SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 issue37Peer Assessment Based on Clinical Cases and within a Virtual EnvironmentThe Resident as Teacher in Family Medicine: Experimental Study with a Faceto-Face Course and its Online Version author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Investigación en educación médica

On-line version ISSN 2007-5057

Abstract

GOMEZ-ALCALA, Alejandro V.; BORBOA-OSUNA, Manuel J.  and  ORNELAS-AGUIRRE, José Manuel. Magical Thinking, Religiosity and Bioethical Decisions in Medical Students in Sonora, Mexico. Investigación educ. médica [online]. 2021, vol.10, n.37, pp.18-30.  Epub Dec 06, 2021. ISSN 2007-5057.  https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2021.37.20265.

Introduction:

Although the community tends to appreciate doctors with religious beliefs, these may influence their bioethical decisions and affect patient care in vulnerable groups.

Objective:

To study religious beliefs and magical thinking among medical students, as well as their effect on solving ethical dilemmas.

Method:

Medical students in their eighth semester were given a validated survey of magical thinking (MTS), the DUREL survey of religiosity (RS) and a bioethical decision questionnaire, followed by the description, correlation and appropriate statistical inference.

Results:

We studied 50 pupils, 20 to 27 years old, 26 women and 24 men; half of them answered being Catholic and 20 (40%) to be non religious. The MTS score (29 to 88, average 46 ± 13.5) and RS score (5 to 26, average 9.8 ± 4.9) were typical of rational, skeptical and secular thinking and showed a significant correlation between them both (r = 0.37, p = 0.008); but in half of the students, traits of magical thinking were found and in three quarters traits of religiosity. All agreed to prescribe contraceptives and refused to deny service to homosexuals, but the induction of abortion or suicide assistance led to divided decisions that enabled the creation of four bioethical profiles, in which the MTS and RS scores differed significantly.

Conclusions:

There is an association between magical thinking and religiosity in medical students; both, in addition, associate with a traditionalist bioethical reasoning that enable conscientious objections in controversial treatments.

Keywords : religiosity; magical thinking; bioethics; medical education; conscientious objection.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )