SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.51 issue152Intuitions, Simplicity and Extrapolation from ConceptsThe Nature of Subject and the Argument from Unity author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Crítica (México, D.F.)

Print version ISSN 0011-1503

Abstract

MARRAUD, Huberto. On the Definition of Conductive Arguments. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2019, vol.51, n.152, pp.61-84.  Epub Dec 28, 2020. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2019.09.

In 1971, Wellman coined the terms “conduction” and “conductive” to name a distinctive kind of reasoning, different both from deductive and inductive reasoning. Most authors think that the weighing of pros and cons is the distinctive feature of conduction. However I contend that weighing is characteristic of some kinds of argumentation structures while “conductive” applies to the relationship between the premises and the conclusion of an argument. Hence I offer a definition of conductive argument according to which conductive arguments are arguments from verbal classifications involving cluster concepts or compounds of such arguments.

Keywords : argumentation schemes; cluster concept; conductive argument; verbal classification; weighing.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )