SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.93 issue4Corrected sinus node recovery time as a screening test in patients with typical atrial flutter post-ablation to predict pacemaker implantationHeart transplantation in patients with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Archivos de cardiología de México

On-line version ISSN 1665-1731Print version ISSN 1405-9940

Abstract

LARA-VARGAS, Jorge A. et al. Third National Registry of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Mexico (RENAPREC III-2022). Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2023, vol.93, n.4, pp.405-416.  Epub May 29, 2023. ISSN 1665-1731.  https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.22000235.

Introduction:

In Mexico, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as an interdisciplinary intervention with therapeutic impact in patients with heart disease is growing. There is the need to know actual conditions of CR in our country.

Objectives:

The objective of this National Registry is to follow-up those existing and new CR units in Mexico through the comparison between the two previous registries, RENAPREC-2009 and RENAPREC II-2015 studies. This is a descriptive study focused on diverse CR activities such as assistance training, and certification of health professionals, barriers, reference, population attended, interdisciplinarity, permanence over time, growth prospects, regulations, post-pandemic condition, integrative characteristics, and scientific research.

Results:

Data were collected from 45 CR centers in the 32 states, 75.5% are private practice units, 67% are new, 33% were part of RENAPREC II-2015, and 17 have continued since 2009. With a better distribution of CR units along the territory, the median reference of candidates for CR programs is 9% with a significant reduction into tiempo of enrollment to Phase II admission (19 ± 11 days). Regarding to previous registries, the coverance of Phases I, II, and III is 71%, 100%, and 93%, respectively; and a coverance increases in evaluation, risk stratification, and prescription, more comprehensive attendance and prevention strategies.

Conclusions:

CR in Mexico has grown in the past 7 years. Even there is still low reference and heterogeneity in specific processes, there are strengths such as interdisciplinarity, scientific professionalization of specialists, national diversification, and an official society that are consolidated over time.

Keywords : Cardiovascular rehabilitation; Mexico; RENAPREC 2009; RENAPREC II-2015; National Registry.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )