SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.68 número2Geometry optimization for multi-inlet vortex photoreactor for CO2 reductionTime-dependent interactions in tunnelling dynamics índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.68 no.2 México mar./abr. 2022  Epub 27-Mar-2023

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.68.020701 

RESEARCH

GRAVITATION, MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS AND FIELD THEORY

Impressive and accurate solutions to the generalized Fokas-Lenells model

A. Bekira 

E. H. M. Zahranb 

A. Gholami Davodic 

aNeighbourhood of Akcaglan, Imarli Street, Number: 28/4, 26030, Eskisehir, Turkey

bDepartments of Mathematical and Physical Engineering, Benha University, Faculty of Engineering, Shubra, Egypt

cDepartment of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran.


Abstract

In this article, we study the generalized full nonlinearity perturbed complex Fokas-Lenells model (GFLM) which is a general dynamical representation of modern electronic communications “Internet blogs, Facebook communication and Twitter comments”. The modified simple equation method (MSEM) has been applied effectively to generate closed form solutions. On the other hand, the Riccati-Bernoulli Sub-ODE method (RPSODM) which reduces the steps of calculation has been applied perfectly to achieve accurate solution to this equation. We established the solutions achieved by these different methods in same vein and parallel.

Keywords: The perturbed complex Fokas-Lenells model; the modified simple equation method; the Riccati-Bernoulli Sub-ODE method; the travelling wave solutions

1. Introduction

This principal idea of this article is focused on proposing the optical solution to the GFLM “which makes revolution in the social media”. The suggested model is the important one that appears in the area of nonlinear optical fibers and represents the power low nonlinearity from which the FLM with its different forms are emerged. Moreover, this model plays a vital rule in many complex nonlinear phenomena, including acoustics, nonlinear optics, telecommunication industry, convictive fluids, plasma physics, condensed matter, and solidstate physics. Specially, this model represents the propagation of short light pulses in the mono-mode optical fibers. Various authors have studied the FLM via different methods [19-30]. On the other hand, the GFLM will be discussed for the first time in the frame work of two distinct techniques namely the MSEM and the RPSODM. The suggested methods have been examined previously for many NLPDE and achieved good results. The suggested two methods belong to the well-known ansatz methods. The MSEM surrenders to the balance rule and achieve analytical closed form solution while the RPSODM is the only one of the ansatz methods which does not surrenders to the balance rule and reduces the volume of calculation and continuously achieve impressive results. The two methods are applied in the same vein and parallel. The suggested equation is in fact mainly responsible of a surprising representation for all modern social media arising in the soliton technology. Furthermore, recent studies for new significant models have been demonstrated for just few authors, for example, Khan and Atangana [31] who describe the mathematical modeling and dynamics of a novel corona virus (2019-nCoV), specially the brief details of interaction among the bats and unknown hosts, then among the peoples and the infections reservoir, and Khan, et al. [32] who regarded on of the reason for lever inflammation and explores the HEV dynamics in fractional derivative.

According to [10, 22], GFLM can be written as,

ipt+a1pxx+a2pxt+p2(bp+iσpx)=i[αpx+λ(p2nP)x+μ(p2n)xp]. (1)

Here, p(x;t) is a complex-valued function which represents the temporal development of the pulses. Furthermore, the variables b, σ are the self -phase modulation and the nonlinear dispersal respectively, while α 1, α 2 are the group velocity dispersal and the spatial-temporal dispersal respectively. In addition, α is the influence of the considered dispersal, λ is the special effect of deepening and µ captures the effect of nonlinear dispersal. Finally, n denotes the generalized full nonlinearity. Recently, many approaches have resulted in the exact solutions to NLPDEs which are mostly demonstrated through [1-18]. One of the most famous and powerful ansatz methods which is described briefly and results in the closed form optical solutions for the NLPDEs is the MSEM. In the same vein and parallel, the RPSOM which treats the frailer of balance operation significantly and satisfies the optical solitons exactly has been used.

2. Applications

In this section, the modified simple equation method is applied on the suggested equation in order to find the optical solutions. In terms of some parameters, the travelling wave solutions are achieved when these constants are determined.

2.1.The closed form solution using the MSEM

According to the MSEM, the solution is written as:

R(ζ)=k=0mAkψ'(ζ)ψ(ζ)k, (2)

where A k (0 ≤ km) are arbitrary constants and A m 6= 0. The unknown function ψ(ζ) is determined by finding arbitrary constants and we have ψ’(ζ) 6= 0. The positive integer m is derived by using the homogeneous balance between the nonlinear term and the highest order derivative term. A function of ψ −j (j = 0,1,2,....) is achieved by computing the derivative of the function R(ζ). By setting the same powers of ψ −j to zero, we will organize the system of algebraic equations. The constants A k appearing in this system can be determined using any organized computer program such as Maple or Mathematica software. Now, for the suggested equation this wave transformation is introduced:

q(x,t)=u(ζ)expiθ(x,t), (3)

qt=expiθ(x,t)(-vu'+i(w-vφ')u), (4)

qx=expiθ(x,t)(u'-i(k-φ')u), (5)

qxx=expiθ(x,t)(u''-i(ku'-uφ''-u'φ')

-i(k-φ')u'-(k-φ'2)u), (6)

where ζ = xvt denotes to the shape features of the wave pulse, θ(x,t) = −kx + wt + θ 0 is the element state of the soliton. k, θ 0, w and v are the soliton frequency, phase constant, wave number and the velocity, respectively. Substituting Eqs. (3)-(6) into Eq. (1) we get the real and imaginary parts of this equation separately as,

(a1-a2)u''-(a2wk-a1k2-αk-w)u+(b+kσ)u3+ku[(2n+1)λ+2nμ]u2n=0, (7)

v+2ka1-a2kv+w-σu2+α+[(2n+1)λ+2nμ]u2n=0. (8)

From (7) and (8) we get,

[(2n+1)λ+2nμ]u2n=-v-2ka1+a2(kv+w)+σu2-α. (9)

For (2n + 1)λ + 2 = 0 and σ = 0 we have v = (2 1α 2 wσu 2 /(α 2 k − 1)) and λ = −2nµ/(2n + 1)

Thus, the general form is obtained from (7) and (8) as,

a1-a2vu''+[a1k2-w+kv1-a2k]u+bu2n+1=0. (10)

For n 1 = α 1α 2 v and n 2 = α 1 k 2w+kv(1−α 2 k) Eq. (10) becomes

n1u''+n2u+bu2n+1=0. (11)

Applying the balance rule, we get (2n + 1)m = m + 2 ⇒ m = 2/2n = 1/n, n 6= 0.

In addition, by considering the transformation u = R 1/n , we obtain

u'=1nR1n-1R',u''=1n(1n-1)R1-2nnR'+1nR1n-1R''. (12)

Substituting this transformation in Eq. (11), we get

n1(1-n)R'+nRR''+n2n2R2+n2bR4=0. (13)

Again, balancing of Eq. (13) leads to m + m + 2 = 4m so we get m = 1, hence the solution according to the MSEM is,

R(ζ)=A0+A1ψ'(ζ)ψ(ζ), (14)

therefore, we can write:

R'=A1ψ''ψ-ψ'ψ2, (15)

R''=A1ψ'''ψ-3ψ'ψ''ψ2+2ψ'ψ3, (16)

R2=A02+2A0A1ψ'ψ+A12ψ'ψ2, (17)

RR''=A0+A1ψ'ψψ'''ψ-3ψ'ψ''ψ2+2ψ'3ψ3, (18)

R4=A04+4A03A1ψ'ψ+6A02A12ψ'ψ2

+4A0A13ψ'ψ3+A14ψ'ψ4. (19)

Moreover, substituting R(ζ) in Eq. (13) and collecting the coefficients of different power of ψ −j , equating them to zero implies this system of equations:

2+nbA13=0, (20)

ψ''ψ'=2A0(2nbA13+1)3A1, (21)

(n1A1[n-1]+n2n2A12+6n2bA02A12)ψ

-3nA0ψ'+nA1ψ''=0, (22)

ψ''ψ'=2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1, (23)

A02=-n2b. (24)

Firstly, from Eq. (20) and Eq. (24) we obtain:

A1=-2nb3,       A0=-n2b.

Now, from Eq. (21) and Eq. (22) we get

3A1ψ''=2A0(2nbA13+1)ψ', (25)

ψ'ψ=18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0. (26)

By integrating Eq. (26) we get,

ψ=C1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ. (27)

Also, by integrating Eq. (23) leads to

ψ'=C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζ. (28)

Dividing Eq. (28) by Eq. (27) implies

ψ'ψ=C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζC1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ. (29)

We can easily obtain the solution by substituting Eq. (23), Eq. (24) and Eq. (29) into Eq. (14) as follows,

R(x,t)=-n2b+-2nb3C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζC1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ. (30)

u(x,t)=-n2b+-2nb3C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζC1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ1n. (31)

Consequently,

q(x,t)=-n2b+-2nb3C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζC1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ1nexpi(-kx+wt+θ0), (32)

Re  q(x,t)=-n2b+-2nb3C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζC1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ1ncos(-kx+wt+θ0), (33)

Im  q(x,t)=-n2b+-2nb3C2exp2A0A1n2(n2+2bA02)nA0+n1(1-n)A1ζC1exp18n2bA02A13+3n2A2A12+3n1(n-1)A14n2bA0A13-7nA0ζ1nsin(-kx+wt+θ0). (34)

3 The exact solutions using the RPSOM

According to the RPSOM [4] the solution is

R'=AR2-M+BR+CRM, (35)

where the parameters A,B,C and M can be calculated later. Note that when AC ≠ 0 and M = 0, Eq. (35) is a Riccati equation. When A ≠ 0, C = 0 and M ≠ 1, Eq. (34) is a Bernoulli equation. Differentiating Eq. (35) once, we get,

R''=AB(3-M)R2-M+A2(2-M)R3-2M+MC2R2M-1+BC(M+1)RM+(2AC+B2)R. (36)

Substituting about the distinct derivatives of R into Eq. (35) and setting equality for the highest exponential order of R we obtained the value of M. Now, equating distinct coefficients of R i implies a set of equations in terms A,B,C and λ from which we can calculate them.

Now, using the transformation ζ = x + yλt as well as the values of A,B,C and λ into the auxiliary Eq. (35), then it will admit these forms of solutions:

Rζ=C1eA+B+Cζ,       M=1, (37)

R(ζ)=A(M-1)(ζ+C1)1/(1-M)   M1,  B=0  and  C=0, (38)

R(ζ)=-AB+C1eb(M-1)ζ1/(M-1)   M1,  B0  and  C=0, (39)

R(ζ)=-B2A+4AC-B2tan(1/2(1-M)2A4AC-B2(ζ+C1) 1(1-M), (40)

and

R(ζ)=-B2A+4AC-B2cot(1/2(1-M)2A4AC-B2(ζ+C1) 1(1-M), (41)

when M ≠ 1, A ≠ 0and B 2-4AC < 0.

R(ζ)=-B2A+B2-4ACcoth(1/2(1-M)2AB2-4AC(ζ+C1) 1(1-M), (42)

and

R(ζ)=-B2A+B2-4ACtanh(1/2(1-M)2AB2-4AC(ζ+C1) 1(1-M), (43)

when M ≠ 1, A ≠ 0and B 2-4AC < 0.

R(ζ)=1A(M-1)(ζ+C1)-B2A1/(1-M), (44)

when M ≠ 1, A ≠ 0 and B 2 − 4AC = 0, where C 1 is an arbitrary constant. Now, according to the constructed method

R'=AR2-M+BR+CRM, (45)

R''=(3-M)ABR2-M+(2-M)A2R3-2M+MC2R2M-1+(M+1)BCRM+(2AC+B2)R, (46)

RR''=(3-M)ABR3-M+(2-M)A2R4-2M+MC2R2M+(M+1)BCRM+1+(2AC+B2)R2. (47)

Substituting into Eq. (13), we get

1-nn1AR2-M+BR+CRM+n3-MABR3-M+2-MA2R4-2M+MC2R2M+M+1BCRM+1+[2AC+B2]R2+n2n2R2+n2bR4=0. (48)

Equating the coefficients of different powers of R to zero we obtain,

(1-n)n1(AR2+BR+C)+n(3ABR3+2A2R4+BCR+[2AC+B2]R2)+n2n2R2+n2bR4=0. (49)

Equating the coefficients of different powers of R to zero we obtain,

R42A2+nb=0, (50)

R33nAB=0, (51)

R2A(1-n)(a1-a2v)+n(2AC+B2)+n2[a1k2-w+kv1-a2k]=0, (52)

R(1-n)(a1-a2v)B+nBC=0, (53)

ConstantC(1-n)(a1-a2v)=0. (54)

From these equations we obtain,

A=±-nb2,         B=0=C=(a1-a2v)(1-n)n. (55)

According to the proposed method we take the 4-th case for which M ≠ 1, A ≠ 0 and B 2−4AC < 0, the solution of Eq. (13) is

R(ζ)=(4a1-a2vn-1n-nb2-2nbtan124a1-a2vn-1n-nb2-2nbζ+C1), (56)

R(ζ)=(4a1-a2vn-1n-nb2-2nbcot124a1-a2vn-1n-nb2-2nbζ+C1), (57)

u(x,t)=(4a1-a2vn-1n-nb2-2nbtan124a1-a2vn-1n-nb2-2nbx-vt+C11n), (58)

u(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbcot124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1n. (59)

Consequently,

q(x,t)=u(ζ)exp(iθ[x,t]), (60)

q1(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbtan124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1nexpi(-kx+wt+θ0), (61)

Re  q1(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbtan124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1ncos(-kx+wt+θ0), (62)

Im  q1(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbtan124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1nsin(-kx+wt+θ0), (63)

q2(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbcot124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1nexpi(-kx+wt+θ0), (64)

Re  q2(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbcot124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1ncos(-kx+wt+θ0), (65)

Im  q2(x,t)=4(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nbcot124(a1-a2v)(n-1)n-nb2-2nb(x-vt+C1)1nsin(-kx+wt+θ0). (66)

4. Graphical interpretation

In this section we illustrate the soliton solutions of the generalized perturbed full nonlinearity complex Fokas-Lenells equation The real part and modulus of optical soliton are depicted in 3D plot and 2D plot in each figure. In Fig. 1, the plots of soliton solutions (32) are established with the constant values α 1 = 4 2 = 1,b = −2,n = 3 = 1,k = 10,w = 2,c 1 = 3 and θ 0 = 2.

FIGURE 1 Soliton solution with α 1 =4, α 2 =1, b =−2, n =3, ν =1, k =10, w =2, c 1 =3 and θ 0 = 2. a) Three dimensional plot, b) Line chart, c) Two dimensional plot. 

It is assumed that α 1 = 4, α 2 = 1, b = −2, n = 3, ν = 1, k = 10, w = 10, c 1 = 1 and θ 0 = 2 in Fig. 2, where we first illustrate the soliton solution (60) in three dimension (Fig. 2a)) and then 2D plots are depicted in Figs. 2b) and 2c).

FIGURE 2 Soliton solution with α 1 =4, α 2 =1, b =−2, n =3, ν =1, k =10, w =10, c 1 =3 and θ 0 =2. a) Three dimensional plot, b) Line chart, c) Two dimensional plot. 

5. Conclusion

In this work the MSEM and the RPSOM are used in the same vein and parallel as a powerful advance for future studies to get the new exact optical solutions for the generalized perturbed full nonlinearity complex Fokas-Lenells model (GPFNCFL). These solutions will brief positive accuracy to the quasi-particle theory to suppress intra-channels collision of optical solitons corresponding Langevin equations in order to obtain the mean free velocities of the soliton, and proved the phenomena of soliton cooling using the distortion terms. We also conclude that these different techniques are concise, effective, powerful, and direct. Furthermore, they reduce the large amount of calculations and can be used to any nonlinear problem of science.

References

1 A. Bekir, Application of the (G’/G)-expansion method for nonlinear evolution equations, Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 3400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.01.057. [ Links ]

2 E. H. M. Zahran and M. M. A. Khater, Exact traveling wave solutions for the system of shallow water wave equations and modified Liouville equation using extended Jacobian elliptic function expansion method. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 4 (2014) 455, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2014.45038. [ Links ]

3 A. M. Wazwaz, Construction of soliton solutions and periodic solutions of the Boussinesq equation by the modified decomposition method, Chaos Solitons & Fractals, 12 (2001) 1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(00)00133-8. [ Links ]

4 M. S. M. Shehata, H. Rezazadeh, E H. M. Zahran, E. Tala-Tebue, and A. Bekir, New Optical Soliton Solutions of the Perturbed Fokas-Lenells Equation, Commun. Theor. Phys. 71 (2019) 1275. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0253-6102/71/11/1275. [ Links ]

5 M. M. A. Khater, D. Lu, and E. H. M. Zahran, Solitary wave solutions of the Benjamin-Bona-Mahoney-Burgers equation with dual power-law nonlinearity. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci, 11 (2017) 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/paper. [ Links ]

6 X.-F. Yang, Z.-C. Deng, and Y. Wei, A Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method for nonlinear partial differential equations and its application. Advances in Difference Equations, 2015 (2015) 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13662-015-0452-4. [ Links ]

7 M. M. A. Khater, E. H. M. Zahran, and M. S. M. Shehata, Solitary wave solution of the generalized Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV system, Journal of Egyptian Mathematical Society, 25 (2017) 8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2016.04.006. [ Links ]

8 M. S. M. Shehata, The exp-Method and its Applications for Solving Some Nonlinear Evolution Equations in Mathematical Physics. American Journal of Computational Mathematics 5 (2015) 468, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2015.54041. [ Links ]

9 E. H. M. Zahran, Traveling Wave Solutions of Nonlinear Evolution Equations via Modified exp-Expansion Method. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 12 (2015) 5716, https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2015.4707. [ Links ]

10 A. Biswas, M. Ekici, A. Sonmezoglu, and R.T. Alqahtani, Optical solitons with differential group delay for coupled Fokas-Lenells equation by extended trial function scheme. Optik , 165 (2018) 102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.102 [ Links ]

11 M. Eslami, and M. Mirzazadeh, First integral method to look for exact solutions of a variety of Boussinesq-like equations. Ocean Engineering, 83 (2014) 133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.02.026 [ Links ]

12 D. Kumar, A. R. Seadawy, and A. K. Joardare, Modified Kudryashov method via new exact solutions for some conformable fractional differential equations arising in mathematical biology, Chinese Journal of Physics, 56 (2018) 75, https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2017.11.020g. [ Links ]

13 A. Biswas, 1-soliton solution of the K(m,n) equation with generalized evolution. Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 4601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.05.002 [ Links ]

14 H. Triki and A.M. Wazwaz, Bright and dark soliton solutions for a K(m, n) equation with t-dependent coefficients . Phys. Lett. A , 373 (2009) 2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.029. [ Links ]

15 A. G Davodi, D. D Ganji, A. G Davodi, and A. Asgari, Finding general and explicit solutions (2+ 1) dimensional Broer-Kaup-Kupershmidt system nonlinear equation by exp-function method, Applied Mathematics and computation, 217 (2010) 1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.05.069. [ Links ]

16 G. Domairry, A. G. Davodi, and A. G. Davodi, Solutions for the double Sine-Gordon equation by Exp-function, Tanh, and extended Tanh methods, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 26 (2010) 384. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20440. [ Links ]

17 M. M. Alipour, G. Domairry, and A. G. Davodi, An application of exp-function method to approximate general and explicit solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 27 (2011) 1016, https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20566. [ Links ]

18 A. Asgari, D. D. Ganji, and A.G. Davodi, Extended tanh method and exp-function method and its application to (2+ 1)dimensional dispersive long wave nonlinear equations, Journal of the Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Informatics, 6 (2010) 61. [ Links ]

19 A. Biswas, M. Ekici, A. Sonmezoglu, and R. T. Alqahtani, Optical soliton perturbation with full nonlinearity for FokasLenells equation. Optik, 165 (2018) 29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.094. [ Links ]

20 A. Biswas et al., Optical solitons with differential group delay for coupled Fokas-Lenells equation using two integration schemes. Optik, 165 (2018) 74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.100 [ Links ]

21 A Biswas et al., Optical soliton perturbation with Fokas-Lenells equation using three exotic and efficient integration schemes. Optik, 165 (2018) 288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.132. [ Links ]

22 A.J.M. Jawad, A. Biswas, Q. Zhou, S.P. Moshokoa, and M. Belic, Optical soliton perturbation of Fokas-Lenells equation with two integration schemes. Optik 165 (2018) 111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.104. [ Links ]

23 A.-M. Wazwaz, Bright and dark soliton solutions for a k(m, n) equation with t-dependent coefficients. Phys. Lett. A , 373 (2009) 2162. [ Links ]

24 A.-M. Wazwaz, Gaussian solitary wave solutions for nonlinear evolution equations with logarithmic nonlinearities. Nonlinear Dyn. 83 (2016) 591, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2349-x [ Links ]

25 A. Bansal, A. H. Kara, A. Biswas, S. P. Moshokoa, and M. Belic, Optical soliton perturbation, group invariants and conservation laws of perturbed Fokas-Lenells equation, Chaos. Solitons and Fractals 114 (2018) 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.030 [ Links ]

26 B. Ghanbari and J. F G Aguilar, The generalized exponential rational function method for Radhakrishnan-KunduLakshmanan equation with beta-conformable time derivative, Rev. Mex. Fis 65 (2019) 503, https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.65.503. [ Links ]

27 M. Senol, New Analytical Solutions of Fractional Symmetric Regularized-Long-Wave Equation, Rev. Mex. Fis . 66 (2020) 297, https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.66.297 [ Links ]

28 A. Cevikel and E. Aksoy, Soliton solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations with its applications in mathematical physics, Rev. Mex. Fis. 67 (2021) 422, http://dx.doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.67.422 [ Links ]

29 S. Abbagari, A. Houwe, H. Rezazadeh, A. Bekir, and S. Y. Doka, Solitary wave solutions in two-core optical fibers with coupling-coefficient dispersion and Kerr nonlinearity, Rev. Mex. Fis . 67 (2021) 369, http://dx.doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.67.369. [ Links ]

30 Y. Gurefe, The generalized Kudryashov method for the nonlinear fractional partial differential equations with the beta-derivative, Rev. Mex. Fis . 66 (2020) 771, https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.66.771. [ Links ]

31 M.A. Khan and A. Atangana, Modeling the dynamics of novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) with fractional derivative, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59 (2020) 2379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.033. [ Links ]

32 M.A. Khan, Z. Hammouch, and D. Baleanu, Modeling the dynamics of hepatitis E via the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 14 (2019) 311. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2018074. [ Links ]

Received: June 10, 2021; Accepted: August 26, 2021

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License