zamora et al., 2008; Solano et al., 2009; Zamora et al., 2010). The experimental lines are M-173, M-174, M-10542, M-176 and M-177; the first three were selected for El Bajío and the other two for the High Valleys (Zamora, 2013).

The experimental design was randomized complete blocks. To facilitate irrigation, it was divided into strips of 30 experimental plots each, which represented each sowing day and the three replications of each treatment. The experimental unit consisted of one 3x1.5 m plot with four rows of barley 30 cm apart. In this study, 100 treatments were evaluated in a 10x5x2 factorial array: ten genotypes, five sowing dates and two agricultural cycles. The sowing dates (FS) were November 15 and 30, December 15 and 30, and January 15. The agricultural cycles were autumn-winter 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. The test site was the INIFAP Bajío Experimental Station (CEBAJ), Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico. Sowing density was 100 kg h-1, except for the variety Esperanza, which was sown at a density of 120 kg ha-1, following the technical recommendation due to its low tillering capacity (Zamora, 2006). Irrigation was applied at sowing and 45, 70 and 90 d after the first irrigation. Agronomic management was that recommended by INIFAP for the El Bajío region (Zamora et al., 2010). Low and high temperatures during the agricultural cycles were obtained from the CEBAJ-INIFAP meteorological station.

Evaluation of agronomic traits

The agronomic characteristics evaluated were number of tillers, nodes on the main stem and plant height. Measurements were taken from ten plants selected at random from the middle of the two central rows of each plot. The number of tillers was determined 35 d after sowing. Nodes were counted during the spiking stage and plant height was measured just before physiological maturity from ground level to the last grain of the spike on the main stem.

Assessment of yield and grain physical quality

To determine grain yield, the two central rows of each plot was threshed. Once the gain was cleaned, it was weighed, recording moisture content and hectoliter and thousand-grain weight. Grain yield was expressed in t ha-1 adjusted to 13 % moisture, the average of three samples. Moisture was determined with a digital moisture tester (BURROWS, model DMC750, Chicago, USA). Hectoliter weight (PHL) in kg hL-1 was determined with the test tube method described in the Mexican norm NMX-FF-043-SCFI-2003 (Secretaría de Economía, 2003). For the weight of one thousand grains (PMG), eight replications of 100 grains were counted and weighed. With these data, average, variance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. The procedure was repeated until the CV was equal to or greater than 4. PMG was obtained by multiplying the arithmetic mean of the eight replications (ISTA, 2005).

Statistical analysis

With the data, an ANOVA, comparison of means with the Tukey test (p≤0.05), and correlations were carried out using SAS (2009) software.

Results and Discussion

Agronomic characteristics

The number of tillers (NM) was determined (p≤0.05) by three factors and the interaction FSxC (Table 1). NM was higher with the genotypes were sown at the end of autumn and tillering coincided with cool temperatures in December and early January (Figure 1). In contrast, NM decreased when sowing was at the beginning of winter (Table 2) because of the gradual increase in temperature at the end of January and early February, which coincided with that development stage.

Table 1 F test statistical probability of the analysis of variance for agronomic characteristics, grain physical quality and grain yield of ten barley genotypes sown on five sowing dates of two agricultural cycles in El Bajío, Mexico. 

*Significant (p≤0.05); NS: not significant (p>0.05); FV: factor of variation; CV: coefficient of variation; GL: degrees of freedom; FS: sowing date; C: cycle; G: genotype; NM: number of tillers; NN: number of nodes; AP: plant height; PHL: hectoliter weight; PMG: thousand-grain weight; REN; grain yield.

Figure 1 High and low temperatures in Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico, during the agricultural cycles 2012-2013 (year 1) and 2013-2014 (year 2). 

Table 2 Agronomic characteristics and grain physical quality of ten barley genotypes sown on five sowing dates in two agricultural cycles in El Bajío, Mexico. 

†Means in a column and variation factor with different letters, are statistically different (Tukey; p≤0.05). DMSH: least honest significant difference; FS: sowing date; C: cycle; NM: number of tillers; NN: number of nodes; AP: plant height; PHL: hectoliter weight; PMG: thousand-grain weight. FS represents the average for G in both C. C represents the average of FS and C in each C.

The number of tillers in the 2012-2013 agricultural cycle was 25 % higher than in the other cycle evaluated. Often, cool temperatures favor tillering (García and García, 1995), but this is also in function of the efficient use of water, nutrient availability and solar radiation (Hussain et al., 2013).

The number of tillers was higher in the genotypes developed for dryland cultivation: genotype M-177 had the highest number (Table 3). In the genotypes developed for irrigation, this characteristic was limited, manifesting the influence of genetic aptitude of each genotype (Tamm, 2003). Other factors that influenced in the number of tillers per plant were sowing date and cultivar (García and García, 1995).

Table 3 Agronomic characteristics and grain physical quality of ten genotypes sown on five sowing dates in two agricultural cycles in El Bajío, Mexico. 

†Means in a column and variation factor with different letters, are statistically different (Tukey; p≤0.05). DMSH: least honest significant difference; G: genotype; NM: number of tillers; NN: number of nodes; AP: plant height; PHL: hectoliter weight; PMG: thousand-grain weight. G represents the average of each G in FS and C.

The number of nodes (NN) was significant (p≤0.05) due to the factors FS and G (genotype), and the interaction FSxG (Table 1). Genotypes sown on FS3 had the highest NN, 8 % higher than that of genotypes sown on FS5, which had the lowest NN (Table 2). The genotypes Adabella and M-176 had the highest NN (Table 3). Generally, NN is in function of the cultivar. Each node is a meristematic zone from which leaves differentiate. In turn, leaves contribute to the accumulation of biomass and therefore to yield. Besides influence from genetic factors, NN also depends on agrometeorological factors (López, 1991).

Plant height (AP) was significant (p≤0.05) by effect of the factors FS and G, and of the interaction FSxC (agricultural cycle) (Table 1). Plants sown at the beginning of winter had lower AP values (<80) (Table 2). The genotypes developed for dryland farming had higher AP than those developed for irrigated conditions, with the exception of Alina (Table 3). Genetically, low stature is desirable in genotypes generated for irrigated farming to prevent winds from lodging the plants during irrigation. AP is a morphological trait determined by the cultivar (Alam et al., 2007) and is often affected by environmental conditions (Tamm, 2003).

Grain yield and physical quality

Low temperatures during the 2012-2013 agricultural cycle affected yield and physical quality of the grain. Temperatures fell to 0.4, -0.5 and 0.8 °C on March 3, 4, and 5. The low temperatures 109 days after FS1 did not apparently harm grain development. However, 94 d after FS2, they affected grain physical quality (thin grains), and 79 d after FS3, because of the cold temperatures, seeds did not develop possibly because most of them were in an aqueous stage. With FS4, the low temperatures occurred 64 days when the crop was between the boot stage and spiking; there was damage to the foliage, and seeds were absent in the spikes of the earliest genotypes (M-173, Armida and Alina). With FS5, the low temperatures occurred 48 days when most of the genotypes were in the boot stage, and damage was observed only in the foliage.

Hectoliter weight (PHL) was determined (p≤0.05) by three factors and the interactions FSxC and FSxG (Table 1). With FS3, PHL was 7 % higher than that of FS5, which had the lowest PHL value (Table 2). This was likely the consequence of the stress caused by temperature increases in April and May (Figure 1), which coincided with grain filling and reduction of the biological cycle of the crop. The 2013-2014 agricultural cycle produced a higher PHL than the other cycle (Table 2) because of the low temperatures during sowing in the autumn of 2012, when PHL decreased. This showed the effect of climatic variations between the two years. Alina had the highest PHL, 5 % above the genotypes Adabella, Esperanza and M-173 (Table 3); the differences between genotypes were significant. Industrial quality and grain yield of barley is better with high PHL (López et al., 2005). Generally, grain weight is determined by the duration of the grain filling stage (García del Moral et al., 2003), but it decreases with high temperatures during this stage. (Alam et al., 2007).

Thousand-grain weight (PMG) was also significant (p≤0.05) by effect of the three factors and the interactions FSxC, FSxG and FSxCxG (Table 1). Sowing in autumn obtained heavier grains; FS1 had the highest PMG, which was 9 and 19 % higher than FS4 and FS5, which had the lowest values. The PMG of Armida and Alina was 10 % higher than Adabella and M-173, which were the lowest. In the 2013-2014 agricultural cycle, PMG was 4 % higher than the other cycle evaluated (Table 2) because of the climatic variations between the two years studied. Generally, cultivar influences thousand-grain weight (Soleymani and Shahrajabian, 2012). Grain physical quality is better when the crop develops in cool temperature environments because the time of dry matter accumulation is longer and there can be more soil moisture since evapotranspiration decreases (Copeland and McDonald, 1995). In contrast, when the crop develops in high temperatures, PMG is usually lower since the weight of individual grains decreases (Hossain et al., 2012). Other factors that influence grain weight are the quality of intercepted light and the position of the grain on the spike (Copeland and McDonald, 1995).

Grain yield (REN) was determined (p≤0.05) by the three factors and the interactions (FSxC and FSxG (Table 1). In general, establishing the crop at the end of autumn allowed greater expression of REN. Nevertheless, REN of barley sown on FS3 in the 2012-2013 agricultural cycle decreased 35 %, relative to the value found in 2013-2014 (Table 4), due to the low temperatures in 2012-2013. REN of the crops sown at the beginning of winter decreased in both cycles evaluated. With the exception of FS5, in the 2013-2014 agricultural cycle, REN was higher than in the other evaluated cycle (Table 5). This is related to cold injury from low temperatures in March 2013. In both agricultural cycles the lowest REN was obtained with FS5 (Table 4) because the increase in temperature reduced the number of days to physiological maturity and, therefore, there was less time to accumulate reserves in the grain.

Table 4 Grain yield of barley genotypes sown on five sowing days in two agricultural cycles in El Bajío, Mexico. 

†Means in a column and variation factor with different letters, are statistically different (Tukey; p≤0.05). DMSH: least honest significant difference; FS: sowing date.

Table 5 Grain yield (t ha-1) of ten barley genotypes, sown on five sowing dates in two agricultural cycles in El Bajío, Mexico. 

Means in a column and variation factor with different letters, are statistically different (Tukey; p≤0.05). DMSH: least honest significant difference; 𝑋 : mean; FS: sowing date.

The results of this study coincide with those of Solís et al. (2004), who evaluated wheat cultivars in El Bajío. They found no differences in grain yield when sowing was between November 15 and December 15. However, when sowing was on January 15, grain yield was lower because the number of grains per spike decreased and the grains were smaller.

For small-grained cereals to have good expression of grain yield, the cultivars should be grown in relatively cool temperatures (García del Moral et al., 2003). For this reason, when crops are established in periods that are not recommended, grain yield often decreases (Aslani and Mehrvar, 2012).

Mendoza et al. (2011) mention that grain yield is affected largely by sowing date, mainly because of the effect of temperature variation. Sowing wheat at the end of autumn in El Bajío permits higher grain yield, while sowing at the beginning of winter exposes the crop to high temperatures during the reproductive stage and thus shortens the period of grain formation leading to lower yields (Suaste- Franco et al., 2013).

The varieties Alina and Armida had the most outstanding yields (Table 5). These are varieties developed for the study region and recently released (Solano et al., 2009; Zamora et al., 2010). There are cultivars recommended as suitable for the study area, but it is important to be familiar with the performance of genotypes developed for dryland farming since barley seed is produced in El Bajío.

In both agricultural cycles, the genotypes produced higher REN when sown on FS1 and FS2, and some genotypes, such as Alina and Armida also did so on FS3. However, when sown on FS4 and FS5, REN decreased considerably. This variation is generally due to the genotypes’ adaptations that are specific to given environmental conditions Bolandi et al., 2012). The genotypes selected for production with irrigation had higher yields than the genotypes selected for dryland and varied more in their behavior among sowing dates and growing cycles (Table 5). Similar results were reported by Saad et al. (2013) with barley cultivars in different environments.

The correlations showed that when NM, PHL and PMG increased, REN also increased (Table 6). Hossain et al. (2012) found similar results. Moreover, REN was higher when NN and AP increased; this is attributed to the association of REN with plant dry matter accumulation since there is higher availability of assimilates for grain formation (López-Castañeda, 2011). In this study, expression of potential grain yield was influenced by environmental conditions. In both growing cycles evaluated the genotypes expressed higher NM, NN, AP, PHL, PMG and REN when sown on FS1, FS2 and FS3, but when sown on FS4 and FS5, these values decreased. Sowing on optimum or suitable sowing dates contributes to obtaining higher REN (Aslani and Mehrvar, 2012). However, REN decreases principally when sowing occurs in periods that coincide with high temperatures during grain filling (Soleymani and Shahrajabian, 2012).

Table 6 Mean squares of the correlation analysis for agronomic characteristics, yield and grain physical quality of ten barley genotypes sown on five sowing dates in two agricultural cycles in El Bajío, Mexico. 

*Significant (p≤0.05); NS: not significant (p>0.05); NM: number of tillers; NN: number of nodes; AP: plant height; PHL: hectoliter weight; PMG: thousand-grain weight; REN; grain yield.

Conclusions

The genotypes expressed higher number of tillers, number of nodes, plant height, hectoliter weight, thousand-grain weight and grain yield when sown at the end of autumn, while those sown at the beginning of winter had lower values. The varieties Alina and Armida had the highest yield and the best physical quality. The environmental conditions of the site where the barley crop developed influenced the expression of agronomic traits, yield and grain physical quality.

Literatura Citada

Alam, M. Z., S. A. Haider, and N. K. Paul. 2007. Yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in relation to sowing times. J. Biol. Sci. 15: 139-145. [ Links ]

Aslani, F., and M. R. Mehrvar. 2012. Responses of wheat genotypes as affected by different sowing dates. Asian J. Agric. Sci. 4: 72-74. [ Links ]

Bolandi, A., A. A. Imani, H. Shahbazi, and A. Mehraban. 2012. The study of compatibility and stability of grain yield in barley advanced genotypes in tropical and subtropical rainfed regions. Ann Biol. Res. 3: 5540-5544. [ Links ]

Copeland, L. O., and M. B. McDonald. 1995. Principles of seed science and technology. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall. New York. United States. 393 p. [ Links ]

Friedt, W., R. D. Horsley, B. L. Harvey, D. M. Poulsen, R. Lance, S. Ceccarelli, and F. Carpettini. 2011. Barley breeding, history, progress, objectives and technology. In: Barley: production, improvement and uses. Ullrich S. E. (ed.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp: 160-220. [ Links ]

García, M. B., and L. F. García. 1995. Tiller production and survival in relation to grain yield in winter and spring barley. Field Crops Res. 44: 85-93. [ Links ]

García del Moral, L. F., Y. Rharrabti, D. Villegas, and C. Royo. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in Durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: An ontogenic approach. Agron. J. 95: 266-274. [ Links ]

Hossain, A., J. A. Teixeira da Silva, M.V. Lozovskaya, V. P. Zvolinsky, and V. I. Mukhortov. 2012. High temperature combined with drought affect rainfed spring wheat and barley in south-eastern Russia: Yield, relative performance and heat susceptibility index. Journal of Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 4: 184-196. [ Links ]

Hussain, M., M. B. Khan, Z. Mehmood, A. B. Zia, K. Jabran, and M. Farooq. 2013. Optimizing row spacing in wheat cultivars differing in tillering and stature for higher productivity. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59: 1457-1470. [ Links ]

ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). 2005. International Rules for Seed Testing. Rules. ISTA Editions. Zurich, Switzerland. 243 p. [ Links ]

Lobell, D., Cassman, K., Field, C., 2009. Crop Yield Gaps: Their Importance, Magnitudes and Causes. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34: 179-204. [ Links ]

López-Castañeda, C. 2011. Variación en rendimiento de grano, biomasa y número de granos en cebada bajo tres condiciones de humedad del suelo. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems 14: 907-918. [ Links ]

López, P., F.A. Guzmán, E.M. Santos, F. Prieto, G. Román, y D. Alma. 2005. Evaluación de la calidad física de diferentes variedades de cebada (Hordeum sativum jess) cultivadas en los estados de Hidalgo y Tlaxcala, México. Revista Chilena de Nutrición 32(3): 247-253. [ Links ]

López B. L. 1991. Cultivos herbáceos. Cereales. Vol. 1, Ed. Mundi-Prensa. Madrid, España. 539 p. [ Links ]

Mendoza M., Cortez E., Rivera J. G., Rangel J. A., Andrio E., y F. Cervantes. 2011. Época y densidad de siembra en la producción y calidad de semilla de triticale (X Tritico secale Wittmack). Agron. Mesoamericana 22: 309-316. [ Links ]

O’Donovan J. T., T. K. Turkington, M. J. Edney, P. E. Juskiw, R. H. McKenzie, K. N. Harker, G. W. Clayton, G. P. Lafond, C. A. Grant, S. Brandt, E. N. Johnson, W. E. May, and E. Smith. 2012. Effect of seedling date and seedling rate on malting barley production in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 321-330. [ Links ]

Saad, F. A, A. A. Abd El-Mohsen, and I. H. Al-Soudan. 2013. Parametric statistical methods for evaluating barley genotypes in multi-environment trials. Scientia Agriculturae 1: 30-39. [ Links ]

SAS. 2009. Statistical Analysis System release 9.1 for windows. Cary, North Carolina, United States. SAS institute, Inc. [ Links ]

SIAP. SAGARPA. 2014. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. http://www.siap.gob.mx , consultado el 20 de agosto de 2015. [ Links ]

Secretaría de Economía. 2003. Norma Mexicana NMX-FF-043SCFI-2003. Productos alimenticios no industrializados para consumo humano-cereal-cebada maltera (Hordeum vulgare L. y Hordeum distichum L.). Especificaciones y métodos de prueba. 31 p. [ Links ]

Solano H., S. M. Zamora D., F. P. Gámez V., J. J. García R., R. Sánchez C., J. Ireta M., F. Díaz E., y R. Garza G. 2009. Alina, nueva variedad de cebada maltera para riego en El Bajío. Agricultura Técnica en México 35: 467-469. [ Links ]

Soleymani, A., and M. H. Shahrajabian. 2012. Changes in seed yield and yield components of elite barley cultivars under different plant populations and sowing dates. J. Food Agric. Environ. 10: 596-598. [ Links ]

Solís E., M. Hernández, A. Borodanenko, J. L. Aguilar, y O. A. Grajeda. 2004. Duración de la etapa reproductiva y el rendimiento de trigo. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 27: 323-332. [ Links ]

Steffen C., y F. Echánove. 2005. La sustitución del trigo por cebada en tierras ejidales de riego de Guanajuato, México: una alternativa efímera. Cuadernos Geográficos 37: 135-151. [ Links ]

Suaste-Franco, M. P., E. Solís-Moya, L. Ledesma-Ramírez, M. L. de la Cruz-Gonzalez, O. A. Grageda-Cabrera, y A. Báez-Pérez. 2013. Efecto de la densidad y método de siembra en el rendimiento de grano de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.) en El Bajío, México. Agrociencia 47: 159-170. [ Links ]

Tamm, Ü. 2003.The variation of agronomic characteristics of European malting barley varieties. Agron. Res. 1: 99-103. [ Links ]

Zamora D., M. 2006. Informe Anual: Programa de Cebada Maltera, INIFAP, Celaya, Guanajuato, México. 46 p. [ Links ]

Zamora D., M. S. Solano H., R. Gómez M., I. Rojas M., J. Ireta M., R. Garza G., y C. Ortiz T. 2008. Adabella: variedad de cebada maltera para valles altos de la mesa central de México. Agricultura Técnica en México 34: 491-493. [ Links ]

Zamora D., M., S. Solano H., R. Garza G., J. Islas G., R. Huerta Z., y M. López C. 2010. Armida, nueva variedad de cebada maltera para riego en El Bajío. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 1: 723-726. [ Links ]

Zamora D., M. 2013. Programa Nacional de Cebada (entrevista). Edo. de México, Méx. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. [ Links ]

Received: April 2015; Accepted: August 2015

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons