SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 issue140Borderline experiences one cannot undergoSobre el uso de heurísticas como posible solución del problema de marco author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Crítica (México, D.F.)

Print version ISSN 0011-1503

Abstract

HERNANDEZ BETANCUR, Juan Pablo. Racionalidad y acción no reflexiva. El debate Dreyfus-McDowell. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2015, vol.47, n.140, pp.43-63.  Epub Feb 20, 2020. ISSN 0011-1503.

The recent debate initiated by Hubert Dreyfus and John McDowell has called attention on the relation between rationality and unreflective action. In this paper I propose a form of specifying the disagreement between intellectualists and anti-intellectualists, as I will call them. In light of this proposal I argue that the main anti-intelectualist argument can only succeed if at least one of three implicit presuppositions is granted. These presuppositions are far from being self-evident and their truth is challenged by familiar phenomena. I finish with some remarks that suggest the intellectualist ends up in a better argumentative position.

Keywords : intellectualism; reasons for action; nonconceptual content; phenomenology; absorbed coping.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )