SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue2Antifungal activity of Trichoderma harzianum and T. koningiopsis against Fusarium solani in seed germination and vigor of Miahuateco chili seedlingsIdentification and molecular analysis of races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolated from tomato in Baja California, Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

On-line version ISSN 2007-8080Print version ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.39 n.2 Texcoco May. 2021  Epub Nov 03, 2021

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2102-1 

Scientific articles

Efficacy of microbial antagonists and chitin in the control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in postharvest of mango cv. Azúcar

Yimmy Alexander Zapata-Narváez1 

Luisa Fernanda Izquierdo-García1 

Blanca Lucía Botina-Azaín1 

Camilo Rubén Beltrán-Acosta1  * 

1 Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria -Agrosavia. Centro de Investigación Tibaitatá - Km 14 Vía Mosquera, Cundinamarca-Colombia.


Abstract.

The efficacy in the control of mango cv. Azúcar anthracnose in postharvest was determined by subjecting the fruit to a hydrothermal treatment at 53 °C; later two wounds of 2 mm deep were made and the fruits were immersed in suspensions of the antagonists or chitin in different concentrations. After, each wound was inoculated with a drop of 5 µL of the pathogen, and the fruits were storage at 23 °C. From this trial, Lysinibacillus xylaniticus Ap282, Rhodotorula glutinis Lv316, and chitin 10 mg L-1 were selected for showing an efficacy in the disease control of 49% to 69%. The bioassay was repeated, but adding the chitin to the hydrothermal treatment and evaluating the control of the disease from pathogen’s quiescent infections, storage the fruit at 13 °C. The combination of hydrothermal treatment and tempered of the fruit in the AP282 suspension presented the highest efficacy in the control of anthracnose (84%) in fruits inoculated with the pathogen, while, in the disease control from the quiescent infections, the combination of hydrothermal treatment adding the chitin or tempering in the microbial suspensions showed an efficacy of 83% to 89%.

Key words: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; hydrothermal treatment; efficacy; quiescent infections

Resumen.

Se determinó la eficacia en el control de la antracnosis en la poscosecha de mango cv. Azúcar sometiendo la fruta a un tratamiento hidrotérmico a 53 °C, realizando posteriormente dos heridas de 2 mm de profundidad, luego se realizó la inmersión en suspensiones de los antagonistas o quitina en diferentes concentraciones, posteriormente en cada herida se inoculó una gota de 5 µL del patógeno, almacenando la fruta a 23 °C. De este ensayo se seleccionó a Lysinibacillus xylaniticus Ap282, Rhodotorula glutinis Lv316 y quitina (10 mg L-1) por presentar una eficacia del 49% al 69% en el control de la enfermedad. El bioensayo se repitió, adicionando la quitina al tratamiento hidrotérmico y evaluando el control de la enfermedad a partir de infecciones quiescentes del patógeno, almacenando la fruta a 13 °C. La combinación del tratamiento hidrotérmico y el temperado de la fruta en la suspensión de AP282 presentó la mayor eficacia en el control de la antracnosis (84%) en frutos inoculados con el patógeno, mientras que, en el control de la enfermedad a partir de las infecciones quiescentes la combinación del tratamiento hidrotérmico adicionando la quitina o el temperado en suspensiones microbianas presentó una eficacia del 83 al 89%.

Palabras clave: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; tratamiento hidrotérmico; eficacia; infecciones quiescentes

Different varieties of mango (Mangifera indica) are cultivated in Colombia, with a production of 321,083 t in 28,000 ha, for fresh consumption and agro-industrial processing (MINAGRICULTURA, 2018). This crop is important for its contribution to farmers economy, since it is typically produced on a small scale (Alvarado and Moreno, 2012), it has low technification characteristics and low technical assistance. Additionally, it is cultivated on fields managed with good practices according to the experience and ability for economic investment of the farmers (Asmar, 2021). Mango cv. Azúcar is a colombian variety, characterized for being and oval and small fruit, with little fiber, pleasant in aroma and flavor; particularly, the mature pulp, contains important amounts of total phenols and carotenoids, which give antioxidant potential, as well as active and nutritional compounds that are beneficial to human health. It is considered a very profitable fruit, since it has the best price in comparison with other varieties, 10 months of the year (Corrales-Bernal et al., 2014).

It is therefore necessary to continue working on the implementation of pre and postharvest technologies that help obtain fruits with phytosanitary and organoleptic quality to positioning the mango cv. Azúcar in internal and external markets. This has been done for the past three years by farmers with mango cv. Azúcar plantations located in the department of Magdalena, where exports have increased between 2018 and 2020, with an annual growth of 33% (Asmar, 2021).

However, one of the main limitations in its production and postharvest is the anthracnose, which is the most important disease in mango production worldwide caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Kamle and Kumar, 2016). In the field, the fungus produces quiescent infections in immature fruits, which develop during postharvest, due to the environment and the maturation of the fruit, causing losses that can exceed to 50% (Arauz, 2000; Prusky et al., 2013; Kamle and Kumar, 2016). It is mainly controlled using systemic fungicides which, although efficient, have negative effects such as residuality or the generation of resistance of the fungus, and its use is therefore becoming less accepted by importing countries, since its toxicity is potentially harmful to consumers (Bautista-Rosales et al., 2014; Chechi et al., 2019).

Given this, the use of innocuous and efficient control alternatives is presented as a necessity. Biological control is a strategy that involves the use of microorganisms such as yeast and bacteria, which have a rapid growth on the surface of the plant, produce metabolites that inhibit the growth of plant pathogens and tolerate, in the case of some strains, extreme conditions such as low temperatures or activity of water (aw) and the presence of fungicides (Lastochkina et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2013). Likewise, the application to the fruits of biopolymers such as chitin is proposed, since its cationic character presents antifungal activity mediated by the interaction of its free amino groups (positively charged in an acidic medium), modifying the permeability of the plasmatic membrane, altering its function, or forming a film on the fruit that changes the internal atmosphere, favoring its conservation (Ban et al., 2015; Bautista-Baños et al., 2006).

Some studies have proven the efficacy of alternatives for the control of postharvest diseases such as physical treatments in fruits and vegetables (Usall et al., 2016), including hydrotherapy, carried out by immersion, rinsing or brushing. In immersion, temperatures of 43 °C to 53 °C are applied for periods lasting between a few minutes and 2 hours, depending on the species of the fruit and the stage of maturity, whereas rinsing and brushing are used for 10 to 25 seconds at temperatures ranging from 43 °C to 53 °C (Fallik, 2004). The immersion treatment is the most commonly reported and may lead to the stimulation of responses of defense against anthracnose in fruits, without affecting it sensorial and physical quality (Vilaplana et al., 2018), making it efficient against pathogens in postharvest such as Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria alternata (Fallik et al., 1996).

It has been observed that the combined use of different alternatives may increase the effect of individual alternatives (Perez et al., 2016). The success of the use of combined alternatives lies in their modes of action. For example, physical treatments act on the surfaces, sealing or curing openings, and as surface disinfectants, limiting the infection sites of the pathogen, whereas the posterior application of antagonists or bioactive compounds provides a persistent protective action through the restriction of secondary diseases (Zhang et al., 2017).

Considering the potential of the use of these alternatives in the control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides during the postharvest of mango cv. Azúcar in Colombia, the aim of this study was to determine their efficacy with the use of microbial antagonists, a hydrothermal treatment at 53 °C and different concentrations of chitin, as well as the combination of the best treatments.

Materials and methods

This investigation was carried out in the Agricultural Microbiology Laboratory of the Tibaitatá Research Center of the Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria AGROSAVIA.

Plant and pathogenic material. Azúcar mango variety fruits (susceptible to anthracnose) in the stage of physiological maturity (slightly green with a pinkish-yellow tone and a yellow pulp), asymptomatic to any pathology, sized 8 to 10 cm and an average weight of 100 g, from a commercial plantation in the municipal area of Ciénaga were used (department of Magdalena, Colombia). To reduce the expression of quiescent infections of the pathogen, the fruit underwent a hydrothermal treatment at 53 °C for 5 minutes (Memmert WNB 14 waterbath) and tempering by immersion in water at 17 °C for 10 min, followed by producing two lesions, each 2 mm deep, with a sterilized dissection needle on one of the faces of the fruit, with a distance of 5 cm from each other (based on the methodology by Trinidad-Angel et al. (2017), modified).

To select the pathogen, three isolations were evaluated (Y1, Y2, Y3). Y3 (C. gloeosporioides) was selected from the Yulima variety of mangoes, identified by its morphology and selected due to its pathogenicity when carrying out Koch’s postulates (data not shown). Conidia inoculum was obtained from cultures in Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Oxoid®) previously incubated at 25 °C for 10 days and adjusted to 1x105 conidia mL-1 in sterile distilled water.

Efficacy of antagonistic microorganisms in the control of anthracnose. The AGROSAVIA Microorganism Germplasm Bank provided the antagonistic microorganisms characterized in previous studies and which displayed control over different pathogens (Zapata and Cotes, 2013; Díaz-García et al., 2015), which were the bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bs006 (Gámez et al., 2015), Bacillus safensis AP280 and Lysinibacillus xylaniticus AP282; and the yeasts Candida oleophila Lv037, Pichia onychis Lv297 and Rhodotorula glutinis Lv316 (Moreno et al., 2012; Zapata et al., 2011). In order for them to grow, the bacteria were cultivated in a Luria Bertani broth (LB, Oxoid®), and the yeasts, in a broth composed of malt extract and yeast (YM, Oxoid®) at 125 rpm, 28 °C for 48 and 72 hours, respectively. For the inoculant, suspensions were made in sterile distilled water at concentrations of 1x108 cells mL-1 for the bacteria and 1x107 cells mL-1 for the yeasts. The fruit was inoculated by immersion in the suspensions of each microorganism for 10 min, they were later dried at 18 °C and a 5 μL drop of the pathogen was inoculated on the lesions.

Efficacy of chitinous additives in the control of anthracnose. Chitin (Sigma® C7170) was used in concentrations of 0.5; 0.8; 10; 100 and 1000 mg L-1. The fruit was immersed in the suspension of the additive in each defined concentration for 10 min, dried at 18 °C and 5 μL drop of the pathogen was inoculated on the lesions.

Efficacy of the combination of alternatives in the control of anthracnose in mangoes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides. Four treatments were proposed to determine the efficacy in the control of anthracnose in mangoes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides (Table 1). First, the hydrothermal treatment was carried out, followed by the lesions on the fruit and then depositing them in suspensions of controlling microorganisms or the concentration of chitin (10 mg L-1) for 10 min. They were then inoculated with the pathogen at the concentration described earlier and storage in humid chambers.

Efficacy in quiescent C. gloeosporioides infections: The same treatments mentioned above (Table 1) were evaluated on quiescent C. gloeosporioides infections, without inoculating the pathogen. The hydrothermal treatment was carried out, followed by the placement of the fruits in suspensions of controlling microorganisms for 10 minutes. For the treatment that contained chitin, it was added during the hydrothermal treatment. They were then left to dry and storage in humid chambers.

For the treatments in which the efficacy of the microorganisms and the different concentrations of chitinous substrates were determined, the fruits were places in humid chambers (Relative humidity (RH) of 90%), storage at 23 °C for seven days, under conditions considered optimal for the pathogen and severe for the selection of alternatives. On the other hand, the fruits corresponding to the combination of alternatives were storage in humid chambers at 13 °C for 19 days as an approximation to the storage of the fruit.

Variables evaluated. As a response variable, we calculated the efficacy in the control of the disease by applying the Schneider-Orelli formula: Percentage of efficacy = ((b - k) / (100 - k)) * 100, where b= area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) in the treatment depending on the diameter of the lesion in fruits and k= AUDPC in the pathogen control (Koller et al., 2016). The irregular distribution of the lesions of the disease were taken into consideration and therefore, in quiescent infections, Brodrick’s disease severity scale (1978, cited by Corkidi et al., 2006) was used (Table 2, Figure 1).

Table 1 Combination of treatments evaluated for the control of anthracnose from the inoculation of C. gloeosporioides Y3 in mango cv. Azúcar fruits. 

Tratamiento
Control: 53 °C 5 min
53 °C 5 min + AP282
53 °C 5 min + Lv316
53 °C 5 min + Quitina 10 mg L-1
53 °C 5 min + Quitina 10 mg L-1

Table 2 Scale to evaluate the severity of anthracnose caused by C. gloesosporioides in mango cv. Azúcar. Values as percentages of the area of the fruits with symptoms. 

Nivel Área afectada
0 0 %
1 1-5 %
2 6-9 %
3 10-49 %
4 50-100 %

Experimental design and data analysis. Bioassays were established under a completely random block design. The experimental unit consisted of three fruits, with three repetitions and two replicates, including an untreated control and one pathogenic control. An analysis of variance was carried out, along with Tukey’s test (p≤0.05), using the statistics software Statistix 10.0.

Figure 1 Scale of severity for the evaluation of anthracnose in mango cv. Azúcar, appearance of the fruits in each level of severity. A. level 0, B. level 1, C. level 2, D. level 3, E. level 4. 

Results

Efficacy of antagonistic microorganisms in the control of anthracnose. A difference was noted in the performance of the microorganisms between the two replicates carried out in different times, possibly under the influence of the quiescent infections. However, in replicate one the treatments AP282, Bs006 and Lv316 displayed the highest efficacy in the control of the disease, with values between 62% and 65%, whereas in replicate two, the highest efficacy was obtained with AP282 (49%), which was also the most consistent treatment in accordance with the first replicate (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Efficacy of microbial antagonists in the reduction of anthracnose in mango cv. Azúcar fruits inoculated with C. gloeosporioides Y3 after storage for 7 days at 23 °C. Columns with the same letter are not significantly different, according to Tukey’s test (*= P>0.05). 

Efficacy of chitinous additives in the control of anthracnose. The different concentrations of chitin evaluated displayed some percentage of control, although the concentration of 10 mg L-1 with an efficacy of 42% in replicate one and 49% in replicate two presented the greatest protection against the growth of C. gloeosporioides, and was also the most consistent treatment (Figure 3).

Efficacy of the combination of alternatives in the control of anthracnose in mangoes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides. All treatments displayed some level of control on the development of the disease in mangoes inoculated with C. gloeosporioides. However, the combination of the hydrothermal process and the tempering of the fruits in the L. xylaniticus AP282 suspension presented the greatest control, with an efficacy of 84%, whereas an evaluation of only the hydrothermal treatment presented the lowest performance, with an efficacy of 19% (Figure 4).

Figure 3 Efficacy of chitin in different concentrations on the reduction of anthracnose in mango cv. Azúcar fruits inoculated with C. gloeosporioides Y3 after storage for seven days at 23 °C. Columns with the same letter are not significantly different, according to Tukey’s test (*= P>0.05). 

Efficacy of the combination of alternatives in the control of anthracnose from quiescent C. gloeosporioides infections. Regarding the reduction in the expression of quiescent infections, combining the hydrothermal treatment with the addition of chitin or the later tempered of the fruits in the L. xylaniticus AP282 or R. glutinis Lv316 suspensions reduced the incidence of infections with a greater efficacy in the control of the disease in comparison with the hydrothermal treatment alone, and although these treatments surpassed an efficacy of 80%, the combination of hydrotherapy and the immersion in Lv316 was the most outstanding, with 89% (Figures 5 and 6).

Figure 4 Efficacy of the combination of treatments in the reduction of anthracnose in mango cv. Azúcar fruits inoculated with C. gloeosporioides Y3 after storage for 15 days at 13 °C. Columns with the same letter are not significantly different, according to Tukey’s test (*= P>0.05). 

Figure 5 Efficacy of the combination of treatments in the reduction of anthracnose from quiescent infections of C. gloeospo rioides in mango cv. Azúcar fruits after storage for 19 days at 13 °C. Columns with the same letter are not signifi cantly different, according to Tukey’s test (*= P>0.05). 

Figure 6 Symptoms of anthracnose in mango cv. Azúcar fruits treated with the combination of treatments storage at 13 °C. Top: Fruits inoculated with C. gloeosporioides Y3 after 15 days of storage. Bottom: Quiescent infections of C. gloeosporioides in treated fruits after 19 days of storage. 

Discussion

Lysinibacillus xylaniticus AP282, R. glutinis Lv316 and chitin (10 mg L-1) proved to control the anthracnose in the fruits inoculated with the pathogen under storage conditions that favors their development (RH of 90% at 23 °C) and afterwards, when evaluating under a condition nearer to commercial storage (13 °C), they maintained or increased their protection and also reduced the expression of quiescent infections. Meanwhile, the single application of the hydrothermal treatment displayed an efficacy of 19%, but when combining it with tempering in the suspension of antagonists or adding chitin, its efficacy increased, particularly in the case of quiescent infections.

In this sense, the development of C. gloeosporioides may be limited by the absence of nutrients such as organic nitrogen and microelements such as iron, needed in the germination of conidia and later tissue infection processes, as well as by the exposure to metabolites produced by antagonistic microorganisms that may take action on the pathogen from quiescent infections (Liu et al., 2013).

Bacteria and yeasts display action mechanisms that may inhibit the development of different pathogens, namely, competition for space and nutrients, the production of antibiotics, siderophores, parasitism and the induction of defense responses in plants (Rungjindamai, 2016). Although little is known on the action mechanisms of L. xylaniticus, other species of this genus, such as Lysinibacillus sphaericus ZA9, are known to have the ability to inhibit the growth of Aspergillussp., A. alternata, Bipolaris spicifera, Curvularia lunata and Sclerotiniasp. in vitro, by secreting siderophores, hydrocyanic acid (HCN), chitinases, proteases and lypases, cycloalkane and quinoline type compounds (Naureen et al., 2017). However, in order to clarify how L. xylaniticus AP282 controls C. gloeosporioides Y3, its action mechanisms should be stablished.

On the other hand, R. glutinis may compete for space and nutrients with different pathogens. Studies have shown the ability of this yeast to colonize lesions in strawberry and pear fruits, observing a rapid colonization on lesions and control over B. cinerea at 20 °C without affecting quality parameters, such as the loss of mass, firmness and acidity (Zhang et al., 2008, 2010). In addition, R. glutinis produces rhodotorulic acid, a siderophore that chelates the iron in the substrate, giving it a competitive advantage (Calvente et al., 1999). For R. glutinis Lv316, a study carried out by Zapata and Cotes, (2013) obtained a control of 60% for B. cinerea in commercial berry crops, higher than that obtained with Prochloraz (58%) and Carbendazim (27%) applications, relating to the reduction of quiescent infections in the flowers.

Regarding chitin, its cationic character displays antifungal activity, mediated by the interaction of its free amino groups (positively charged in an acidic medium) with the negative residues in the molecules of the fungal walls modifying the permeability of the plasmatic membrane, causing the ionic homeostasis of K+and Ca2+causing the loss of small molecules such as phosphates, nucleotides and substrates of enzyme reactions that will eventually affect the fungal metabolism (Ban et al., 2015; Bautista-Baños et al., 2006). Lucas-Bautista et al. (2019) found a greater content of chitinases in mature lyophilized papaya skins (29.000 units of chitinases (UC) g-1) than those contained in mature frozen skins (1.500 UC g-1), and they also determined that the chitin contained in C. gloeosporioides as a pathogen present in the papaya postharvest may contain up to 20.6%.

Despite the tendency of hydrothermal treatments to seal or cure lesions, limiting the areas of penetration for the pathogens (Schirra et al., 2000), with the action of chitin (10 mg L-1) or the tempering of the fruit in the suspensions of L. xylaniticus AP282 or R. glutinis Lv316, it is possible to reduce secondary infections by reinforcing control. However, studies must be carried out to develop biopesticides based on the selected microorganisms to allow their implementation on a commercial scale. On the other hand, considering the efficacy of chitin, it is necessary to have a commercial substitute, considering that this study used reactive grade chitin.

The inoculation of antagonistic microorganisms during the tempering after the hydrothermal treatment has shown a high potential for the reduction of damages by pathogens in postharvest. Karabulut and Baykal (2004) observed that the incidence of B. cinereaandPenicillium expansum in peaches decreased with a hydrothermal treatment at 55 °C for 10 seconds followed by inoculation with C. oleophila. On the other hand, it is possible that with the combined application of the antagonists, the control may be greater, as proven by Carrillo-Fasio et al. (2005), who evaluated isolations of the genus Bacillus and Rhodotorula on their own and combined, finding a greater control of anthracnose in Kent mango fruits when applying the mixture of biocontrol agents.

In this sense, controlling quiescent infections with the hydrothermal treatments with the addition of chitin at 10 mg L-1 or the later tempering of the fruit in the suspension of R. glutinis Lv316 or L. xylaniticus AP282 may be a strategy to treat the mango cv. Azúcar immediately after its harvest, allowing the microorganisms in the fruit to establish and therefore, increase their protective ability during storage.

Conclusions

The combination of the hydrothermal treatment at 53 °C for 5 minutes with the addition of chitin at 10 mg L-1 or the later tempering of the mangoes in the suspensions of R. glutinis Lv316 or L. xylaniticus AP282 presented an efficacy between 83 and 89% in the control of anthracnose originated from the quiescent C. gloeosporioides infections, alternatives which may be considered in the postharvest treatment of the mango cv. Azúcar.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia and the Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA for funding the project “Evaluation of prevention methods and tools to prevent anthracnose on the field and postharvest (First approach)” that allowed this research to be carried out.

REFERENCES

Alvarado JR y Moreno LA. 2012. Acuerdo de competitividad cadena productiva del mango en Colombia. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Mango/Normatividad/004%20-%20D.C.%20-%20Acuerdo%20Competitividad%20Cadena%20Mango.pdf. (Consulta, marzo 2021). [ Links ]

Arauz L. 2000. Mango anthracnose: Economic impact and current options for integrated management. Plant Disease 84(6): 600-611. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.6.600 [ Links ]

Asmar S. 2021. Productores de mango del Magdalena recibieron luz verde para exportar hacia Europa. Agronegocios. https://www.agronegocios.co/agricultura/productores-de-mango-del-magdalena-recibieron-luz-verde-para-exportar-hacia-europa-3146069. (Consulta, marzo 2021). [ Links ]

Ban Z, Wei W, Yang X, Feng J, Guan J and Li L. 2015. Combination of heat treatment and chitosan coating to improve postharvest quality of wolfberry (Lycium barbarum). International Journal of Food Science and Technology 50(4): 1019-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12734 [ Links ]

Bautista-Baños S, Hernández-Lauzardo AN, Bautista-Baños -Del Valle MG, Hernández-López M, Ait Barka E, Bosquez-Molina E and Wilson CL. 2006. Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities. Crop Protection 25(2): 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.03.010 [ Links ]

Bautista-Rosales P, Calderon-Santoyo M, Servín-Villegas R, Ochoa-Álvarez N, Vázquez-Juárez R and Ragazzo-Sánchez J. 2014. Biocontrol action mechanisms of Cryptococcus laurentii on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides of mango. Crop Protection (65): 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.07.019 [ Links ]

Calvente V, Benuzzi D and de Tosetti M. 1999. Antagonistic action of siderophores from Rhodotorula glutinis upon the postharvest pathogen Penicillium expansum. International Biodeterioration and Bioegradation 43(4): 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(99)00046-3 [ Links ]

Chechi A, Stahlecker J, Dowling ME and Schnabel G. 2019. Diversity in species composition and fungicide resistance profiles in Colletotrichum isolates from apples. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology (158): 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.04.002 [ Links ]

Corrales-Bernal A, Maldonado ME, Urango LA, Franco MC and Rojano BA. 2014. Mango de azúcar (Mangifera indica), variedad de Colombia: características antioxidantes, nutricionales y sensoriales. Revista chilena de nutrición 41(3): 312-318. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182014000300013 [ Links ]

Carrillo-Fasio JA, García-Estrada RS, Muy-Rangel MD, Sañudo-Barajas A, Márquez-Zequera I, Allende-Molar R. 2005. Control Biológico de Antracnosis [Colletotrichum gloeosporioides(Penz.) Penz. y Sacc.] y su Efecto en la Calidad Poscosecha del Mango (Mangifera indicaL.) en Sinaloa, México. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 23: 24-32. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/612/61223104.pdfLinks ]

Corkidi G, Balderas-Ruíz KA, Taboada B, Serrano-Carreón L and Galindo E. 2006. Assessing mango anthracnose using a new three-dimensional image-analysis technique to quantify lesions on fruit. Plant Pathology 55(2): 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01321.x [ Links ]

Díaz-García A, García-Riaño J and Zapata-Narváez J. 2015. Improvement of sporulation conditions of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciensin liquid fermentation. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology 6 (4): 302-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.64029 [ Links ]

Fallik E. 2004. Prestorage hot water treatments (immersion, rinsing and brushing). Postharvest Biology and Technology 32(2): 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.10.005 [ Links ]

Fallik E, Grinberg S, Alkalai S and Lurie S. 1996. The effectiveness of postharvest hot water dipping on the control of grey and black moulds in sweet red pepper (Capsicum annuum). Plant Pathology 45(4): 644-649. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-175.x [ Links ]

Gámez RM, Rodríguez F, Bernal JF, Agarwala R, Landsman D and Mariño-Ramírez L. 2015. Genome sequence of the Banana plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BS006. Genome announcements 3(6): e01391-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01391-15 [ Links ]

Kamle M and Kumar P. 2016. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides: Pathogen of anthracnose disease in Mango (Mangifera indica L.). In: Kumar P, Kumar GV, Kumar TA and Kamle M (Ed.). Current Trends in Plant Disease Diagnostics and Management Practices, Fungal Biology. 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27312-9_9 [ Links ]

Karabulut O and Baykal N. 2004. Integrated control of postharvest diseases of peaches with a yeast antagonist, hot water and modified atmosphere packaging. Crop Protection 23(5): 431-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.012 [ Links ]

Koller M, Rayns F, Cubison S and Schmutz U. 2016. Guidelines for Experimental Practice in Organic Greenhouse Horticulture. BioGreenhouse COST Action FA 1105. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/373581 [ Links ]

Lastochkina O, Seifikalhor M, Aliniaeifard S, Baymiev A, Pusenkova L, Garipova S Kulabuhova D and Maksimov I. 2019. Bacillus spp: Efficient biotic strategy to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Plants 8(4): 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8040097 [ Links ]

Lucas-Bautista JA, Bautista-Baños S, Ventura-Aguilar RI y Gómez-Ramírez M. 2019. Determinación de quitina en hongos postcosecha y de quitinasas en frutos de papaya ¨Maradol¨. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 37 (No. Esp. 1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1902-3. [ Links ]

Liu J, Sui Y, Wisniewski M, Droby S and Liu Y. 2013. Review: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit. International Journal of Food Microbiology 167(2): 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004 [ Links ]

MINAGRICULTURA. 2018. Mango. https://www.agronet.gov.co/Documents/13-MANGO_2017.pdf (Consulta diciembre, 2020). [ Links ]

Moreno CA, Zapata JA, Díaz A and Cotes AM. 2012. Selection of a Pichia onychis isolate for biological control of Botrytis cinerea based on its eco-physiological characteristics. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin 78(2):229-233. [ Links ]

Naureen Z, Rehman NU, Hussain H, Hussain J, Gilani SA, Al Housni SK, Mabood F, Khan AL, Farooq S, Abbas G and Harrasi AA. 2017. Exploring the potentials of Lysinibacillus sphaericus ZA9 for plant growth promotion and biocontrol activities against phytopathogenic fungi. Frontiers in Microbiology (8):1477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01477 [ Links ]

Perez M, Contreras L, Garnica N, Fernández-Zenoff M, Farías M, Sepulveda M, Ramallo J and Dib J. 2016. Native killer yeasts as biocontrol agents of postharvest fungal diseases in lemons. PLoS ONE 11(10): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165590 [ Links ]

Prusky D, Alkan N, Mengiste T and Fluhr R. 2013. Quiescent and necrotrophic lifestyle choice during postharvest disease development. Annual Review of Phytopathology 51(1): 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102349 [ Links ]

Rungjindamai N. 2016. Isolation and evaluation of biocontrol agents in controlling anthracnose disease of mango in Thailand. Journal of Plant Protection Research 56(3): 306-311. https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0034 [ Links ]

Schirra M, Dʹhallewin G, Ben‐yehoshua S and Fallik E. 2000. Host-pathogen interaction modulated by heat treatment. Postharvest Biology and Technology 21(1): 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00166-6 [ Links ]

Trinidad-Ángel E, Ascencio-Valle FDJ, Ulloa OA, Ramírez-Ramírez OC, Ragazzo-Sánchez JA, Calderón-Santoyo M and Bautista PU. 2017. Identificación y caracterización de Colletotrichum spp. causante de antracnosis en aguacate de Nayarit, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (19):3953-3964. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i19.664 [ Links ]

Usall J, Ippolito A, Sisquella M and Neri F. 2016. Physical treatments to control postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology (122): 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.002 [ Links ]

Vilaplana R, Pazmiño L and Valencia-Chamorro S. 2018. Control of anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum musae, on postharvest organic banana by thyme oil. Postharvest Biology and Technology (138): 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.12.008 [ Links ]

Zapata J, Acosta C, Díaz A, Villamizar L and Cotes AM. 2011. Characterization of Rhodotorula glutinis and Pichia onychis isolates with potential as biopesticides for controlling Botrytis cinerea. Acta Horticulturae (905): 155-160. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2011.905.16 [ Links ]

Zapata J and Cotes AM. 2013. Eficacia de dos prototipos de bioplaguicida a base de Rhodotorula glutinis cepa LvCo7 y un bioplaguicida a base de Trichoderma koningiopsis cepa Th003 en el control de B. cinerea en cultivos de mora. Pp. 73-79. En: Zapata, J. (Ed.), Desarrollo de prototipos de bioplaguicida a base de Rhodotorula glutinis LvCo7 para el control de Botrytis cinerea en cultivos de mora. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria, Corpoica, Produmedios 79p. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/13072Links ]

Zhang H, Komla G, Castoria R, Tibiru M and Yang Q. 2017 Augmentation of biocontrol agents with physical methods against postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Trends in Food Science & Technology (69): 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.020 [ Links ]

Zhang H, Ma L, Turner M, Xu H, Zheng X, Dong Y and Jiang S. 2010. Salicylic acid enhances biocontrol efficacy of Rhodotorula glutinis against postharvest Rhizopus rot of strawberries and the possible mechanisms involved. Food Chemistry 122(3): 577-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.013 [ Links ]

Zhang H, Wang L, Dong Y, Jiang S, Zhang H and Zheng X. 2008. Control of postharvest pear diseases using Rhodotorula glutinis and its effects on postharvest quality parameters. International Journal of Food Microbiology 126(1-2): 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.018 [ Links ]

Received: February 21, 2021; Accepted: April 17, 2021

*Autor para correspondencia: cbeltran@agrosavia.co

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons