SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue53“Permissive” Interests and the (Moral) Power of Consent. A Critique of David OwensPreferences Depend on Reference Point! A Challenge to Law & Economics –and Coasean– Theory author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Isonomía

Print version ISSN 1405-0218

Abstract

GARCIA-CASTILLO, Zoraida et al. Technical and Rational Elements for the Assessment of Scientific Evidence Reliability: Reference on Three Forensic Science Areas. Isonomía [online]. 2020, n.53, pp.31-69.  Epub June 09, 2021. ISSN 1405-0218.

The adoption of the accusatory criminal system in many Latin American countries has faced many challenges, among them that of configuring new standards for judicial action. This article focuses on the challenge faced by judges when tasked with assessing scientific evidence reliability, since its nature lies beyond the expertise of most judges. Evaluating the reliability and correctness of individual evidence so as to allocate a specific weight to it in the whole of the evidence is a task in which judges require multidisciplinary analyses. We propose both general and specific guidelines for assessing the reliability of the evidence from three forensic areas (genetics, fingerprint and forensic voice comparison) as an innovative tool in the Latin American judicial environment.

Keywords : evidence reasoning; reliability of the scientific evidence; forensic genetics; dactyloscopy; forensic voice comparison.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )