SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue137Analyticity and context-sensitivity. On Gillian Russell’s account of truth in virtue of meaningEncuentros cercanos con argumentos del “tercer tipo”: razonamiento plausible y probabilidad subjetiva como modelos de evaluación de argumentos author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Crítica (México, D.F.)

Print version ISSN 0011-1503

Abstract

CARRASCO, María A.. Reinterpretación del espectador imparcial: impersonalidad utilitarista o respeto a la dignidad. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2014, vol.46, n.137, pp.61-84.  Epub Jan 07, 2020. ISSN 0011-1503.

During the Scottish Enlightenment, the “point of view of the spectator” was considered to be the adequate standpoint from where to make impartial moral judgments. This school of thought has often been seen as anticipating Utilitarianism. However, many interpreters are now saying that, despite their similar approaches to ethics, Hutcheson’s and Hume’s theories are proto-utilitarian while Smith’s is not. Indeed, Smith was the first important critic of Utilitarianism. In this paper I provide further reasons for Smith’s critical attitude to Utilitarianism by tracing it back to his specific account of the position of the impartial spectator: either a third-person or a second-person standpoint. This position generates different meta-ethical structures that determine, among other things, the meaning of the notion of impartiality.

Keywords : moral systems; second-person perspective; third-person perspective; Scottish Enlightenment; Adam Smith.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )