SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.86 issue2Sigmoid septum: A variant of the ventricular hypertrophy or of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?Registry of "early latecomer" patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at the Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular INCOR - Peru author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Archivos de cardiología de México

On-line version ISSN 1665-1731Print version ISSN 1405-9940

Abstract

GUALIS, Javier et al. Biatrial vs. isolated left atrial cryoablation for the treatment of long-lasting permanent atrial fibrillation. Midterm recurrence rate. Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2016, vol.86, n.2, pp.123-129. ISSN 1665-1731.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acmx.2015.09.005.

The long-term results of cryomaze in patients with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation during concomitant surgical procedures are still uncertain.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2011, 150 consecutive patients with associated long-lasting permanent atrial fibrillation and associated heart disease underwent heart surgery were treated by biatrial Cox-Maze (63 patients) or by isolated endocardial or epicardial left atrial cryoablation (83 patients) concomitantly. The results at 3 years in these groups were compared with clinical monitoring, electrocardiography, 24-hour Holter, and echocardiography with measurement of the transmitral A wave at 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter in all patients.

Results

Patients undergoing Cox-Maze IV ablation presented rates of freedom from atrial fibrillation of 97, 94, 89, 80 and 54% at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. In the 12-month follow-up, these differences were significant (p < .05). The independent risk factors of atrial fibrillation recurrence was isolated ablation of left atrium.

Conclusions

Atrial fibrillation by cryothermia ablation had a high success rate before 2 years postoperatively. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation increased thereafter regardless of the technique used, although it was more intense and developed earlier in cases of monoatrial ablation. For the treatment of other long-lasting permanent atrial fibrillation cardiac surgery-associated pathology, an aggressive biatrial treatment with Cox maze ablation should be performed.

Keywords : Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Arrhythmia; Surgery; Spain.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )