Introduction
About 2.7 million tons of limes and lemons are produced annually in Mexico (FAO, 2021a). Most of the Mexican lemon [Citrus aurantifolia (Christm.) Swingle] production is concentrated in Michoacán, in the Apatzingán Valley, with an established area of 60 thousand hectares, distributed in the municipalities of Múgica, Parácuaro, Apatzingán, Aguililla, and Tepalcatepec mainly, with a production of 1.22 million tons annually, representing an economic spillover of USD $ 328.21 million annually (SIAP, 2021). However, during the Mexican lemon production process in the Apatzingán Valley, citrus growers observe the presence of pests such as the Asian psyllid Diaphorina citri (Kuwayama), red spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch) and Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). This last pest became the most important pest in terms of fruit damage, causing lacerations in the epidermis in the early stages of development. Consequently, at the time of harvesting, the damage that occurs in production causes a marketing problem that is reflected in lower prices and, in very severe cases, the rejection of the crop. In addition, the excess of insecticide applications (organophosphates, carbamates, neonicotinoids, pyrethroids/pyrethrins) has caused the development of multiple resistance of the pest and the mortality of most beneficial insects that can control pest populations, leaving residues in food, intoxications to users, contamination to natural resources (Bejarano-González, 2017) and technological dependence.
Among several pest management options, the adoption of integrated management through biorational control and biological control by conservation has stood out. In the case of severe thrips infestations on Mexican lime, the most indicated is to reduce chemical insecticide applications and make good management of herbaceous plants, which act as a refuge for thrips predators such as Chrysoperla rufilabris, Ceraeochrysa cincta, Stetorus sp, Cycloneda sanguinea, Hippodamia convergens, Olla v-nigrum, Zelus renardii, Leptotrips sp. and several spider species (Atakan & Pehlivan, 2019; Miranda-Salcedo & Loera-Alvarado, 2019).
In relation to the above, there are antecedents on the management of thrips in Mexican lime, such as the case of Miranda-Salcedo et al. (2021) who reported for the insecticide Spirotetramat at a dose of 0.5 ml L-1, 2 days after application a decrease in the population of thrips F. occidentalis Pergande 1895 by 100 % (from 1.6 thrips to 0 thrips), in Michoacán, Mexico.
Monteon-Ojeda et al. (2020) found a 73 % presence of Frankliniella invasor in the mango manila crop in Actopan, Veracruz. They reported that Spinetoram at a dose of 500 mL ha-1, maintained an average of 0.71 thrips per inflorescence and an efficacy of 87 % at 7 daa, while garlic, chili, and cinnamon extract at a dose of 2 L ha-1 controlled 85.46 % of the population at 14 daa.
Miranda-Salcedo et al. (2020) in Michoacán Mexico, showed that Spirotetramat at a dose of 0.75 mL L-1 decreased the population of F. occidentalis thrips on Mexican lime by 70 % (from 1.0 to 0.3 thrips) at 18 daa. In addition, they observed a wide group of natural enemies that can control the pest such as Cereaochrysa cincta Schneider, 1851, Chrysoperla rufilabris Burmeister, 1839, Cycloneda sanguinea L., 1763, Hippodamia convergens Guerin-Meneville, 1842, Leptotrips sp. and different spider species. Olla v-nigrum Mulsant, 1866, Sthetorus sp., Tamarixia radiata Waterston, 1922, Zelus renardii Kolenati, 1857. However, Avendaño-Gutiérrez et al. (2020), collected 4968 Thysanoptera on Mexican lime and identified four thrips predatory species: Scolotrhips sexmaculatus, Leptotrhips micconelli, Stomatotrhips brunneus, and Scolotrhips palidus, also in Michoacán Mexico.
In Germany, in an apple crop, Viñuela et al. (1996) showed that neem (EC, 1 % azaradactin) at a dose of 0.3 % had low toxicity (20 % mortality) on Chrysoperla carnea larvae in the field, because the substance has a repellent effect.
Bennison et al. (2002) reported that rosemary plants (Rosmarinus officinalis) associated with chrysanthemum crops showed great potential as repellent plants for the California thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae); however, there was observed evidence of a repellent effect on its biological predator Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). This corroborates a “push-pull” strategy based on the combination of stimuli, which modifies the distribution and abundance of arthropod pests and their enemies (Salas et al., 2021).
Therefore, through the application of biorational insecticides along with conservation and management of natural enemies, good thrips management is obtained for the Mexican lemon crop. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of biorational products on thrips management and to record the impact on their natural enemies, for the Mexican lemon crop in Michoacán, Mexico.
Material and Methods
Study site
This research was conducted at 19°00’44.10’’ N, 102°13’38.57’’ W, 346 masl (Google Earth, 2021) at the Campo Agrícola Experimental del Valle de Apatzingán del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (CEVA-INIFAP) at km 17, Apatzingán-Cuatro Camino’s highway, municipality of Parácuaro Michoacán, Mexico. The site corresponds to a tropical depression between the mountainous axes, which limit it to the north and south with the Neovolcanic axis and the Sierra Madre del Sur del Pacífico, Mexico (García, 1987). The soil type is clayey pelic vertisolic, with dry climate type BS1 warm semi-dry (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI], 2022), mean annual temperature of 30 °C and 650 mm of annual rainfall (Comisión Nacional del Agua [CONAGUA], 2022).
Phenological characterization of the orchard
The site where the study was conducted is characterized by an area of 3 ha with trees in development of 3 years old, with an average height of 2 m, a crown diameter of 2.5 m, in normal vigor conditions according to their age and good bearing, with Macrophylla rootstock and Mexican lime variety.
The spring season was selected for the establishment of the experiment, during the month of May 2021, which is characterized by the highest temperatures of the year, up to 42.5 °C on average during the day, with a relative humidity of 26 %, without rain (CONAGUA, 2022).
Treatments
For biorationals selection, the effect of the damage caused on human and animal health, biodiversity, and the environment was taken into account (FAO, 2021b). Twelve treatments were evaluated including the absolute control and the regional commercial control (Table 1). Spirotetramat is not considered highly toxic (PAN, 2016), however, Tolfenpyrad is highly toxic to bees, aquatic species, and humans (PAN, 2016). In relation to Pyrifluquinazon is a highly toxic insecticide to humans as well as carcinogenic (PAN, 2016; Lewis et al., 2016). The other treatments are considered as plant extracts and are valid within agroecological pest management (Bejarano- González, 2017).
In all treatments, a 20.2 % ethoxylated fatty alcohol-based commercial adherent [1 mL L-1 - Inex A®, Cosmocel, Mexico] was used. The application was carried out at the same time with a spray solution directed to the foliage of trees. Three new Swissmex manual backpack pumps, model Lola 20, with a capacity of 20 liters of water, and Swissmex high volume nozzles, model Solo 501, previously calibrated and washed were used.
Table 1 Treatments used for the control management of thrips and the impact on their natural enemies.
Number | Treatment | Dose mL/L-1 | Commercial product / Company / Country |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | Tolfenpyrad 15 % | 1.25 | Hachi Hachi / Nichino / Mexico |
T2 | Pyrifluquinazon 20.2 % | 0.58 | Pyriflu / Nichino / Mexico |
T3 | Garlic oil (A. sativum L.) 95 % | 2 | Garlic / Biotech / Mexico |
T4 | Garlic extract (A. sativum) at 87 %, chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) and rue (Ruta graveolens L.) extract at 10 % | 2 | Bio Crack / Berni Labs / Mexico |
T5 | Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) at 95 % | 2 | Neemtech / Biotech / Mexico |
T6 | Fenpyroximate 5 % | 1.25 | Portal / Nichino / Mexico |
T7 | Citrus extract + 10 % keratin | 2 | Fractal / Berni Labs / Mexico |
T8 | Spirotetramat 15.3 % | 0.3 | Movento 150 OD / Bayer Crop Science / Mexico (trade witness of the region) |
T9 | Castor oil (Ricinus communis L.) 95 % | 2,0 | Higuerilla / Biotech / Mexico |
T10 | Neem oil (A. indica) at 18%, castor oil (R. communis) at 18 %, governor oil (Larrea tridentata (Sessé & Moc ex DC.) Coville) at 18 %, cinnamon oil (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) at 18 %, garlic oil (A. sativum) at 1 %, mustard oil (Sinapis alba L.) at 18 % | 2 | KillerPlus / Biotech / Mexico |
T11 | Vegetable Spinosin- Spinosad 62.5 gr/L | 2 | Lifetech S60 / Biotech / Mexico |
T12 | Water | - | Absolute control |
Study variables
The measurement of the study variables was structured in two categories, the first one contemplates the variable of insect pest: 1) Number of thrips F. occidentalis. The second, contemplates three variables of the arthropods considered as natural enemies: 2) Number of Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant, 1866) catarinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae); 3) Number of lacewings Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister, 1839) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae); 4) Number of phytoseiids [predatory mites] Phytoseiulus persimilis (Athias-Henriot, 1957) (Acari: Tetranychidae: Phytoseiidae). To convert the number of insects of the variables into percentages, Equation 1 was used.
Technique and instruments for field data collection
The technique used to record pest insect infestation in the field was “tapping sampling”. The materials used were a 38 x 21 cm wooden board lined with blue adhesive paper and a wooden handle 30 cm long and 3 cm in diameter. One lateral branch per tree was selected at approximately 1.50 m of height and three light blows were given with the wooden handle so that arthropods fell on the board and at the same moment they were identified, counted in situ and capture data recorded (Miranda-Ramírez et al., 2021).
For data collection, a previous sampling was done as a starting point for the study and comparison. After the application of the treatments, sampling was carried out at 3, 6, 12, 20, 26, 35 and 41 days after application (daa).
Experimental design and statistical analysis
The design used was completely randomized, with twelve treatments, and ten replications; the experimental unit was a tree. For the statistical analysis, the Post Hoc test of homogeneity of variances data, ANDEVA, and Tukey’s test of comparison of means (p ≤ 0.05) were performed, using the statistical package Statistica version 13 (StatSoft Inc., 2017).
Results and Discussion
Number of thrips
The results of the test for homogeneity of variances of data showed a linear coincidence, likewise, the samplings presented a normal distribution that guaranteed its reliability.
The analysis of variance indicated that there is no statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments for the population means, thus they are statistically equal, except for the samplings at 35 and 41 daa, which did show significant differences (Table 2).
The results of the Tukey mean comparison test (p ≤ 0.05) showed a differential effect between treatments at 3, 6 and, 26 daa (Table 3). From the twelve treatments evaluated, nine showed a decrease in the thrips population, which fell in a range from 6 to 100 % compared to T12 from 16.05 to 100 %, and for T8, considered as the chemical control for the region, the range was 34.37 to 100 %.
At 3 daa the treatments that showed the best results in relation to the decrease in the number of thrips are presented in descending order and were: T5 (0.54 thrips) equivalent to 83.02 %, T11 with (0.63) 76.92 %; T10 with (0.56) 76.74 %; compared to T8 (0.55) 67.26 % and T12 with (1.28) 57.19 % (Table 3). From the above, it can be deduced that the thrips population was sensitive to these treatments where the population decreased in a short time span of 72 hours.
Table 2 Levene´s analysis (p ≤ 0.05) for the variable number of thrips prior to application and after 3, 6, 12, 20, 26, 35, and 41 daa.
Sampling dda | MS Effect | Error MS | F Levene | df | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous | 0.35514 | 0.39829 | 0.891660 | 11.108 | 0.550939 |
3 | 0.12185 | 0.08374 | 1.455060 | 11.108 | 0.159336 |
6 | 0.18360 | 0.11834 | 1.551500 | 11.108 | 0.123860 |
12 | 0.06249 | 0.05695 | 1.097260 | 11.108 | 0.370470 |
20 | 0.34979 | 0.24602 | 1.421770 | 11.108 | 0.173453 |
26 | 0.07736 | 0.21823 | 0.354470 | 11.108 | 0.970265 |
35 | 0.06672 | 0.00607 | 10.985440 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
41 | 0.00838 | 0.00093 | 8.970850 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
MS= mean square, df= degrees of freedom, *significant (p ≤ 0.05).
At 6 daa T9 (1.24) 61.61 % showed a greater reduction effect on the thrips population compared to T8 (0.81) 51.79 % and T12 (1.50) 35.45 %. T11 (1.50) 45.05 % showed a value below T8, but not T12 and T1 (2.42) 41.50 % showed a greater reduction effect compared to T1 (Table 3).
At 12, 20, 35 and 41 daa, results of the treatments were non-significant, Tukey (p ≤ 0.05). However, treatments that denoted the lowest numerical values in relation to the decrease in thrips population at 12 daa were: T11 (0.26) 90.48 %; T3 (0.40) 71.43 %. At 20 daa, T5 (1.59) 50 % and T11 (1.64) 30.93 %. At 35 days were T6 (0.00) 100 %; T1 (0.23) 98.79 % and T5 (0.23) 92.77 % and at 41 days were T5; T6; T7; T8; T9; T10 and T12 with values of 0.00 which equals 100 % (Table 3).
At 26 daa T3 (0.81) and T9 (1.29) showed a reduction effect on thrips population of 49.69 and 60.06 % respectively among other treatments and compared to T8 (1.13) with 32.47 % and T12 (2.08) with 30.43 % (Table 3).
Number of coccinellid predators
Homogeneity of variances of data showed a slight dispersion on the straight line, and in the observations made in all samplings presented sparse values with a normal distribution that evidences the low reliability of sampling.
The analysis of variance showed statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05) among treatments for all samplings including the previous sampling (Table 4).
Tukey’s test of means (p ≤ 0.05) did not identify significant statistical differences between treatments. However, the treatment that obtained the best numerical results was T12, which maintained an average of 0.01 coccinellids at 3 daa, subsequently, there was an increase in the population at 6 daa of 0.03, an increase of 42 %. In relation to T12, the previous sampling presented a number of coccinellids of 0.019 and at 6 daa an increase in the population of 0.190 was observed, which corresponds to an increase of 100 %.
Table 3 Effect of treatments on Tukey thrips (p ≤ 0,05)*.
Treatment | Previous sampling | Days after application (daa) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 12 | 20 | 26 | 35 | 41 | ||
T1 | 4.136b | 1.099ab | 2.422abc | 0.702a | 1.852a | 2.273a | 0.232a | 0.059a |
T2 | 3.018ab | 1.030ab | 2.197abc | 0.713a | 2.177a | 2.027a | 0.298a | 0.019a |
T3 | 1.611a | 0.616ab | 2.192abcd | 0.409a | 1.941a | 0.819b | 0.370a | 0.038a |
T4 | 3.011ab | 1.251ab | 2.723bc | 0.836a | 1.808a | 1.507ab | 0.292a | 0.019a |
T5 | 3.186ab | 0.543ab | 2.030abcd | 0.573a | 1.594a | 1.681ab | 0.232a | 0.000a |
T6 | 2.189a | 1.100ab | 2.959c | 0.906a | 1.873a | 1.709ab | 0.000a | 0.000a |
T7 | 1.522a | 0.400a | 1.064ef | 0.514a | 1.781a | 1.407ab | 0.305a | 0.000a |
T8 | 1.682a | 0.557ab | 0.817e | 0.782a | 1.918a | 1.130ab | 0.371a | 0.000a |
T9 | 3.237ab | 0.797ab | 1.240def | 0.436a | 2.123a | 1.295ab | 1.162a | 0.000a |
T10 | 2.388a | 0.561ab | 2.230abcd | 0.333a | 1.859a | 1.518ab | 1.664a | 0.000a |
T11 | 2.732ab | 0.639ab | 1.501adef | 0.264a | 1.642a | 1.806ab | 0.232a | 0.019a |
T12 | 2.991ab | 1.282b | 1.931abdf | 0.878a | 2.519a | 2.086a | 0.205a | 0.000a |
T1) Tolfenpyrad - 1,25 mL/L-1; T2) Pyrifluquinazon - 0.58 mL/L-1; T3) Garlic oil - 2 mL/L-1; T4) Garlic extract + chamomile and rue extract - 2 ml/L-1; T5) Neem oil - 2 mL/L-1; T6) Fenpyroximate 1.25 mL/L-1; T7) Citrus extract + keratin 2 mL/L-1; T8) Spirotetramat - 0,31 mL/L-1; T9) Castor oil - 2 mL/L-1; T10) Neem + castor oil + governor oil + cinnamon oil + garlic oil + mustard oil - 2 mL/L-1; T11) Vegetable spinosin - 2 mL/L-1 and T12) Water.
* Means with different letters in the column are statistically different (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).
Number of lacewings
In this case, the homogeneity of the variances of data indicated a slight dispersion on the straight line. It was observed that all samplings exhibit sparse values with a normal distribution, thus corroborating the reliability of sampling.
An analysis of variance showed statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05) among treatments for all samplings (Table 5).
Table 4 Levene´s analysis (p ≤ 0.05) for the variable number of ladybugs prior to application and after 3, 6, 12, 26, 35, and 41 daa.
Sampling dda | MS Effect | Error MS | F Levene | df | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous | 0.011858 | 0.001387 | 8.54876 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
3 | 0.006808 | 0.000720 | 9.45776 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
6 | 0.007937 | 0.000606 | 13.08815 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
12 | 0.006346 | 0.001001 | 6.33977 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
26 | 0.006346 | 0.001001 | 6.33977 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
35 | 0.001843 | 0.000400 | 4.60227 | 11.108 | 0.000010* |
41 | 0.001014 | 0.000200 | 5.06250 | 11.108 | 0.000002* |
MS= mean square, df= degrees of freedom, *significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 5 Levene´s analysis (p ≤ 0.05) for the variable number of lacewings prior to application and after 3, 6, 12, 20, 26, 35, and 41 daa.
Sampling daa | MS Effect | Error MS | F Levene | df | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous | 0.006104 | 0.001777 | 3.43611 | 11.108 | 0.000403* |
3 | 0.008023 | 0.001436 | 5.58878 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
6 | 0.007060 | 0.001641 | 4.30215 | 11.108 | 0.000026* |
12 | 0.017697 | 0.001252 | 14.14041 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
20 | 0.005773 | 0.001401 | 4.11932 | 11.108 | 0.000046* |
26 | 0.004135 | 0.001602 | 2.58168 | 11.108 | 0.005992* |
35 | 0.006152 | 0.001201 | 5.12121 | 11.108 | 0.000002* |
41 | 0.002949 | 0.000801 | 3.68182 | 11.108 | 0.000184* |
MS= mean square, df= degrees of freedom, *significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Treatments that showed an increase in the population of lacewings at 12 daa were: T1 (0.08 lacewings) 30 %; T3 (0.08) 50 % in relation to T8 (0.06) 3 % and T12 (0.08) 33 % (Table 6). Consequently, T1 and T3 evidenced to be less aggressive in the decrease against these insect predators of thrips. Among all the treatments evaluated, T3 proved to be the only insecticide that presented an increase in the population of 75, 125, and 50 % at 3, 6, and 12 daa, respectively (Table 6).
Number of phytoseiids
In predatory mites, the homogeneity of data variances showed minimal deviations of the points from linearity. All observations in the samples followed a normal distribution, which guaranteed the reliability of this variable.
The analysis of variance showed a statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments for all samples (Table 7).
Table 6 Effect of treatments on Tukey lacewings (p < 0,05)*.
Treatment | Previous sampling | Days after application | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 12 | 20 | 26 | 35 | 41 | ||
T1 | 0.060a | 0.190a | 0.000a | 0.080ab | 0.000a | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0.019a |
T2 | 0.020a | 0.000a | 0.030a | 0.020ab | 0.038a | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0.000a |
T3 | 0.040a | 0.070a | 0.090a | 0.080ab | 0.000a | 0.019a | 0.019a | 0.000a |
T4 | 0.060a | 0.010a | 0.030a | 0.040ab | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0.038a | 0.000a |
T5 | 0.080a | 0.000a | 0.030a | 0.120b | 0.019a | 0.038a | 0.019a | 0.000a |
T6 | 0.060a | 0.010a | 0.090a | 0.000a | 0.019a | 0.019a | 0.019a | 0.019a |
T7 | 0.020a | 0.010a | 0.030a | 0.000a | 0.019a | 0.019a | 0.019a | 0.000a |
T8 | 0.060a | 0.010a | 0.030a | 0.063ab | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a |
T9 | 0.020a | 0.000a | 0.030a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0.019a |
T10 | 0.060a | 0.010a | 0.010a | 0.042ab | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.019a |
T11 | 0.100a | 0.000a | 0.050a | 0.042ab | 0.038a | 0.000a | 0.038a | 0.000a |
T12 | 0.060a | 0.030a | 0.050a | 0.084ab | 0.038a | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0000a |
T1) Tolfenpyrad - 1.25 mL/L-1; T2) Pyrifluquinazon - 0.58 mL/L-1; T3) Garlic oil - 2 mL/L-1; T4) Garlic extract + chamomile and rue extract - 2 ml/L-1; T5) Neem oil - 2 mL/L-1; T6) Fenpyroximate 1.25 mL/L-1; T7) Citrus extract + keratin 2 mL/L-1; T8) Spirotetramat - 0.31 mL/L-1; T9) Castor oil - 2 mL/L-1; T10) Neem + castor oil + governor oil + cinnamon oil + garlic oil + mustard oil - 2 mL/L-1; T11) Vegetable spinosin - 2 mL/L-1 and T12) Water.
* Means with different letters in the column are statistically different (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).
Statistical differences between Tukey treatments (p < 0.05) were only present in the sampling carried out at 35 daa (Table 8). Treatments with null effects on the decrease of phytoseiids were T3 (0.45) and T2 (0.45); on the contrary, they allowed growth in the phytoseiids population of 866.96 and 69.55 %, respectively. These results seem to indicate that phytoseiids are arthropods that show some tolerance to these insecticides during thrips control despite being scarce during initial sampling. However, treatments T8 (0.09) and T12 (0.06) showed a decrease in population of 45.45 and 81.29 % respectively (Table 8).
Table 7 Levene´s analysis (p ≤ 0.05) for the variable number of phytoseiids prior to application and after 3, 6, 12, 20, 26, 35, and 41 daa.
Sampling daa | MS Effect | Error MS | F Levene | df | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous | 0.048065 | 0.012115 | 3.96752 | 11.108 | 0.000075* |
3 | 0.001014 | 0.000200 | 5.06250 | 11.108 | 0.000002* |
6 | 0.051611 | 0.013177 | 3.91672 | 11.108 | 0.000088* |
12 | 0.008037 | 0.001137 | 7.06672 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
26 | 0.013262 | 0.001298 | 10.21954 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
35 | 0.089133 | 0.015240 | 5.84875 | 11.108 | 0.000000* |
41 | 0.002949 | 0.000801 | 3.68182 | 11.108 | 0.000184* |
MS= mean square, df= degrees of freedom, *significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 8 Effect of treatments on Tukey phytoseiids (p < 0,05).
Treatment | Previous sampling | Days after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 12 | 26 | 35 | 41 | ||
T1 | 0.274a | 0.000a | 0.096a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.204abc | 0.019a |
T2 | 0.266a | 0.000a | 0.357a | 0.000a | 0.019a | 0.451bcd | 0.000a |
T3 | 0.046a | 0,000a | 0.254a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.454cd | 0.000a |
T4 | 0.214a | 0.000a | 0.395a | 0.019a | 0.038a | 0.295abcd | 0.019a |
T5 | 0.416a | 0.000a | 0.184a | 0.000a | 0.039a | 0.381abcd | 0000a |
T6 | 0.262a | 0.000a | 0.144a | 0.000a | 0.000a | 0.163abc | 0.000a |
T7 | 0.425a | 0.000a | 0.192a | 0.019a | 0.000a | 0.095abc | 0.019a |
T8 | 0.168a | 0.019a | 0.048a | 0.019a | 0.078a | 0.095ab c | 0.000a |
T9 | 0.215a | 0.000a | 0.158a | 0.019a | 0.039a | 0.000a | 0.000a |
T10 | 0.181a | 0.000a | 0.441a | 0.000a | 0.039a | 0.261abcd | 0.019a |
T11 | 0.185a | 0.000a | 0.479a | 0.058a | 0.058a | 0.646c | 0.000a |
T12 | 0.326a | 0.000a | 0.445a | 0.039a | 0.058a | 0.061ab | 0.000a |
T1) Tolfenpyrad - 1.25 mL/L-1; T2) Pyrifluquinazon - 0.58 mL/L-1; T3) Garlic oil - 2 mL/L-1; T4) Garlic extract + chamomile and rue extract - 2 ml/L-1; T5) Neem oil - 2 mL/L-1; T6) Fenpyroximate 1.25 mL/L-1; T7) Citrus extract + keratin 2 mL/L-1; T8) Spirotetramat - 0.31 mL/L-1; T9) Castor oil - 2 mL/L-1; T10) Neem + castor oil + governor oil + cinnamon oil + garlic oil + mustard oil - 2 mL/L-1; T11) Vegetable spinosin - 2 mL/L-1 and T12) Water.
* Means with different letters in the column are statistically different (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).
Discussion
The present work corroborates an analysis of the agronomic management of thrips and its natural enemies in the Mexican lemon crop. The results showed that there is a sustainable alternative for the management of thrips populations, supported by some commercial botanical insecticides and the biorational effect on natural enemies.
There is a large number of chemical products that control thrips, but they may also affect its natural enemies, which increases damage to Mexican lemon foliage and fruit (Miranda-Salcedo et al., 2020; Miranda-Salcedo et al., 2021). Argolo et al. (2014), reported persistence of secondary effects of Spirotetramat for Phytoseiulus persimilis of zero days, with mortality ranging from 30 to 79 %. This insecticide has a rapid and temporary impact on insect populations and citrus growers prefer to use it, because it seems easy to obtain visible results with a rapid decrease in insect populations, including beneficial insects (Xiao et al., 2010; Raza et al., 2017). On the other hand, Ferragut et al. (1990) pointed out, that phytoseiid mites found on wild plants, exhibit good tolerance to some insecticides, and are very common in field crops and feed on small-sized arthropods such as pest thrips.
Argolo et al. (2013), reported in Spain, mortality of less than 30 % of phytoseiids with the application of neem oil (azadirachtin) and a persistence effect of zero days for citrus. The control efficiency of these phytoseiid mites on thrips pests depends largely on the percentage decrease caused by the effect of insecticides, which are used during the management of this pest. Argolo et al. (2014), found that the phytoseiid species most sensitive to mineral oils is Phytoseiulus persimilis.
Phytoseiid mites can show persistence to plant Spinosina for up to seven days, with a decrease of 30 to 79 % (San-Andres et al., 2006; Argolo et al., 2013). However, to identify biorational insecticides that could be used in combination with a biological control strategy, it is important to know any side effects on natural enemies (Sterk et al., 1999). One way to control F. occidentalis thrips is by releasing native phytoseiid mites (Urbaneja et al., 2005) which at one point in time and in the near future may eventually reduce the excess application of insecticides in the Apatzingán valley.
Esparza-Díaz et al. (2010) pointed out that the effect of azadirachtin depends on its dose and the pest species to be controlled since it can reduce feeding, survival, nymph viability, progeny, and can even produce acute toxicity. This oil acts as an alarm pheromone and makes insects stop eating, and its active substances are biodegradable and non-toxic to humans and domestic animals (Guerra-Maldonado, 2021).
In relation to chrysopids, Luna-Cruz et al. (2018) applied an insecticide composed of argemonin (Chicalote, Argemone mexicana L.), berberine (Berberis sp.) ricinine (higuerilla, Ricinus communis L.) and α-Terthienyl by direct contact and reported a mortality of 9 % at 24 h, the highest mortality of 11 % at 98 h, under laboratory conditions.
Planes et al. (2013) pointed out, that the conservation of natural enemies is key to being able to carry out an effective “Integrated Management” of pests in citrus since a major part of the pests are naturally controlled by some of these natural enemies.
Conclusions
Tolfenpyrad product proved to be a very efficient chemical insecticide in reducing the number of thrips during all sampling dates and remained constant with a range of 41.40 to 98.78 % mortality. However, for the number of coccinellids, the effect was devastating, showing a reduction in the population of 100 % in all the samplings except for 35 daa; for lacewings, it also reached levels of decrease in the population up to 100 %, so it is considered of high impact for the natural enemies of thrips.
The insecticides that showed a decrease in the population of thrips based on plant extracts were garlic extract + chamomile and rue extract, castor oil, Neem + castor oil + governess oil + cinnamon oil + garlic oil + mustard oil, neem oil, and vegetable Spinosin on all sampling dates and with the effect observed up to 41 daa. Garlic oil proved to be a good option for the control of thrips by reducing their population by an average of 60 %, and in phytoseiid mites, there was an increase of an average of 800 %. These extracts may represent an alternative for the control of thrips on Mexican lime in the Apatzingán Valley.