SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue6Predicting soil traits of agronomic importance by of near infrared reflectance spectroscopFactors that explain the yield of sugar cane at municipal level in Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Print version ISSN 2007-0934

Abstract

UZCANGA PEREZ, Nelda Guadalupe; CANO GONZALEZ, Alejandro de Jesús  and  RAMIREZ SILVA, Jorge Humberto. Socioeconomic diagnosis of watermelon crop in the State of Campeche, Mexico. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [online]. 2015, vol.6, n.6, pp.1331-1344. ISSN 2007-0934.

Watermelon in Campeche, Mexico is a crop of outstanding importance because of its potential market, as it is demanded throughout the year by local consumers. The State-wide average watermelon acreage from 2007 to 2012 was 1613 ha; of it, 80.93% concentrated in the municipalities ofCampeche and Hopelchén whose production was approximately together 33 267 t of a State total of39 955 t, the latter valued at 117 338 thousand pesos. Therefore, a socioeconomic diagnosis of the watermelon crop was held in Campeche to identify the main features of the producer, the market and relevant aspects of the production system to facilitate decision-making. A six-year statistical information from official sources in the calculation of basic agricultural indicators was collected. The characteristics of the producer and relevant technical aspects were obtained directly through a structured questionnaire. The method used to determine the sample size was proportional stratified random distribution with a pressure of 5% and confidence level of 95%. The data were analysed with the Statistical Package Software and Predictive Analytical Solut (PASS) version 21. Levene test homogeneity of variance contrasting the hypothesis (H0: σ21 = σ22 = σ23) ANOVA was used of one factor, maintaining the hypothesis (H0: μ1= μ2= μ3) to compare means and identify significant differences by stratum (K1 and K2). The most relevant results indicated differences between groups for entry (K1= $4 578.81) vs (K2= $7 958.33), plantings (K1=5.45 ha) vs (K2= 14.13 ha) but not for the amount of the fertilizer used (K1= 119.68 kg ha of 18-46-00), (K1=46.84 kg ha of 12-00-46), (K1=41.30 kg ha of 12-61-00) vs (132.94 kg ha K2= 18- 46-00), (K2= 80.64 kg ha of 12-00-46), (K2= 55.06 kg ha of 12-61-00) and yield (K1= 27.67 t ha-1) vs (K2= 31.09 t ha1).

Keywords : diagnosis; economic indicators; production; stratification.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License