SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 número133Argumentación jurídica, por qué y para quéMéxico como nación pluricultural: Una propuesta de articulación sociojurídica en el siglo XXI índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado

versión On-line ISSN 2448-4873versión impresa ISSN 0041-8633

Resumen

SOUSA, Felipe Oliveira de. The Objectivity of Beliefs, Reasonable Disagreement and Political Deliberation. Bol. Mex. Der. Comp. [online]. 2012, vol.45, n.133, pp.193-214. ISSN 2448-4873.

This paper is part of a broader argument that seeks to offer a justification for political (and law's) authority. The aims here are two-fold: to investigate the role of truth in political argument and to place the problem of reasonable disagreement. More precisely, the argument focuses on the possibility of political deliberation. Political deliberation figures as a preliminary stage of political decision-making. It has to do with a confrontation between various incompatible substantive beliefs which, in despite ofthis, seem to be all reasonable. How can citizens holding incompatible beliefs engage in a common enterprise of justifying them to one another? That is the main question.

Palabras llave : beliefs; objectivity; reasonable disagreement; political deliberation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons