SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue3Spatiotemporal distribution of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in relation to environmental parameters in a coastal lagoon on the Pacific coast of northwestern MexicoFatty acid profile of Cystoseira C. Agardh (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) species from the Tunisian coast: Taxonomic and nutritional assessments author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Ciencias marinas

Print version ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.44 n.3 Ensenada Sep. 2018  Epub July 30, 2021

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v44i3.2851 

Articles

Burrowing activity of the Neohelice granulata crab (Brachyura, Varunidae) in southwest Atlantic intertidal areas

Actividad cavadora del cangrejo Neohelice granulata (Brachyura, Varunidae) en sitios intermareales del atlántico sudoccidental

Sabrina Angeletti1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9860-1266

Patricia M Cervellini1 

Leticia Lescano2  3 

1Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional del Sur (CONICET-UNS), San Juan 670, 8000-Bahía Blanca, Argentina.

2Departamento de Geología, Universidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670, 8000-Bahía Blanca, Argentina.

3Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Calle 526 entre 10 y 11, 1900-La Plata, Argentina.


Abstract

The burrowing and semiterrestrial crab Neohelice granulata actively and constantly builds its burrows in the intertidal zone of the Bahía Blanca Estuary during low tide. Differences in structural morphology of N. granulata burrows and burrowing activities in contrasting microhabitats (saltmarsh and mudflat) were analyzed and related to several conditions, such as tide level, substrate type, sediment properties, and population density. In the mudflat the higher density of total burrows in autumn (172 burrows·m-2) was associated with molt timing, and the higher density of active burrows in summer (144 burrows·m-2) was associated with reproductive migration. Sediments from biogenic mounds (removed by crabs) showed higher water content and penetrability than surface sediments (control), suggesting that bioturbation increases the values of these parameters. Grain size distribution profiles and mineralogical composition did not vary between microhabitats or between seasons. Burrows were all tunnel-shaped and only those from the saltmarsh had chambers inside the tunnels, possibly used for reproductive purposes. Burrows from the saltmarsh had narrow entrances and deep tunnels, and burrows from the mudflat presented very narrow entrances and surface tunnels. Differences in burrow features and burrow activity of N. granulata between microhabitats were confirmed and associated with biotic and abiotic factors, indicating that this species has an adaptive burrowing behavior.

Keywords: bioturbation; burrowing organisms; brackish-water environment; ecological zonation; sediments

Resumen

El cangrejo cavador y semiterrestre Neohelice granulata construye sus cuevas activamente y constantemente en la zona intermareal del estuario de Bahía Blanca durante la marea baja. Se analizaron diferencias en la morfología estructural de las cuevas y la actividad excavadora de N. granulata en microhábitats contrastantes (marisma y planicie de marea) y se relacionaron con diversas condiciones, como el nivel de las mareas, el tipo de sustrato, las propiedades del sedimento y la densidad poblacional. En la planicie de marea la mayor densidad de cuevas totales en el otoño (172 cuevas·m-2) se relacionó con el fenómeno de muda, y la mayor densidad de cuevas activas durante el verano (144 cuevas·m-2) se relacionó con la migración reproductiva. Los sedimentos de los montículos biogénicos (removidos por cangrejos) presentaron mayor contenido de agua y penetrabilidad que los sedimentos superficiales (control), lo cual sugiere que la bioturbación incrementa los valores de estos parámetros. La granulometría y mineralogía no variaron entre los microhábitats ni entre las estaciones. Todas las cuevas presentaron forma de túnel y sólo aquellas provenientes de la marisma presentaron cámaras dentro de los túneles, posiblemente usadas con propósitos reproductivos. Las cuevas de la marisma exhibieron entradas angostas y túneles profundos, y las de la planicie de marea presentaron entradas muy angostas y túneles superficiales. Se confirmaron diferencias en las características de las cuevas y en la actividad excavadora de N. granulata entre los distintos ambientes y se relacionaron con los factores bióticos y abióticos, lo cual indica que esta especie tiene un comportamiento excavador adaptativo.

Palabras clave: bioturbación; organismos excavadores; ambientes salobres; zonación ecológica; sedimentos

Introduction

Neohelice granulata is a crab with a characteristic burrowing behavior. It digs and keeps open semipermanent burrows, allowing it to adopt a semiterrestrial life from the northerneastern coast of Patagonia, Argentina (42º25′S, 64º36′W), to Río de Janeiro, Brazil (22º57′S, 42º50′W) (Spivak 2010). This species uses these burrows to protect itself from wave action, extreme temperatures, and desiccation. The burrows also provide shelter from aerial and terrestrial predators during periods of low tide and from aquatic predators at high tide, thus avoiding the stress of finding refuge or escaping predators. Moreover, burrows are the places where 2 important events in a crab’s life occur, molting and reproduction, and also where young recruits are safeguarded until they reach larger sizes (Milner et al. 2010, Sal-Moyano et al. 2012).

When building and maintaining their burrows, crabs bring sediments to the surface, forming mounds near burrow entrances (Murray et al. 2002). This bioturbation affects sediment structure, because the cohesive nature of the organic matrix is disrupted by this process. Apart from directly affecting sediment porosity and permeability, this process has ecological significance in the aeration of soils containing anoxic sediments and in the distribution of halophytes. Consequently, high densities of active burrowers can increase erosion rates and sediment mobility (Botto and Iribarne 2000).

Variations in the architecture of N. granulata burrows have been observed in studies conducted at other locations in Argentina, such as Mar Chiquita Lagoon, Buenos Aires Province (36º09′26″S, 60º34′11″W; Iribarne et al. 1997, Botto et al. 2006), and San Antonio Bay, Río Negro Province (40º44′51.43″S, 64º52′5.10″W; Sal-Moyano et al. 2012, Luppi et al. 2013, Bas et al. 2014). These studies revealed differences in terms of size and shape of burrows (diameter, depth, volume, and angle) when different intertidal sites, relative to the tide line, were compared.

In the Bahía Blanca Estuary (30º45′-39º25′S, 61º45′-62º25′W), which is near the southern range of N. granulata, Escapa et al. (2007, 2008) analyzed the potential role of the burrowing crab in the erosion of salt marshes and described some architectural variables; their studies are the only antecedents near our study area. However the Bahía Blanca Estuary is a broad ecosystem, and local and specific studies are necessary to include the different habitats in this singular environment. In this context, the main goal of the present study was to assess differences in burrowing behavior and the structural morphology of N. granulata burrows at different intertidal sites in a mesotidal estuary. We hypothesized that burrowing activity and burrow morphology would vary between contrasting habitats, which were selected on the basis of their differences in tide level, sediment characteristics, and substrate type.

Materials and methods

Study area

The Bahía Blanca Estuary, in the southwest region of the Buenos Aires Province, covers an area of approximately 3,000 km2. It is a mesotidal coastal plain estuary with a semidiurnal tidal regime, and it is characterized by the presence of islands that are interconnected by an extensive system of tidal channels that is affected by up to 4-m tides. Freshwater input to the estuary is weak and comes mainly from 2 tributaries on the northern shore of the interior part of the system (Melo 2004). Salinity in the middle portion of the estuary is about 33.98 (annual mean), whereas the inner zone becomes hypersaline during dry summers because of the high evaporation rate (Piccolo et al. 2008). The sampling area was located in Cuatreros Port (38º44′50″S, 62º23′5″W). It is the site that is most representative of the inner zone of the estuary in terms of hydrodynamic conditions and the site with the most marked temperature and salinity fluctuations. The inner zone acts as a true estuary (Negrín 2011) (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1 (a) Study area with zoning of the sampling site (red outline). (b) Schematic representation of the sampling site. MHWS, mean high water springs; MSL, mean sea level. 

Field surveys

We conducted seasonal samplings from autumn 2013 to autumn 2015. Measurements of burrow architecture were performed during the 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 breeding seasons. We selected 2 habitats with visually different vegetation composition and sedimentary and hydrodynamic conditions: a Sarcocornia perennis saltmarsh in the middle intertidal zone and a mudflat in the lower intertidal zone (Fig. 1b).

Burrow density was quantified using quadrats (0.5 × 0.5 m), which were randomly placed at each site during low tides, when the area was exposed (10 replicates). The total number of open burrows in each quadrat was counted, and active burrows were identified by the presence of crabs, prints, or removed sediments, which are lighter in color and have different texture (biogenic mounds). Polyester resin and 2 components, accelerator (cobalt octoate solution) and catalyst (methyl ethyl ketone peroxide), were poured into selected active burrows to make burrow casts.

Sediment samples from the adjacent surface were collected to compare sediments from biogenic mounds with sediments from areas without crabs (control) and to determine water and organic matter contents, grain size distribution profiles, and mineralogical composition. Penetrability (N·cm-2) was measured as the pressure needed to compress the spring of a piston that was forced into the sediment to a standard depth (McLachlan and Brown 2006); low pressure values indicated soft sediments and high values indicated firm sediments.

Laboratory measurements and data analysis

Entrance diameter, tunnel diameter, total length, and total depth were measured from each burrow cast with a digital caliper (±0.1 mm). Curvature and number of branches and entrances were also recorded for each burrow cast. Only data from complete casts were used for analyses.

Sediment properties were analyzed. Water content was determined as the difference between wet and dry weight (after drying at 60 ºC for 5 d). Organic matter content was taken to be the difference between dry and ash-free dry weight (after ignition in a muffle furnace at 500 ºC for 7 h).

For grain size analysis, samples were dried to constant weight and organic matter was removed with hydrogen peroxide at 130 volumes, initially cold and then hot (60 ºC) until bubbling of organic material had ceased. This methodology was used to avoid interference with the determination of clay content. A laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Malvern Mastersizer 2000) was used to determine particle size distribution (0.2-2000 µm particles). Data were analyzed using Mastersizer 2000 v5.40 (Malvern Instrument Ltd. 2007) and Gradistat v5.0 (Blott and Pye 2001) software.

To determine the mineralogical composition of sediments, samples were dried to constant weight and then milled using an agate mortar. An X-ray diffraction analysis was performed with a Rigaku D-Max III-C diffractometer with CuKα radiation and a graphite monochromator at 35 Kv and 15 mA for the qualitative determination of minerals. The loose grain method was also applied under a magnifying glass using a B2-UMA trinocular Olympus stereomicroscope and computerized image processing programs.

To analyze the differences in mean burrow densities and sediment properties, two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used. If a significant interaction was obtained, the main effects of fixed factors were not considered since this type of interaction indicates lack of independence (Underwood 1997). The null hypothesis of no differences in burrow architectural variables between microhabitats was assessed using one-way ANOVA (Zar 1999). For all statistical analyses, data were previously transformed to comply with the normality and homoscedasticity assumptions. In the case of significant differences with ANOVA, a posteriori multiple-comparison tests (Tukey test, Zar 1999) were used to identify significant differences.

Results

The total number of burrows (per square meter) differed significantly between sites (F = 236.78, P < 0.001) but not between seasons (F = 1.26, P > 0.05). The effects of interaction between sites and seasons were also not significant (two-way ANOVA interaction: F = 0.19, P > 0.05). Maximum was 172 burrows·m-2 in autumn in the mudflat (Fig. 2a). When only the active burrows were considered, differences occurred between sites (F = 55.36, P < 0.001) and between seasons (F = 6.61, P < 0.001). The effects of interaction between sites and seasons were also significant (two-way ANOVA interaction: F = 19.47, P < 0.001). The highest number of active burrows was found in the mudflat too, but unlike the previous case, significantly higher values were observed in spring and summer. The maximum number of active burrows (144 burrows·m-2) was recorded in summer in the mudflat, where all the burrows showed signs of activity (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2 Density of Neohelice granulata burrows. Number of total burrows (a) and number of active burrows (b) in 2 microhabitats throughout the seasons. Lines inside boxes are median values, box limits are standard errors of the mean, and error bars represent non-outlier ranges. Different letters above the boxes denote significant differences between groups of data (Tukey test after ANOVA, P < 0.05). 

Water content of sediments varied significantly between microhabitats (F = 18.90, P < 0.001). The sediments from the mudflat had higher water content than those from the saltmarsh. The effect of crab bioturbation on sediment condition was also significant (F = 6.71, P < 0.05); removed sediments had higher water content than control sediments. The effect of this interaction was not significant (F = 0.16, P > 0.05) (Fig. 3a). Organic matter content did not show significant differences between microhabitats (F = 0.04, P > 0.05) or between sediment conditions (F = 0.09, P > 0.05). The effect of the interaction was also not significant (F = 0.10, P > 0.05) (Fig. 3b). When sediment penetrability was analyzed, significant differences were found between microhabitats (F = 7.89, P < 0.05) and sediment conditions (F = 9.44, P < 0.05). Sediments from the mudflat had higher penetrability (lower pressure to penetrate the substrate) than sediments from the saltmarsh. Sediments removed from burrows had higher penetrability than control sediments. The interaction effect of these factors was not significant (F = 0.53, P > 0.05) (Fig. 3c).

Figure 3 Sediment properties in 2 microhabitats: water content (a), organic matter content (b), and penetrability (c) in control sediments and sediments removed by crabs. Lines inside boxes are median values, box limits are standard errors of the mean, and error bars represent non-outlier ranges. Different letters above the boxes denote significant differences between groups of data (Tukey test after ANOVA, P < 0.05). 

The grain size distribution profiles and mineralogical analysis did not show significant differences between sediments from the saltmarsh and sediments from the mudflat. These sediments were composed of thick and very thick limes and very fine sands. Most of the measurements were characterized by one mode between approximately 6 and 60 µm, corresponding to silt particles (Fig. 4). The mineralogical composition of the intertidal sediments was represented mostly by quartz, feldspar, calcite, and halite (salt), and to a lesser extent by clays such as illite and montmorillonite (Fig. 5). No seasonal variations were observed.

Figure 4 Grain size distribution profiles. (a) Saltmarsh. (b) Mudflat. 

Figure 5 X-ray diffraction analysis. (a) Saltmarsh. (b) Mudflat. Qz, quartz; Pl, feldspar; Ar, clay; Ha, halite; Ca, calcite. 

Biogenic mounds did not have a specific orientation. No general pattern was observed with their position in relation to the mouth of the burrow or to the location relative to the subtidal zone. The diameters of burrow entrances measured in the field showed significant differences between microhabitats (F = 29.71, P < 0.01). Burrow entrances from the mudflat were found to be significantly narrower, compared to the burrows from the saltmarsh (Fig. 6).

Figure 6 Entrance diameters of burrows measured in the field (EDF) in 2 microhabitats. Lines inside boxes are median values, box limits are standard errors of the mean, and error bars represent non-outlier ranges. Different letters above the boxes denote significant differences between groups of data (Tukey test after ANOVA, P < 0.05). 

From the casts obtained during field sampling, we observed that burrows had both simple and complex morphologies, ranging from vertical tunnels with a single entrance to complex interconnected tunnels with multiple entrances. Entrance diameters did not show significant differences between the microhabitats (F = 0.53, P > 0.05), nor did the tunnel diameters (F = 0.06, P > 0.05). While for the length variable, significant differences occurred between microhabitats (F = 6.88, P < 0.05). We also found significant differences in burrow depth between microhabitats (F = 5.85, P < 0.05). The casts from the saltmarsh were significantly longer and deeper than those from the mudflat (Fig. 7). The relationship between the depth of the tunnel and the diameter of the entrance (ratio >1) allowed all casts to be classified as tubular. Chambers were found inside burrows from the saltmarsh. These chambers were recorded only within the tunnels, not at the entrances of the burrows.

Figure 7 Parameters measured in burrow casts. (a) Entrance diameter. (b) Tunnel diameter. (c) Total length. (d) Total depth. Lines inside boxes are median values, box limits are standard errors of the mean, and error bars represent non-outlier ranges. Different letters above the boxes denote significant differences between groups of data (Tukey test after ANOVA, P < 0.05). 

Discussion

Neohelice graulata density decreases towards the upper intertidal zone, as noted by Bortolus and Iribarne (1999). However the colonization of the high marsh by N. granulata is facilitated by the presence of plants. Sarcocornia perennis is a good colonizer of high and saline intertidal areas. It generates a shading area allowing the sediment to stay wetter, therefore softer and more liable to being excavated. It also dampens various environmental factors, such as desiccation and high surface temperatures (Bortolus et al. 2002).

The maximum density of total N. granulata burrows recorded in this study was 72 burrows·m-2 for the saltmarsh and 172 burrows·m-2 for the mudflat. These densities are comparatively similar, and sometimes higher, to those reported by other authors for the Argentinean coast. An average of 64.8 burrows·m-2 in saltmarshes and a maximum of 75 burrows·m-2 in mudflat areas were found by Escapa et al. (2008) and Montemayor et al. (2011) in the internal section of the Bahía Blanca Estuary. In the Mar Chiquita Lagoon, burrows can reach a maximum density of 60 burrows·m-2 in saltmarshes and 100 burrows·m-2 in mudflats (Iribarne et al. 1997, Bortolus et al. 2002). By contrast, in the wetlands of Santa Lucía, Uruguay, a maximum of 95 burrows·m-2 were recorded in saltmarshes (Merentiel-Ferreyra 2014).

A higher density of burrows in autumn might be related to the molting phenomenon. According to Luppi et al. (2013), N. granulata is almost inactive on the intertidal surface of the Mar Chiquita Lagoon and Bahía Blanca Estuary during this season, regardless of the daily variation in environmental conditions. So the burrows increase in number and their entrances are closed up with mud deposits. Crabs remain inside the burrows during the pre- and post-molt phases, suggesting a rather synchronized molting season. Burrows are the best refuge for the species during this delicate stage.

Total and active burrow densities showed high variation throughout the year in the mudflat, possibly one of the most dynamic areas in the intertidal zone. In this microhabitat we found the highest densities of active burrows in the summer, compared to the rest of the year. In addition, ovigerous females have been found only in this microhabitat; this could be interpreted as a reproductive advantage for the species. Settling in areas near the coastline during the summer months would allow ovigerous females to better oxygenate their eggs and readily release their larvae (Anger et al. 1994).

The physical properties of the sediments from the mudflat (e.g., the high water content and penetrability) might be correlated with their proximity to the subtidal zone, which is usually saturated with water. Sediments removed by crab activity had higher water content and penetrability than control sediments; this is in agreement with Botto and Iribarne (2000) and Escapa et al. (2007), who indicated that bioturbation increases the values of these parameters. No significant differences were found in the contents of organic matter between sediments, because remixing of sediments by the species kept organic matter homogeneously dispersed in the sedimentary column (Bortolus and Iribarne 1999, Gutiérrez et al. 2006).

The predominant fractions in the grain size distribution profile corresponded to the medium size (medium to fine sands) and the fine size (silts and clays). Homogeneous sediments indicate a low-energy environment. Tidal channels in low-energy environments branch out and leave wide, shallow flood plains, and energy in these areas consequently decreases (Gelós et al. 2004). No significant variations were found in the mineralogical composition of sediments, only in the proportion of minerals present in the sediments from the 2 microhabitats. This study constitutes the first mineralogical results for 2 intertidal zones from the Bahía Blanca Estuary that had not been previously studied.

Burrows in mudflats had a weak structure. They sometimes collapsed when the polyester resin was poured into them. In some cases burrows entrance diameters were overestimated because of this. This is the reason we found differences in the diameters of the burrow entrances from the mudflats when we used both methodologies. However, burrows in the upper intertidal zone were well structured. We believe that the diameters measured in the field are more accurate estimates of the actual dimensions of the entrances than those measured from the casts.

In our study site we found burrows with ramifications and multiple entrances, and this was directly associated with the type of substrate on which the burrows were built. Several experiments with Austrohelice crassa crabs showed that the burrows from sandy sites were unique and simple, while those at sites with a higher proportion of the clay-silt fraction were more complex in structure, with multiple vertical ramifications that were horizontally interconnected through tunnels (Morrisey et al. 1999). These multiple entrances may provide easy access to the shelter, especially in un-vegetated mudflats. In addition, there is evidence suggesting that a larger number of burrow entrances in intertidal mudflats increase the ability to entrap organic particles that may serve as food (Iribarne et al. 1997, Botto et al. 2006). This phenomenon was also observed for species of the genus Uca (Genoni 1991, Qureshi and Saher 2012) and in our study would be supported by the high densities of burrows found in the mudflat.

Burrows from the saltmarsh were longer and deeper than those from the mudflat near the subtidal zone for the internal zone of the Bahía Blanca Estuary. Crabs could change the depth of their burrows in relation to water table depth, to reach groundwater levels. In this way, the burrows would contain water throughout the tide cycle, an adaptation to maintain the humidity in the high areas of the marshes (Iribarne et al. 1997, Escapa et al. 2007).

The burrows with chambers are not mentioned in the bibliography for the Bahía Blanca Estuary. However, copulation is likely to occur not only on the surface but also within the burrows, as was found for the Grapsoidea superfamily by Brockerhoff and McLay (2005). In contrast, burrows from mudflats could have chambers in their tunnels, although they would not be as conspicuous as the ones described by these authors, since the value that was used to detect them (18 mm, Sal-Moyano et al. 2012) could be a very high parameter for this microhabitat.

Our observations and field experiments showed that burrow features and burrowing activity of N. granulata differed between study sites, according to biotic and abiotic factors, indicating that this species has an adaptive burrowing behavior. Moreover, in this study we demonstrated that burrowing activity affects some sediment properties. It is important to highlight that in environments with intermediate levels of energy (such as Bahía Blanca Estuary), burrowing organisms play a very significant role. They destabilize the substrate, making fresh material available to tidal currents and waves, which ultimately increases the load of suspended sediments within the environment. This favors the bioavailability of sediment in the water column, particularly when there are high densities of bioturbators as in mudflats. This may have important implications for the functioning of estuarine ecosystems.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a Doctoral scholarship from the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET, Argentina). We thank Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS) and Commission of Scientific Investigations (CIC, Buenos Aires). This work is part of a doctoral thesis by SA at UNS. We want to thank Paula D Pratolongo and Jorge O Pierini for their contribution in field measurements of burrow architecture and Perla H Angeletti for her advice and helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

Anger K, Spivak E, Bas C, Ismael D, Luppi T. 1994. Hatching rhythms and dispersion of decapod crustacean larvae in a brackish coastal lagoon in Argentina. Helgolander Meeresun. 48(4): 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02366257 [ Links ]

Bas C, Lancia JP, Luppi T, Méndez-Casariego A, Kittlein M, Spivak E. 2014. Influence of tidal regime, diurnal phase, habitat and season on feeding of an intertidal crab. Mar. Ecol. 35(3): 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12083 [ Links ]

Blott SJ, Pye K. 2001. GRADISTAT: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 26(11): 1237-1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.261 [ Links ]

Bortolus A, Iribarne O. 1999. Effects of the SW Atlantic burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulata on a Spartina salt marsh. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 178: 79-88. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps178079 [ Links ]

Bortolus A, Schwindt E, Iribarne O. 2002. Positive plant-animal interactions in the high marsh of an Argentinean coastal lagoon. Ecology 83(3): 733-742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3071877 [ Links ]

Botto F, Iribarne O. 2000. Contrasting effects of two burrowing crabs (Chasmagnathus granulata and Uca uruguayensis) on sediment composition and transport in estuarine environments. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 51(2): 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2000.0642 [ Links ]

Botto F, Iribarne O, Gutierrez J, Bava J, Gagliardini A, Valiela I. 2006. Ecological importance of passive deposition of organic matter into burrows of the SW Atlantic crab Chasmagnathus granulatus. Mar. Ecol.: Prog. Ser. 312: 201-210. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps312201 [ Links ]

Brockerhoff AM, McLay CL. 2005. Mating behaviour, female receptivity and male-male competition in the intertidal crab Hemigrapsus sexdentatus (Brachyura: Grapsidae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 290: 179-191. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps290179 [ Links ]

Escapa M, Perillo GME, Iribarne O. 2008. Sediment dynamics modulated by burrowing crab activities in contrasting SW Atlantic intertidal habitats. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 80(3): 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.020 [ Links ]

Escapa M, Minkoff DR, Perillo GME, Iribarne O. 2007. Direct and indirect effects of burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulatus activities on erosion of southwest Atlantic Sarcocornia-dominated marshes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52(6): 2340-2349. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.6.2340 [ Links ]

Gelós EM, Marcos AO, Spagnolo JO, Schillizi RA. 2004. Textura y mineralogía de los sedimentos. In: Píccolo MC, Hoffmeyer MS (eds.), Ecosistema del Estuario de Bahía Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, pp. 43-50. [ Links ]

Genoni GP. 1991. Increased burrowing by fiddler crabs Uca rapax (Smith) (Decapoda: Ocypodidae) in response to low food supply. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 147(2): 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(91)90186-z [ Links ]

Gutiérrez JL, Jones CG, Groffman PM, Findlay SEG, Iribarne OO, Ribeiro PD, Bruschetti CM. 2006. The contribution of crab burrow excavation to carbon availability in surficial salt-marsh sediments. Ecosystems 9(4): 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0135-9 [ Links ]

Iribarne O, Bortolus A, Botto F. 1997. Between-habitat differences in burrow characteristics and trophic modes in the southwestern Atlantic burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulata. Mar. Ecol.: Prog. Ser. 155: 137- 145. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps155137 [ Links ]

Luppi T, Bas C, Méndez-Casariego A, Albano M, Lancia J, Kittlein M, Rosenthal A, Farías N, Spivak E, Iribarne O. 2013. The influence of habitat, season and tidal regime in the activity of the intertidal crab Neohelice (=Chasmagnathus) granulata. Helgol. Mar. Res. 67(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-012-0300-9 [ Links ]

McLachlan A, Brown AC. 2006. The Ecology of Sandy Shores. Elsevier, USA, 392 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-372569-1.x5000-9 [ Links ]

Melo WD. 2004. Orígenes morfológicos. In: Píccolo MC, Hoffmeyer MS (eds.), Ecosistema del Estuario de Bahía Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, pp. 21-27. [ Links ]

Merentiel-Ferreyra MN. 2014. Biología poblacional del cangrejo estuarino Neohelice granulata (Dana, 1851) (Crustacea: Brachyura: Varunidae) en los humedales del Santa Lucía, Montevideo. MSc thesis, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, 62 pp. [ Links ]

Milner RNC, Booksmythe I, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY. 2010. The battle of the sexes? Territory acquisition and defence in male and female fiddler crabs. Anim. Behav. 79(3): 735-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.030 [ Links ]

Montemayor DI, Addino M, Fanjul E, Escapa M, Alvarez MF, Botto F, Iribarne OO. 2011. Effect of dominant Spartina species on salt marsh detritus production in SW Atlantic estuaries. J. Sea Res. 66(2): 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2011.05.003 [ Links ]

Morrisey DJ, DeWitt TH, Roper DS, Williamson RB. 1999. Variation in the depth and morphology of burrows of the mud crab Helice crassa among different types of intertidal sediment in New Zealand. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 182: 231-242. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps182231 [ Links ]

Murray JMH, Meadows A, Meadows PS. 2002. Biogeomorphological implications of microscale interactions between sediment geotechnics and marine benthos: a review. Geomorphology 47(1): 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-555x(02)00138-1 [ Links ]

Negrín VL. 2011. El rol de las marismas del estuario de Bahía Blanca en el ciclo bio-geoquímico de nutrientes inorgánicos y de materia orgánica. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina, 166 pp. [ Links ]

Piccolo MC, Perillo GME, Melo WD. 2008. The Bahía Blanca estuary: an integrated overview of its geomorphology and dynamics. In: Neves R, Baretta JW, Mateus M (eds.), Perspectives on Integrated Coastal Zone Management in South America. IST Press, Lisbon, pp. 219-230. [ Links ]

Qureshi NA, Saher NU. 2012. Burrow morphology of three species of fiddler crab (Uca) along the coast of Pakistan. Belg. J. Zool. 142(2): 114-126. [ Links ]

Sal-Moyano MP, Gavio MA, Luppi TA. 2012. Mating system of the burrowing crab Neohelice granulata (Brachyura: Varunidae) in two contrasting environments: effect of burrow architecture. Mar. Biol. 159(7): 1403-1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1917-6 [ Links ]

Spivak ED. 2010. The crab Neohelice (=Chasmagnathus) granulata: an emergent animal model from emergent countries. Helgoland Mar. Res. 64(3): 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-010-0198-z [ Links ]

Underwood AJ. 1997. Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge Univ. Press, USA, 500 pp. [ Links ]

Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ). [ Links ]

Received: November 01, 2017; Accepted: April 01, 2018

*Corresponding author. E-mail: angelettisabrina@conicet.gov.ar

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License