SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número3Potencial dendrocronológico del piñonero llorón (Pinus pinceana Gordon) en Tamaulipas, MéxicoDos nuevos registros de Cantharellus comestibles en el Parque Nacional Pico de Orizaba, Veracruz, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4018versión impresa ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.30 no.3 Chapingo sep./dic. 2024  Epub 09-Jun-2025

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2024.06.018 

Scientific articles

Diversity and horizontal structure along an altitudinal gradient at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua

Emanuel Molina-Marchan1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7202-3218

José I. Yerena-Yamallel1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-7427

Andrés E. Estrada-Castillón1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-9862

Eduardo Alanís-Rodríguez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-4275

Raúl Narváez-Flores2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2270-4573

1Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales. Carretera Nacional km 145. C. P. 67700. Linares, Nuevo León, México.

2Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales. km 2.5 carretera Delicias-Rosales. C. P. 33000. Delicias, Chihuahua, México.


Abstract

Introduction

Altitude variation can influence the diversity and structure of a forest.

Objective

To assess the diversity, horizontal structure, and tree associations of a conserved temperate forest using an elevation gradient.

Materials and methods

The research was conducted at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary at three altitudinal intervals: 1) 2 307 to 2 466 m, 2) 2 466 to 2 625 m and 3) 2 625 to 2 785 m. Horizontal structure was determined with the importance value index (IVI); analysis of variance and Tukey's test (p < 0.05) were performed for the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou's evenness and Margalef's richness. Similarity was determined with the Morisita-Horn index.

Results and discussion

Three families, five genera and seven species were recorded; Pinus strobiformis Engelm. had the highest IVI with values above 25 %. The Pinaceae family is the most representative with three species in risk category. Abundance decreased as altitude increased (p < 0.05). Dominance showed an upward trend in relation to altitude, in contrast to true diversity and evenness; however, there were no significant differences between intervals (p > 0.05). Richness was not related to altitude and floristic similarity was high (75 to 93 %) among the three intervals.

Conclusions

Dominance, diversity and evenness indices were similar in the three intervals. Floristic similarity suggests that altitude variation may lead to a gradual change in composition.

Keywords protected natural area; ecological indicators; Pinus strobiformis; Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha; floristic similarity

Resumen

Introducción

La variación en altitud puede influir en la diversidad y estructura de un bosque.

Objetivo

Determinar la diversidad, estructura horizontal y afinidad arbórea de un bosque templado bajo conservación a través de un gradiente altitudinal.

Materiales y métodos

La investigación se realizó en el Santuario de la Cotorra Serrana Occidental en tres intervalos altitudinales: 1) 2 307 a 2 466 m, 2) 2 466 a 2 625 m y 3) 2 625 a 2 785 m. La estructura horizontal se obtuvo mediante el índice de valor de importancia (IVI); se realizó análisis de varianza y prueba de Tukey (p < 0.05) para el índice de diversidad de Shannon-Wiener, equidad de Pielou y riqueza de Margalef. La similitud se determinó con el índice de Morisita-Horn.

Resultados y discusión

Se registraron tres familias, cinco géneros y siete especies; Pinus strobiformis Engelm. tuvo el mayor IVI con valores superiores al 25 %. La familia Pinaceae es la más representativa con tres especies en categoría de riesgo. La abundancia disminuyó conforme la altitud aumentó (p < 0.05). La dominancia mostró tendencia ascendente respecto a la altitud, a diferencia de la equidad y diversidad verdadera; sin embargo, no hubo diferencias significativas entre los intervalos (p > 0.05). La riqueza no mostró comportamiento relacionado con la altitud y la semejanza florística fue alta (75 a 93 %) entre los tres intervalos.

Conclusiones

La dominancia y los índices de diversidad y equidad fueron similares en los tres intervalos. La semejanza florística indica que la variación en altitud puede ocasionar un cambio gradual en la composición.

Palabras clave área natural protegida; indicadores ecológicos; Pinus strobiformis; Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha; semejanza florística

Introduction

Mexico is home to a wide variety of ecosystems, a rich diversity of species, and high levels of endemism (Hernández-López et al., 2020). The state of Chihuahua, located in the northwest of the country, is notable for its wealth of gymnosperms and angiosperms, including over 16 taxa from the genus Pinus (Sánchez-González, 2016) and 34 species with six hybrids from the genus Quercus (Lebgue-Keleng et al., 2015).

Pine-oak forests are globally recognized for their rich biodiversity (Martin et al., 2021); however, both natural and human-related factors contribute to species loss (Singh et al., 2021). In response to this issue, Natural Protected Areas (NPA) have been established with the goal of preserving biodiversity, providing ecosystem services, and maintaining ecosystem representativeness (Tlapa-Almonte et al., 2020). These areas, like the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary, are considered biologically significant due to the vital relationship between flora and fauna. The thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha Swainson), an endangered species, typically nests in standing dead trees of Populus tremuloides (Michx) as well as in species like Pinus strobiformis Engelm., Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco and Abies concolor (Gordon) Lindl. ex Hildebr. (Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas [CONANP], 2023). These conifers fall under the “subject to special protection” category in NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT], 2010). These conifers are located in the higher mountain regions, within areas classified as relict forests (Martínez-Sifuentes et al., 2022; Requena-Lara et al., 2020).

Altitude is one of the main variables driving changes in the diversity of a community, as it is related to the adaptation of each species and influences structural complexity due to resource availability (Sharma & Kala, 2022). For these reasons, evaluating these changes along an altitudinal gradient is crucial for understanding the ecology of forests (Bhat et al., 2020), especially in NPA, where there is often a strong correlation between structural heterogeneity, biodiversity, and the level of conservation (Duncanson et al., 2023). However, this field has seen limited analysis (Malhi et al., 2018). This is the case with the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary, which has studies like those by González-Gaona et al. (2021) and Miranda-Briones et al. (2022); nonetheless, it lacks research focused specifically on the tree layer. For this reason, the objectives were to analyze diversity, structure, and similarity along an altitudinal gradient within the NPA, aiming to understand how changes in altitude can affect a community where relic and endemic species primarily coexist.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The study was conducted along an altitudinal gradient ranging from 2 307 to 2 785 m within the core zone of the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary. This area was chosen due to the high biodiversity concentrated within small spaces, where endemic and ecologically important species are distributed, threatened by both natural and human activities (Fattorini et al., 2020). Additionally, one of the most significant factors in mountainous regions is altitude, which causes a temperature decrease of 1 °C for every 150 m. This directly affects the distribution of species in distinct zones, where populations are adapted to specific environmental requirements based on the conditions and landforms in which they live (Fattorini, 2014). The sanctuary is located in the southern part of El Largo y Anexos, municipality of Madera in western Chihuahua (Figure 1). The area has a Cb’(w2)x’ climate, classified as semi-cold sub-humid (García, 2004), with an average annual temperature ranging between 5 and 12 °C and average annual precipitation ranging from 400 to 1 200 mm (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI], 2017a). The sanctuary covers an area of 420 ha and, according to CONANP (2023), the soil is classified as Umbrisol.

Figure 1 Location of sampled sites at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary, Madera, Chihuahua. 

Sampling design

Altitudes were classified using the Mexican Elevation Continuum with a resolution of 15 m (INEGI, 2017b). In the core zone comprising the nesting area, three altitudinal intervals were established: 1) 2 307 to 2 466 m, 2) 2 466 to 2 625 m and 3) 2 625 to 2 785 m. At each elevation interval, 10 circular plots, each covering an area of 500 m², were randomly distributed on north-facing slopes. These slopes, with their higher moisture levels, are primarily inhabited by P. tremuloides, P. menziesii, A. concolor, and P. strobiformis-species that are ecologically important and essential for the nesting and feeding of the thick-billed parrot, the flagship species of this NPA (CONANP, 2023).

Coordinates were recorded at the center of each plot using a Garmin® eTrex 20 GPS. Tree measurement data for individuals with a diameter at breast height (d 1.30) ≥ 7.5 cm were recorded using a Haglöf Mantax Blue® caliper, and total height (h) was measured using a Suunto® PM5-15 hypsometer. Genus and species of each individual were also identified

Data analysis

The horizontal structure was evaluated by the distribution of individuals by diameter category with a range of 5 cm; in addition, the importance value index (IVI; Curtis & McIntosh, 1951) was calculated for each altitudinal interval (Table 1).

Table 1 Ecological parameters and importance value index to determine horizontal tree structure. 

Parameter and index Equation Variables
Relative abundance Ar =ni N*100 n i = number of individuals recorded for species
iN = total number of individuals
Relative dominance Dr =gi G*100
G =i-1Ngi
gi = basal area of species i
G = total basal area
Relative frequency Fr =mi M*100 mi = frequency of the presence of species i at the sites
M = total number of sites sampled
Importance value index IVI = Ar + Dr+Fr 3 Ar = relative abundance
Dr = relative dominance
Fr = relative frequency

The Shannon index (H’) is frequently used to study species diversity; however, according to the parameters used, structural diversity can be evaluated (Morgenroth et al., 2020). In this regard, the maximum value of H’ is reached when abundances are equally distributed in each diameter category:

H'= - i=1dpilnpi

where,

ln = natural logarithm

pi = proportion of trees of the i-th diameter class

d = number of diameter classes

Species diversity was determined from the Shannon-Wiener (H’) (Shannon, 1948):

H'= - i=1Spilnpi

where,

ln = natural logarithm

S = number or richness of species

pi = relative abundance of species i (quotient of ni/N)

ni = total number of individuals of the i-th species

N = sum of all individuals recorded

Relative abundance evenness was generated with the Pielou index (J’) (Magurran, 1988):

J' =H'In(S)

where,

H’ = Shannon-Wiener index

ln = natural logarithm

S = species richness

To determine the difference between diversity values, the exponential of the Shannon index exp(H') representing the true diversity of order 1 ( q D) was used (Jost, 2006): q D = exp (H’).

Species richness was analyzed with the Margalef index (D mg ) (Margalef, 1972):

Dmg= S-1 ln N

where,

N = total number of individuals in the community

ln = natural logarithm

S = total number of species present

Floristic similarity was evaluated using the quantitative Morisita-Horn index (Magurran, 1988):

IM-H=2(ani*bnj)da+dbaN*bN

where,

an i = number of individuals of the i-th species of sample A

bn j = number of individuals of the j-th species of sample B

da = Σan i 2 / aN 2

db = Σbn j 2 / bN 2

aN = number of individuals in sample A

bN = number of individuals in sample B

The validity of the sampling intensity was verified with species accumulation curves; the number of estimated species was generated from the ACE (Abundance-based Coverage Estimator), ICE (Incidence-based Coverage Estimator), Chao 1, Chao 2, Jackknife 1 and bootstrap nonparametric models in the EstimateS 9.1.0 program (Colwell, 2013).

The Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene's homoscedasticity test determined the normality of the data distribution. Subsequently, a one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) was carried out to check for significant differences in diversity, true diversity, evenness, richness, abundance, and dominance among altitudinal intervals. For the variables that showed differences, Tukey's post hoc mean comparison (α = 0.05) was applied using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (Zar, 2010).

