SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 número2Dependence of exchange bias in NiFe/NiO bilayers on film thicknessGrowth of carbon fibres, sheets and tubes on diamond films under high power plasma etching conditions índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.63 no.2 México mar./abr. 2017

 

Research

Positive even-odd effects in the maximal kinetic energy and negative even-odd effects in the minimal excitation energy of fragments from thermal neutron induced fission of 235U

M. Montoyaa 

V. Collinb 

aUniversidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Av. Túpac Amaru 210, Rímac, Lima, Peru

bCentro de Preparación para la Ciencia y Tecnología, Ceprecyt, Juan Alfaro 135, Miraflores, Lima, Peru.


Abstract

Based on the Coulomb effect hypothesis it is shown that positive even-odd effects of the maximal total kinetic energy (K max) and negative even-odd effects of the total minimal excitation energy (X max), as a function of charge (Z) and neutron number (A) of fragments, respectively, are not in contradiction. According to the Coulomb effect hypothesis, K max is equal to the maximal Coulomb interaction energy (C max) reached by the most compact scission configuration. The fragmentation corresponding to Z = 41 and A = 103 is an exceptional case for which scission configuration is formed by complementary fragments in their corresponding ground states. However, more symmetrical o more asymmetrical fragmentations than that need to be out of their ground states, which implies that K max = C max < Q.

Keywords: cold fission; even-odd effect; kinetic energy; uranium 235

PACS: 24.75.+i; 25.85.Ec; 21.10.Ft; 1.10.Dr

1. Introduction

Positive even-odd effects, in proton and neutron numbers distributions, in higher windows of kinetic energy of fragments from thermal neutron induced fission of actinides are well stablished1.

The even-odd effect of charge distribution is defined by the relation

δZ=YeZ-YoZYeZ+YoZ

where YeZ y YoZ are the yield of fragments with even and odd proton numbers, respectively. Similarly are defined the even-odd effect in the distribution neutron number (δN) and nucleon numbers (δA), respectively.

However, when C. Signarbieux et al. 2 found the evidence of the existence of cold fission, corresponding to highest kinetic energy windows, for which the excitation energy is not enough for fragments to emit neutrons, they did not find a significant even-odd effect in the distribution of the mass numbers. This set a controversy in those authors that, based on the even-odd effects in proton and neutron number distributions, respectively, observed in light fragment kinetic energy, supported the hypothesis that the fission process is superfluid 2. However, in 1981, M. Montoya 3,4 deduced the relation

δA=δZ+δN-1,

which is confirmed by H. Nifenecker 5. After this relation there is no contradiction between null even-odd effects in mass distribution and positive even-odd effects in proton and neutron number distributions, respectively.

In 1991 F. Gönnenwein and B. Börsig 6 show that the minimum excitation energy is lower for the odd than for the even Z. In 1993 the positive even-odd in cold fission of actinides is questioned by F.-J. Hambsch 7. In 2013, F. Gönnenwein confirms the hypothesis of negative even-odd effects on total excitation energy in cold fission 8. In 2016, M. Mirea proposes a microscopic model in order to explain negative odd-even effects in excitation energy in cold fission 9.

In this work we review experimental data to show that there is no contradiction between positive even-odd effects in total maximal kinetic energy and negative effects in minimal excitation energy of fragments.

2. Formalism for even-odd effects in cold fission

In order describe even-odd effects in cold fission is useful to recall some definitions related to them. See Ref. 6. Let be a fissile nucleus with charge Z f and mass A f that splits in a light fragment with Z L protons, N L neutrons (number of nucleons A L = Z L + N L ) and a heavy fragment with Z H protons, N H neutrons (number of nucleons A H = Z H + N H ). These numbers obey the following relations:

Zf=ZL+ZH

and

Af=AL+AH

In order to simplify notations, Z L , N L , and A L will be renamed Z, N and A, respectively.

After scission, light and heavy fragments acquire kinetic energies K L , K H , and excitation energies X L , X H , respectively. Thus, the total kinetic energy (K) and the total excitation energy (X) are

K=KL+KH

and

X=XL+XH

respectively. These quantities are limited by the energy balance equation:

Q=K+X,

where Q is the available energy of the reaction.

At the scission point, the available energy is spent into deformation energy (D), Coulomb interaction energy (C) and free energy (F), according to relation

Q=C+D+F.

The free energy is partitioned into intrinsic energy (X *) and total pre-scission energy of fragments (K sc ):

F=X*+Ksc

One assumes that, for a given fragmentation corresponding to proton and mass numbers Z and A, respectively, the maximum total kinetic energy (K max) is reached by a configuration with X * = 0, maximum Coulomb interaction energy (C max), and a minimum total deformation energy (D min), limited by the equation

Q=Cmax+Dmax

Because Coulomb repulsion between fragments is the unique force after scission, Coulomb interaction potential energy at scission becomes the final total kinetic energy, so that:

Kmax=Cmax=Q-Dmin.

Let be A an odd nucleon number of the light fragment, the local even-odd effect in the maximum Q-value (QmaxA) as a function of mass, is defined as

δAQmax=QmaxA-1+QmaxA-12-QmaxA.

In general δAQmax is positive. Similarly there are local positive even-odd effects in Q max as a function of proton number (δZQmax) and as a function of neutron number ( δNQmax), respectively.

Because the even-odd effect of charge and mass distribution, respectively, increases with the fragment kinetic energy 1, a positive local even-odd effect in the maximum total kinetic energy as a function of mass

δAKmax=KmaxA-1+KmaxA+12-KmaxA,

and positive values of δZKmax and δNKmax, which correspond to even-odd effects in the maximum total kinetic energy as a function of Z and N, respectively, are expected.

3. Even-odd effects in the maximum total kinetic energy

In 1986 J. Trochon et al. 10 present the curve of the maximum total kinetic energy as a function of light fragment mass from the reaction 235U(n th , f). For each A they identify the charge Z that maximizes the total kinetic energy K. See Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Thermal neutron induced fission of 235U. Curve of the maximum total kinetic energy (K max) as a function of the light fragment mass number is presented. The measured odd charges that maximize K max for several mass fragmentations are indicated. The other cases correspond to neighboring even charge fragmentations. Taken from Ref. 10

The K max value corresponding to an odd mass are generally below the average of the values corresponding to two neighboring even masses, which means that δAKmax is positive.

In general, for each A, an even charge maximizes K, except in transitions between two neighboring even charges. These cases are the following:

(Z,A)=(35,87);(37,93);(39,99);(41,103).

Applying the definition of δZKmax and δNKmax to these cases, one obtains results presented in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The existence of positive even-odd effects on the maximal total kinetic energy as a function of Z and N, respectively, is confirmed. δZKmax values are approximately 0.8 MeV, except for (Z, A) = (37,93), in which case is 0.2 MeV. The explanation of this may be in the fact that Q-values corresponding to

Figure 2. Even-odd effects on maximal total kinetic energy (K max) as a function of charge (Z) of fragments from the reaction 235U(n th , f). 

Figure 3. Even-odd effects on maximal total kinetic energy (K max) as a function of neutron number (N) of fragments from the reaction 235U(n th , f). 

(Z,A)=(36,92),(37,93),(38,93)

are approximately the same (189.3 MeV). See Fig. 4.

Figure 4. The available energy (Q) as a function of charge (Z) and mass (A) of fragments from the reaction 235U(n th , f). Atomic masses values are taken from Ref. 11

Taking regions with even Z, one also observes positive δNKmax values. For masses 95, 97, 101 and 107, δNKmax is approximately 1.2 MeV. The lower values, corresponding to A = 91 and 105, are approximately 0.5 MeV.

One must notice that δNKmax is negative (near null) for Z = 36 and A = 89. This result may be explained by the fact that the Q-value corresponding to A = 88 (Q = 186.3 MeV) is very close to the corresponding to A = 89 (Q = 185.8 MeV).

From experimental result one can observe that

δZKmax<δZQKmax

and

δNKmax<δNQKmax

To interpret this result one must take into account that

QKmax<Cmax+Dmin,

and

δACmax=δAKmax=δAQkmax-δaDmin,

regarding which it follows that

δZDmin>0

which suggests that the even-even fragments are harder than odd A fragments, they need higher deformation energy to get the most compact configuration that obeys the relation

Cmax=QKmax-Dmin.

A positive even-odd effect in D min implies that an odd charge or neutron number splits will reach K values closer to their corresponding Q-values than the even splits do, as it was observed by F. Gönnenwein 6,8 and F.-J. Hambsch 7.

4. Discussion

In this work positive even-odd effects on maximal kinetic energy as a function of Z, N and A, respectively, of light fragments from the reaction 235U(n th , f), were put in evidence.

One must notice that, in 2013, F. Gönnenwein and B. Börsig 10 show that, for isobaric fragmentations 104/132, the kinetic energy associated to the charge fragmentation 41/51 reach the Q-value of the reaction, while the corresponding to the fragmentation 42/50 reaches a total maximum kinetic energy below 3 MeV the corresponding Q-value. These authors suggest that this is due to the fact the charge split 41/51 corresponds to odd fragment charges. However, we should note that charge fragmentation 41/51 is more asymmetric than the 42/50 fragmentation. Therefore that result is also consistent with the Coulomb effect after which for neighboring masses with similar values of energy available, the more asymmetric fragmentation reaches the higher values of total kinetic energy 12,13.

The fact that the charge split 41/51 reaches the Q-value means that both fragments are in their respective ground states (X = 0) whose corresponding scission configuration is so that

Cmax=Q.

With a same configuration the charge split 42/50 with fragments in their corresponding ground states have not necessarily a similar relation. It means that at least one fragment must be deformed out of its ground state, then

Xmin>0

and

Kmax=Q-Xmin<Q.

Moreover, the isobaric mass fragmentation 104/132 corresponds to a pronounced turning point in the Q-values. See Fig. 4. The highest Q-value and the highest K max correspond to the transitional deformed nucleus Mo42104 14, and the doble magic spherical nucleus Sn50152 15. These conditions makes difficult to distinguish even-odd from transitional effects.

5. Conclusion

Based on the Coulomb effect hypothesis 12,13 we have demonstrated that, in thermal neutron induced fission of 235U, there is no contradiction between the positive even-odd effects in the maximal kinetic energy (measured by J. Trochon et al. 10), and the negative even-odd effects in the minimal excitation energy of fragments (shown by F. Gönnenwein 8) as a function of fragment neutron and proton numbers, respectively. Assuming that the maximum Coulomb energy configuration corresponds to the minimum excitation energy one, the deformation energy explains both seemingly contradictory mentioned results.

References

1. W. Lang, H.-G. Clerc, H. Wohlfarth, H. Schrader y K.-H. Schmidt, Nucl. Phys. A 345 (1980) 34-71. [ Links ]

2. C. Signarbieux et al., J. Physique Lettres 42 (1981) L-437. [ Links ]

3. M. Montoya, Thesis, Doctorat d’Etat, Universidad París XI, Orsay (1981). [ Links ]

4. M. Montoya, J. Physique 44 (1983) 785-790. [ Links ]

5. H. Nifenecker, G. Mariolopoulos, J.P. Bocquet, J. Physique Lett. 42 (1981) 527-529. [ Links ]

6. F. Gönnenwein and F. Börig, Nucl. Phys. A 530 (1991) 27-57. [ Links ]

7. F.-J. Hambsch et al., Nucl. Phys. A 554 (1993) 209. [ Links ]

8. F. Gönnenwein , Physics Procedia 47 (2013) 107-114. [ Links ]

9. M. Mirea, EPJ Web of Conferences 122 (2016) 01009. [ Links ]

10. J. Trochon, G. Simon, J.W. Behrens, F. Brisard and C. Signarbieux, Radiation Effects 92 (1986) 327-332. [ Links ]

11. M. Wang et al., CPC (HEP & NP) 36 (2012) 1603-2014. [ Links ]

12. M. Montoya , R.W. Hasse and P. Koczon, Z. Phys. A-Atoms and Nuclei 325 (1986) 357-362. [ Links ]

13. M. Montoya , Rev. Mex. Fis, 60 (2014) 350-356. [ Links ]

14. J. Genevey, J.A. Pinston, G. Simpson and W. Urban, DANF 2006 (2008) 307-318. [ Links ]

15. S. Leoni et al., Acta Physica Polonica B 46 (2015) 637-646. [ Links ]

Received: October 21, 2016; Accepted: December 09, 2016

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License