SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue4Early-onset neonatal sepsis in newborns to mother with chorioamnionitis: Case-controls studyRisk factors associated with mother-to-child transmission of HIV in the patients of CAPACITS in Veracruz, Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Perinatología y reproducción humana

On-line version ISSN 2524-1710Print version ISSN 0187-5337

Abstract

AZCARRAGA-DE LARA, César Raul; FERNANDEZ-CARROCERA, Luis A  and  YLLESCAS-MEDRANO, Eucario. Nasopharyngeal ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as rescue ventilatory method: Preliminary report. Perinatol. Reprod. Hum. [online]. 2013, vol.27, n.4, pp.222-228. ISSN 2524-1710.

Objective: To compare the nasal continuous positive airway pressure and nasopharyngeal ventilation. Methods: Randomized clinical trial that included all infants admitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the INPer, who had respiratory distress and required ventilatory support. In total were included 28 neonates, divided into two groups, the first with 12 patients with nasopharyngeal ventilation, and the second with 16 neonates in nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Inclusion criteria: Infants with respiratory distress and respiratory automatism that required ventilatory support. Exclusion criteria: Nasal pathology, major congenital malformations, neuromuscular disorder, air leak syndrome, previous abdominal surgery or intestinal disease. Study variables: gestational age, weight, days of life, underlying disease, prior ventilatory support method of ventilation, days of application, indications, complications, rate of success. We used descriptive statistics and for comparison of the groups χ2 or Mann-Whitney U. Results: The group with nasopharyngeal ventilation had nine preterm hypotrophic neonates; the group in nasal continuous positive airway pressure had six preterm hypotrophic neonates. At the moment of admission to the study all the neonates were in phase I of ventilation. The predominant indication of ventilation at the nasopharyngeal ventilation group was apnea, and respiratory distress for nasal continuous positive airway pressure group. Nasopharyngeal ventilation failed in five patients (41.6%) and three (18.7%) in nasal continuous positive airway pressure group, without statistical difference.

Keywords : Nasal continuous positive airway pressure; nasopharyngeal ventilation; apnea; respiratory distress.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License