Results and Discussion

Species accumulation curve

Figure 2 shows that the accumulation curves had similar results, estimating between five to six species, with a defined asymptote in all three altitudinal intervals. Stabilization was achieved starting from the third site. The average coverage values of the species, compared to the non-parametric models, were 100 % for intervals 2 and 3, while interval 1 recorded 99.7 %.

Figure 2 Accumulation curves of tree stratum species, generated with non-parametric models, at three altitudinal intervals of the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua. ICE: Incidence-based Coverage Estimator, ACE: Abundance-based Coverage Estimator. 

Floristic composition

Three families were recorded in the locality; the most representative was Pinaceae with three genera and five species, while Fagaceae and Salicaceae only presented one genus and one species. The conifers A. concolor, P. strobiformis and P. menziesii are the only ones listed in NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 (SEMARNAT, 2010) under the category subject to special protection. In addition, Pinus durangensis Martínez and Quercus sideroxyla Bonpl. are classified as endemic species (Jin et al., 2021; Rodríguez-Acosta & Coombes, 2020), which generates additional biological importance for the floristic and genetic diversity of Mexico represented in the area.

According to Table 2, intervals 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m) and 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m) showed six taxa compared to interval 3 (2 625 to 2 785 m) which harbored five species. This is probably due to the decrease in available habitable surface area due to the topography of the mountains, as well as the decrease in temperature, strong winds, steep slopes and soil creep. However, due to climate change, there is the option that lowland vegetation will migrate upwards (Fattorini et al., 2020) and taxa with fragmented distribution, specialized habitat or endemics will be suppressed because of environmental pressure (Mendoza-Fernandez et al., 2022) and low genetic diversity (Salgotra & Chauhan, 2023), as could be the case of Abies and Pseudotsuga cohabiting in cold and humid areas in the mountains (Chang et al., 2021).

Although the sanctuary is located in northwestern Mexico, a region of greater conifer richness (Gernandt & Pérez-De la Rosa, 2014), NPA had lower values in richness compared to those indicated in other studies conducted within the same physiographic province of the Sierra Madre Occidental (Flores-Morales et al., 2022; Rascón-Solano et al., 2022).

Table 2 Floristic composition at three elevation intervals (I1 = 2 307 to 2 466 m, I2 = 2 466 to 2 625 m, I3 = 2 625 to 2 785 m) at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua. 

Species Common name Presence Family
Abies concolor (Gordon & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. White fir I1, I2, I3 Pinaceae
Pinus arizonica Engelm. Arizona pine I1, I2, I3 Pinaceae
Pinus durangensis Martínez Durango pine I1 Pinaceae
Pinus strobiformis Engelm. White pine I1, I2, I3 Pinaceae
Populus tremuloides Michx. Golden aspen I2, I3 Salicaceae
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco Douglas-fir I1, I2, I3 Pinaceae
Quercus sideroxyla Bonpl. Santa rosa oak I1, I2 Fagaceae

Abundance

According to Table 3, the species P. strobiformis, A. concolor, and P. arizonica had the highest abundance in intervals 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m) and 3 (2 625 to 2 785 m), collectively representing 72.02 % and 91.57 %, respectively, in each interval. In contrast, P. tremuloides had the lowest relative abundance in both intervals, with values below 6 %. On the other hand, in interval 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m), P. strobiformis (35.71 %) and P. arizonica (24.73 %) made up 60.44 %, while A. concolor had the lowest percentage at 0.55 %. These results are consistent with the Land Use and Vegetation Map Series VII (INEGI, 2021), which reports that about 40 % (98 695 ha) of El Largo and Anexos ejido is covered by pine vegetation.

Table 3 Abundance, dominance, frequency, and importance value index (IVI) by altitudinal interval in the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua. 

Species Abundance (trees·ha-1) RA (%) Basal area (m2·ha-1) BA (%) Frequency RF (%) IVI (%)
Interval 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m)
Pinus strobiformis 260 35.71 8.26 26.89 10 23.81 28.80
Pinus arizonica 180 24.73 9.70 31.57 10 23.81 26.70
Pseudotsuga menziesii 140 19.23 8.39 27.28 5 11.90 19.47
Quercus sideroxyla 100 13.74 3.35 10.91 9 21.43 15.36
Abies concolor 4 0.55 0.25 0.80 6 14.29 5.21
Pinus durangensis 44 6.04 0.78 2.55 2 4.76 4.45
Total 728 100 30.73 100 42 100 100
Interval 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m)
Pinus strobiformis 228 33.93 7.32 22.84 9 21.95 26.24
Pinus arizonica 156 23.21 8.34 26.04 10 24.39 24.55
Pseudotsuga menziesii 92 13.69 6.86 21.43 6 14.63 16.58
Abies concolor 100 14.88 3.49 10.91 9 21.95 15.91
Populus tremuloides 40 5.95 4.28 13.37 4 9.76 9.69
Quercus sideroxyla 56 8.33 1.73 5.41 3 7.32 7.02
Total 672 100 32.03 100 41 100 100
Interval 3 (2 625 to 2 785 m)
Pinus strobiformis 248 37.35 10.42 31.13 10 22.73 30.40
Abies concolor 208 31.33 11.98 35.78 10 22.73 29.94
Pinus arizonica 152 22.89 8.83 26.37 10 22.73 24.00
Pseudotsuga menziesii 44 6.63 2.04 6.09 9 20.45 11.06
Populus tremuloides 12 1.81 0.21 0.64 5 11.36 4.60
Total 664 100 33.47 100 44 100 100

RA: relative abundance, BA: Relative basal area and RF: Relative frequency.

Figure 3 shows that abundance decreased as altitude increased. Interval 1 had 728 trees·ha-1, interval 2 had 672 trees·ha-1, and interval 3 recorded 664 trees·ha-1 (Table 3). The ANOVA showed a significant difference at least between two intervals (df = 29, F = 7.54, and p = 0.003), and Tukey's test demonstrated that abundance was significantly higher in the lower interval compared to the upper (p = 0.0038) and middle intervals (p = 0.0116). However, there was no significant difference between intervals 2 and 3 (p = 0.8969).

Figure 3 Mean abundance and standard error by altitudinal interval (1 = 2 307 to 2 466 m, 2 = 2 466 to 2 625 m, 3 = 2 625 to 2 785 m) at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua. Altitudinal intervals with different letters are significantly different in abundance according to Tukey's test (p < 0.05). 

Horizontal distribution

The distribution of individuals by diameter class in intervals 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m) and 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m) presented an inverted ‘J’ shape and the 10, 15 and 20 cm classes recorded more than 55 % of their individuals; interval 3 (2 625 to 2 785 m) also has the characteristic distribution of an irregular forest with a bias to the right and 54.82 % of its abundance was recorded in the 20, 25 and 30 cm classes (Figure 4). These results are similar to those reported by Hernández-Moreno et al. (2020) in irregular forest stands with and without management with a Liocurt curve distribution in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve.

Figure 4 Distribution of individuals by diameter category at three altitudinal intervals (1 = 2 307 to 2 466 m, 2 = 2 466 to 2 625 m, 3 = 2 625 to 2 785 m) at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua 

This behavior generally suggests efficient regeneration, because young individuals will potentially replace mature trees in the community and the high proportion of young trees may be related to the silvicultural inactivity that ceased approximately two decades ago in the sanctuary (CONANP, 2023). It should be noted that forest management generates a shortage of mature trees due to extraction when they reach a certain size (Addo-Fordjour et al., 2022) and reduces the presence of standing dead trees that provide microhabitats (Tavankar et al., 2021) and environmental services (Lutz et al., 2021).

Structural complexity is the result of the variety of species, ages and sizes that a community possesses and directly influences the availability of microhabitats for animals, plants and microorganisms (Zhao et al., 2022). According to the structural diversity analysis with H', the highest value was found in interval 2 with 1.99, followed by interval 1 with 1.93 and interval 3 with 1.91. The maximum value is due to the homogeneous distribution in the diameter classes (Figure 4) and, consequently, the lower values were generated by the unequal distribution in the categories, which may allow the shelter of a higher diversity of associated organisms, because a greater differentiation in the structure increases the development of niches (Stein et al., 2014).

Dominance

Table 3 shows the information on dominance by interval. In the upper interval (2 625 to 2 785 m), A. concolor had the highest dominance value with 11.98 m2·ha-1, followed by P. strobiformis with 10.42 m2·ha-1, while P. tremuloides has the lowest dominance with 0.21 m2·ha-1. For interval 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m), P. arizonica showed the highest basal area with 8.34 m2·ha-1; on the other hand, Q. sideroxyla recorded the lowest figure with 1.73 m2·ha-1. For interval 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m), P. arizonica with 9.70 m2·ha-1and P. menziesii with 8.39 m2·ha-1 were the highest taxa in dominance.

Figure 5 indicates that dominance showed no significant difference in the three altitudinal intervals (df = 29, F = 2.05 and p = 0.154). Other authors such as Khadanga et al. (2023) recorded a positive relationship between dominance and altitude, which can be attributed to the extraction of large trees through logging activities that are more frequent in the lower parts of the mountain. These practices were conducted in the area until the year 2000 (CONANP, 2023).

Figure 5 Average basal area and standard error by altitudinal interval (1 = 2 307 to 2 466 m, 2 = 2 466 to 2 625 m, 3 = 2 625 to 2 785 m) in the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua. Altitudinal intervals with the same letter indicate statistical similarity in basal area according to Tukey's test (p > 0.05) 

Importance value index

According to Table 3, all species had an IVI lower than 50 % for the three altitudinal intervals. This suggests that at the current successional stage of the forest, no single taxon dominates, contrasting with the findings of Quintero-Gradilla et al. (2019) and Rodríguez-Pacheco et al. (2023), who reported that a species from the Pinus genus accounted for approximately 50 % of the ecological weight in each community in disturbed areas.

In the upper interval (2 625 to 2 785 m), P. strobiformis and A. concolor, with values close to 30 %, had the highest ecological weight. This may be due to the inclusion of these species in the NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 (SEMARNAT, 2010), and because, being at the highest elevation, they have experienced less anthropogenic impact, leading to greater preservation. Similar results have been reported by Holguín-Estrada et al. (2021) and Matiullah et al. (2022), where Pinus and Abies recorded the highest IVI in temperate forests.

For the middle interval (2 466 to 2 625 m), the species with the highest IVI were P. strobiformis and P. arizonica, each with values around 25 %. Similarly, in the lower interval (2 307 to 2 466 m), P. strobiformis had the highest percentage at 28.8%, followed by P. arizonica at 26.7 %. These results demonstrate the importance of the Pinus genus, likely due to silvicultural activities that altered the structure to favor commercially valuable species (Rendón-Pérez et al., 2021), such as P. arizonica, which holds significant economic interest in Chihuahua (Rascón-Solano et al., 2021).

Diversity indices

Species diversity along an altitudinal gradient is related to changes in temperature, precipitation, productivity, and soil characteristics (Fattorini et al., 2020). The Shannon-Wiener index, with values below 2, indicated low diversity in the tree stratum for the three intervals (Table 4). The H’ results are lower than those recorded by García-García et al. (2019) and López-Serrano et al. (2022) in temperate forests excluded from forestry activities. Although diversity decreased as altitude increased, no significant differences were found between intervals (df = 29, F = 0.95, and p = 0.401). It is important to note that several authors report a decrease in diversity as the altitudinal gradient increases (Lee et al., 2021; Rana et al., 2020).

Table 4 Diversity and richness indices at each altitudinal interval in the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua. 

Interval Shannon (H') Pielou (J’) True diversity ( q D) Margalef (D mg )
1 (2 307 to 2 466 m) 1.26 ± 0.05 a 0.85 ± 0.03 a 3.57 ± 0.20 a 0.68 ± 0.04 a
2 (2 466 to 2 625 m) 1.22 ± 0.04 a 0.77 ± 0.03 a 3.40 ± 0.15 a 0.74 ± 0.05 a
3 (2 625 to 2 785 m) 1.13 ± 0.08 a 0.73 ± 0.05 a 3.18 ± 0.26 a 0.68 ± 0.04 a

Means ± standard error with the same letter in each column indicate no significant differences between altitudinal intervals according to Tukey's test (p > 0.05).

The analysis of true diversity showed that interval 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m), with 3.57 effective species, is 1.05 and 1.12 times more diverse than intervals 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m) and 3 (2 625 to 2 785 m), respectively. Additionally, interval 2 is 1.07 times more diverse than interval 3. While there is some variability in the number of effective species, this variation was not statistically significant (df = 29, F = 0.872, p = 0.433; Table 4).

Pielou’s evenness index highlights the uniformity level within the community (Useni-Sikuzani et al., 2022). The three intervals showed high evenness with an average value above 0.70, but no significant differences were found (df = 29, F = 2.68 and p = 0.092) (Table 4).

Species richness is an important parameter for assessing anthropogenic and natural impacts, developing conservation strategies (Lelli et al., 2019), and monitoring areas of interest due to variety of organisms (Perrin & Waldren, 2020). The Margalef richness index did not reveal a pattern of increasing or decreasing richness associated with the altitudinal intervals, showing values of 0.68 for the lower and upper intervals, and 0.74 for the middle interval (Table 4). These results are classified as low richness, as they are below 2 (Margalef, 1972). Based on ANOVA, no significant differences were found between the three intervals (df = 29, F = 0.48 and p = 0.626).

Floristic similarity

Figure 6 illustrates the dendrogram generated using the Morisita-Horn index, which shows high similarity in the clustering of the three intervals. The greatest affinity was observed between intervals 1 (2 307 to 2 466 m) and 2 (2 466 to 2 625 m), with a value of 93 %, as both shared five species, excluding P. durangensis and P. tremuloides, which were the least abundant in their respective intervals. Intervals 2 and 3 (2 625 to 2 785 m) are 92 % similar, sharing five species; P. strobiformis is the most abundant, differing only in the presence of Q. sideroxyla, which was recorded in interval 2. The upper and lower intervals showed the least similarity at 75 %, as they share four taxa.

Figure 6 Dendrogram of the cluster generated by the quantitative Morisita-Horn index and abundance for the three altitude intervals (1 = 2 307 to 2 466 m, 2 = 2 466 to 2 625 m, 3 = 2 625 to 2 785 m) at the Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary in Madera, Chihuahua 

Differences in species composition along an altitudinal gradient are related to environmental, edaphic, and physiological processes (Murga-Orrillo et al., 2021). For instance, in the lower interval, Q. sideroxyla was one of the most abundant species, primarily found at altitudes between 2 000 and 2 500 m (Lebgue-Keleng et al., 2015). In contrast, A. concolor became more abundant as the gradient increased, because it mainly dominates in high, cold areas with steep slopes that experience snow accumulation (Werner et al., 2019). Meanwhile, P. durangensis may indicate deep soils rich in nitrogen, calcium, and potassium (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT] & Comisión Nacional Forestal [CONAFOR], 2014).

Species affinity agrees with Bhat et al. (2020) and Song et al. (2021), who report a linear reduction in species similarity with increasing altitude. Moreover, the floristic similarity of the present study is higher than that reported by Rosaliano Evaristo et al. (2022) in oak forests in the physiographic province of the Transmexican Volcanic Belt and that of Ramos-Hernández et al. (2024) between a pine, pine-oak and an altered forest in Nuevo León with a similarity lower than 60 %.

Conclusions

The Thick-billed Parrot Sanctuary is of great ecological importance due to the endemic, relict, and specially protected species it hosts, primarily from the Pinaceae family. Dominance, diversity, and evenness indices were statistically similar among altitudinal intervals; however, dominance showed an upward trend with increasing elevation, in contrast to the indices and effective species, which decreased. Additionally, the altitudinal gradient showed a high similarity, with the lowest value recorded at the extremes, indicating that changes in habitat conditions may lead to a gradual turnover in species composition. This study in the Natural Protected Area provides crucial information for developing management programs and evaluating the relict forest, which is beneficial both for society and for the conservation of the national vegetation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT) for the scholarship awarded to the first author for the master's program at the Faculty of Forestry Sciences at Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. We also extend our gratitude to the staff of CONANP and CONAFOR in Madera, Chihuahua, for their assistance in field activities, as well as to the reviewers whose ideas and comments helped enhance the quality of this manuscript.

References

Addo-Fordjour, P., Afram, I. S., & Oppong, J. (2022). Selective and clear-cut logging have varied imprints on tree community structure in a moist semi-deciduous forest in Ghana. Heliyon, 8(11), e11393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11393 [ Links ]

Bhat, J. A., Kumar, M., Negi, A. K., Todaria, N. P., Malik, Z. A., Pala, N. A., Kumar, A., & Shukla, G. (2020). Species diversity of woody vegetation along altitudinal gradient of the Western Himalayas. Global Ecology and Conservation, 24, e01302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01302 [ Links ]

Chang, C. Y. Y., Bräutigam, K., Hüner, N. P. A., & Ensminger, I. (2021). Champions of winter survival: cold acclimation and molecular regulation of cold hardiness in evergreen conifers. The New Phytologist, 229(2), 675-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16904 [ Links ]

Colwell, R. K. (2013). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimatesLinks ]

Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). (2023). Estudio previo justificativo para el establecimiento del Área Natural Protegida Santuario Cotorra Serrana. https://www.conanp.gob.mx/pdf/separata/EPJ-S-CotorraSerranaOccidental.pdfLinks ]

Curtis, J. T., & McIntosh, R. P. (1951). An upland forest continuum in the prairie forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology , 32(3), 476‒496. [ Links ]

Duncanson, L., Liang, M., Leitold, V., Armston, J., Moorthy, S. M. K., Dubayah, R., Costedoat, S., Enquist, B. J., Fatoyinbo, L., Goetz, S. J., Gonzalez-Roglich, M., Merow, C., Roehrdanz, P. R., Tabor, K., & Zvoleff, A. (2023). The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38073-9 [ Links ]

Fattorini, S., Mantoni, C., Di Biase, L., & Pace, L. (2020). Mountain biodiversity and sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho, A. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, T. Wall (Eds.), Life on land. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals (pp. 1‒21). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_144-1 [ Links ]

Fattorini, S. (2014). Disentangling the effects of available area, mid-domain constraints, and species environmental tolerance on the altitudinal distribution of tenebrionid beetles in a Mediterranean area. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(10), 2545‒2560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0738-y [ Links ]

Flores-Morales, E. A., Aguirre-Calderón, O. A., Treviño-Garza, E. J., González-Tagle, M. A., Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Ángeles-Pérez, G., & Huizar-Amezcua, F. (2022). Diversidad y estructura arbórea de un bosque templado bajo manejo en el municipio de Pueblo Nuevo, Durango, México. Polibotánica, (54), 11‒26. https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.54.2 [ Links ]

García, E. (2004). Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía, UNAM. [ Links ]

García-García, S. A., Narváez-Flores, R., Olivas-García, J. M., & Hernández-Salas, J. (2019). Diversidad y estructura vertical del bosque de pino-encino en Guadalupe y Calvo, Chihuahua. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 10(53). https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v10i53.173 [ Links ]

Gernandt, D. S., & Pérez-De la Rosa, J. A. (2014). Biodiversidad de Pinophyta (coníferas) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85, 126‒133. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.32195 [ Links ]

González-Gaona, E., Gómez-Nísino, A., De Lira-Ramos, K. V., Rodríguez-Cruz, Y. E., Olivo-Martínez, J. A., Rascón-Mendoza, A. A., & Martínez, G. S. (2021). Primer registro documentado de Neodiprion abietis (Harris, 1841) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) para México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 12(64). https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v12i64.837 [ Links ]

Hernández-López, L., Alcántar, O. R., Figueroa-García, D., Dueñas, J. J. R., & Arias, A. (2020). Flora y micobiota en riesgo y endémicas en el municipio San Sebastián del Oeste, Jalisco, México. Acta Botánica Mexicana, (128). https://doi.org/10.21829/abm128.2021.1771 [ Links ]

Hernández-Moreno, J. A., Velázquez-Martínez, A., Fierros-González, A. M., Gómez-Guerrero, A., Reyes-Hernández, V. J., & Vera-Castillo, J. A. G. (2020). Estimación de biomasa aérea y carbono, en rodales con y sin manejo forestal en la Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca. Madera y Bosques, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2020.2611802 [ Links ]

Holguín-Estrada, V. A., Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Aguirre-Calderón, Ó. A., Yerena-Yamallel, J. I., & Pequeño-Ledezma, M. Á. (2021). Estructura y composición florística de un bosque de galería en un gradiente altitudinal en el noroeste de México. Madera y Bosques, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2021.2722123 [ Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2017a). Compendios de información geográfica municipal. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/topografia/compendio.aspxLinks ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2017b). Continuo de Elevaciones Mexicano 3.0 (CEM 3.0). México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía . https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/geo2/elevacionesmex/#:~:text=El%20Continuo%20de%20Elevaciones%20Mexicano,le%20integran%20valores%20que%20representanLinks ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2021). Uso del suelo y vegetación, escala 1:250000, serie VII (continuo nacional). http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/Links ]

Jin, W., Gernandt, D. S., Wehenkel, C., Xia, X., Wei, X., & Wang, X. (2021). Phylogenomic and ecological analyses reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of global pines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(20), e2022302118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022302118 [ Links ]

Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363‒375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x [ Links ]

Khadanga, S. S., Dar, A. A., Jaiswal, N., Dash, P. K., & Jayakumar, S. (2023). Elevation patterns of tree diversity, composition and stand structure in Mahendragiri Hill Forest, eastern Ghats of Odisha, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 16(3), 391‒405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2023.04.004 [ Links ]

Lebgue-Keleng, T., Soto-Cruz, R., Quintana-Martínez, G., Quiñonez-Martínez, M., Balderrama-Castañeda, S., Melgoza-Castillo, A., Morales-Nieto, C., & Cortés-Palacios, L. (2015). Árboles y arbustos templados de Chihuahua, México: Temperate trees and shrubs of Chihuahua, Mexico. Tecnociencia Chihuahua, 9(1), 49‒57. https://doi.org/10.54167/tch.v9i1.602 [ Links ]

Lee, M. A., Burger, G., Green, E. R., & Kooij, P. W. (2021). Relationships between resource availability and elevation vary between metrics creating gradients of nutritional complexity. Oecologia, 195(1), 213‒223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04824-4 [ Links ]

Lelli, C., Bruun, H. H., Chiarucci, A., Donati, D., Frascaroli, F., Fritz, Ö., Goldberg, I., Nascimbene, J., Tøttrup, A. P., Rahbek, C., & Heilmann-Clausen, J. (2019). Biodiversity response to forest structure and management: Comparing species richness, conservation relevant species and functional diversity as metrics in forest conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 707‒717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.057 [ Links ]

López-Serrano, P. M., Vega-Nieva, D. J., Corral-Rivas, J. J., Briseño-Reyes, J., & Antúnez, P. (2022). Diversidad e importancia ecológica de la vegetación arbórea en el Parque El Tecuán, Durango, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 13(74), 34‒53. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v13i74.1273 [ Links ]

Lutz, J. A., Struckman, S., Germain, S. J., & Furniss, T. J. (2021). The importance of large-diameter trees to the creation of snag and deadwood biomass. Ecological Processes, 10, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00299-0 [ Links ]

Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. [ Links ]

Malhi, Y., Jackson, T., Bentley, L. P., Lau, A., Shenkin, A., Herold, M., Calders, K., Bartholomeus, H., & Disney, M. (2018). New perspectives on the ecology of tree structure and tree communities through terrestrial laser scanning. Interface Focus, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0052 [ Links ]

Margalef, R. (1972). Homage to Evelyn Hutchinson, or why is there an upper limit to diversity. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 44, 211‒235. [ Links ]

Martin, M. P., Peters, C. M., Asbjornsen, H., & Ashton, M. S. (2021). Diversity and niche differentiation of a mixed pine-oak forest in the Sierra Norte, Oaxaca, Mexico. Ecosphere, 12(4), e03475. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3475 [ Links ]

Martínez-Sifuentes, A. R., Hernández-Herrera, J. A., Valenzuela-Núñez, L. M., Briceño-Contreras, E. A., Manzanilla-Quiñones, U., Gastélum-Arellánez, A., Trucíos-Caciano, R., & López-Calderón, M. J. (2022). Climate change impact on the habitat suitability of Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. Franco in Mexico: An approach for its conservation. Sustainability, 14(14), 8888. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148888 [ Links ]

Matiullah, N., Rahman, A. U., Ullah, Z., Qureshi, R., Burslem, D. F. R. P., & Mashwani, Z. U. R. (2022). Composition and structure of plant communities in the Moist Temperate Forest Ecosystem of the Hindukush Mountains, Pakistan. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.266637 [ Links ]

Mendoza-Fernández, A. J., Fernández-Ceular, Á., Alcaraz‐Segura, D., Ballesteros, M., & Peñas, J. (2022). The fate of endemic species specialized in island habitat under climate change in a Mediterranean high mountain. Plants, 11(23), 3193. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233193 [ Links ]

Miranda-Briones, R., Cerano-Paredes, J., Esquivel-Arriaga, G., Morató-Farreras, J., Cervantes-Martínez, R., Sánchez-Cohen, I., & Gómez-Nísino, A. (2022). Precipitation variability (1660-2018) for the western part of Chihuahua induced with tree rings. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 28(3), 349‒366. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2021.08.052 [ Links ]

Morgenroth, J., Nowak, D. J., & Koeser, A. K. (2020). DBH distributions in America’s urban forests-An overview of structural diversity. Forests, 11(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020135 [ Links ]

Murga-Orrillo, H., Jorge, M., Abanto-Rodríguez, C., & De Almeida-Lobo, F. (2021). Gradiente altitudinal y su influencia en las características edafoclimáticas de los bosques tropicales. Madera y Bosques, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2021.2732271 [ Links ]

Perrin, P. M., & Waldren, S. (2020). Vegetation richness and rarity in habitats of European conservation value in Ireland. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106387 [ Links ]

Quintero-Gradilla, S. D., Jardel-Peláez, E. J., Cuevas-Guzmán, R., Oliva, F. G., & Martínez‐Yrizar, A. (2019). Cambio postincendio en la estructura y composición del estrato arbóreo y carga de combustibles en un bosque de Pinus douglasiana de México. Madera y Bosques, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2019.2531888 [ Links ]

Ramos-Hernández, C., González-Rodríguez, H., López-Hernández, J., Cantú-Silva, I., & Gómez-Meza, M. (2024). Estructura y diversidad en tres ecosistemas forestales del Noreste de México. Polibotánica, (57). https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.57.3 [ Links ]

Rana, D., Kapoor, K. S., Samant, S. S., & Bhatt, A. (2020). Plant species conservation priority index for preparing management strategies: A case study from the western Himalayas of India. Small Scale Forestry, 19(4), 461‒481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09447-4 [ Links ]

Rascón-Solano, J., Galván-Moreno, V. S., Aguirre-Calderón, Ó. A., & García-García, S. A. (2022). Caracterización estructural y carbono almacenado en un bosque templado frío censado en el noroeste de México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 13(70), 136‒165. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v13i70.1123 [ Links ]

Rascón-Solano, J., Magaña-Magaña, J. E., Kiessling-Davison, C. M., Licón-Trillo, L. P., Portillo-Vázquez, M., & Galván-Moreno, V. S. (2021). Viabilidad técnica, financiera y económica de establecer un aserradero privado en el Noroeste de México. Custos e @gronegócio online, 17(4), 332‒357. http://www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br/numero4v17/OK%2016%20aserradero.pdfLinks ]

Rendón-Pérez, M. A., Hernández-de la Rosa, P., Velázquez- Martínez, A., Alcántara-Carbajal, J. L., & Reyes-Hernández, V. J. (2021). Composición, diversidad y estructura de un bosque manejado del centro de México. Madera y Bosques, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2021.2712127 [ Links ]

Requena-Lara, G., Sandoval, P. O., Morales-Pacheco, J., Garza-Torres, H., Zamora-Tovar, C., González-Romo, C., Guerra-Pérez, A., Manzano-Banda, J., & Treviño-Carreón, J. (2020). Distribución y condiciones ecogeográficas del bosque relicto de Abies en zonas montañosas de Tamaulipas. Polibotánica, (49). https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.49.4 [ Links ]

Rodríguez-Acosta, M., & Coombes, A. J. (2020). Manual para la propagación de Quercus: Una guía fácil y rápida para cultivar encinos en México y América Central. Jardín Botánico Universitario de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. [ Links ]

Rodríguez-Pacheco, A., Palacios-Rangel, M. I., Mohedano-Caballero, L., & Villanueva Morales, A. (2023). Estructura y diversidad arbórea de un bosque de pino-encino en Huiztlatzala, Guerrero, México. Polibotánica, (55), 25‒40. https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.55.3 [ Links ]

Rosaliano Evaristo, R., Ávila-Akerberg, V., Franco-Maass, S., Valencia‐A., S., & López Mathamba, L. A. (2022). Estructura y diversidad arbórea en bosques de encino del centro de México. Madera y Bosques, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2022.2822449 [ Links ]

Salgotra, R. K., & Chauhan, B. S. (2023). Genetic diversity, conservation, and utilization of plant genetic resources. Genes, 14(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010174 [ Links ]

Sánchez-González, A. (2016). Una visión actual de la diversidad y distribución de los pinos de México. Madera y Bosques, 14(1), 107‒120. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2008.1411222 [ Links ]

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2010). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Protección ambiental- Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. México: DOF. https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5173091 [ Links ]

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT) & Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). (2014). Inventario estatal forestal y de suelos - Chihuahua 2013. Author. https://transparencia.cnf.gob.mx/filesconafor/userfiles/IEFyS/IEFYS_Chihuahua_2013/IEFYS_Chihuahua_2013.pdfLinks ]

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379‒423. https://doi.org/10.1002 / j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [ Links ]

Sharma, N., & Kala, C. P. (2022). Patterns in plant species diversity along the altitudinal gradient in Dhauladhar mountain range of the North-West Himalaya in India. Trees Forests and People, 7, 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100196 [ Links ]

Singh, V., Shukla, S., & Singh, A. (2021). The principal factors responsible for biodiversity loss. Open Journal of Plant Science, 6(1), 11‒14. https://doi.org/10.17352/ojps.000026 [ Links ]

Song, X., Cao, M., Li, J., Kitching, R. L., Nakamura, A., Laidlaw, M. J., Tang, Y., Sun, Z., Zhang, W., & Yang, J. (2021). Different environmental factors drive tree species diversity along elevation gradients in three climatic zones in Yunnan, southern China. Plant Diversity, 43(6), 433‒443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2021.04.006 [ Links ]

Stein, A., Gerstner, K., & Kreft, H. (2014). Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 17(7), 866‒880. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/ele.12277 [ Links ]

Tavankar, F., Latterini, F., Nikooy, M., Venanzi, R., Naghdi, R., & Picchio, R. (2021). Influence of forest management and sylvicultural treatments on abundance of snags and tree cavities in mountain mixed beech forests. Environments, 8(6), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8060055 [ Links ]

Tlapa-Almonte, M., Bustamante-González, A., Vargas-López, S., Ramírez-Valverde, B., Cervantes-Gutiérrez, V., & Cruz Bello, G. (2020). Factores del deterioro de las áreas naturales protegidas periurbanas del Valle de Puebla, México. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 35(1), 51‒82. https://doi.org/doi:10.24201/edu.v35i1.1828 [ Links ]

Useni-Sikuzani, Y., Mpibwe-Kalenga, A., Yona-Mleci, J., N’Tambwe-Nghonda, D., Malaisse, F., & Bogaert, J. (2022). Assessment of street tree diversity, structure and protection in planned and unplanned neighborhoods of Lubumbashi city (DR Congo). Sustainability, 14(7), 3830. https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/su14073830 [ Links ]

Werner, C. M., Young, D. J. N., Safford, H. D., & Young, T. P. (2019). Decreased snowpack and warmer temperatures reduce the negative effects of interspecific competitors on regenerating conifers. Oecologia, 191(4), 731‒743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04536-4 [ Links ]

Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. [ Links ]

Zhao, Z., Gao, H., Liu, W., Hu, Y., & Zhang, G. (2022). A novel method for calculating stand structural diversity based on the relationship of adjacent trees. Forests, 13(2), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020343 [ Links ]

Received: June 11, 2024; Accepted: October 21, 2024

*Corresponding author: jose.yerenaym@uanl.edu.mx; tel.: +52 826 103 0073.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License