SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 issue2The translation of De rerum natura by T. Lucretius Carus: theoretical and practical aspectsRepresentations of yoga in Kālidāsa’s Raghuvaṃśa: idealization and domestication author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Nova tellus

Print version ISSN 0185-3058

Abstract

RAMOS-UMANA, Leonardo. Prohairesis in Epictetus. Nova tellus [online]. 2022, vol.40, n.2, pp.53-82.  Epub Aug 29, 2022. ISSN 0185-3058.  https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.nt.2022.40.2.0021x53.

The purpose of this article is to explain what prohairesis is in the philosophy of Epictetus, for which we will collect its main features, namely, (I) that the achievement of happiness (or the achievement of virtue) depends entirely on the use we give to our prohairesis, and (II) that prohairesis is the highest thing among all which belong to human being. So three complex questions need to be addressed: (1) How does prohairesis relate to the rational faculty (δύναμις λογική)?, (2) How does prohairesis relate to the faculty that uses representations (ἡ χρηστικὴ δύναμις ταῖς φαντασίαις)? And, last but not least, (3) How does prohairesis relate to the ruling part of the soul (τὸ ἡγεμονικόν)? According a comparative reading of several key passages, in this article we show that only the first two questions are answered by an identity relationship. About the third question, we argue that prohairesis is a faculty belonging to hēgemonikón, a conclusion that turns away from common postures in specialized literature.

Keywords : precedent; hēgemonikón; Stoic theory of action; what depends on us; eph’ hēmîn.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )