SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Poverty and its Relation with the Problems of Employment in Catamarca and Tucumán, Argentina, at the End of the XX CenturyEconomic Impacts of Intensification in the Exploitation of Natural Gas Deposits of Cuenca de Burgos Using the Scheme of Public Investment Financing Contracts author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Estudios demográficos y urbanos

On-line version ISSN 2448-6515Print version ISSN 0186-7210

Abstract

ARIAS, Patricia. Migration, Peasant Economy and Domestic Development Cycle. Discussions and Recent Studies. Estud. demogr. urbanos [online]. 2013, vol.28, n.1, pp.93-121. ISSN 2448-6515.  https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v28i1.1440.

Based on a review of recent studies conducted in various rural communities in the new migration regions, this article critically reviews two interpretations of rural family studies: the peasant economy as a production-consumption unit and the household development cycle. In the current conditions, internal and international migration play a key role in rural communities. Many studies have shown the willingness of women to leave home and join migratory flows for personal reasons, or due to specific situations and demands. Their departure has contributed to the breakdown of the traditional systems of organization and reproduction of the peasant family.

Feminists, and subsequently studies with a gender perspective, criticized the view that rural families were production-consumption units where decisions corresponded to a model of family strategies for survival and reproduction (Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf, 1990). That model favored homogeneity, collectivity, solidarity and consensus, in other words, it assumed that households had no conflicts or tensions when it came to making decisions that involved everyone (Ariza, 2007). The family was a “moral economic unit” based on the principles of “reciprocity, consensus and altruism” (Grasmuck and Pessar, 1991).

Studies from a gender perspective pointed out that there were power relations in families based on a hierarchical, unequal distribution of rights, resources and authority that particularly affected women (Ariza, 2007; González Montes, 2002; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007; Wolf, 1990). This criticism reached migration studies: migration was not an exclusively male phenomenon; women migrants were not appendages of male migration and their displacement could be based on personal motivation (Ariza, 2007; Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2007).

Keywords : migration; peasant economy and domestic development cycle.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )