SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue15The Moral Obligation to Perform Contracts: Some Preliminary ThoughtsLaw and Morality (Practical Reason): Connections in Times of the Constitutional Rule of Law author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

HELMREICH, Jeffrey S.. Advertising as Guaranteeing: a Defense of Strict Liability. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2021, n.15, pp.29-51.  Epub May 31, 2022. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2021.15.16118.

In many jurisdictions, advertisers are held strictly liable for false statements of fact. This may seem to depart from the ordinary moral treatment of speech, whereby individuals describing their activities -the food they cooked last night or the room they prepared for guests- are held only to being sincere and careful about what they say; if they tried hard to get things right, they are morally in the clear if they turn out mistaken. That may invite the thought that strict liability for false advertising is either a departure from ordinary morality or a special context justifying a different moral standard from the norm. Here, to the contrary, I argue that commercial claims often take the form of a familiar type of speech act, namely guarantees, for which, I try to show, speakers are already morally responsible for accuracy, regardless of fault. For that reason, I argue, strict liability for false advertising is not only justifiable, but natural and inevitable.

Keywords : Legal Strict Liability; Inviting Reliance; Guarantees; Ethics of Guaranteeing; Corporate Product Descriptions.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )