SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue1Mexicans with University Studies and the Debate About the U.S. Admissions System for Skilled Immigrants author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Norteamérica

On-line version ISSN 2448-7228Print version ISSN 1870-3550

Abstract

TORRE-CANTALAPIEDRA, Eduardo  and  SCHIAVON, Jorge A.. To Act or Not to Act: Comparing the Role of the States of Chiapas and Arizona in Managing Immigration. Norteamérica [online]. 2016, vol.11, n.1, pp.159-189. ISSN 2448-7228.  https://doi.org/10.20999/nam.2016.a006.

Setting immigration policy is reserved for the federal government in both Mexico and the United States. However, de facto, the states in both countries carry out certain immigration policies. Chiapas and Arizona have both faced challenges in this area. The government of Arizona has followed an anti-immigrant logic, while the government of Chiapas has focused on the defense of migrants' human rights. The aim of this article is to understand the practically opposite roles played by these two states in managing immigration.

Keywords : international migration; irregular migration; undocumented immigration; migratory policy; multi-level immigration management; migratory federalism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )