SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue31Notas sobre De Utilitate Credendi author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tópicos (México)

Print version ISSN 0188-6649

Abstract

OOMS, Nicole. Dédalo y Platón: el espacio escultórico del Eutifrón o de los graciosos razonamientos que pasaron entre Sócrates y Eutifrón, y de lo que, por mal de éstos, sucedió con aquéllos. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2006, n.31, pp.147-163. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v31i1.188.

Unless one views metaphor as a prephilosophical tool to be erradicated from proper philosophy, the reader of Plato’s dialogues will find it interesting to investigate both the significance and the power of the great number of metaphors to be found in these works. The present text focuses on the comparison made by Plato at the end of his Euthyphro between the results of the enquiry about piety, on the one hand, and the living statues supposedly created by Daedalus, on the other hand. The claim I make here is that this metaphor has at least four virtues: 1) it offers ways of revisiting the reasons why the arguments failed; 2) it illustrates a peculiar sense of mimesis often disregarded by Plato’s interpreters; 3) it gives the enquiry on piety a cultural context that illuminates the conceptual frame of such enquiry as well as the very notion of piety in Ancient Greece; finally, (4), the metaphor is a joke whose several possible interpretations may say something about the interlocutors of this platonic dialogue as well as about ourselves as Plato’s readers.

Keywords : Plato; Euthyphro; Daedalus; statuary; piety; mimesis; logos; joke.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )