SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue2Chitosan: a versatile antimicrobial polysaccharide for fruit and vegetables in postharvest - a review author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Chapingo. Serie horticultura

On-line version ISSN 2007-4034Print version ISSN 1027-152X

Rev. Chapingo Ser.Hortic vol.23 n.2 Chapingo May./Aug. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2017.01.002 

Scientific article

Planting dates of Allium cepa L. hybrids in Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil

Aline Torquato-Tavares1  * 

Irais-Dolores Pascual-Reyes1 

Kellen Kiara Barros-Milhomens1 

Tiago Alves-Ferreira1 

Ildon Rodrigues-do-Nascimento1 

1Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Departamento de Produção Vegetal. Rua Badejos, lote 7, Chácaras 69/72, Zona rural, Gurupi, Tocantins, C. P. 66, CEP 77402-970, BRASIL.

Abstract

Brazil imports a large amount of onion and the producing states are restricted to the Central-South regions; therefore, it is essential to identify new areas with production potential. In the state of Tocantins, located in northern Brazil, there is no record of commercial onion cultivation for bulb production; consequently, it is important to determine the best date for the establishment of this crop. The aim of this research was to determine the adaptation and yield potential of onion planted on three dates in the town of Gurupi, Tocantins. Three experiments were established using the hybrids NUN 1205, Dulciana, and Cimarron, all of early-maturity, and three transplant dates: May 26, June 26 and July 26, 2015. A randomized complete block experimental design with four replicates was used. The bulb was evaluated in terms of commercial yield, average weight, shape and diameter, as well as plant height, pseudostem diameter and number of leaves. In postharvest, concentration levels of pyruvic acid, pH, size and bulb classification were determined. In July and June, commercial bulb yield was 27.90 and 58.05 t∙ha-1, respectively. The average bulb weight varied from 93 to 193 g∙bulb-1, where the round shape predominated. The most suitable month for transplanting onion in the region is June, which was when the highest yield was recorded. The classification of the bulbs obtained on the three dates and from the evaluated hybrids covers the demands of the market. In addition, the commercial yield was similar to that obtained in other producing regions. In July, the hybrid Cimarron obtained a lower yield than the national average; for this reason, its production is not recommended in that month.

Keywords: onion; genotypes x environments interaction; yield; bulb quality

Introduction

Globally, onion is the fourth most economically important vegetable crop and the third in terms of production volume. China is the leading producer and in 2013 accounted for 26 % of global production, while Brazil was the ninth largest producer with only 2 % (Salvador, 2015). In Brazil, onion is the third most important vegetable in terms of economic value, surpassed by potato (Solanum tuberosum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in production volume.

In onion production, variety selection is conditioned initially by the photoperiod and temperature requirements for the bulb formation process, which are specific to each genotype and characteristic of each producing region (Menezes & Vieira-Neto, 2012). Its phenological cycle depends on the variety, climate, and production system. The growth period can be divided into four stages: pre-planting, vegetative growth, bulb formation and maturation (Duarte-Costa & Milanez-de Resende, 2007).

For the selection of the planting area or region, genotype x environment interaction should be considered, relating mainly to the photoperiod and temperature, which are directly affected by the planting dates (Faria et al., 2012).

In Brazil, according to Oliveira, Mendonça, and Santos (2009), it is possible to cultivate two type of genotypes: the so-called “short day” ones (11-12 h daylight photoperiod) that can be established in any region of the country, and “intermediate day” ones (12-14 h daylight photoperiod) which are more suited to the southern region.

In relation to the temperature required by the crop, the ideal range is from 20-25 °C. High temperatures (above 32 °C) during the pre-planting stage of development can lead to formation of premature bulbs, which is a disadvantage. By contrast, exposure of plants to prolonged periods of low temperatures (below 10 °C) may induce premature flowering (bolting), which is highly undesirable when pursuing commercial bulb production rather than seed production (Vilela-de Resende, Bona-Pires, Pinheiro-Camargo, & Marchese, 2007).

Onion breeding programs in Brazil have developed hybrids with tropical germplasm that can expand planting areas into regions where there is no history of commercial cultivation. The aim of this is to reduce supply fluctuations throughout the year in the domestic market by increasing production and thereby reducing imports of this crop.

Tocantins is a new agricultural frontier, where annual crops such as corn and soybean are established during the summer in the Brazilian cerrado (second-largest biome in Brazil), and from May to September, either watermelon or melon is grown by producers.

Warm temperatures during the day and moderate during the night can favor the differentiation of onion bulbs that contain tropical germplasm. However, the lack of technical information about the crop in the region makes it necessary to evaluate onion genotypes to create recommendations that may be useful to producers in the region.

In view of these facts, the aim of the present study was to determine the adaptation and yield potential of onion established on three planting dates in the town of Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil.

Materials and methods

Three experiments were conducted in 2015 in the experimental olericulture plot at the Federal University of Tocantins (UFT for its initials in Spanish), located in Gurupi in the Central-South part of the state of Tocantins (11° 44’ 42” South latitude, 49° 03’ 05” West longitude, 276 masl). Based on the Köppen (1948) climate classification system, the region has an Aw climate, defined as tropical wet with a rainy season during the summer and a dry season in winter. The soil of the region is a red-yellow lithosol (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária [Embrapa], 2006).

During the experiments the observed minimum and maximum temperatures were 16.5 and 38.7 °C, respectively; the mean temperature was slightly variable, between 24 and 29 °C. Rainfall and temperature were obtained from the UFT weather station at the Gurupi campus (Figure 1, Instituto Nacional de Meteorología [INMET], 2015).

Figure 1 Mean monthly values of minimum, maximum and average temperatures, relative humidity (RH) and total rainfall during the period of the experiments in Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil, 2015. 

The onion hybrids used in the study were NUN 1205®, Dulciana® and Cimarron®, all obtained from Nunhems Bayer CropScience Vegetable Seeds®. All these hybrids have a cycle of 90-95 days in warm climates and a photoperiod of 11-12 h daylight. The hybrids were transplanted on May 26, June 26 and July 26. On all planting dates, a completely randomized block experimental design with four replicates was used. The experimental plot consisted of three rows separated by 0.15 m, with 60 plants spaced 0.10 m apart. The 20 plants in the middle row were used as the experimental unit.

The seedlings were produced in 200-cavity expanded polystyrene trays, with each cavity containing commercial Plantmax® substrate (composed of equal parts of pine bark, charcoal, peat moss and vermiculite). The trays were kept in shade houses under sprinkler irrigation. The seedlings were transplanted 30 days after sowing (das).

According to the crop requirements, fertilizer was applied 30 and 50 days after transplanting (dat) with 75 kg∙ha-1 of N and 75 kg∙ha-1 of P. Sprinkler irrigation and weed, pest and disease control were carried out according to crop recommendations (Duarte-Costa & Milanez-de Resende, 2007).

In the three experiments, harvesting was carried out when the plants showed advanced signs of senescence, such as yellowing and dry leaves, and when more than 80 % presented soft stem and their leaves were bent or inclined. After harvest, the bulbs were “cured” (dried before storage) for 30 days; then the remains of the roots and aerial parts of the bulbs were removed.

The characters evaluated in the field were:

  1. Commercial yield (YIELD, t∙ha-1).

  2. Plant height (PH, cm): measured from ground level to the most distal part of the plant.

  3. Average bulb weight (ABW, g): coefficient of yield divided by the number of bulbs.

  4. Bulb shape (BS, mm): obtained by dividing bulb size by its diameter, according to the following scale: group I (round, oblong or pyriform), when the average value is equal to or greater than 0.9 mm; group II (oval), when the average value is equal to or less than 0.89 mm, and group III (elongated), when the average value is equal to or greater than 1.1 mm (Companhia de entrepostos e armazéns gerais do Estado de São Paulo [CEAGESP], 2001).

  5. Bulb diameter (BD, mm).

  6. Pseudostem diameter (PSD, mm).

  7. Number of fully developed leaves (NL).

The evaluated post-harvest characteristics were:

  1. Concentration of pyruvic acid (CPA, μmol pyruvic acid∙g-1 of fresh matter): this was estimated using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) according to the method described by Schwimmer and Weston (1961), and modified by Anthon and Barrett (2003). This method uses spectrophotometry to determine the total amount of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine that reacts with the carbonyl group and evaluates the enzymatic development of pyruvic acid as a form of measurement of its concentration in onions. Absorbances were obtained in a spectrophotometer at 420 nm.

  2. pH: determined following the method described by the Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC, 2000).

  3. Bulb classification: based on bulb diameter and according to the scale described by CEAGESP (2001), the following classes were used: class 0 or non-commercial, less than 15 mm; class I, 15 - 35 mm; class II, 35 - 50 mm; class III, 50 - 60 mm; class III mature, 60 - 70 mm; class IV, 70 - 90 mm, and class V, greater than 90 mm.

Data were submitted to an individual analysis of variance, followed by a joint analysis. The means were compared with the Tukey test (1949), P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was carried out using SISVAR software version 5.3.(Ferreira, 2008).

Results and discussion

The analysis of variance showed significant effects among the hybrids on the evaluated characters, with the exception of PH and pH, revealing genetic variations among them. In the case of dates, only YIELD, PH, ABW, and BD were affected (P ≤ 0.05, Table 1).

Table 1 Analysis of variance of evaluated characters of three onion hybrids established on three transplant dates in Gurupi, Tocanti, Brazil, 2015. 

SV DF Mean squares
YIELD PH ABW PSD NL CPA pH BS BD
Planting dates 2 1849.74** 539.29** 20552.69** 0.12 4.56 10.71 0.02 0.07* 3.16**
Hybrids 2 346.99* 66.61 3855.44* 0.94** 6.73* 28.29* 0.01 0.29** 3.52**
Planting date x Hybrids 4 114.19 51.49 1268.77 0.04 1.00 6.94 0.05 0.01 0.45
Block (date) 9 412.17** 136.99 4579.73** 0.08 2.59 3.89 0.03 0.01 0.75
Error 18 69.26 61.88 769.59 0.09 1.53 5.50 0.02 0.01 0.48
Total 35 2380.16 856.26 31026.22 1.27 16.41 55.33 0.58 0.39 8.36
C.V. (%) 19.03 16.99 19.03 30.66 19.37 38.70 3.31 11.44 11.67
Mean 43.74 46.3 145.8 0.99 6.39 6.06 4.99 1.21 5.97

**, *: significant with P ≤ 0.01 and 0.05, respectively; SV: source of variation; DF: degrees of freedom; YIELD: commercial yield (t∙ha-1); PH: plant height (cm); ABW: average bulb weight (g); PSD: pseudostem diameter (cm); NL: number of leaves; CPA: concentration of pyruvic acid (μmol pyruvic acid∙g-1.fresh matter); pH; BS: bulb shape (mm); BD: bulb diameter (mm); CV: coefficient of variation.

In May (first evaluation), there were significant differences in yield between evaluated dates and hybrids. NUN 1205 presented higher yields (54.22 t∙ha-1, Table 2); however, in June greater similarity was shown between Cimarron and Dulciana with 54.90 and 58.05 t∙ha-1, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Means comparisons of the interaction between planting dates x onion hybrids evaluated in Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil, 2015. 

Planting dates Hybrids Means
Nun 1205 Cimarron Dulciana
Yield (t∙ha -1 )
May 26 54.22 aA 32.02 abB 42.82 abB 43.04 ab
June 26 56.55 aA 54.90 aA 58.05 aA 56.50 a
July 26 36.30 bB 27.90 bA 30.90 bB 31.70 b
Means 49.02 A 38.27 B 43.92 A
HSD 8.67
PH (cm)
May 26 44.06 bB 46.15 aA 37.61 bAB 42.60 b
June 26 58.99 aA 51.40 aA 51.73 aA 54.04 a
July 26 40.73 cB 44.58 aA 41.46 bA 42.26 b
Means 48.59 A 47.37 A 43.60 A
HSD 8.20
ABW (g)
May 26 180.75 aA 106.75 bC 142.75 bB 143.41 b
June 26 188.50 aA 183.00 aA 193.50 aA 188.33 a
July 26 121.00 bA 93.00 cB 103.00 cB 105.66 c
Means 163.41 A 127.58 B 146.41 AB
HSD 28.91
PSD (cm)
May 26 0.81 aB 1.50 aA 0.85 aB 1.05 a
June 26 0.91 aB 1.30 bA 0.91 aB 1.04 a
July 26 0.80 aA 1.02 abA 0.82 aA 0.87 a
Means 0.84 B 1.27 A 0.86 B
HSD 0.31
NL
May 26 5.12 bA 7.12 aA 4.81 bA 5.68 b
June 26 6.59 aA 7.37 aA 6.11 aA 6.69 ab
July 26 6.37 aA 7.27 aA 6.77 aA 6.80 a
Means 5.02 B 7.25 A 5.82 B
HSD 1.29
CPA (μmol pyruvic acid∙g -1 fresh matter)5
May 26 4.35 bA 8.48 aA 6.52 abA 5.35 a
June 26 4.97 bA 8.91 aA 5.74 bA 5.69 a
July 26 6.69 aA 7.87 aA 7.16 aA 7.13 a
Means 5.33 B 8.42 A 6.47 AB
HSD 2.44
pH
May 26 4.81 bB 5.09 aA 4.94 aA 4.94 a
June 26 4.92 abAB 5.04 aA 5.03 aA 4.99 a
July 26 5.12 aA 4.94 aA 5.04 aA 5.03 a
Means 4.95 A 5.02 A 5.00 A
HSD 0.17
BS (mm)
May 26 76.6 aA 74.0 bB 69.40 bC 73.30 a
June 26 71.0 bB 78.40 aA 69.90 aC 73.15 a
July 26 66.70 cB 69.10 cA 62.80 cC 66.20 b
Means 71.43 B 73.83 A 67.36 C
HSD 0.14
BD (mm)
May 26 65.90 bA 48.60 cA 59.30 bAB 57.93 b
June 26 68.70 aA 59.40 aA 68.20 aA 65.48 a
July 26 58.60 cA 53.20 bA 55.10 cB 55.66 c
Means 64.40 A 53.73 C 60.86 B
HSD 0.72

Means with the same lowercase letter within columns and uppercase letter within rows are not statistically different (Tukey, P ≤ 0.05).

YIELD: commercial yield; PH: plant height; ABW: average bulb weight; PSD: pseudostem diameter; NL: number of leaves; CAP: concentration of pyruvic acid; pH; BS: bulb shape; BD: bulb diameter; HSD: honest significant difference.

When the transplant was performed in July, yields decreased, probably due to the occurrence of temperatures (between 15 and 25 °C) higher than the suitable range for these varieties. The highest temperatures, recorded in September at the beginning of bulb differentiation, favor fast formation and maturation (smaller bulbs), resulting in reduced yields (Souza & Resende, 2002). The Cimarron hybrid presented the lowest yield (27.90 t∙ha-1), being even lower than the average yield in Brazil (28.03 t∙ha-1 ,Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola [IBGE - LSPA], 2015).

For each planting date, plant height was similar among the hybrids. On the second date, NUN 1205 presented the greatest height (58.99 cm), differing statistically from the others. In relation to the June transplant, the highest averages (between 51.40 and 58.99 cm, Table 2) of all hybrids was observed.

For average bulb weight, hybrids differed only with respect to the May transplant date, where Cimarron obtained the lowest weight (106.75 g, Table 2). In June, when high commercial prices occur due to the demand for onion to make fast food (Baier et al., 2009), the highest means, 183.00 and 193.50 g, were recorded in Cimarron and Dulciana, respectively.

For the July transplant, there was a decrease in average bulb weight (Table 2), which in the Cimarron hybrid fell from 183 g∙bulb-1 in June to 93 g∙bulb-1. In this case, high relative humidity caused by rainfall at the end of the cycle could have caused the cessation of bulb growth.

Quartiero et al. (2014) evaluated onion hybrids in Guarapuava-PR and found a significant reduction in average bulb weight at late transplant dates. This may have been due to variations in photoperiod and temperature during the year causing alterations in characteristics related to bulb yield and premature bulb formation (Sirtoli, Furlan, & Rodrigues, 2010). However, the photoperiod in the experimental area had no significant alterations, so temperature was the factor that contributed the most to the modifications observed.

In the May transplant, no significant statistical differences in pseudostem diameter were observed. This parameter is important since it is related to the photosynthetically active part and the onion bulb. When the plant is exposed to short periods of extreme cold (<6 °C), the pseudostem tends to increase in diameter. For the evaluated dates, the pseudostem had values between 1 and 2 cm in diameter (Table 2), values similar to those found by Kunz et al. (2009) and considered acceptable to the market.

In terms of number of leaves, observed values ranged between 4.81 for Dulciana and 7.12 for Cimarron (Table 2). The results found in this study are similar to those reported by Cecílio-Filho, Marcolini, May, and Barbosa (2010) in San José del Rio Pardo-SP, where six and seven leaves were obtained. An unusual characteristic of the onion is that when the growth phase of the bulb begins the growth of the leaves is interrupted. For this reason, the size of the bulb at harvest is highly associated with the size and number of plant leaves; therefore, it is important to maintain a large number of healthy leaves with good development to ensure the production of large bulbs that are suitable for the market (Oliveira, 2015).

According to the methodology proposed by Dhumal, Datir, and Pandey (2007) to classify the concentration of pyruvic acid, onions are classified on the basis of pungency as low pungency/sweet if the bulbs have values from 0-3 μmol pyruvic acid∙g-1; medium pungency for 3-7 μmol pyruvic acid∙g-1 and high above 7 μmol pyruvic acid∙g-1. The concentrations of pyruvic acid in the hybrid Cimarron were 8.48, 8.91 and 7.87 μmol pyruvic acid∙g-1, in May, June, and July, respectively (Table 2). These values corresponded to the category of high concentrations.

On the other hand, medium concentrations were obtained by NUN 1205 for all dates, while Dulciana presented medium values in June and high ones in July (Table 2). According to Crowther et al. (2005), onions with a low concentration of pyruvic acid are desirable when they are destined to consumption in natura, this being an essential prerequisite for this type of market. However, Souza et al. (2008) assert that there is a market preference for the consumption of onions with a medium to high concentration of pyruvic acid, which is a classification similar to that observed in the present study.

Among all the post-harvest characteristics of onion, the concentration of pyruvic acid is one of the most important (Vilela-de Resende et al., 2010). The chemical composition and sensory characteristics of the bulb’s taste, color and smell depend mainly on genetic and environmental factors, crop management, nutrition and planting date (Randle, 1997).

A high concentration of pyruvic acid is desirable for the industrialization of onions; this is due to the fact that aromatic compounds are lost during the dehydration processes (de Rezende-Chagas, Milanez-de Resende, & Pereira, 2004).

The pH did not vary significantly between the evaluated dates and hybrids, with the exception of NUN 1205, which had pH values of 4.81 in May and 5.12 in July (Table 2). These values are similar to those found by Schunemann, Treptow, Lopes-Leite, and Vendruscolo (2006) and Vilela-de Resende et al. (2010). In relation to bulb shape, the hybrids did not differ significantly in the transplant dates (60-80 mm, Table 2).

Another important characteristic in the classification of the collected product is the transverse diameter. Souza and Resende (2002) note that the Brazilian consumer market prefers bulbs of 40-80 mm in size. In the present study, the three hybrids presented values within that range (48.6-68.7 mm, Table 2).

Dulciana presented an average diameter of 55.1 mm in July, differing significantly from the other dates, whereas Cimarron in May had the smallest bulb diameter (48.6 mm). Very Large bulbs are not commercially desirable, obtaining lower prices than those of class III (de Oliveira-Rodrigues, Costa-Grangeiro, de Negreiros, da Silva, & Novo-Júnior, 2015).The ideal genotype for onion cultivation is the one with the highest yield associated with the highest percentage of bulbs belonging to class III (51 and 60 mm) and class III mature (61 and 70 mm), which are preferred by housewives (Silva, Teixeira, & Amado, 1991) and receive the best remuneration during the commercialization process (Torre-Figueiredo et al., 2011).

In the present study, all bulbs had a class III mature rating, which means that the state of Tocantins has the potential for onion production and has an adequate photoperiod (between 11 and 12 hours) for the formation of good quality bulbs for the market.

Conclusions

In the region of Gurupi, Tocantins, Brazil, yields similar to those of other onion-producing regions were observed; therefore, onion production can be recommended in this region.

The most suitable month for transplanting onion in this region is June, which is when the highest yields were obtained. However, the May and June transplants also achieved adequate yields with bulb classifications that satisfy market demands.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank A Nunhems Bayer CropScience Vegetable Seeds® for providing the onion hybrids, and also the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Agency for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the Federal University of Tocantins (UFT)

References

Anthon, G. E., & Barrett, D. M. (2003). Modified for the determination of pyruvic acid with DNPH in the assessment of onion pungency. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 83(12), 1210-1213. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1525 [ Links ]

Baier, J. E., Vilela-de Resende, J. T., Gonҫalves-Galvão, A., Mendes-Battistelli, G., Modesto-Machado, M., & Ventura-Faria, M. (2009). Produtividade e rendimento comercial de bulbosde cebola em função da densidade de cultivo. Ciências e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, 33(2), 496-501. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542009000200021 [ Links ]

Cecílio-Filho, A. B., Marcolini, M. W., May, A., & Barbosa, J. C. (2010). Produtividade e classificação de bulbos de cebola em função da fertilização nitrogenada e potássica, em semeadura direta. Científica, Jaboticaba l, 38(1/2), 14-22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2010v38n1%2F2p14+-+22 [ Links ]

Companhia de entrepostos e armazéns gerais do Estado de São Paulo (CEAGESP). (2001). Programa Brasileiro para a melhoria dos padrões comerciais e embalagens de hortigranjeiros. São Paulo: Author. [ Links ]

Crowther, T., Collin, H. A., Smith, B., Tomsett, A. B., O’Connor, D., & Jones, M. G. (2005). Assessment of the flavour of fresh uncooked onions by taste-panels and analysis of the flavour precursors, pyruvate and sugars. Journal of the Science Food Agriculture, 85(1), 112-120. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1966 [ Links ]

De Oliveira-Rodrigues, G. S., Costa-Grangeiro, L., de Negreiros, M. Z., da Silva, A. C., & Novo-Júnior, J. (2015). Qualidade de cebola em função de doses de nitrogênio e épocas de plantio. Revista Caatinga, Mossoró, 28(3), 239-247. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/html/2371/237141066027/Links ]

De Rezende-Chagas, S. J., Milanez-de Resende, G., & Pereira, L. V. (2004). Características qualitativas de cultivares de cebola no Sul de Minas Gerais. Ciências e Agrotecnologia 28(1), 102-106. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542004000100013 [ Links ]

Dhumal, K., Datir, S., & Pandey, R. (2007). Assessment of bulb pungency level in diferente Indian cultivars of onion (Allium cepa L.). Food Chemistry, 100(4), 1328-1330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.11.044 [ Links ]

Duarte-Costa, N., & Milanez-de Resende, G. (2007). Cultivo da cebola no Nordeste. Embrapa Semi-Árido, 3, 1-90. Retrieved from https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/162405/1/Cultivodacebola.pdfLinks ]

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa). (2006). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Rio de Janeiro: Author. [ Links ]

Faria, M., Morales, R. G., de Resende, J. T., Zanin, D., Menezes, C., & Kobori, R. (2012). Desempenho agronômico e heterose de genótipos de cebola. Horticultura Brasileira, 30(2), 220-225. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362012000200007 [ Links ]

Ferreira, D. F. (2008). SISVAR-Sistema de análise de variância, versão 5.3. Lavras Minas Gerais: Universidade Federal de Lavras. [ Links ]

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola (IBGE - LSPA). (2015). Dados de previsão de safra novembro de 2015 (20 de noviembre de 2015). Retrieved fromhttp://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/ prevsaf/default.asp?t=1&z=t&o=26&u1=31&u2=1&u3=1&u4=1Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Meteorología (INMET). (2015). Informe meteorológico (18 de noviembre de 2015). Retrieved from http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=tempo/graficosLinks ]

Köppen, W. (1948). Climatología: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. México: Fondo de Cultura Económico. [ Links ]

Kunz, V. L., Sirtoli, L. F., Furlan, L., Poletti, L., Primo, M. A, & Rodrigues, J. D. (2009). Produtividade de cebola sob diferentes fontes e modos de aplicação de adubos nitrogenados en cobertura. Revista biodiversidade, 8(1), 31-37. Retrieved from http://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/biodiversidade/article/view/88/79Links ]

Menezes, F. O. G., & Vieira-Neto, J. (2012). Produção da cebola em função da densidade de plantas. Horticultura Brasileira, 30(4), 733-739. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/hb/v30n4/v30n4a28.pdfLinks ]

Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC). (2000). International Official Methods of Analysis. Maryland: Author. [ Links ]

Oliveira, V. R. (2015). Árvore do conhecimento. Cebola. Brasil: Embrapa. [ Links ]

Oliveira, V. R., Mendonça, J. L., & Santos, C. A. (2009). Cultivo da cebola - clima. Brasília: Embrapa Hortaliças. [ Links ]

Quartiero, A., Faria, M., Resende, J., Figueiredo, A., Camargo, L., Santos, R., & Kobori, R. (2014). Desempenho agronômico, heterose e estabilidade fenotípica de genótipos de cebola. Horticultura Brasileira, 32(3), 259-266. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362014000300004. [ Links ]

Randle, W. M. (1997). Onion flavor chemistry and factors influencing flavor intensity. ACM symposium series (pp. 660). Washington: American Chemical Society. doi: 10.1021/bk-1997-0660.ch005 [ Links ]

Salvador, C. A. (2015). Cebola - Boletim. Brazil: Secretaria de Estado da Agricultura e do Abastecimento y Departamento de Economia Rural. Retrieved from http://www.agricultura.pr.gov.br/modules/qas/uploads/4313/cebola_24abr_2015.pdfLinks ]

Schunemann, A. P., Treptow, R., Lopes-Leite, D., & Vendruscolo, J. L. (2006). Pungência e características químicas em bulbos de genótipos de cebola (Allium cepa L.) cultivados no alto vale do Itajaí, SC, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Agrociência , Pelotas, 12(1), 77-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18539/cast.v12i1.4492 [ Links ]

Schwimmer, S., & Weston, W. J. (1961). Onion flavor and odor, enzimatic development of pyruvic acid as a measure of pungency. Journal Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 9(4), 301-304. doi: 10.1021/jf60116a018 [ Links ]

Silva, E., Teixeira, L. A. J., & Amado, T. J. C. (1991). The increase in onion production in Santa Catarina State, South of Brazil. Onion Newsletter for the Tropics, 3(1), 7-9. [ Links ]

Sirtoli, M. F., Furlan, L., & Rodrigues, J. D. (2010). Avaliação de cultivares de cebola para conserva em diferentes épocas de semeadura em Marechal Cândido Rondon-PR. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis, 9(1), 5-14. Retrieved from http://www.bibliotekevirtual.org/revistas/SAP/v09n01/v09n01a01.pdfLinks ]

Souza, J., Grangeiro, L., Santos, G. M., Duarte-Costa, N., Santos, C. A., & Nunes, G. H. (2008). Avaliação de genótipos de cebola no semi-árido Nordestino. Horticultura Brasileira, 26(1), 97-101. doi: 10.1590/S0102-05362008000100019 [ Links ]

Souza, R. J., & Resende, G. M. (2002). Cultura da cebola. Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras. [ Links ]

Torre-Figueiredo, A. S., Vilela-de Resende, J. T., Hunger, H., Tauffer-de Paula, J., Munhoz-Dias, D., & Ventura-Faria, M. (2011). Desempenho de genótipos comerciais de cebola cultivados em diferentes densidades populacionais. Horticultura Brasileira, 29(2), 2265-2272. Retrieved from http://www.abhorticultura.com.br/eventosx/trabalhos/ev_5/a4125_t5880_comp.pdfLinks ]

Vilela-de Resende, J. T., Bona-Pires, D., Pinheiro-Camargo, L. K., & Marchese, A. (2007). Desempenho produtivo de cultivares de cebola em Guarapuava, Paraná. Ambiência, 3(2), 193-199. Retrieved from http://revistas.unicentro.br/index.php/ambiencia/article/view/314/436Links ]

Vilela-de Resende, J. T., Marchese, A., Pinheiro-Camargo, L. K., Clock-Marodin, J., Kopanski-Camargo, C., & Ferreira-Morales, R. G. (2010). Produtividade e qualidade pós-colheita de cultivares de cebola em sistemas de cultivo orgânico e convencional. Bragantia, 69(2), 305-311. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052010000200007 [ Links ]

Received: January 09, 2017; Accepted: April 28, 2017

*Corresponding author: alinet4t@hotmail.com, tel. +55 (63) 98108-4554.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License