SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29Challenges and opportunities for efficient management of drinking water, sanitation and electricity services in the Dominican RepublicTechnology-based business opportunity identification in a Latin American country author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Acta universitaria

On-line version ISSN 2007-9621Print version ISSN 0188-6266

Abstract

CAMACHO-ESCOBAR, Marco Antonio et al. The backyard egg: physical characteristics and performance in artificial incubation tests. Acta univ [online]. 2019, vol.29, e2381.  Epub Sep 11, 2020. ISSN 2007-9621.  https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.2381.

The backyard egg is small in comparison with the incubating egg. The objective was to incubate backyard eggs to know physical characteristics and performance in artificial incubation tests. 1129 eggs were incubated: 1002 creole hens’ eggs, 68 araucana hens’ eggs and 59 turkeys’ eggs. The evaluated variables were weight, longitudinal axis, maximum polar diameter, equatorial diameter, polar minimum diameter, shape index, broken shell or dirty shell, fertility, hatchability, and total early, intermediate, and late embryonic mortality. The turkey egg had greater weight, length, maximum polar diameter, equatorial diameter, minimum polar diameter and fertility (p < 0.05). They also had a lower rate of form than the eggs of the creole and araucanian hens (p < 0.05). The araucanian chicken egg showed greater hatchability and lower total embryonic mortality (p < 0.05). The characteristics and performance of the creole egg are different from the incubable egg; therefore, the criteria of uniformity and commercial incubation are not, precisely, suitable for incubation.

Keywords : Araucana hen; creole hen; turkey hen; hatchability; guajolote.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )