SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue4Bioregulators and biostimulants on development, growth and fruit yield of blueberry cv. BiloxiIodine biofortification and antioxidant activity in eggplant fruits (Solanum melongena L.) author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista fitotecnia mexicana

Print version ISSN 0187-7380

Abstract

OSUNA-ENCISO, Tomás et al. Flowering delay and quality of Kent mango fruit in southern Sinaloa, Mexico. Rev. fitotec. mex [online]. 2023, vol.46, n.4, pp.389-397.  Epub Apr 09, 2024. ISSN 0187-7380.  https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2023.4.389.

In Southern Sinaloa, 26,500 ha of mango are grown with the early-season Ataulfo and Tommy Atkins, intermediate-season Kent and late-season Keitt varieties. Despite this classification, the harvest of these varieties is concentrated in a short period of time during the months of June and July. It is considered that this phenomenon is caused by high temperatures during fruit growth. The aim of this research was to extend the harvest period of the Kent variety, the most cultivated in the region, with 48 % of the planted area. Two experiments were established in the municipalities of Escuinapa in 2018 and El Rosario in 2019, both in the state of Sinaloa, Mexico. Treatments were manual pruning and chemical pruning with ethephon (2-chloroethylphosphonic acid) at doses of 1.0 and 1.2 mL L-1 in panicles of the first flowering during anthesis stage, to induce a second flowering in axillary buds, the control were unpruned trees. Manual pruning delayed bloom between 40 and 42 d, and with chemical pruning the flowering delay was between 45 and 47 d. Harvest delay was 33 and 31 d, respectively. For each apical panicle pruned, 2.5 to 4.8 axillary panicles were formed. In 2018, the manual and chemical pruning of apical panicles produced fewer fruits, but larger than the control, which resulted in a more balanced production between treatments. In 2019 the unpruned control was more productive. Fruits of the control and trees pruned with ethephon 1.2 mL L-1 had the best performance in quality indicators firmness, total soluble solids (TSS) and the TSS/acidity ratio (SAR). It is concluded that flowering delay by manual or chemical etephone-pruning in panicles of the first bloom might be an alternative to delay the harvest in Kent mango with quality fruits.

Keywords : Mangifera indica L; delay of flowering and harvest; fruit quality; manual and chemical pruning; panicle.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )