SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue1Effects of homeopathic medicines on physiological indicators and the initial development of Yorimón bean (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp.)The Homeopathy increases tolerance to stress by NaCl in plants of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety Quivican author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Terra Latinoamericana

On-line version ISSN 2395-8030Print version ISSN 0187-5779

Terra Latinoam vol.38 n.1 Chapingo Jan./Mar. 2020  Epub June 20, 2020

https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v38i1.583 

Scientific papers

Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Quivican variety to the application of homeopathic medicines

Milagro García-Bernal1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-7284

Carlos Michel Ojeda-Silvera1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-0672

Daulemys Batista-Sánchez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-3171

Fernando Abasolo-Pacheco3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-7432

José Manuel Mazón-Suástegui1   
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-1180

1 Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C. Av. I. P. N. No. 195, Colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur. 23096 La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.

2 Universidad Central de las Villas (CBQ). Carretera a Camajuaní km 5.5. Santa Clara, Provincia de Villa Clara, Cuba.

3 Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Campus “Ingeniero Manuel Agustín Haz Álvarez”. Av. Quito km 1 1/2 vía a Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas. Quevedo, Los Ríos, Ecuador.


Summary:

The response of Phaseolus vulgaris L. variety Quivican to the application of homeopathic medicines as growth promoters was assessed during its initial plant development. A completely randomized experimental design was applied with three homeopathic treatments: TH1 [MgM-31CH (Magnesium metallicum 31 CH)], TH2 [MaMnP-3CH (Magnesium-Manganum phosphoricum)], TH3 [TH1 + TH2), and distilled water as Control group. The analyses showed the best results in the plants that received TH3 with a significant increase (P ≤ 0.05) with respect to the control group in the following response variables: length of stem (47.14%) and root (30.27%); biomass of fresh root (13.57%), leaves (68.36%) and stem (11.88%); dry biomass of leaves (84.72%) and stem (36.11%); leaf area (21.74%), stem diameter (39.54%) and number of leaves (16.66%). These results confirm that agricultural homeopathy is an eco-friendly and technologically viable alternative for bean cultivation because it stimulates growth, which allows obtaining more vigorous plants with greater productive potential and less dependent on agrochemicals. Because homeopathic medicines are harmless, the balance of the agroecosystem is also improved, achieving a positive impact in the short, medium and long term besides their application in conventional and organic agricultural production.

Index words: agricultural homeopathy; growth promotion; legumes

Resumen:

Se evaluó la respuesta de Phaseolus vulgaris L. variedad Quivicán, a la aplicación de medicamentos homeopáticos como promotores del crecimiento durante su desarrollo vegetativo inicial. Se aplicó un diseño experimental completamente al azar con tres tratamientos homeopáticos: TH1 [MgM-31CH (Magnesium metallicum 31 CH)], TH2 [MaMnP-3CH (Magnesium-Manganum phosphoricum)], TH3 [TH1 + TH2), y agua destilada como Control. Los análisis mostraron los mejores resultados en las plantas que recibieron TH3, con incrementos significativos (P ≤ 0.05) respecto al control en las siguientes variables de respuesta: longitud del tallo (47.14%) y de raíz (30.27%); biomasa fresca de raíz (13.57%), de hojas (68.36%) y tallo (11.88%); biomasa seca de hojas (84.72%) y tallo (36.11%); área foliar (21.74%); diámetro del tallo (39.54%) y número de hojas (16.66%). Estos resultados confirman que la homeopatía agrícola es una alternativa eco-amigable y tecnológicamente viable para el cultivo de frijol, porque al estimular el crecimiento permite la obtención de plantas más vigorosas con mayor potencial productivo y menos dependientes de los agroquímicos. En virtud de que los medicamentos homeopáticos son inocuos, también se mejora el equilibrio del agroecosistema, logrando un impacto positivo a corto, mediano y largo plazo; aplicable en la producción agrícola convencional y orgánica.

Palabras clave: homeopatía agrícola; promoción del crecimiento; leguminosas

Introduction

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an edible legume of high consumption worldwide and great source of proteins, vitamins and mineral, so it includes in the diet of diverse developing countries of the American continent (Suárez-Martínez et al., 2016).

With the indiscriminate use of agrochemicals in agriculture, resistance of pest-organisms has increased causing a negative impact in the environment; these type of products have been applied in increasing amounts to combat them and periodically substituted by new generation agrochemicals each time more potent and also more harmful to the environment (Meneses, 2017). The new generation agrochemicals also bio-accumulate toxic substances in the plants treated, which also accumulate in animals or humans that finally feed on them. In this context, research and development of ecofriendly alternatives with a high degree of innocuousness and elicitor activity facing biotic and abiotic stress are totally justified to partially or totally substituting other products highly contaminant in agroecosystems (Mazón-Suástegui et al., 2019). One of these alternatives is the use of that promote growth microorganisms in plants that can foster growth of their radicle system and strengthen their response capacity facing different pathogens besides increasing plant biomass production (Leal-Almanza et al., 2018). Another alternative is the use of bio-stimulants rich in amino acids that belong to the plant cellular metabolism, such as VIVA®, FitoMas-E® and other commercial products capable of influencing physiological plant processes, which stimulate plant development, growth, and biological production (Kocira et al., 2015; Koleska et al., 2017; Batista et al., 2017).

A third and less studied option is homeopathic medicine. Homeopathy is a discipline of universal medical science based on recognizing the innate capacity of the organism to maintain itself in equilibrium and with its environment, which could be applied to all living beings (Andrade, 20041; Mazón-Suástegui et al., 2018). The application of this medical therapy in agriculture has been recently intensified under the denomination of “Agricultural Homeopathy” since it is already an ecofriendly and economic alternative for agricultural and livestock farmers, compatible with traditional, organic, ecological, bio-dynamic, including traditional agriculture (Mazón-Suástegui et al., 2019). Agricultural homeopathy is defined as the productive application of scientific knowledge that uses ultra-diluted substances to promote a favorable response in plants cultivated according to the principles of this medicine. Homeopathy strengthens in the plants cultivated their own vital force favoring their dynamic equilibrium with soil and promoting the symptomatology associated to a disease, infection or stressing agent through a systemic focus in a lasting manner and without any collateral effect. All this is possible in any living organism, including plants because they possess a genetic memory, which is continuously enriched (Barberato, 2002).

Homeopathic medicine can affect the plant biological processes positively to control health problems caused by fungi, viruses, and bacteria, contributing to pest control and affecting cultivation growth and development favorably (Meneses, 2017). Ruiz et al. (1997) demonstrated the stimulating effect of homeopathic preparations in the cultivation of P. vulgaris by increasing biomass in treated plants. Another research performed in the cultivation of Allium fistolosum revealed an increase in plant biomass when it was treated with homeopathic medicine (Sánchez and Meneses, 2011). On the other hand, Bonato et al. (2009) found that with the use of homeopathic medications, such as Sulphur and Arsenicum (dynamizations 6, 12, 24 and 30 CH) applied weekly for 98 days in Mentha arvensis, obtained an increase in plant height and fresh and dry biomass. Rossi et al. (2003) applied the homeopathic medicine Carbo vegetabilis 30 CH to lettuce Lactuca sativa for 48 h, reporting and increase in plant dry weigh of 22% with respect to the control group. Arellano-Rodríguez et al. (2017) assessed homeopathic dynamizations prepared from alkaloid extracts of Lupino (Lupinus rotundiflorus) in tomato (Solanun lycopersicum) plants as growth promoters and found that the plants with such treatments showed a significant increase in stem length. Such results confirmed the efficiency of homeopathic medicine in plants. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the response of the bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. variety Quivican plant to homeopathic medicine application as growth promoters.

Materials and Methods

Study Site

Research was developed in the facilities of Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR) located northwest of the city of La Paz, Baja California Sur, México at 24° 08’ 10.03” N and 110° 25’ 35.31” W at 7 m altitude in the Laboratorio de Fisiotecnia Vegetal and Campo Agrícola Experimental of CIBNOR. A metallic structure totally covered with an anti-aphid white 30%-shade mesh also covered by a black 35% shade mesh was used. The experiment lasted 35 days, corresponding to the initial plant growth stage with a minimum, medium, and maximum temperature of 14.25 ± 3.83, 27.64 ± 4.01, 45.17 ± 2.94 ºC, respectively, and a relative humidity of 34.8 ± 5.07%. These climatological data were recorded with a portable climatological station (Vantage Pro2® Davis Instruments, USA) within the area of study.

Experimental Design

A completely randomized design was applied with three homeopathic treatments: TH1 [MgM-31CH (Magnesium metallicum 31CH)], TH2 [MaMnP-3CH (Magnesium-Manganum phosphoricum 3 CH)], TH3 mixed [MgM-31CH + MaMnP-3CH] and a control (distilled water, DW) group, with six replicates per treatment.

Experimental Development

The treatments were performed by dilution and agitation (succussion) from the commercial homeopathic medicine Magnesium metallicum 30 CH (Similia®) and Magnesium-Manganum-Phosphoricum-Injeel (Rubiopharma®) authorized for their use in humans with registry in the Health Ministry (Secretaría de Salud) of Mexico. For this purpose, the procedures from Farmacopea Homeopática de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (SSA, 2015) were applied, including serial centesimal dilution (1:99) alternated with vigorous agitation (Mazón-Suástegui et al., 2018).

Certified seeds were used from the variety Quivican white cowpea bean from Empresa de Semillas (Villa Clara, Cuba). Previous to the experiment, a germination test was used following the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA, 2010) methodology. Seeds were disinfected previously by immersion in a hypochlorite solution at 1.5% for 15 min and then in ethanol at 70% for five min. Subsequently, seeds were rinsed with distilled water, dried with sterilized paper, and embedded in the corresponding homeopathic or control treatments. Seeds were sown in plastic pots (three seeds/pot) with 5 kg of commercial substrate (Sogemix PM®). Emergence assessment was performed daily to know the effect of the initial application of the homeopathic and control treatments. When 50% + 1 of the seeds sown emerged, the start of the initial growth stage was considered. From that moment on, the application of 1 mL (homeopathic medicine) and control (distilled water) were applied every other day surrounding the stems of the emerging plants. Substrate humidity was guaranteed by applying homogeneous irrigation at field capacity until the study concluded (T35). Photosynthetic rate (TF) was measured in completely turgid and healthy leaves on sunny days and at the schedule of greater solar radiation (twice per week) using the ADC photosynthesis meter (BioScientific-Ltd model LCi, USA).

At the end of the experiment, length (cm) of stem (LT) and root (LR); weight (g) of fresh root biomass (BFR), stem (BFT), and leaves (BFH); dry root (BSR), stem (BST) and leaf (BSH) biomass were measured. These measurements were performed with an analytical balance (Mettler Toledo®, model AG204 USA). Leaf area (AF) (cm2) was obtained using a leaf area integrating equipment (Li-Cor®, model-LI-3000A, series PAM 1701 Lincoln, NE, USA). Stem diameter (DT) (mm) was also measured and leaf number (No. H) counted.

Statistical Analyses

Analyses of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison of means (Tukey’s HSD, P ≤ 0.05) were performed. In all the variables, average values were considered significantly different when P ≤ 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed with the program Statistica v.10.0 for Windows® (StatSoft® Inc., 2011).

Results and Discussion

When the experiment ended (T35), the common bean P. vulgaris L. var. Quivican that received the homeopathic treatments (TH1, TH2 and TH3) responded favorably recording increase in the majority of the response variables studied. A higher response was observed in the plants treated with TH3 (MgM-31CH + MaMnP-3CH), which contained metallic and magnesium phosphate and manganese, homeopathically diluted and dynamized. With this treatment (TH3), statistically significant average values and percentages (%) were obtained, higher than those recorded in the plants of the control group (distilled water) for the following response variables: LT 47.14%, LR 30.27%, BFR 13.57%, BFT 11.88%, BFH 68.36%, BST 36.11%, BSH 84.72 %, AF 21.74%, DT 39.54% and number of leaves 16.66%. These results showed that TH3 favored P. vulgaris growth, under the cultivation conditions applied (Table 1), which agree with that reported by Castro (20022) who observed leaf area increase on both carrot and beet when different homeopathic dynamizations of Phosphorus were applied, impacting their yield positively. With the application of this same medicine, an increase in stem diameter of white Eucalyptus globulus was also recorded (Duarte, 20073).

Table 1: Effect of homeopathic medicines on the morphometric variables of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety Quivican. 

Morphological parameters Treatments
TH1 TH2 TH3 Control
LT (cm) 13.4 ab 13.4 ab 15.45 a 10.5 b
LR (cm) 20.6 ab 20.05 ab 27.97 a 21.47 b
BFT (g) 6.25 b 7.00 b 8.20 a 3.87 c
BFR (g) 12.25 ab 8.88 b 23.75 a 11.12 b
BFH (g) 13.75 b 14.75 b 21.12 a 7.87 c
BST (g) 0.67 a 0.72 a 0.85 a 0.36 b
BSR (g) 0.71 b 0.58 b 1.52 a 1.04 ab
BSH (g) 1.43 b 1.56 b 2.05 a 0.72 c
AF (cm2) 476.15 b 495.14 ba 629.37 a 283.83 c
DT (mm) 2.97 b 2.92 b 3.07 a 2.20 c
No. H 5.75 a 5.75 a 6.25 a 3.75 b

LT = stem length; LR = root length; BFT = fresh stem biomass; BFR = fresh root biomass; BFH = fresh leaf biomass; BST = dry stem biomass; BSR = dry root biomass; BSH = dry leaf biomass; AF = leaf area; DT = stem diameter; No. H = number of leaves. Values with different letters in the same row differ according to Tukey’s (P < 0.05).

TH3 is a mix of two homeopathic medicines: Magnesium metallicum in the 31st Hahnemanian Centesimal dilution (MgM-31CH) and Magnesium-Manganum phosphoricum 3rd Hahnemanian Centesimal dilution (MaMnP-3CH). The results obtained in the common bean P. vulgaris morphometric variables when TH3 was applied can be explained in function of the mother tincture (MT) components or initial concentration, starting from the initial dynamization process (serial dilution and agitation) of both homeopathic medicines. The importance of magnesium, manganese, and phosphorus is sufficiently known because they are mineral nutrients that act in diverse plant metabolic routes and physiological processes. Magnesium is essential for growth of any live cell; it is a secondary macronutrient essential for plant growth and development and forms part of the chlorophyll molecule (Cakmak and Yazici, 2010).

Magnesium phosphate, included in TH2 (Magnesium-Manganum phosphoricum 3CH) and also in TH3 because it is the sum of TH1 and TH2, plays an important role in plant nutrition and in its resistance to diseases (Huber, 1980); 75% of leaf magnesium is known to be involved in protein synthesis, and 15-20% of total magnesium is associated with photosynthetic pigments (White and Broadley, 2009). Magnesium acts mainly as a cofactor of a series of enzymes involved in photosynthetic carbon fixation and metabolism (Cakmak and Kirkby, 2008; Maathuis, 2009; Hermans et al., 2013). Phosphorus is, after nitrogen, the second nutrient in quantitative importance for the development of agricultural cultivations; it is found in organic and inorganic forms in soils, but only is a small part available for plants due to its chemical fixation and its low solubilization (Sindhu et al., 2010). Phosphorus is an essential element that plants require in large amounts to perform different physiological processes, such as respiration, photosynthesis, glycolysis (Shen et al., 2011), and enzyme activation and inactivation (Vance et al., 2003). The results observed during this research study confirmed the hypothesis that the homeopathic medicines used had a stimulating effect on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) var. Quivican plant. This assertion is based on the activity of its active ingredients, assuming that TH3 contains magnesium nanoparticles, manganese, and phosphorus, and it could also contain, in some measurement, metallic magnesium nanoparticles. The separated action of the TH3 components can explain a greater efficiency of this combined homeopathic treatment besides the potential synergies that result from the interaction TH1 + TH2 = TH3 (Figure 1). The presence of nanoparticles of the “active principle” originally contained in the MT has been demonstrated even in high centesimal dilutions (30CH and 200CH) of homeopathic medicines by physical-chemical studies (Chikramane et al., 2012).

Figure 1: Effect of homeopathic medicines on the photosynthetic rate of plants of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety Quivican. 

The TF of the treated plants with the homeopathic medicine mix (TH3) had a better development when compared to the other treatments (Figure 1). This result can be attributed to the increase in leaf area that favored plants treated with TH3 to have a greater light reception area and more efficient use in the physiological processes involved, such as photosynthesis. At the same time, it impacted biomass production in the plants treated with the TH3 mix. On the other hand, the number of leaves is known to be closely related to photosynthetic activity (Honório et al., 2016), and precisely, the plants that received this treatment had a greater number of leaves (6.25), compared with the control group (distilled water) without homeopathic medicine.

The revealed results agree with that reported by Panda et al. (2013) who assessed three homeopathic dynamizations in growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants, observing a positive impact in TF on those treated with homeopathy, which also increased their fresh biomass. In another study performed by Mazón-Suástegui et al. (2019) in basil O. basilicum plants treated with homeopathic medicine showed a favorable response in TF and a significant increase in fresh biomass. The results of the PR demonstrated in this research may be related directly with the presence of magnesium nanoparticles in TH3, favoring the formation of chlorophyll molecules and stimulating the photosynthetic process (Mazón-Suástegui et al., 2018).

The use of homeopathic medicines in agriculture, particularly in the cultivation of P. vulgaris, can be of great interest in general and practical relevance. Homeopathic dynamizations are much more economic than agrochemicals and their application is simple and effective. They are highly diluted substances of high innocuousness, and their environmental impact is greatly reduced or practically inexistent. To summarize, agricultural homeopathy has a great potential because homeopathic dynamizations have a measurable positive impact in the plants treated and lack toxicity, their cost is low and they are innocuous (Ruiz, 2004; Mazón-Suástegui et al., 2019).

Conclusions

The application of homeopathic medicines in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) var. Quivican plants favored their growth significantly. An increase in photosynthetic rate, length of stem and root, fresh root biomass, fresh and dry stem and leaf biomass, leaf area, stem diameter and number of leaves. The best results were obtained with the mixed TH3 (MgM-31CH + MaMnP-3CH) that contained the homeopathic medicines Magnesium metallicum and Magnesium-Manganum phosphoricum. These results showed that agricultural homeopathy is an alternative with application in production, totally compatible with organic agriculture. Specifically, the application of TH3 is recommended during the initial growth stage of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) var. Quivican white cowpea plant.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by Fondo Sectorial de Investigación para la Educación (México), Proyecto Ciencia Básica SEP-CONACYT No. 258282 “Evaluación experimental de homeopatía y nuevos probióticos en el cultivo de moluscos, crustáceos y peces de interés comercial”, under the academic responsibility of JMMS. The authors would like to thank the support of CIBNOR technical staff: Lidia Hirales-Lucero and Pedro Luna-García; and Diana Fischer for translation-editorial services.

REFERENCES

Arellano-Rodríguez, L. J., J. Sánchez-Martínez, M. C. Arriaga-Ruiz y J. M. Padilla-García. 2017. Uso de extractos de alcaloides de Lupino (Lupinus rotundiflorus) en diluciones homeopáticas como estimulador del rendimiento en Jitomate (Solanum lycopersicum). Rev. Energ. Quím. Fís. 4: 13-18. [ Links ]

Batista Sánchez, D., B. Murillo Amador, A. Nieto Garibay, L. Alcaraz Meléndez, E. Troyo Diéguez, L. Hernández Montiel y C. M. Ojeda Silvera. 2017. Mitigación de NaCl por efecto de un bioestimulante en la germinación de Ocimum basilicum L. Terra Latinoamericana 35: 309-320. [ Links ]

Barberato, C. 2002. Homeopatia também na agricultura. J. Rural 1325: 8. [ Links ]

Bonato, C. M., G. T. Proença, and B. Reis. 2009. Homeopathic drugs Arsenicum album and Sulphur affect the growth and essential oil content in mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Acta Sci. Agron. 31: 101-105. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i1.6642. [ Links ]

Cakmak, I. and A. M. Yazici. 2010. Magnesium: Forgotten element in crop production. Better Crops 94: 23-25. [ Links ]

Cakmak, I. and E. A. Kirkby. 2008. Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage. Physiol. Plant 133: 692-704. [ Links ]

Chikramane, P. S., A. K. Suresh, J. R. Bellare, and S. G. Kane. 2010. Extreme homeopathic dilutions retain starting materials: A nanoparticulate perspective. Homeopathy 99: 231-242. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2010.05.006. [ Links ]

Hermans, C., S. J. Conn, J. Chen, Q. Xiao, and N. Verbruggen. 2013. An update on magnesium homeostasis mechanisms in plants. Metallomics 5: 1170-1183. doi: 10.1039/c3mt20223b. [ Links ]

Honório, I. C. G., F. P. G. Bonfim, S. G. Montoya, V. W. D. Casali, J. P. V. Leite, and P. R. Cecon. 2016. Growth, development and content of flavonoids in calendula (Calendula off icinalis L.). Acta Sci. Agron. 38: 69-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i1.25976. [ Links ]

Huber, D. M. 1980. The role of mineral nutrition in defense. pp. 381-406. In: J. G. Horsfall and E. B. Cowling. (eds.). Plant disease: An advanced treatise. Academic Press. New York, NY, USA. [ Links ]

ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). 2010. Rules proposals for the International Rules for Seed Testing 2010 Edition. OM Rules Proposals for the International Rules for Seed Testing 2010 Edition.doc. Approved by ECOM Decision. No.498. Bassersdorf, Switzerland. [ Links ]

Kocira, S., A. Kocira, M. Szmigielski, A. Piecak, A. Sagan, and U. Malaga-Tobola. 2015. Effect of an amino acids-containing biostimulator on common bean crop. Przemysl Chemiczny 94: 1732-1736. doi: 10.15199/62.2015.10.16. [ Links ]

Koleska, I., D. Hasanagic, V. Todorovic, S. Murtic, I. Klokic, N. Paradikovic, and B. Kukavica. 2017. Biostimulant prevents yield loss and reduces oxidative damage in tomato plants grown on reduced NPK nutrition. J. Plant Int. 12: 209-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1319503. [ Links ]

Leal-Almanza, J., M. A. Gutiérrez-Coronado, L. Castro-Espinoza, F. Lares-Villa, J. M. Cortes-Jiménez, and S. de los Santos-Villalobos. 2018. Vegetable growth promoter microorganisms with agricultural plaster on potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) Under shadow housing. Agrociencia 52: 1149-1159. [ Links ]

Maathuis, F. J. M. 2009. Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12: 250-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.003. [ Links ]

Mazón-Suástegui, J. M., B. Murillo-Amador, D. Batista-Sánchez, Y. Agüero-Fernández, M. R. García-Bernal, and C. M. Ojeda-Silvera. 2018. Natrum muriaticum as an attenuant of NaCl-salinity in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Nova Sci. 10: 120‑136. doi: 10.21640/ns.v10i21.1423. [ Links ]

Mazón-Suástegui, J. M. , C. M. Ojeda-Silvera, M. García-Bernal, M. A. Avilés-Quevedo, F. Abasolo-Pacheco, D. Batista-Sánchez, D. Tovar-Ramírez, F. Arcos-Ortega, B. Murillo-Amador, A. Nieto-Garibay, Y. Ferrer-Sánchez, R. M. Morelos-Castro, A. Alvarado-Mendoza, M. Díaz-Díaz, and B. Bonilla-Montalvan. 2019. Agricultural homeopathy: A new insights into organicʼs. IntechOpen Books. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.84482. [ Links ]

Meneses-Moreno, N. 2017. Agrohomeopatía como alternativa a los agroquímicos. Rev. Méd. Homeop. 10: 9-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.homeo.2017.04.004. [ Links ]

Panda, S. S., S. S. Mohanty, and N. K. Dhal. 2013. Effects of potentised homeopathic medicines on the germination, growth and photosynthetic activity of Pisum sativum L. Recent Res. Sci. Technol. 5: 11-14. [ Links ]

Rossi, F., E. J. Ambrosano, N. Guirado, G. M. B. Ambrosano, V. W. D. Casali, J. Tessarioli Neto, P. C. T. Melo, M. C. Arenales, and E. A. Schammass. 2003. Aplicação de solução homeopática Carbo vegetabilis e produtividade da alface. 21: 1 CD-ROM. 43 Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura. Recife. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Olericultura. Brasília. [ Links ]

Ruiz, E., I. Castro y P. Curtis. 1997. Uso del barbasco (Dioscorea villosa) en dinamizaciones homeopáticas como bio-regulador de crecimiento de crecimiento del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris). Cuadernos de Centros Regionales. Chapingo, México. [ Links ]

Ruiz, E. F. 2004. Control Natural de plagas y enfermedades. Revista Aquí Centros Regionales. Año 11, No. 38. Chapingo, México. [ Links ]

Sánchez S., J. L. y N. Meneses Moreno. 2011. Efecto de cinco medicamentos homeopáticos en la producción de peso fresco, en cebollín (Allium f istolosum). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.comenius.edu.mx/Cinco_medicamentos_homeop_ticos_en_Ceboll_n.pdf (Consulta: marzo 15, 2019). [ Links ]

SSA (Secretaría de Salud). 2015. Farmacopea homeopática de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. FEUM-SSA. Biblioteca Nacional de México 615.532-scdd21. ISBN: 978-607-460-509-9. [ Links ]

Shen, J., L. Yuan, J. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Bai, X. Chen, W. Zhang, and F. Zang. 2011. Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 156: 997-1005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175232. [ Links ]

Sindhu, S. S., S. Dua, M. K. Verma, and A. Khandelwal. 2010. Growth promotion of legumes by inoculation of rhizosphere bacteria. pp. 195-235. In: M. S. Khan, J. Musarrat, and A. Zaidi (eds.). Microbes for legume improvement. Springer. Vienna. [ Links ]

StatSoft Inc. 2011. Statistica. System reference. StatSoft, Inc. Tulsa, OK, USA. [ Links ]

Suárez-Martínez, S. E., R. A. Ferriz-Martínez, R. Campos-Vega, J. E. Elton-Puente, K. de la Torre Carbot, and T. García-Gasca. 2016. Bean seeds: Leading nutraceutical source for human health. CyTA-J. Food 14: 131-137. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2015.1063548. [ Links ]

Vance, C. P., C. Uhde-Stone, and D. L. Allan. 2003. Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol. 157: 423-447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x. [ Links ]

White, P. J. and M. R. Broadley. 2009. Biofortif ication of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets - iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine, New Phytol 182: 49-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x. [ Links ]

1 Andrade, F. M. C. 2004. Alteracoes na vitalidade do solo como uso de preparados homeopáticos. Tese doutorado em fitotecnia. Universidad Federal de Viçosa. Viçosa, Brasil. 362 p.

2 Castro, D. M. 2002. Preparações homeopáticas em plantas de cenoura, beterraba, capim-limão e chambá. Tese de Doutor em Ciências. Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil. 227 p.

3 Duarte, E. S. M. 2007. Crescimento e teor de óleo essencial em plantas de Eucalyptus citriodora e Eucalyptus globulus tratadas com homeopatía. Tese de Doutor em Ciências. Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil. 188 p.

Recommended citation: García-Bernal, M., C. M. Ojeda-Silvera, D. Batista-Sánchez, F. Abasolo-Pacheco y J. M. Mazón-Suástegui. 2020. Respuesta del frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variedad Quivicán a la aplicación de medicamentos homeopáticos. Terra Latinoamericana Número Especial 38-1: 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v38i1.583.

Received: June 03, 2019; Accepted: December 06, 2019

Corresponding author (jmazon04@cibnor.mx)

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons