SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue24On the contemporary ethical-political communityAgonism and Deliberation: Conceptual Differences between two Perspectives on Politics and Conflict author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Andamios

Print version ISSN 1870-0063

Abstract

BACARLETT PEREZ, María Luisa  and  PEREZ BERNAL, Ángeles Ma. del Rosario. Aporetics community: tensions between policy and the political. Andamios [online]. 2014, vol.11, n.24, pp.35-58. ISSN 1870-0063.

We analyze the status of the community from the perspective of Post-Foundational Thought. This approach allows us to reflect about the relationship between politics and the political, which also allows us to question the need for a b ontological foundation of the real political life. Based on some ideas of Martin Heidegger, the Being is no longer a foundation but now is conceived as an Event. In this way, is possible to think this foundation as something hidden and removed. From these ideas is then possible to consider the community in non-essentialist terms, as a contradictory reality that is only feasible if it is not feasible.

Keywords : Community; Paradox; the Political; Politics; Post-Foundational Thought.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License