SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue15Precedent, Analogy and Reasons for Action. Comments on the Ideas of Frederick SchauerConsent and the Fallacy of Necessity: a Replay to Beyleveld and Brownsword author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

GARCIA YZAGUIRRE, Víctor. Conceptual Notes for Identification of Normative Conflicts Between Norms. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2021, n.15, pp.343-371.  Epub May 31, 2022. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2021.15.16126.

The purpose of this article is to provide criteria for identifying regulatory conflicts between legal rules. To do so, an analytical approach is used to describe and analyze cases in which two conditional prescriptive rules are inconsistent with each other. Therefore, I will i) define the type of rules relevant to this study; ii) analyze the need to use logical constructs to conceptualize and formulate criteria for identifying cases of regulatory conflict; and iii) give an account of the main ways of understanding the concept of regulatory conflict. I conclude that it is necessary to adopt concepts and principles of deontic logic to be able to differentiate between cases of antinomy and those that are not.

Keywords : Normative Conflict; Conditional Norms; Principle of Non-Contradiction; Deontic Logic.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )