SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue8Histological analysis of sour citrus and sweet orange leaves with symptoms caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticusTesting of pine especies for restoration of degraded sites author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Agrociencia

On-line version ISSN 2521-9766Print version ISSN 1405-3195

Abstract

CERNA, Ernesto et al. Comparison of toxicity and selectivity of the pest Bactericera cockerelli and its predator Chrysoperla carnea. Agrociencia [online]. 2012, vol.46, n.8, pp.783-793. ISSN 2521-9766.

Chemical and biological control in sustainable management requires understanding the risks, selectivity and conditions of use for insecticides, in order to maximize their compatibility. Therefore, the tolerance of Chrysoperla carnea and Bactericera cockerelli to field concentrations of 18, 180, 1200, 1300 and 1400 ppm L-1 of the insecticides abamectin, bifenthrin, endosulfan, imidacloprid and profenofos was evaluated, and, in addition, their selectivity on predator Chrysoperla carnea. The selectivity proportion of insecticides to C. carnea was calculated through the relation SP = CL50 of the insecticide for the natural enemy/CL50 of the insecticide for the plague. Abactemin, bifenthrin and endosulfan were more toxic for B. cockerelli than for C. carnea. Profenofos was highly toxic for both species and imidacloprid was more toxic for C. carnea. The values for the selectivity proportion were 1072.84, 14.33, 6.07, 0.61 and 0.11 for abamectin, endosulfan, bifenthrin, profenofos and imidacloprid, indicating that abamectin was highly selective, endosulfan and bifenthrin were selective and profenofos and imidacloprid were not selective for the predator.

Keywords : integrated control; selectivity; tolerance; lethal concentration.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License