Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
-
Citado por SciELO -
Accesos
Links relacionados
-
Similares en
SciELO
Compartir
Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124
Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.16 no.2 Mérida abr./jun. 2025 Epub 29-Sep-2025
https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v16i2.6802
Articles
Mineral diagnosis of grazing beef cows
aUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo. Posgrado en Producción Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia. Carretera México-Texcoco km 38.5, C.P. 56230, Chapingo, Estado de México, México.
bUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo. Centro Regional Universitario Anáhuac. Chapingo, Estado de México, México.
cUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo. Departamento de preparatoria agrícola. Chapingo, Estado de México, México.
The present research aimed to determine the mineral concentrations in forage, water, and blood serum, and the clinical signs of grazing cows. Twenty-five (25) Angus and Hereford cows of different physiological states were analyzed, from which blood samples were taken by venipuncture. Forage samples were collected using the hand-plucking technique and water was collected from available sources. The determination of minerals was performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and visible ultraviolet spectrophotometry. The blood serum of the cows showed deficient concentrations of copper (100 %), zinc (88 %), sodium (52 %), potassium (36 %), and phosphorus (16 %). Iron and manganese were in concentrations above the normal range. A copper deficiency classification index (CUDI) was generated: severe 0.41-0.48 mg L-1, moderate > 0.48-0.54 mg L-1, and mild > 0.54 -0.79 mg L-1. Sixty-eight, 20, and 12 % of the cows corresponded to the given classification, respectively. The following signs were identified: abortions, lameness, dull, shaggy, and discolored hair, tearing, steely hair, goiter, and pica. For forage, deficient levels of copper (1.27 mg kg-1) and zinc (24.5 mg kg-1) were found. In water, copper and zinc were not detectable, and there was excess iron 0.345 (mg L-1). In conclusion, the primary deficiency is copper, caused by deficiencies in forage, water, and possible imbalances caused by other minerals.
Keywords Bovines; Minerals; Deficiency; Copper; and Zinc
El objetivo de la presente investigación fue determinar las concentraciones minerales en forraje, agua, suero sanguíneo; así como signos clínicos de vacas en pastoreo. Se analizaron 25 vacas de raza Angus y Hereford de diferentes estados fisiológicos, a las cuales se les tomaron muestras sanguíneas por venopunción. Las muestras de forraje se colectaron mediante la técnica de “hand-plucking” y el agua se colectó de las fuentes disponibles. La determinación de minerales se realizó mediante espectrofotometría de absorción atómica y espectrofotometría ultravioleta visible. El suero sanguíneo de las vacas presentó concentraciones deficientes de cobre (100 %), zinc (88 %), sodio (52 %), potasio (36 %) y fósforo (16 %). El hierro y manganeso estaban en concentraciones por arriba del rango normal. Se generó un Índice de clasificación de la deficiencia de cobre (IDCU): severa 0.41-0.48 mg L-1, moderada > 0.48-0.54 mg L-1 y ligera > 0.54 -0.79 mg L-1. El 68, 20 y 12 % de las vacas correspondían a la clasificación dada respectivamente. Se identificaron los siguientes signos; abortos, cojeras, pelo: opaco, hirsuto y descolorido, lagrimeo, pelo acerado, bocio y pica. Para forraje se encontraron niveles deficientes de cobre (1.27 mg kg-1) y zinc (24.5 mg kg-1). En agua, cobre y zinc no fueron detectables y había exceso de hierro 0.345 (mg L-1). En conclusión, la deficiencia primaria es cobre, ocasionada por las deficiencias en forraje, agua y posibles desbalances causados por otros minerales.
Palabras clave Bovinos; Minerales; Deficiencia; Cobre y Zinc
Introduction
Livestock farming in Mexico is an activity that is carried out in approximately 60 % of the national territory with a wide diversity of production systems1. The cow-calf system is the most important in Mexico, but it is also the most vulnerable since it is usually implemented under grazing conditions, which makes it dependent on environmental factors2. In these production systems, the quality of forages can be fluctuating and, consequently, nutritional contributions are variable3.
Forage generally fails to meet the nutritional requirements of livestock. These forages are insufficient in minerals, which are essential nutrients for development, growth, and reproduction4. Mineral deficiency in cattle causes some alterations in reproductive and metabolic activity; to avoid these alterations, it is advisable to provide mineral supplementation5,6. Grazing animals are mainly deficient in phosphorus, copper, and zinc; for this reason, several studies have been carried out on supplementation in this type of production systems7,8,9.
There are currently several direct and indirect mineral supplementation methods and the choice of the most appropriate method will depend on the type of production system, economy, and availability9,10,11. In order to carry out effective and accurate supplementation, it is necessary to know the state of the production system through a complete mineral diagnosis that includes soil, water, forage, blood serum, production objective, season of the year, and animal management. Implementing biochemical and mineral diagnostics helps better assess nutritional status10-13. The present research aimed to determine the mineral concentrations in forage, water, and blood serum, and the clinical signs of grazing cows in Lagos de Moreno, Jalisco, Mexico.
Material and methods
The present research was conducted in a cow-calf production system located in the municipality of Lagos de Moreno, Jalisco, Mexico, 21° 21′ 24″ N, 101° 56′ 16″ W. The climate is semi-arid temperate, the average annual temperature is 15.1 °C, and its average minimum and maximum temperature ranges between 5.4 °C and 28.5 °C. The average annual rainfall is 665 mm, whereas the average accumulated precipitation is 536.31 mm14.
Cattle management. Blood samples were taken from 25 animals of the Angus and Hereford breeds in different physiological states: pregnant, empty, recently calved, and heifers, with various body conditions, and they were handled in a cattle chute and press. The presence of signs associated with mineral deficiencies was also recorded.
Blood sample management. Blood samples were collected using the jugular venipuncture technique, extracting 10 ml per cow following the procedures defined by Fick et al15. These samples were placed in vacuum tubes without anticoagulants and centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 15 min. The blood serum was then obtained, which was refrigerated and stored at -4 °C until the time of analysis.
Forage sample management. Twenty-four (24) forage samples were collected in a rangeland composed of sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), and Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) in an area of 50 ha; these samples were collected by the hand-plucking technique16 and kept in paper bags. They were then dried in a forced-air oven at 60 °C for 48 h. Subsequently, they were ground, and dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ethereal extract, and ash were determined by proximate analysis16. In addition, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was determined according to Van Soest’s16,17 methodology. Mineral determinations were carried out according to Fick et al’s15 methodology.
Water sample management. Three water samples were collected from each source available to the animals (2 earthen dams and a drinking trough that was inside the handling pen); these samples were stored in 50 ml plastic cups previously demineralized. These samples were filtered before their determination following the methodology described by Fick et al15. The sampling was carried out in May (dry season).
Laboratory tests. The determination of serum, water, and forage concentrations for the minerals Cu, Fe, Zn, Ca, Mg, Na, K, and Mn was performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The P concentration of the samples was determined by means of visible ultraviolet spectrophotometry; both determinations followed the methodology described by Fick et al15.
Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed with the GLM procedure in SAS18. Since the concentration of copper in blood serum was the most deficient of the minerals studied, a copper deficiency classification index (CUDI) was generated: severe (0.41-0.48 mg L-1), moderate (0.48-0.54 mg L-1), and mild (0.54 -0.79 mg L-1). CUDI was considered as the dependent variable and the concentrations of the rest of the minerals as independent variables.
The statistical model included the following parameters:
Where Y = dependent variable, μ = overall mean, Aj= mineral concentrations, and eij = residual error. The comparison of means was performed using Tukey’s test.
Results
Mineral concentration in blood serum
Deficient concentrations of most of the minerals tested were found in blood serum. Table 1 shows that the most deficient minerals in cows are copper (100 %), zinc (88 %), and sodium (52 %). For potassium and phosphorus, there are some deficient animals; however, the general mean is within the appropriate levels. It should be noted that iron and manganese in blood serum were found in concentrations above those appropriate according to Puls19.
Table 1 Mineral concentration in blood serum of beef cows
| Mineral | Mineral concentration (mg L-1) |
Normal range | Deficient cows (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.8 - 1.5 | 100 |
| Iron | 2.58 ± 0.57 | 1.3 - 2.5 | 0 |
| Zinc | 0.70 ± 0.09 | 0.8 - 1.4 | 88 |
| Calcium | 65.28 ± 10.30 | 37.6 - 48.8* | 0 |
| Magnesium | 34.65 ± 10.53 | 18 - 30 | 0 |
| Sodium | 2879.80 ± 744.30 | 3100 - 3450 | 52 |
| Potassium | 167.54 ± 35.07 | 160 - 215 | 36 |
| Manganese | 2.40 ± 22.51 | 0.006 - 0.070 | 0 |
| Phosphorus | 56.38 ± 0.91 | 40 - 60 | 16 |
Copper deficiency classification index (CUDI)
One of the most deficient minerals was Cu, for which a classification index was generated according to the severity of the deficiency based on the concentrations of Cu in blood serum: severe, moderate, and mild. Since it is a primary deficiency, it causes various effects, such as decreased feed intake and alteration between interactions, which in turn affects the metabolism of other elements. However, after analyzing all the elements, no significant effect was found, which could be attributed to the number of animals present in each group.
Most of the animals sampled were in the severe deficiency category (68 %). Twenty percent of the animals were classified in the moderate deficiency category (> 0.48-0.54 mg L-1) and finally, only 12 % of the cows were detected with mild deficiency (> 0.54-0.79 mg L-1) (Table 2). Blood serum concentrations of zinc, iron, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, and manganese were not affected by CUDI (P>0.05).
Table 2 Copper deficiency classification index in relation to the different mineral concentrations in blood serum of beef cows
| CUDI | Range (mg L-1) |
DA (%) |
Mineral concentrations according to each classification
(mg L-1) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | Fe | Ca | Mg | Na | K | P | Mn | |||
| Severe | 0.41-0.48 | 68 | 0.68 | 2.8 | 65.5 | 34.6 | 2750 | 166 | 53 | 2.36 |
| Moderate | 0.48-0.54 | 20 | 0.74 | 2.3 | 63.2 | 34.0 | 3154 | 159 | 66 | 2.70 |
| Mild | 0.54-0.79 | 12 | 0.71 | 1.9 | 67.8 | 36.1 | 3357 | 204 | 67 | 2.00 |
| Probability | - | - | 0.47 | 0.30 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.63 |
CUDI= copper deficiency index; DA= deficient animals; Zn= zinc; Fe= iron; Ca= calcium; Mg= magnesium; Na= sodium; K= potassium; P= phosphorus; Mn= manganese.
The most characteristic signs of mineral deficiency were identified in the copper deficiency index, where dull, shaggy, and discolored hair was observed in 100 % of the animals in the severe and mild classification. Pica is present in all categories: 50 to 60 % of the animals had it. In the case of tearing, it only occurs in the severe and mild deficiency index. It should be noted that a cow can show more than two signs and all signs are observed in the classification of severe (Table 3).
Table 3 Copper deficiency index in relation to the percentage of animals showing characteristic signs of mineral deficiency
| CUDI | Range (mg L-1) |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe | 0.41-0.48 | 33 | 17 | 100 | 39 | 29 | 39 | 33 | 50 | 22 |
| Moderate | 0.48-0.54 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 0 |
| Mild | 0.54 -0.79 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 19 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
CUDI= copper deficiency index; A= abortions; B= lameness; C= dull, shaggy, and discolored hair; D= tearing; E= steely hair or wool; F=goiter, G= udder inflammation; H= pica; I= excessive salivation.
Forage composition
The forage analyzed was sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), and Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) in a total area of 50 ha, and it was found dry and ripe and had deficient concentrations of CP (<6 %), high levels of NDF (71.97 %), which may be an indication that the available forage is highly lignified, and low concentrations of ethereal extract (0.93 %). Deficient levels of Cu (1.27 mg kg-1) were identified; the opposite occurred for the other minerals (Table 4).
Table 4 Mineral concentrations of forage on a dry basis (mg/kg for microminerals and percentage for macrominerals)
| Cu | Fe | Zn | Mn | Na | K | Ca | Mg | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical level | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 0.06 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.25 |
| Average + SD | 1.275 ±
0.33 |
23 ±
8.25 |
24.5 ±
2.65 |
176 ±
76.15 |
0.03
± 0.01 |
0.33
± 0.16 |
0.40
± 0.10 |
0.20
± 0.03 |
0.38
± 0.05 |
Cu= copper; Fe= iron; Zn= zinc; Mn= manganese; Na= sodium; K= potassium; Ca= calcium; Mg= magnesium; P= phosphorus.
Critical levels of forage minerals based on ruminant needs21.
Minerals in drinking water
The minerals copper and zinc in the water were undetectable. The rest of them were within the normal range suggested by Puls19, except for iron, which exceeds the maximum tolerable levels (349 mg L-1) (Table 5).
Table 5 Mineral concentration in the different water sources
| Minerals | Cu | Fe | Zn | Mn | Na | K | Ca | Mg | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum tolerable | >1.0 | <0.3 | <25 | <0.05 | <800 | <20 | <1000 | <1000 | <0.7 |
| Average
± SD |
ND | 0.35
± 0.05 |
ND | 57.76 ±
20.24 |
1.71 ±
0.34 |
37.5
± 12.1 |
18.84
± 3.25 |
4.82
± 0.06 |
711
± 277 |
Cu= copper; Fe= iron; Zn= zinc; Mn= manganese; Na= sodium; K= potassium; Ca= calcium; Mg= magnesium; P= phosphorus.
ND= not detectable; SD= standard deviation.
Maximum tolerable levels in water19.
Discussion
In systems where the components of the diet are properly analyzed to define mineral supplementation, favorable responses in production are achieved, with increases of up to 16 % in daily weight gain22. According to the results of this work, copper is a mineral that is deficient in all the animals analyzed (0.48 ± 0.07 mg L-1); this deficiency is relevant because it is involved in various enzymatic functions as a cofactor, one of the most important being ceruloplasmin, a copper-dependent enzyme23.
Copper is also related to embryogenesis since it promotes early embryo development and increases the percentage of blastocysts, and it is mentioned that Cu transporters could exist in the cumulus-oocyte complex24. Hence, the effects caused by hypocupremia are associated with decreased conception, anovulatory cycles, and anestrus, which causes an increase in open days, reproductive tract integrity, and embryonic death25. Several studies in humans have demonstrated the function of copper in the central nervous system and its relationship with various diseases26.
Arthington et al27 defined how copper interferes with immune responses, but when there is a deficiency, haptoglobin and fibrinogen are suppressed, and the immune response is provoked28,29,30. Phillippo et al30 described how delayed puberty was found in heifers supplemented with molybdenum, this being a copper antagonist. Some authors mentioned that manganese may have effects on Cu-dependent enzymes, such as lysyl oxidase, causing negative effects on reproduction31,32.
Copper deficiency has been reported in most parts of the world and is considered to be the second most relevant deficiency of grazing animals33. In a study on the prevalence of Cu deficiency in Canada, it was found that the deficiency ranged from 24 to 43 % of the population studied34. Another study35 diagnosed 80 cows with copper deficiency, which after supplementation showed favorable reproductive responses and a decrease in reproductive pathologies, such as placental retention, metritis, pyometras, and cysts. Ramírez et al36 found more than 50 % of animals with severe copper deficiency.
Zinc
Arthington and Ranches37 mentioned that zinc is the third element with the highest deficiency in grazing animals; the most notable function of this mineral is based on the synthesis of DNA and RNA, processes such as spermatogenesis, and immune function. Multiple studies indicate that zinc is essential in animal development38,39,40. This nutrient is closely related to the synthesis of proteins and carbohydrates and other biochemical functions41. Davy et al42 found deficiencies ranging from 23 % to 47 % in the region studied.
Sodium
Sodium is a macromineral considered an electrolyte mineral because it is responsible for maintaining the balance of body fluids, muscles, and nerves43. It also interacts in the digestion and denaturation processes of tannins44. Hyponatremia is defined as sodium deficiency and deficiency is considered when serum concentration levels < 3,139.5 mg L-1(45 are present. Davy et al42 found some areas of California with sodium deficiencies and Olson et al46 found cows with levels below 3,523 mg L-1. Sodium deficiency can present some clinical signs, such as loss of body condition, decrease in weight gain, and pica, which is a disorder where the animal licks, chews, and consumes objects47.
Copper deficiency index
The most deficient mineral in this diagnosis was copper. Its deficiency was classified as severe (0.41-0.48 mg L-1), moderate (0.48-0.54 mg L-1), and mild (0.54-0.79 mg L-1). Several characteristic signs of mineral deficiency were identified, which occurred when the deficiency was severe: abortions, lameness, dull, shaggy, and discolored hair, tearing, steely hair or wool, goiter, udder inflammation, pica, and excessive salivation. The more severe the deficiency, the more signs are present. When the deficiency is mild, the signs found are fewer.
Dull, shaggy, and discolored hair. In the severe deficiency classification, 100 % of the animals had shaggy, dull, and discolored hair. Copper is involved in the transformation of melanin through polyphenol oxidase; melanin is responsible for providing coloration to the skin and hair48,49,50. Some studies52,53 describe that black coat tones tend to become reddish, and reddish coats acquire yellowish tones.
Lameness and claudication. This sign is also considered characteristic of Cu deficiency, and the diagnosis showed that it is present for both severe and moderate deficiency, and it is due to the interaction that copper has with the lysyl oxidase enzyme; this enzyme is an important part of the formation of collagen polypeptide chains49,50. Copper has also been associated with inflammation and hardening of joints; others describe that the keratin defect causes soft nails, a situation also observed in zinc deficiencies51,52.
Abortions and reproductive disorders. The role of Cu in reproduction is still not very clear; some authors describe that Cu deficiency can cause abortion, embryonic resorption, anestrus, alteration in the estrous cycle, decrease in the number and frequency of LH pulses52,53,54. Copper participates in the reduction of oxidative stress in the ovary; it has also been mentioned that copper participates in the synthesis and secretion of gonadotropins and follicular growth55-58.
Steely hair. The curly appearance of the hair is due to the disulfide that is present in keratin, but to convert it, it necessary to transform sulfhydryl into disulfide, and this is carried out with copper-dependent enzymes; when there is a copper deficiency, the hair is dull, rough, and very fragile59,52. Other signs of copper deficiency are diarrhea, neonatal ataxia, anemia, and decreased body condition52,60.
Pica. Pica is a disorder that occurs in animals and humans, in which they consume, lick, and chew on objects61. It can be caused by a deficiency of one or more minerals, but some studies describe that it is a deficiency of sodium, a mineral that was deficient in the sampled animals62. Sodium deficiency also causes languor, dry hair, weakness, and decreased milk production52,62. In a study conducted in Saskatchewan, Canada, between 2003 and 2012 to see the prevalence of mineral deficiency, the following signs were found: abortions, deaths, downer cows, neonatal losses, diarrhea, weak calves, and the most common mineral deficiency was Cu (47.2 %)63.
Forage and water
Forages had low protein concentrations (< 6 %) and high concentrations of NDF (71.97 %), which are considered typical forage concentrations64. Muñoz-González et al65 found NDF levels of 64.6 to 66.4 %. Cu and Zn deficiencies were also identified. In a study conducted in the tropics, they found that almost 91 % of forages had copper deficiency and 16 % had zinc deficiency and none of the forages analyzed reached the levels required by cattle66. In water, iron (349 mg L-1) was found to be above the maximum tolerable levels and according to some studies, there is a contamination of this mineral, which can cause antagonism with some others67.
Antagonism of iron and copper
Iron is one of the essential minerals for animals and one of the most abundant on earth; it is considered to be present in all food sources, so grazing animals consume large amounts of it68,69. Iron is antagonistic to some minerals, such as Cu, Mn, and Zn70. Copper metabolism is affected by elevated concentrations of Fe, Zn, and S; it has been described that cattle that had iron levels above the normal range showed a copper deficiency, which triggered hypocupremia, a situation reported in Fe-rich waters70,71.
Mexico’s previous results found
A study assessed blood serum and found that the concentration of Cu was deficient, below the critical level, mainly in the localities of Benito Juárez 0.36 mg dL-1 and Jilotepec 0.46 mg dL-1, in the state of Mexico; in the latter, Cu was also low in forage72. Likewise, in the same locality, zinc deficiencies in blood serum were found: 0.55 mg dL-1. As can be identified, it was the same situation that happened with the sampled cattle72. In Chihuahua, a study carried out in several localities found phosphorus and iron deficiency and copper deficiency in three localities73. Cu deficiency is widespread throughout the country in cattle, sheep, and goats. In a study conducted in the state of Yucatan, it was found that, in some areas, up to 99 % of the animals had this deficiency, with an average Cu content of less than 2 ppm74.
When analyzing the forage in San Luis Potosí, it was found that there was more Fe (P≤0.05) in the dry season, which coincides with what was found, and it is agreed that the concentrations of minerals found in the forage do not meet the requirements of grazing cattle72. Muñoz-González et al75 found that 100, 28, and 72 % of forage was below the minimum level for Cu, Zn, and P75, respectively.
Conclusions and implications
The cattle of the ranch studied, which is located in the arid and semi-arid zone of the country, have copper deficiency, which is related to the existing deficiency of this mineral in forage and water. When copper deficiency is severe, more clinical signs appear in the animal, such as abortions, lameness, dull, shaggy, and discolored hair, tearing, steely hair or wool, goiter, and pica. Another problem in cattle is zinc deficiency, which can also contribute to the presence of clinical signs and mineral imbalances. Excess iron in forage and water contributes to copper deficiencies because of the antagonism that exists between them.
Acknowledgements and conflict of interest
The authors are grateful to the Secretariat of Sciences, Humanities, Technology, and Innovation (SECIHTI, for its acronym in Spanish) for the scholarship awarded. They also thank Rancho Los Fresnos and Mrs. Marisa Candiani Castañeda for the support in working with their cattle. Finally, they are grateful to the Ruminant Nutrition Laboratory of the Department of Zootechnics of the Chapingo Autonomous University.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the dissemination of the results, discussion, data analysis, and conclusions presented in this work.
REFERENCES
1. Enríquez-Quiroz JF, Esqueda-Esquivel VA, Martínez-Méndez D. Rehabilitación de praderas degradadas en el trópico de México. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2021;243(60). [ Links ]
2. Bautista-Martínez Y, Granados-Zurita L, Joaquín-Cancino S, Ruiz-Albarrán M, Garay-Martínez JR, Infante-Rodríguez F, et al. Factores que determinan la producción de becerros en el sistema vaca-cría del Estado de Tabasco, México. Nova Scientia 2020;12(25). http://dx.doi.org/10.21640/ns.v12i25.2117. [ Links ]
3. Almeraya SS, Mora FJS, García SJA, Hernández MO, Almeraya QSX. Caracterización de la cadena de abasto de ganado bovino producida en la zona norte de Veracruz. Agricultura Sociedad y Desarrollo 2024;21(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v21i2.1602. [ Links ]
4. Navas PA, Aragón HLF, Triana VJF. Efecto del componente arbóreo sobre la dinámica de crecimiento y calidad nutricional de una pradera mixta en trópico alto. Rev Med Vet 2020;1(41):71-82. https://doi.org/10.19052/mv.vol1.iss41.7. [ Links ]
5. Da Silva CEI. Suplementação e formulação de sal mineral y mistura múltipla para bovinos. Rev Universitaria Brasileira 2024;2(1)⟨10.5281/zenodo.11069052⟩. ⟨hal-04543118⟩. [ Links ]
6. Anchordoquy JM, Anchordoquy JP, Galarza EM, Farnetano NA, Giuliodori MJ, Nikoloff N. Parenteral zinc supplementation increases pregnancy rates in beef cows. Biol Trace Element Res 2019;192(2):175-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-1651-8. [ Links ]
7. Depablos L, Ordóñez J, Godoy S, Chicco CF. Suplementación mineral proteica de novillas a pastoreo en los Llanos Centrales de Venezuela. Zoot Trop 2009;27(3):249-262. [ Links ]
8. Jiménez-Páez JO, Huerta BM, López AR, Ruíz FA, Rodríguez PG. Bolos intrarruminales para suplementar minerales traza en rumiantes. Revisión. Avances Invest Agropec 2020;24(1):35-46. [ Links ]
9. León-Cruz M, Ramirez-Bibriesca E, López-Arellano R, Miranda-Jiménez L, Rodriguez-Patiño G, Diaz-Sánchez VM, et al. Bolos intrarruminales con liberación controlada de minerales traza. Revisión. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2020;11(2):498-516. [ Links ]
10. Acosta Portillo M, Uran N, Britez L, Pedrozo Prieto R. Perfil bioquímico mineral en vacas cruzadas de Cebú preñadas y vacías de un establecimiento de Caraguatay (Paraguay). Compendio Cient Vet 2020;10(2):5-11. [ Links ]
11. Duffy R, Yin M, Redding LE. A review of the impact of dietary zinc on livestock health. J Trace Elements Minerals 2023;5(100085):100085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemin.2023.100085. [ Links ]
12. Salamanca, A. Suplementación de minerales en la producción bovina. REDVET. 2010;11(9):1-10. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/636/63615732008.pdf. [ Links ]
13. Ruiz-Albarran M, Balocchi O, Wittwer F, Pulido RG. Evaluación de la fermentación ruminal en vacas lecheras en pastoreo otoñal utilizando muestras de líquido ruminal obtenidas por rumenocentesis. Vet Prod 2024;1(2):5-14. https://cienciasveterinariasyproduccionanimal.uat.edu.mx/index.php/cienciasVeterinarias/article/view/19. [ Links ]
14. INEGI. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. División geoestadística municipal y población total por municipio. https://en.www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/app/areasgeograficas/resumen/resumen_01.pdf. [ Links ]
15. Fick KR, McDowell LR, Miles PH, Wilkinson NS, Furik JD, Conrad JH, Valdivia R. Métodos de análisis de minerales para tejidos de plantas y animales. Florida, USA: Universidad de Florida;1979. [ Links ]
16. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington; Association of official analytical chemists, Inc; 1990. [ Links ]
17. Van Soest, P. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2a ed. USA: Cornell University Press; 1994. [ Links ]
18. SAS (versión 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, Carolina del Norte). [ Links ]
19. Puls R. Mineral levels in animal health: diagnostic data. Sherpa International. British Columbia, Canada. 1994. [ Links ]
20. Kvart C, Larsson L. Studies on ionized calcium in serum and plasma from normal cows. Its relation to total serum calcium and the effects of sample storing. Acta Vet Scand 1978;19(4):487-496. [ Links ]
21. McDowell LR, Arthington JD. Minerals for grazing ruminants in tropical regions. University of Florida IFAS. 2005;90. [ Links ]
22. Ocampos ODA, Paniagua Alcaraz PL, Tobal CF, Portillo G. Desarrollo y ajuste en campo de un modelo de simulación para cálculo y evaluación de requerimiento mineral en ganado bovino de carne mantenido sobre Pastizal nativo. Cienc Vet 2023;25(2):111-24. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853-84952023000200009&lang=pt. [ Links ]
23. Arthington JD, Pate FM, Spears JW. Effect of copper source and level on performance and copper status of cattle consuming molasses-based supplements. J Anim Sci 2003;81(6):1357-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2003.8161357x. [ Links ]
24. Gómez Rendón J, Del Campo M, González Tous M. Algunas anotaciones sobre la importancia del cobre en la reproducción bovina. Rev Colomb Cienc Anim 2019;11(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24188/recia.v11.n1.2019.716. [ Links ]
25. Zatta P, Frank A. Copper deficiency and neurological disorders in man and animals. Brain Res Rev 2007;54(1):19-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.10.001. [ Links ]
26. Arthington JD, Corah LR, Blecha F. The effect of molybdenum-induced copper deficiency on acute-phase protein concentrations, superoxide dismutase activity, leukocyte numbers, and lymphocyte proliferation in beef heifers inoculated with bovine herpesvirus-1. J Anim Sci 1996;74(1):211. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1996.741211x. [ Links ]
27. Heegaard PM, Godson DL, Toussaint MJ, Tjørnehøj K, Larsen LE, Viuff B, et al. The acute phase response of haptoglobin and serum amyloid A (SAA) in cattle undergoing experimental infection with bovine respiratory syncytial virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2000;77(1-2):151-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-2427(00)00226-9. [ Links ]
28. Stokka GL, Edwards AJ, Spire MF, Brandt RT, Smith JE. Inflammatory response to clostridial vaccines in feedlot cattle. JAVMA 1994;204(3):415-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.1994.204.03.415. [ Links ]
29. Arthington JD, Cooke RF, Maddock TD, Araujo DB, Moriel P, DiLorenzo N, Cordero GC Effects of vaccination on the acute-phase protein response and measures of performance in growing beef calves. J Anim Sci 2013;91(4):1831-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5724. [ Links ]
30. Phillippo M, Humphries WR, Atkinson T, Henderson GD, Garthwaite PH. The effect of dietary molybdenum and iron on copper status, puberty, fertility and oestrous cycles in cattle. J Agric Sci 1987;109(2):321-36. doi:10.1017/S0021859600080758. [ Links ]
31. Mason J. Thiomolybdates: Mediators of molybdenum toxicity and enzyme inhibitors. Toxicology 1986;42(2-3):99-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-483x(86)90001-6. [ Links ]
32. Kendall NR, Marsters P, Scaramuzzi RJ, Campbell BK. Expression of lysyl oxidase and effect of copper chloride and ammonium tetrathiomolybdate on bovine ovarian follicle granulosa cells cultured in serum-free media Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 2003;125(5):657-665. [ Links ]
33. Waldner C, McLeod L, Parker S, Campbell J. Update on copper and selenium in Canadian cow-calf herds: regional differences and estimation of serum reference values. Transl Anim Sci 2023;7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad062. [ Links ]
34. Hernández-Arroyave W, Jiménez-Arango F. Determinación de los contenidos de cobre en función de su interrelación en los suelos, forrajes y ganado bovino en la región del Magdalena Medio. Vetzootec 2018;12(1):01-13. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/3342. [ Links ]
35. García JR, García-López Cuesta M, Figueredo JM, Quiñones R, Faure R, et al. Los niveles sanguíneos de cobre y su influencia en los indicadores reproductivos de la hembra bovina en las condiciones del trópico. Rev Cubana Cienc Agr 2010;44(3):239-245. [ Links ]
36. Ramírez CE, Tittarelli CM, Mattioli GA, Giuliodori M, Puchuri MC. Hipocupremia bovina en 5 partidos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Vet Arg 1997;14:12-17. [ Links ]
37. Arthington JD, Ranches J. Trace mineral nutrition of grazing beef cattle. Animals 2021;11(10):2767. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11102767. [ Links ]
38. Arthington JD, Corah LR, Hill DA. The effects of dietary zinc concentration and source on yearling bull growth and fertility. PAS 2002;18(3):282-285. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31534-5. [ Links ]
39. Duff GC, Galyean ML. Board-Invited Review: Recent advances in management of highly stressed, newly received feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2007;85(3):823-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-501. [ Links ]
40. Messersmith EM, Smerchek DT, Hansen SL. The crossroads between zinc and steroidal implant-induced growth of beef cattle. Animals 2021;11(7):1914. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11071914. [ Links ]
41. Ozturk H, Niazi P, Mansoor M, Monib AW, Alikhail M, Azizi A. The function of zinc in animal, plant, and human nutrition. JRASB 2023;2(2):35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.2.6. [ Links ]
42. Davy JS, Forero LC, Shapero MWK, Rao DR, Becchetti TA, Koopman Rivers C, et al. Mineral status of California beef cattle. Transl Anim Sci 2019;3(1):66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy114. [ Links ]
43. Sodium in your diet. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA; 2024 https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-education-resources-materials/el-sodio-en-su-dieta. [ Links ]
44. Kaspari M. The seventh macronutrient: how sodium shortfall ramifies through populations, food webs and ecosystems. Eco Lett 2020;23(7):1153-68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32380580/. [ Links ]
45. Hoorn EJ, Liamis G, Zietse R, Zillikens MC. Hyponatremia and bone: an emerging relationship. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012;8(1):33-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2011.173. [ Links ]
46. Olson WG, Link KRJ, Otterby DE, Stevens JB. Assessment of sodium deficiency and polyuria/polydipsia in dairy cows. The Bovine Practitioner 1989;128-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol0no24p128-133. [ Links ]
47. Rodríguez A, Banchero G. Deficiencia de minerales en rumiantes. Revista INIA 2007;13:11-15. [ Links ]
48. García-Márquez LJ, Ramírez-Romero R, Martínez-Burnes J, López-Mayagoitia A, Ruíz-Ramírez JA, Loman-Zúñiga EI, et al. Ataxia enzoótica por deficiencia de cobre en ciervo rojo (Cervus elaphus) cautivo en Colima, México. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2022;12(4):1326-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i4.5750. [ Links ]
49. Rosa DE, Mattioli GA. Metabolismo y deficiencia de cobre en los bovinos. Analecta Vet 2002;22:1. https://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/11140 . Consultado 8 Oct, 2024. [ Links ]
50. Depablos L, Godoy S, Chicco CF, Ordoñez J. Nutrición mineral en sistemas ganaderos de las sábanas centrales de Venezuela. Zoot Trop 2009;27(1):027-38. https://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?pid=S0798-72692009000100004&script=sci_arttext . Consultado 12 Oct, 2024. [ Links ]
51. Quiroz-Rochac G, Bouda J. Fisiopatología de las deficiencias de cobre en rumiantes y su diagnóstico. Vet México 2001;32(4):289-296. [ Links ]
52. Huerta BM. Alimentación y suplementación mineral. Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal. Engormix. 2016. Disponible en: produccion-animal.com.ar. Consultado 18 Oct, 2024. [ Links ]
53. Mertz W, Davis GK. Copper. In: Mertz W, editor. Trace elements inhuman and animal nutrition. Vol I. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Academic Press; 1986. [ Links ]
54. Ingraham RH, Kappel LC, Morgan EB, Srikandakumar A. Correction of subnormal fertility with copper and magnesium supplementation. JDS 1987;70(1):167-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(87)79991-3. [ Links ]
55. Du Z, Hemken RW, Harmon RJ. Copper metabolism of Holstein and Jersey cows and heifers fed diets high in cupric sulfate or copper proteinate. J Anim Sci 1996;79(10):1873-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76555-4. [ Links ]
56. Torres G, Paez R, Azúm J, Roller F, González N, Acosta J, et al. Uso del sulfato de cobre por vía parenteral en vacas hipocuprémicas con mastitis y su efecto en la fertilidad. La Técnica 2016;(16):56. https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122436/records/64747b92425ec3c088f67abb . Consultado 16 Oct, 2024. [ Links ]
57. García J, Cuesta M, Pedroso R, Gutiérrez M, Mollineda A, Figueredo J. Efecto del cobre sobre la reproducción en novillas lecheras de Cuba. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2006;11(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.442. [ Links ]
58. Hernández-Arroyave W, Ocampo-Ortiz PE, Montoya-Flórez LM, Bustamante-Cano JJ. Suplementación parenteral de cobre y su relación con índices de fertilidad en bovinos de regiones con altos niveles de molibdeno en el Magdalena Medio colombiano. Vetzootec 2016;10(1):01-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.17151/vetzo.2016.10.L1. [ Links ]
59. Amin BY, Dar RR, Ali A, Malla JA, Shubeena S. Role of micro-nutrients in bovine reproduction. Theriogenology Insight - Int J Reprod All Anim 2016;6(1):57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2277-3371.2016.00008.5. [ Links ]
60. Riaz M, Muhammad G. Deficiencia de cobre en rumiantes en Pakistán. Matrix Sci Medica 2018;2(1):18-21. [ Links ]
61. Jin X, Meng L, Zhang R, Tong M, Qi Z, Mi L.2023. Effects of essential mineral elements deficiency and supplementation on serum mineral elements concentration and biochemical parameters in grazing Mongolian sheep. Front Vet Sci http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1214346. [ Links ]
62. Perdrizet U, Blakley B, Al Dissi A. Concentrations and deficiencies of minerals in cattle submitted to a diagnostic laboratory in Saskatchewan from 2003-2012: A retrospective study. Can Vet J 2020;61(1):57-62. [ Links ]
63. Villanueva-Avalos JF, Vázquez-González A, Quero-Carrillo AR. Atributos agronómicos y producción de forraje en ecotipos de Cenchrus purpureus en condiciones de trópico subhúmedo. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc 2022;(27):1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i27.3147. [ Links ]
64. Muñoz-González JC, Huerta BM, Lara BA, Rangel SR, De la Rosa AJL. Producción y calidad nutrimental de forrajes en condiciones del Trópico Húmedo de México. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc 2016;3315-3327. [ Links ]
65. Muñoz-González JC, Huerta BM, Rangel-Santos R, Lara-Bueno A, De La Rosa-Arana JL. Evaluación mineral de forrajes del trópico húmedo mexicano. Trop Subtrop 2014; 17:285-287. [ Links ]
66. Rivas JRR, Jaramillo CAR, Baquerizo CJR, Córdova MRA. Estudio de los procesos de remoción de hierro y manganeso en aguas subterráneas: una revisión. Polo del Conocimiento: Rev Científico-profesional 2021;6:1384-1407. [ Links ]
67. NASEM. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 8th ed. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2016. [ Links ]
68. Cheng J, Kolba N, Tako E. The effect of dietary zinc and zinc physiological status on the composition of the gut microbiome in vivo. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2024;64(18):6432-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2023.2169857. [ Links ]
69. Pinto-Santini L, Godoy S, Chicco C, Chacón T. Efecto de altos niveles de hierro y molibdeno sobre la nutrición del cobre en vacas mestizas. Rev Cient (Maracaibo) 2007;17(6):588-96. [ Links ]
70. Mullis LA, Spears, JW, McCraw, RL. Efectos de la raza (Angus vs. Simmental) y la fuente de cobre y zinc en el estado mineral de novillos alimentados con una dieta rica en hierro. J Anim Sci 2003;81:318-322. [ Links ]
71. Krueger KM, Vavrus CE, Lofton ME, McClure RP, Gantzer P, Carey CC, et al. Iron and manganese fluxes across the sediment-water interface in a drinking water reservoir. Water Res 2020;182(116003):116003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116003. [ Links ]
72. Almaraz EM, Vara ID, González-Ronquillo M, Escutia GJ, Ortega OC, Sálas, NP, Huerta BM. Diagnóstico mineral en forraje y suero sanguíneo de bovinos lecheros en dos épocas en el valle central de México. Tec Pecu Méx 2007;45(3):329-344. [ Links ]
73. Maltos R, Carrete F, Rodríguez J, Turriza-Chan JL, Castellanos-Ruelas AF, Rosado-Rubio JG, et al. Concentración de minerales en el agua, suelo, forraje y ganado bovino de la región sur del Estado de Coahuila. Agrociencia 1989;44(4):471-480. [ Links ]
74. Turriza-Chan JL, Castellanos-Ruelas AF, Rosado-Rubio JG, Hetedia y Aguilat M, Cabrera-Torres E. Diagnóstico de la concentración mineral en tejido óseo de ovinos en pastoreo en el Estado de Yucatán, México. Agrociencia 2010;44(4):471-480. [ Links ]
75. Muñoz-González J, Huerta-Bravo M, Bueno AL, Santos RR, de la Rosa-Arana JL. Producción y calidad nutrimental de forrajes en condiciones del trópico húmedo de México. REMEXCA.2017;3315-3327. https://doi.org/10.29312/REMEXCA.V0I16.399. [ Links ]
Received: November 07, 2024; Accepted: January 13, 2025










texto en 



