SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 issue3Typology of irrigation institutions and water governance through horizontal agreementsValencian vegetable gardens: the imperative need to update Maass, Glick and Ostrom's postulates author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Agricultura, sociedad y desarrollo

Print version ISSN 1870-5472

Abstract

CASTRO-PORTALES, Diego  and  MORAGA-NAVARRO, María P.. Conflict resolution inside water users' organizations in Chile: judicialization or arbitration?. agric. soc. desarro [online]. 2015, vol.12, n.3, pp.319-347. ISSN 1870-5472.

The alternatives or pathways currently used for conflict resolution, that is to say judicialization or arbitration, would apparently not be the only existing paths for the resolution of transcendent controversies for users of river courses. In effect, on the one side we believe that we will not obtain anything productive if the legislator continues to add new procedures, both for arbitration and for judicial processes proper. This is because if these new procedures are used daily, they do not fulfill the expected goals. To address and solve the situation set out, we believe it to be completely feasible that Vigilance Boards can firstly solve, as they currently do, the conflicts that arise throughout their territory, using the Board as arbitrator arbiter.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License