SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.67 issue245Urban Indigenous Governmentality: A Revision of Discursive Frameworks in Mexico City, 1997-2018Precariousness, Racialization and Intersectionality. Job Segments and Profiles of Mapuche Women in La Araucanía, Chile author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales

Print version ISSN 0185-1918

Abstract

GARCIA-GARCIA, Aurelio. Why Has the Socialism of Sumak Kawsay/Good Living Failed as a New Revolutionary School of Thought in Latin America?. Rev. mex. cienc. polít. soc [online]. 2022, vol.67, n.245, pp.299-329.  Epub Apr 21, 2023. ISSN 0185-1918.  https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2022.245.77990.

Sumak kawsay socialism, or good living socialism, is one of the three schools of political thought of sumak kawsay which first appeared in the first decade of the twenty-first century. The idea of good living is currently re-emerging in debates on how to build a new post-pandemic world. Sumak kawsay socialism, however, has remained on the sidelines of the political landscape and academic discussions. In its place, twenty-first century socialism has once again re-appeared as the socialist proposal to create and organize a new system. This paper will analyze which practical and theoretical weaknesses and contradictions have led to the disappearance of good living socialism from political and intellectual debates. It concludes that intellectuals from different branches of socialism used sumak kawsay/good living as a “key symbol” to take advantage of the social, economic, political, and environmental situation in Ecuador and Bolivia in order to seize power.

Keywords : Sumak kawsay; good living; twenty-first century socialism; Ecuador; Bolivia.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )