SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue15Consent and the Fallacy of Necessity: a Replay to Beyleveld and BrownswordThe Justice or Injustice of the Work Contract from the Moral Thought of Arthur Schopenhauer author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

INOSTROZA ADASME, Sonia. Aristotle’s Ethics in the Evolution of the Legal Negligence: a Review About Foreseeability. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2021, n.15, pp.421-442.  Epub May 31, 2022. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2021.15.16128.

In the 4th century BC, Aristotle addressed the difference between ἁμάρτημα (negligence) and ἀδικημα (wrongdoing). Consequently, he distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary acts so as to arrive at such reasoning 200 years before Roman jurists did.

Although it is true that it is not possible to affirm an equivalent relationship between negligence, as it was conceived in the Greek world, with the thought of Roman jurisconsultants, it is possible to find the trace, the germ or essence of strict negligence, particularly in the treatment of involuntary acts.

Keywords : Aristotle; Fault; Negligence; Wrongdoing; Foreseeability.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )