Abstract

BOBADILLA BELTRAN, Salvador; CARDOSO JIMENEZ, Daniel; CARRENO SAUCEDO, Leticia  and  MARQUEZ GOMEZ, Josué Ociel. Styles of learning in students of the licensee in psychology of the university center UAEM Temascaltepec, 2016. RIDE. Rev. Iberoam. Investig. Desarro. Educ [online]. 2017, vol.7, n.14, pp.34-50. ISSN 2007-7467.  https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v7i14.271.

The aim of the research was to determine the learning style that students of the psychology career use, depending on the degree of preference.

The population was constituted by a total of 311 students of the degree in Psychology of the University Center UAEM Temascaltepec, Extension Tejupilco; Of which 68 are men and 243 women distributed in the second, fourth and sixth semester, in the morning and afternoon shifts; With ages ranging from 17 to 23 years.

The information was collected through the Learning Styles Questionnaire (CHAEA), the instrument contains 80 items that are structured into four groups of 20 items corresponding to each of the following learning styles: active, reflective, theoretical and pragmatic.

The research was descriptive transectional and non-experimental. The information collected was processed with the statistical package SPSS version 20, calculating the descriptive statistics and obtaining the arithmetic mean, per student and group.

In the morning shift results, in the second semester the active learning style has a direct score of 10.9 and a moderate preference degree, while the reflective, pragmatic and theoretical style have a low preference with direct scores of 13.0, 11.03 and 11.8 respectively.

For the fourth semester, the active learning style had a moderate preference, presented a direct score of 11.52, the reflective learning style presented a direct score of 12.70 which placed it in a very low preference, finally the pragmatic and theoretical style presented a Degree of low preference, with direct scores of 12.23 and 11.85.

In the sixth semester, it was observed that the active learning style obtained a direct score of 10.81 with a moderate degree of preference; The reflexive, pragmatic and theoretical style showed a low degree of utilization, with direct scores of 13.36, 10.84 and 11.13.

For the evening shift, in the second semester the active learning style manifested a moderate preference degree a direct score of 12.09; The reflexive, pragmatic and theoretical style had a low preference degree with direct scores of 11.90, 12.80 and 12.09 respectively.

In the fourth semester, the active learning style obtained a direct score of 11.58 and a moderate preference, while the reflective, pragmatic and theoretical style were placed in a low preference, since they presented direct scores of 17.00, 12.47, and 12.11 respectively.

For the sixth semester it was observed that the active learning style had a moderate preference, since I presented a direct score of 11.58; The reflexive learning style achieved a direct score of 12.65, which refers to a very low preference; The pragmatic and theoretical style manifested a low preference with direct scores of 11.86 and 11.51.

Keywords : learning styles; students; CHAEA; bachelor of Psychology; degrees of utilization.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )