Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Similars in SciELO
Share
Medicina crítica (Colegio Mexicano de Medicina Crítica)
Print version ISSN 2448-8909
Abstract
SEGOVIANO GOMEZ, Edgar; VEJAR SANCHEZ, José Alberto; ARVIZU VELASCO, Diana and BARRIOS LOPEZ, Melba Andrea. Does using high-flow oxygen reduce the need for intubation compared with the use of non-invasive ventilation in the patient with mild acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)?. Med. crít. (Col. Mex. Med. Crít.) [online]. 2016, vol.30, n.5, pp.329-333. ISSN 2448-8909.
There are currently high-flow devices to treat respiratory failure. Our objective was to assess whether the use of high flow oxygen reduces the need for intubation compared with the use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with mild acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature, which resulted in 14 items. We analyzed and excluded review articles, clinical cases and those with pediatric population, which left us with only three items.
Conclusion:
There is insufficient evidence of good methodological quality to support that the use of high flow nasal tips decreases endotracheal intubation.
Keywords : Acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARDS; high flow nasal tips; noninvasive ventilation; orotracheal intubation.