SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue55Book Symposium on Margaret Martin’s Judging Positivism: IntroductionCan Raz’s Pre-Emption Thesis Survive under a Dworkinian Theory of Law and Adjudication? author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Isonomía

Print version ISSN 1405-0218

Abstract

COELHO, André L. S.. Elephants and Flashlights: On Martin on Raz. Isonomía [online]. 2021, n.55, pp.168-178.  Epub Feb 28, 2022. ISSN 1405-0218.  https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i55.491.

The paper responds to some of Margaret Martin’s criticisms of Joseph Raz’s legal theory in her book Judging Positivism, especially the alleged change in Raz’s account of adjudication and its potential negative impact on Raz’s legal theory. To that end, I treat Raz’s theory in particular, and analytic legal theories in general, as providing a picture of what law would be like if it were fully determined by certain aspects rather than revealing essential aspects of what law is. In this sense, legal theories are compared, as in the famous Indian parable, to blind men trying to describe what an elephant is, a comparison that is later completed by the idea of the periodic rotation of a lantern, which illuminates each time a different aspect of the animal.

Keywords : Joseph Raz; Margaret Martin; legal exclusive positivism; adjudication.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )