SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.89 issue4Sex-specific differences in antithrombotic therapy and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with stentAtrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Archivos de cardiología de México

On-line version ISSN 1665-1731Print version ISSN 1405-9940

Arch. Cardiol. Méx. vol.89 n.4 Ciudad de México Oct./Dec. 2019  Epub Jan 12, 2021

https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.m19000054 

ARTÍCULO DE REVISIÓN

Clinimetric analysis of heart failure in Mexican patients

Análisis clinimétrico de la insuficiencia cardiaca en pacientes mexicanos

Eduardo Chuquiure-Valenzuela1  * 

Oscar Fiscal-López1 

Daniel García-Romero1 

María J. Chuquiure-Gil2 

Carlos Silva-Ruz1 

Susana Aguilar-Moreno1 

Mauricio Ordaz-Valdés2 

Gabriela Méndez-Hernández3 

Nayelli Hernández-Isidro1 

Karina Jacobo-García1 

Jorge Cossio-Aranda1 

1Clínica en Insuficiencia Cardiaca, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Ciudad de México, México

2Escuela de Medicina, Instituto tecnológico y de estudios superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, México

3Unidad académica profesional, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Ciudad Nezahualcóyotl, México

4Consulta externa, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Ciudad de México, México


Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome characterized basically by a circulatory deficit to cover the metabolic and energetic demands of the body. This condition has a broad spectrum in its clinical presentation, affects the quality of life significantly, impacts the family/social environment, and generates a great demand for health services. The purpose of this research is to report the situational diagnose of patients with HF in Mexico. We evaluated 292 patients, 70.2% were men. Average age was 56.7 +- 14.3 years. Ischemic heart disease is the main etiology (98 patients, 33.9%) followed by hypertensive (22.6%) and idiopathic (23.3%) heart disease. The associated clinical background was obesity (31.1%), systemic hypertension (36.7%), myocardial infarction (26.4%), and dyslipidemia (15.1%). The most common symptom was stress dyspnea (41.4%) and jugular vein engorgement at physical examination (32.5%). Anemia was observed in 1% of patients. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 29.2 +- 10.6%. Sinus rhythm was the most frequently detected in 84.9%. 19.9% of patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy. 13.7% of patients with QRS > 130 ms. In our population, the meta-analysis global group in chronic heart failure risk score calculated was 16.8 +- 5.7 and for EMPHASIS 3.3 +- 1.5. We observed that age at presentation in HF in this analysis is at least 10 years younger than in other reports. The grade of obesity takes relevance in our group. The association of anemia and HF in Mexico is rare.

Key words Heart failure; Epidemiology; Etiology; Signs; Symptoms; Mexico

Resumen

La insuficiencia cardiaca es un síndrome caracterizado fundamentalmente por un déficit circulatorio para cubrir las demandas metabólicas y energéticas del organismo. Esta entidad tiene un amplio espectro en su presentación clínica, afecta de manera significativa la calidad de vida, impacta en el entorno familiar/social y genera una gran demanda de los servicios de salud. El propósito de esta investigación es reportar el diagnóstico situacional de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) en México. Evaluamos 292 enfermos, 70.2% eran hombres. Con edad promedio 56.7 +- 14.3 años. La principal etiología es la cardiopatía isquémica (33.9%), seguida de la hipertensiva (22.6%) e idiopática (23.3%). Los antecedentes clínicos asociados fueron: obesidad (31.1%), hipertensión arterial sistémica (36.7%), infarto al miocardio (26.4%) y dislipidemia (15.1%). El síntoma con mayor presentación fue la disnea de esfuerzos (41.4%) y a la exploración física la ingurgitación yugular (32.5%). Se observó anemia en 1% de los enfermos. La fracción de expulsión del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) promedio fue de 29.2 + 10.6%. El ritmo sinusal fue el más frecuentemente detectado en 84.9%. El 19.9% de los pacientes tenían instalado un desfibrilador automático implantable (DAI) o tratamiento de resincronización cardiaca (TRC). El 13.7% de los enfermos con QRS mayor de 130 ms. El riesgo (MAGGIC) calculado en nuestro grupo poblacional fue de 16.8 +- 5.7 y para EMPHASIS 3.3 +- 1.5. Observamos que la edad de presentación de la IC en el presente análisis es menor por 10 años en comparación con otros reportes. El grado de obesidad toma relevancia en nuestro grupo. La asociación de anemia e IC en México es poco frecuente.

Palabras clave: Insuficiencia Cardiaca; Epidemiologia; Etiología; Signos; Síntomas; México

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is known as a syndrome characterized basically by an inappropriate function in emptying and/or filling of ventricular cardiac chambers which leads to a circulatory deficit to cover the metabolic and energetic demands of the body1,2. This disease shows a wide range in its clinical presentation, from a completely asymptomatic subject to the group of patients unable to perform physical activity; in advanced stages, it may reach pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock. Causing, throughout the clinical horizon of this pathology, some degree of decline in quality of life (QoL), an economic impact on the individual, family life and health institutions responsible for the care of the population3, as well as a significant decrease in life expectancy with high mortality4 and high rates of hospital admissions5,6.

Notably, HF is a very important public health problem worldwide, as population studies have reported that 1-2% world population suffers from this disease7,8 and one of five people over 40 will experience it at some point in their life9; after the eighth decade of life, the prevalence increases to 11.6%6,8,10. This pandemic causes great demand for health care, generating up to 46.1% of cardiovascular readmissions in the emergency rooms of general hospitals11. HF is known to have an unfavorable prognosis when it has reached the symptomatic phase7; about 60% of patients with this diagnosis die within the first 5 years of clinical follow-up12, and this figure increases to 90% when severe HF has been diagnosed7.

In the past decades, pharmacological therapeutic breakthroughs have allowed a decrease in the clinical, social, and economic impact of this disease13 that is why the importance of optimal medical treatment is stressed, which should be reflected in clinical stabilization, improvement in QoL, a decrease in hospital admissions, as well as, by postponing the time to specialized management, consisting in electrical resynchronization therapy, surgical alternatives, and even heart transplant.

Any efforts to achieve a clinical improvement in patients will be of utmost importance since this pathology has an impact on the economy of national and global health systems, as well as on people, family, and work level, causing great man-hour loss7, in addition to high admission and readmission rates3,5,7,14.

For this reason, there is a need to form a multidisciplinary group constituted in specialized centers for the care of the HF in the different hospital levels, where comprehensive care based on scientific evidence is provided, with therapeutic management guided by national and international standards, as well as continuing medical education to the patient and the caregivers involved. Always aiming to improve the quality in the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of this disease; without excluding promoting research in this area.

Remarkable advances in pharmacological therapeutics have increased survival in the general population; the well-known form of the population pyramid has tended toward reversing with an increase in the proportion of older adults. Pathologies previously considered to have a high mortality, such as various types of cancer or myocardial infarction, with the advent of new therapies have reduced their fatality rates15. Thus, it is recognized that the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (e.g., alkylating agents, anthracyclines, and HER-2 targeted therapies) conditions diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis16; in addition, cardiovascular disease survivors (e.g., congenital, valvular, and ischemic) will achieve a better long-term survival. In addition to these prognostic advances, the provision of life expectancies in the general population increases the risk, probability of presentation, and prevalence of HF in the following decades.

Minimal reports and clinical descriptions for this pathology have been published in Mexico, so the work of the National Institute of Cardiology HF Center (Centro en Insuficiencia Cardiaca del Instituto Nacional de Cardiología) is needed to describe, analyze, investigate, and disclose the statistical, epidemiological, demographic, and clinical data related to this disease, as well as continuous training of multidisciplinary staff (including nurses, psychologists, rehabilitators, nutritionists, social workers, and physicians) to face the effects of this disease in the future.

Given the magnitude of epidemiological evidence and the demand for a specialized service for this condition, in the 90s, Dr. Gustavo Sánchez Torres organized the patients with this pathology. In 1999, the initiative of Dr. Ignacio Chávez Rivera could accomplish the Department of HF and Heart Transplants. Initially, this division was aligned under the leadership of Dr. Sergio Olvera Cruz and Dr. Arturo Méndez, to be later lead by Dr. Gerardo López Mora; since September 13, 2016, the HF Center (CEIC) of the National Institute of Cardiology has been led by Dr. Eduardo Chuquiure Valenzuela and Dr. Oscar Fiscal Lopez.

This research is intended to initially report the demographic, etiological, and clinical data of 300 patients, to generate a situational diagnosis of the HF problem in Mexico.

Materials and methods

We initially analyzed the clinical characteristics of 300 patients whom we evaluated at the National Institute of Cardiology HF Center. Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of HF were consecutively included, according to the clinical criteria of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)17 and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA)18. We obtained both clinical and medical variables.

The patients agreed to the use of all their data, exclusively for the purposes of this research. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved this research. The patients were approached by trained personnel (nurses, psychologists, and physicians), and subsequently, they underwent: comprehensive clinical review, demographic survey, and review of laboratory test and imaging. We administered pharmacological treatment according to guidelines17,18. Medical education was provided, patient and relative doubts were resolved, and clinical follow-up was planned.

We obtained the collection and systematization of the information through an electronic tool of the Google Drive platform. We analyzed 292 variables classified into five dimensions: (a) general characteristics, (b) clinical backgrounds, (c) laboratory and imaging studies, (d) therapeutics, and (e) risk and follow-up. For the statistical analysis, we used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS-22; the description of the density of the continuous variables expressed as mean and standard deviation states a level of significance to avoid alpha error less 0.05.

Results

Data were collected from October 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017. For this report, we included consecutively the first 300 patients, 8 of whom were dismissed (4 minors and 4 who did not meet HF clinical criteria); finally, we defined our study group of 292 patients (Fig. 1). Mean age observed was 56.7 +- 14.3 years (range 18-86). Only 8.90% of patients were older than 75 years. The sex ratio was 205 males (70.2%) and 87 females (29.8%), 10.2% of males and 5.8% of females were older than 75 years. The mean weight was 73.9 +- 14.6 Kg (35.4-130 Kg), mean height 162 +- 9 cm (137-192 cm), and for a body mass index (BMI) of 28 +- 4.5 Kg/m2 (16.6-43.6 Kg/m2). We determined that 31.1% of patients had a BMI > 30 Kg/m2, being the obesity indicator in the population. The mean abdominal circumference was 92.4 +- 6.7 cm (44.5-154 cm), 93.8% had a waist circumference >90 cm. 96.3% of patients were in NYHA functional Classes I and II and the remaining 3.7% in Classes III and IV (Table 1).

Figure 1 Inclusion criteria. 

Table 1 Demographic data 

Demographic Mean +- SD (Range)
Age (years) 56.7 +- 14.3 (18-86)
Weight (Kg) 73.9 +- 14.6 (35.4-130)
Height (cm) 162 +- 9.2 (137-192)
BMI (Kg/m2) 28 +- 4.5 (16.6-43.6)
Abdominal circumference (cm) 92.4 +- 6.7 (44.5-154)
Demographic n (%)
Gender 205 men (70.2) 87 women (29.8)
NYHA functional class
I 77 (26.4)
II 204 (69.9)
III 10 (3.4)
IV 1 (0.3)

SD: standard deviation, Kg: kilograms, cm: centimeters, BMI: body mass index

n: number, NYHA: New York Heart Association.

Clinical data

The distribution by etiology was made up of 98 patients (33.6%) with ischemic heart disease, followed by 68 (23.3%) idiopathic etiology, 66 (22.6%) hypertensive heart disease, and 32 (10.9%) valvular diseases. We classified 28 patients (9.6%) under "other" several etiologies, of which: 7 (2.4%) correspond to congenital heart diseases, 5 (1.7%) secondary to cancer/chemotherapy, 4 (1.4%) associated to myocarditis, 3 patients (1%) secondary to Chagas' disease, 3 females (1%) with HF associated to pregnancy, 3 patients (1%) with non-compaction cardiomyopathy, 2 (0.7%) with cardiac amyloidosis, and one patient with Takayasu's disease (Table 2).

Table 2 Etiology of disease 

Etiology n (%)
Ischemic 98 (33.6)
Idiopathic 68 (23.3)
Hypertension 66 (22.6)
Valvular 32 (10.9)
Others 28 (9.6)

n: number.

The most prevalent clinical histories were as follows: 107 patients (36.7%) with systemic hypertension, 77 (26.4%) with a history of myocardial infarction, 44 (15.1%) with dyslipidemia, 91 (31.2%) were diabetic, 77 (26.4%) with a smoking history, 3 patients (1%) were current smokers, 32 (11%) had a history of angioplasty, and 12 (4%) bypass surgery history. In addition, sudden death, ventricular fibrillation, or ventricular tachycardia were observed in 10 patients (3.4%), thyroid disease in 9 (3.1%), alcoholism history in 8 (2.7%), chronic kidney disease in 8 (2.7%), 4 (1.3%) under dialysis therapy, 4 (1.4%) with a history of stroke, and finally, anemia in 3 subjects (1%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Description of clinical risk factors 

Background n (%)
Hypertension 107 (36.7)
Myocardial infarction 77 (26.4)
Dyslipidemia 44 (15.1)
Diabetes mellitus 91 (31.2)
Previous smoker 77 (26.4)
PTCA/stent 32 (11)
CABG 12 (4.0)
VT/VF/sudden death 10 (3.4)
Thyroid disease 9 (3.1)
Alcoholism 8 (2.7)
Renal disease 8 (2.7)
Dialysis 4 (1.4)
CVA/TIA 4 (1.4)
Anemia 3 (1.0)
Current smoker 3 (1.0)

PTCA: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; VT: ventricular tachycardia; VF: ventricular fibrillation; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; TIA: transient ischemic attack.

Concerning respiratory symptoms, dyspnea showed the highest prevalence, its variant at rest was observed in 25 patients (8.6%), exertion associated in 121 (41.4%), orthopnea in 27 (9.2%), and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea only in 12 (4.1%). In addition, 6 patients (2.1%) experienced palpitations, 21 (7.2%) dizziness/syncope, fatigue was present in 64 patients (21.9%), loss of appetite in 6 (2.1%), changes in weight such as increase in 7 (2.5%) patients and decrease in 1 (0.3%), tachypnea in 3 (1%), and oliguria in 2 (0.7%) (Table 4).

Table 4 Clinical symptoms 

Symptoms n (%)
Exertional dyspnea 121 (41.4)
Dyspnea at rest 25 (8.6)
Orthopnea 27 (9.2)
Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea 12 (4.1)
Palpitations 6 (2.1)
Dizziness/syncope 21 (7.2)
Fatigue 64 (21.9)
Loss of appetite 6 (2.1)
Weight gain 7 (2.5)
Weight loss 1 (0.3)
Tachypnea 3 (1.0)

n: number.

Regarding clinical signs of fluid overload, lower limb edema occurred in 21 patients (7.2%), as well as ascites in 3 (1%). On the other hand, murmurs were auscultated in 26 patients (8.9%) and third heart sound (S3) in 15 (5.1%). Furthermore, only 46 (15.8%) patients with hepatojugular reflux and 12 (4.1%) with hepatomegaly on palpation. Of total patients, only 6 (2.1%) presented lung rales on auscultation (Table 5).

Table 5 Clinical signs 

Clinical signs n (average)
Edema 21 (7.2)
Ascites 3 (1.0)
Murmur 26 (8.9)
S3 heart sound 15 (5.1)
Displaced apex beat 4 (1.4)
Jugular ingurgitation 95 (32.5)
Hepatojugular reflux 46 (15.8)
Hepatomegaly 12 (4.1)
Cold extremities 10 (34)
Pulmonary rales 6 (2.1)
Pleural effusion 3 (1.0)

n: number.

Mean systolic blood pressure was 121.6 +- 11.9 mmHg (range 75-171 mmHg), we measured 0.7% with values less 90 mmHg and 8.9% with values >140 mmHg. Mean diastolic blood pressure was 71.2 +- 7.7 mmHg (range 45-106 mmHg), only in 1% it was less 50 mmHg and in 3.1% >90 mmHg. Mean heart rate was 68.7 +- 11.9 beats per minute (bpm) (43-226 bpm), being >75 bpm in 11% of our population; a patient presented with atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Mean respiratory rate was 14 +- 1.1 bpm (10-18 bpm); capillary oxygen saturation was 92.9 +- 3.1% (63-99%). Only 5.8% patients with capillary saturation less 91% (Table 6).

Table 6 Vital signs 

Clinical sign Mean +- SD (range)
Systolic pressure (mmHg) 121.6 +- 11.9 (75-171)
Diastolic pressure (mmHg) 71.2 +- 7.7 (45-106)
HR (bpm) 68.7 +- 11.9 (43-226)
Respiratory rate (bpm) 14 +- 1.1 (10-18)
Oxygen saturation (%) 92.9 +- 3.2 (63-99)

SD: standard deviation; mmHg: millimeter of mercury; HR bpm: beats per minute; bpm: breaths per minute; HR: heart rate.

Laboratory and imaging studies

Laboratory blood test levels were as follows: mean hemoglobin (Hb) 14.3 +- 2.1 gr/dL (10-20.1), lymphocytes count 2.1 +- 0.8/mm3 (0.3-4.7), serum glucose 116.4 +- 4.3 mg/dL (69-286), glycated Hb 7.2 +- 1.9% (5.1-11.5), serum creatinine 1.2 +- 0.6 mg/dL (0.5-5.2), blood urea nitrogen 26.9 +- 18.1 mg/dL (8.2-109.2), serum albumin 4.1 +- 0.5 g/dL (2.3-5.2), uric acid 6.5 +- 1.9 mg/dL (3.1-14.7), serum sodium 138 +- 3.2 mEq/L (128-144), serum potassium 4.5 +- 0.5 mEq/L (3.3-6.2), total cholesterol 154.3 +- 4.3 mg/dL (71.7-291), triglycerides 158.4 +- 127.2 mg/dL (25.6-1032.2), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 36.9 +- 1.4 mg/dL (19.9-61.8), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 98.5 +- 44.9 mg/dL (28.9-213). Mean n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level was 517.2 +- 157.8 pg/ml (383-1372) (Table 7).

Table 7 Serum laboratory studies for patients with HF 

Parameter Mean +- SD (range)
Hb (gr/dL) 14.3 +- 2.1 (10-20.1)
Lymphocyte (mm3) 2.1 +- 0.8 (0.3-4.7)
Glucose (mg/dL) 116.4 +- 4.3 (69-286)
Glycosylated Hb (%) 7.2 +- 1.9 (5.1-11.5)
BUN (mg/dL) 26.9 +- 18.1 (8.2-109.2)
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.2 +- 0.6 (0.5-5.2)
Albumin (gr/dL) 4.1 +- 0.5 (2.3-5.2)
Uric acid (mg/dL) 6.5 +- 1.9 (3.1-14.7)
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 517.2 +- 157.8 (383-1372)
Serum sodium (mEq/L) 138.0 +- 3.2 (128.0-144.0)
Serum potassium (mEq/L) 4.5 +- 0.5 (3.3-6.2)
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 154.3 +- 4.3 (71.7-291)
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 36.9 +- 1.4 (19.9-61.80)
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 98.5 +- 44.9 (28.9-213)
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 158.4 +- 127.2 (25.6-1032.2)

SD: standard deviation; NT-proBNP: n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; Hb: hemoglobin; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein.

From the electrocardiographic (EKG) parameters, we determined that 248 patients (84.9%) were in sinus rhythm, 15 (5.1%) in atrial fibrillation rhythm, pacemaker rhythm 27 (9.2%), and in two (0.7%), there was no EKG at the time of data collection. Discarding patients with a pacemaker and the two patients without an EKG, we observed that the average QRS duration was 127.2 +- 30.3 ms (80-240 ms). 13.7% of patients showed that a QRS was >130 ms. 7.5% of patients showed complete left bundle branch block. We observed 58 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy (19.9%) (Table 8).

Table 8 EKG parameters 

Parameter n (%)
Sinus rhythm 248 (84.9)
Atrial fibrillation 15 (5.1)
Pacemaker rhythm 27 (9.2)
Bundle block 22 (7.5)
QRS over 130 ms 40 (13.7)
ICD/CRT 58 (19.9)

SD: standard deviation; ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was quantified in all patients; the prevalent method was electrocardiogram performed in 283 patients (96.9%). In the remaining patients, it was obtained using other methods such as magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography, or scintiscan. We observed a mean LVEF 29.2 +- 10.6% (range 9-73); 223 patients (86.6%) classified as HF with reduced LVEF. Mean left ventricular diastolic diameter measure was 57.6 +- 5.4 mm (35-86) and left ventricular systolic diameter 46.9 +- 5.3 (23-71); mean measurement of interventricular septum was 9.2 +- 1.4 mm (8-14) (Table 9).

Table 9 Echocardiogram parameters 

Parameter Mean +- SD (Range)
LVEF % 29.2 +- 10.6 (9-73)
LV diastolic diameter mm 57.6 +- 5.4 (35-86)
LV systolic diameter mm 46.9 +- 5.3 (23-71)
Interventricular septum mm 9.2 +- 1.4 (8-14)

SD: standard deviation; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LV: left ventricle; mm: millimeter.

Medical treatment

The percentage of patients receiving treatment with ACEIs or ARB II was 65.7%; the most common was enalapril, 71.9% of patients received 10 mg every 12 h. The most common adverse effect observed was persistent cough. 68.4% was under treatment with beta-blocking (BB) agents. We observed intake of tartrate, so we provided medical education and change of BB. The most commonly used corticoid-blocking agent was spironolactone (79.5%), at a dose of 25 mg/day. In addition, furosemide 40 mg/day, the dose most commonly indicated in 69.2% of patients. Ivabradine was administered to 5.5% of patients in this study at a dose of 5 mg every 12 h. ARNI is used in 9.6% of patients, observing as main adverse effect associated low blood pressure. Only 14% of patients took digitalis orally.

Risk

The risk of the analyzed population was determined using two scales validated for patients with HF, the MAGGIC19 scale with a 16.8 +- 5.7 average score and the EMPHASIS20 scale with a 3.3 +- 1.5 score (Table 10).

Table 10 Risk estimates 

Scale Score
MAGGIC19 16.80 +- 5.7
EMPHASIS20 3.27 +- 1.5

MAGGIC: Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure.

Discussion

The institute is a national hospital where patients from all states in our country are treated; thus, this report summarizes the clinical situation of patients over 18 years of age with HF diagnosis in Mexico. Of the samples collected, four pediatric patients were not included; we believe that this population at risk should also be assessed within a center specialized in HF. Another four subjects did not meet the diagnostic criteria. Importantly, data collection was carried out at the HF Center of the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chávez."

It is important to highlight that in this report of Mexican patients, HF presentation is observed a decade before compared to other population groups, as the mean age of our patients was 57 years, which is under 72.90 years (2002) and 72.27 years (2013), reported in the US National HF Cohort:21 The Netherlands reported 71.2-72.9 years in males and 75-77.7 years in females22. In the MAGGIC meta-analysis, which included 41,972 patients from 31 clinical trials, the mean age was 68 years23. This early presentation might be mediated by the impact of obesity and diabetes mellitus in Mexico, factors that increase the risk of HF, as well as the consequences it involves24.

Moreover, a greater proportion of male patients older than 75 years was observed, as compared to the AHA report where they specify that since 2013 in the American population over 80 years of age represents 83% of male and 87.1% of female cardiovascular patients18. Obesity in Mexico is a public health problem, the National Survey of Health and Nutrition (ENSANUT) reported a 76.6% obesity rate in adults over 20 years of age, this differs with the study population25.

The main HF-related etiology in this population is ischemic, concomitantly with reports from other population groups26, followed by arterial hypertension. In our population, valvular heart disease was found to be important compared to other population groups; other etiologies are infectious not only myocarditis but also Chagas' disease. Takayasu's disease as an HF-associated etiology draws our attention27.

Other associated etiological pathologies to be considered in the future, for their association with myocardial damage, are congenital abnormalities and cancer-associated heart disease (related to direct myocardial damage or secondary to the use of chemotherapy). The chronic direct deterioration on myocardial fiber is the most frequent pathophysiological mechanism observed in these groups16.

Hypertension is the most frequent clinical history in patients with HF. Our presentation ratio is visibly different compared to what it is reported in studies in Mexican population such as ENSANUT 201625 (25.5%) and lower than RENASICA28 and RENASICA II29 (46% and 55%, respectively); whereas in international multicenter studies, it is similar to that reported in studies such as MAGGIC23, SOLVD30, and CONSENSUS31 (41%, 41.5-42.8%, and 19.2%, respectively). On the other hand, type II diabetes was estimated by the RENASICA study in 50% and by RENASICA II in 42%28,29, whereas multiple international studies (CHARM32, MERIT33, FRAMINGHAM34, PARADIGM35, SOLVD30, MAGGIC23, CONSENSUS31, and RALES36) have a similar relationship with this report. Importantly, the history of myocardial infarction observed in this study is lower compared to national and international studies23,25,28-36. Only 10% had a history of interventional coronary procedures and 4% had a history of bypass surgery. Nearly one-fourth of patients had a history of smoking; only 1% of them were declared as persistent at the time of the study. Of note, only a discreet proportion of patients (1%) showed anemia in laboratory tests and another (1.4%) had a history of stroke.

The population in this report was mainly made up by carriers of HF classified as chronic; the distribution of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class observed is mostly Classes I and II, whereas advanced Classes III and IV NYHA is made up of a smaller size group. The data show that HF is largely a disorder seen on an outpatient basis, whereas a smaller portion has acute decompensation or requires advanced medical care. It is recognized that due to drug therapy and compliance to guidelines, there is an improvement in survival, number of hospital readmissions, and QoL13. In addition to one of the main therapeutic objectives in our center, we intend to keep patients in optimal functional classes with appropriate QoL. It is necessary to detect those cases of high risk due to acute or progressive deterioration of the disease (Classes III and IV) to offer advanced therapies (electrical, hemodynamic, or surgical).

Thus, we believe that the HF spectrum in practice, has a very broad clinical horizon, that is made up by asymptomatic cases or discrete symptoms, in which patients do not go or rarely go to a specialized assessment (we suspect that they represent a large part of our population), going from that large proportion of patients who show signs and symptoms, who receive hospital, medical care, to that spectrum with advanced evolution and severe state (acute or chronic) associated comorbidity.

The most commonly reported symptom by patients is dyspnea, in its modalities such as at rest, on great exertion, and to a lesser extent paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and orthopnea. In several multicenter trials28,29,33,34 such as patient registries with HF, the relevance of this symptom is also stated. Importantly, the clinical observation of progressive deterioration should alert the clinician to take therapeutic measures and encourage lifestyle changes that help correcting bad clinical course.

Water retention (due to edema of the pelvic limbs, ascites, or lung rales) is the clinical expression of volume overload, increased ventricular filling pressure, and diastolic failure. It is reported that 95% of patients enter the emergency room for fluid retention and dyspnea17, overcrowding these services.

We assessed, in our group of patients, through the EMPHASIS19 scale a low-to-moderate risk for cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to HF and moderate risk for HF mortality with the MAGGIC20 scale. This study describes the initial group of patients with HF in Mexico, which we will follow-up as planned in our clinical research program.

Conclusions

HF boasts an ample spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from patients who are completely asymptomatic to complete physical disability in late stages, pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock. Our findings determine that less 7% of patients are classified as NYHA IV.

Mexico is in dire need for strategic planning in accordance with its local, regional, and national reality. All this with the end goal of implementing public health policies for detecting new cases, bringing opportune diagnosis, efficient treatment, relevant cardiac rehabilitation but above all, a real and effective prevention initiative.

Bibliografía

1. Mann D, Zipes D, Libby P, Bonow R. Braunwald:tratado de Cardiología. Texto de Medicina Cardiovascular. 10th ed. Barcelona, España:Elsevier;2015. [ Links ]

2. Boo JF. Entendiendo la insuficiencia cardiaca. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2006;4:431-47. [ Links ]

3. Anderson JL, Heidenreich PA, Barnett PG, et al. ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures:a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on performance measures and task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2304-22. [ Links ]

4. Savarese G, Lund LH. Global public health burden of heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3:7-11. [ Links ]

5. Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, McMurray JJ, Capewell S. Heart failure and socioeconomic status:accumulating evidence of inequality. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:138-46. [ Links ]

6. Braunwald E. Heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:1-20. [ Links ]

7. Ponikowski P, Anker SD, AlHabib KF, et al. Heart failure:preventing disease and death worldwide. ESC Heart Fail. 2014;1:4-25. [ Links ]

8. Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Banegas J, Guallar-Castillón P. Epidemiología de la insuficiencia cardíaca. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004;57:163-70. [ Links ]

9. Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:30-41. [ Links ]

10. Cowie MR, Mosterd A, Wood DA, et al. The epidemiology of heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:208-25. [ Links ]

11. Maggioni AP, Orso F, Calabria S, et al. The real-world evidence of heart failure:findings from 41 413 patients of the ARNO database. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:402-10. [ Links ]

12. McMurray J, Stewart S. The burden of heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2004;6:50-8. [ Links ]

13. LaBresh KA, Gliklich R. Using get with the guidelines to. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29:539-50. [ Links ]

14. Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Lin Z, et al. Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. JAMA. 2013;309:355-63. [ Links ]

15. Velagaleti RS, Pencina MJ, Murabito JM, et al. Long-term trends in the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;118:2057-62. [ Links ]

16. Mehta LS, Watson KE, Barac A, et al. Cardiovascular disease and breast cancer:where these entities intersect:a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2018;137:e30-66. [ Links ]

17. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure:the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European society of cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129-200. [ Links ]

18. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure:a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:776-803. [ Links ]

19. Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, McMurray JJ, et al. Predicting survival in heart failure:a risk score based on 39 372 patients from 30 studies. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1404-13. [ Links ]

20. Collier TJ, Pocock SJ, McMurray JJ, et al. The impact of eplerenone at different levels of risk in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms:insight from a novel risk score for prognosis derived from the EMPHASIS-HF trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2823-9. [ Links ]

21. Ziaeian B, Kominski GF, Ong MK, et al. National differences in trends for heart failure hospitalizations by sex and race/ethnicity. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003552. [ Links ]

22. Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure. Heart. 2007;93:1137-46. [ Links ]

23. Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). The survival of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction:an individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1750-7. [ Links ]

24. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update:a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2014;129:e28-92. [ Links ]

25. Romero-Martínez M, Shamah-Levy T, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Diseño metodológico de la encuesta nacional de salud y nutrición de medio camino 2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2017;59:299-305. [ Links ]

26. Hogg K, Swedberg K, McMurray J. Heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function;Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:317-27. [ Links ]

27. Chuquiure-Valenzuela E, Silva-Ruz C, Chuquiure-Gil M, et al. Takayasu arteritis associated with chronic reduced heart failure:study of a case. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:372. [ Links ]

28. García-Castillo A, Jerjes-Sánchez C, Bermúdez PM, et al. Mexican registry of acute coronary syndromes (RENASICA). Arch Cardiol Mex. 2002;772:45-64. [ Links ]

29. García-Castillo A, Jerjes-Sánchez C, Bermúdez PM, et al. Registro mexicano de síndromes coronarios agudos (RENASICA II). Arch Cardiol Mex. 2005;75:6-32. [ Links ]

30. SOLVD Investigators, Yusuf S, Pitt B, et al. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293-302. [ Links ]

31. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the cooperative North Scandinavian enalapril survival study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429-35. [ Links ]

32. Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, et al. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure:the CHARM-overall programme. Lancet. 2003;362:759-66. [ Links ]

33.Goldstein S, Fagerberg B, Hjalmarson A, et al. Metoprolol controlled release/extended release in patients with severe heart failure: analysis of the experience in the MERIT-HF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:932‑8. [ Links ]

34. Dawber T. The Framingham Study: the Epidemiology of Atherosclerotic Disease. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1980. [ Links ]

McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:993-1004. [ Links ]

36. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized aldactone evaluation study investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:709‑17. [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Financing sourcesNone.

Received: August 27, 2018; Accepted: December 04, 2018

* Correspondencia: Eduardo Chuquiure-Valenzuela E-mail: hf@cardiologia.org.mx

Conflicts of interest

None.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND