SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 número4Balance regional de nitrógeno en el sistema de producción leche-forraje de la Comarca Lagunera, MéxicoTipología de productores de ganado bovino en la región indígena XIV Tulijá-Tseltal-Chol de Chiapas, México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versão On-line ISSN 2448-6698versão impressa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.6 no.4 Mérida Out./Dez. 2015

 

Articles

Pregnancy in dairy cows with two protocols for synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination

Silvano Flores Domíngueza 

Luis Ramón Muñoz Floresa 

Reyes López Ordazb 

Carlos Fernando Aréchiga Floresc 

Gabriela Mapesd 

Joel Hernández Ceróna  * 

a Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

b División de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Unidad Xochimilco. México.

c Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas. México.

d Ceva Salud Animal, México.


Abstract:

The objective was to compare the pregnancy rate (PR) between two timed AI protocols in dairy cattle. Two hundred seventy-five (275) cows were presynchronized with PGF2α given 14 d apart beginning at d 32 postpartum; 12 d after second PGF2α, cows were assigned to two treatments: 1) Ovsynch (n=144) received GnRH, followed 7 d later by PGF2α and then GnRH 56 h after PGF2α and cows were inseminated 16 h later 2) PRID5d (n=131), received GnRH and a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device, which remained in place 5 d. Cows received an injection of PGF2α at the time of progesterone device removal and a second injection of PGF2α 24 h later. At 56 h following progesterone device removal, the next injection of GnRH was given and cows were inseminated 16 h later. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 45 d after AI by transrectal palpation. PR was compared by logistic regression analysis. Independent variables were: treatment (Ovsynch vs PRID5d), milk yield (≤40 vs >40 kg), technician (1 vs 2), puerperium (normal vs abnormal), parity (primiparous vs multiparous) and standing estrus during presynchronization. PR was similar (P>0.1) between treatments (27 vs 21 %; Ovsynch and PRID5d, respectively). There was no effect of the other independent variables on PR. The interaction of these variables with the treatment did not affect PR (P>0.1). In conclusion, PR was similar in dairy cows inseminated by an Ovsynch protocol or through modified Ovsynch which included progesterone during 5 d and reduction of the interval between the GnRH and PGF2α from 7 to 5 d.

Keywords: Ovsynch; Progesterone; Fertility; Dairy cows

Resumen:

Se comparó la tasa de gestación (TG) en vacas lecheras inseminadas a tiempo fijo mediante dos protocolos. El día 32 posparto, 275 vacas recibieron dos inyecciones de PGF2α con intervalo de 14 días. Doce días después de la segunda inyección, se asignaron a los siguientes tratamientos: 1) Ovsynch (n=144) recibieron GnRH; siete días después PGF2α; 56 h más tarde GnRH y se inseminaron 16 h después 2) PRID5d (n=131) recibieron GnRH y un dispositivo intravaginal liberador de progesterona durante cinco días; al retirar el dispositivo, se aplicaron dos inyecciones de PGF2α con intervalo de 24 h; 56 h posterior al retiro del dispositivo, se aplicó GnRH y se inseminaron 16 h después. La gestación se diagnosticó por palpación rectal el día 45 posinseminación. Se comparó la TG mediante regresión logística. Las variables independientes fueron: tratamiento (Ovsynch vs PRID5d), producción láctea (≤40 vs >40 kg), técnico inseminador (1 vs 2), tipo de puerperio (normal vs anormal), partos previos (primíparas vs multíparas) y si mostraron estro en la presincronización. La TG fue similar (P>0.1) entre los tratamientos (27 vs 21 %; Ovsynch y PRID5d, respectivamente). Ninguna de las otras variables independientes afectó la TG (P>0.1); no hubo efecto de la interacción de dichas variables con el tratamiento en la TG (P>0.1). Se concluye que la TG fue similar entre las vacas inseminadas con un protocolo Ovsynch o mediante un protocolo Ovsynch modificado que incluyó 5 días de progesterona y la reducción de 7 a 5 días entre la inyección de GnRH y la PGF2α.

Palabras clave: Ovsynch; Progesterona; Fertilidad; Vacas lecheras

Introduction

The low efficiency of estrus detection in dairy herds, has motivated the development of artificial insemination (AI) programs without the need to detect cows in estrus. The first program validated with these characteristics is known as Ovsynch and has served as the basis for other schemes. This program begins with an injection of GnRH in early diestrus (day zero), followed by injection of PGF2α (d 7); subsequently administration of the second GnRH dose (d 9) and insemination occurs 16 h later. The first injection of GnRH induces ovulation or luteinization of ≥ 8 mm diameter follicles, which synchronizes the emergence of a follicular wave, so at the moment of the PGF2α injection cows continue on diestrus and have a preovulatory follicle in the same state of development; with the second injection of GnRH ovulation is induced, which is synchronized with the fixed-time artificial insemination1. The proportion of pregnant cows of the total inseminated [pregnancy rate (PR)] obtained in this program is similar to that attained when cows are inseminated at observed estrus, either natural or synchronized with PGF2α 1,2. However, the advantage of the Ovsynch program is that all cows that are enrolled in the program can be inseminated, while in programs of insemination at observed estrus only those detected in estrus are inseminated (between 40 and 60 % from the total eligible)1,3.

Although the coherent physiological concept of the Ovsynch program, results in dairy herds are not the optimum. Among the most important factors that determine the results are: the stage of the estrous cycle in which the synchronization of the follicular wave starts4, the characteristics of the ovulatory follicle5,6, the cyclicity of the cows enrolled in the program7, the progesterone concentrations during the program8,9, as well as management factors, which determine that not all cows that start the program complete it correctly2.

Within the modifications that have been made to optimize the basic Ovsynch protocol it stresses the inclusion of progesterone10-12. The combination with progesterone has favored the PR up by 10 percentage points8, which is related to a better environment for the ovulatory follicle development13; in addition, the incorporation of progesterone can induce a fertile estrus in females that are in anoestrus or in the transition phase of the anoestrus to cyclicity14. On the other hand, by shortening the time between the first injection of GnRH and the administration of the PGF2α has been a decrease of the period of dominance of the ovulatory follicle. So, a program was developed in which cows are inserted with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device for 5 d. The day of insertion they receive the first injection of GnRH and upon removing the device are injected PGF2α, repeated 24 h later. The second injection of GnRH is at 56 h after removal of the device and cows are inseminated 16 h later10-12.

According to this information, the program with progesterone would generate better results than basic Ovsynch protocol; however, there is no sufficient field studies with dairy cows in which such programs can be contrasted. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to compare the PR between cows inseminated by the common Ovsynch and cows inseminated with an Ovsynch program, in which cows receive progesterone for 5 d and also the period between injection of GnRH and PGF2α is reduced from 7 to 5 d.

Materials and methods

Herd management

The study was conducted between October 2013 and January 2014, in a dairy herd located in Aguascalientes, Ags. The climate of the region is semi-dry, with an annual average temperature of 17.4 °C and average rainfall of 526 mm.

The dairy farm has 3,200 Holstein cows in production, they are milking three times a day with an average production of 9,500 kg. The cows are in pens with free access cubicles and ground floor areas. The cows are fed twice a day with a completely mixed ration, which complies with requirements recommended by the NRC15.

Design of the experiment

Two hundred and seventy five (275) cows of different parity and body condition score greater than 2 (scale of 1 to 5) were pre-synchronized with two PGF2α i.m. injections (Enzaprost®, Ceva Animal Health, Mexico) 14 d apart, at 32 ± 3 d postpartum (DPP). Twelve (12) days after the second PGF2α injection (58 ± 3 DPP), cows were randomly assigned to the following treatments: 1) Group Ovsynch (n=144), received a GnRH i.m injection at 0800 (Cevarelin ®, Ceva Animal Health, Mexico), 7 d later the cows received a PGF2α i.m. injection (Enzaprost®) (65 ± 3 DPP; 0800); 56 h later received a second injection of GnRH (67 ± 3 DPP; 1600) and were fixed-time inseminated 16 h later (68 ± 3 DPP; 0800). 2) Group PRID5d (n=131) received an i.m. GnRH injection at 0800 and a releasing intravaginal progesterone device (PRID Delta ®, Ceva Animal Health, Mexico), which remained in situ for 5 d; upon removing the device (63 ± 3 DPP; 0800) PGF2 α injection was applied followed by the second PGF2α 24 h later; the second dose of GnRH was applied 56 h after removing the device (65 ± 3 DPP 1600) and cows were inseminated at fixed-time 16 h later (66 ± 3 DPP; 0800). After the second injection of PGF2α during the presynchronization period, all the cows were fitted with heat mount detectors patch for estrus detection and the proportion of cows showing estrus was determined. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by rectal palpation between 45 and 50 d post-insemination.

Figure 1 shows the two treatments in a schematic way. It should be noted that in the present study two different insemination timefixed protocols were compared: group PRID5d is different from the Ovsynch group because the first includes 5 d of progesterone and the reduction of 2 d in the period between injection of GnRH and PGF2α (from 7 to 5 d). This clarification is relevant, because having difference between the groups, it could not be established whether due to the inclusion of progesterone or the modification of the interval between the injection of GnRH and PGF2α.

Figure 1 Schematic overview of the treatments. 

Statistical analysis

PR was compared using a logistic regression analysis with the JMP program16. The independent variables were: treatment (Ovsynch vs PRID5d), milk production (≤40 vs >40 kg), AI technician (1 vs 2), type of puerperium [normal vs abnormal (retention of placenta, metritis and endometritis)], parity (primiparous vs multiparous) and estrous response after the second pre-synchronization PGF2α injection (yes vs not).

Results

The PR was similar between treatments (27 vs 21 %; Ovsynch and PRID5d, respectively). There was no effect on PR from the milk production, parity, AI technician, or the type of puerperium (Table 1). The interaction of the treatment with these variables did not affect PR (P>0.1). The proportion of cows showing estrus after PGF2α injection prior to the start of the synchronization of ovulation (first injection of GnRH) was similar between treatments [77 % (111/144) vs 78 % (102/131); Ovsynch and PRID5d, respectively]. The presentation of the estrus prior to the first injection of GnRH did not affect PR and the interaction between treatments with this variable did not affect PR (P>0.1). The PR was similar between the cows that did not show estrus [Ovsynch (12.1 %; 4/33) vs PRID5d (20.7 %; 6/29). P=0.36].

Table 1 Odds ratio for pregnancy probability according to the treatment and some productive and reproductive variables in dairy cows*. 

*There was not interaction (P>0.1) among the treatments and analyzed variables on pregnancy rates (PR).

Discussion

In the present study it was expected that the inclusion of progesterone in the PRID5d group would improve PR; however, the result was similar to that obtained with basic Ovsynch program. The global PR accomplished in both treatments are equal to that obtained in similar synchronization programs17 and also coincides with that obtained by insemination at observed estrus18,19.

It was expected that the cows in the PRID5d protocol had higher PR than cows that did not receive progesterone, as experimental evidence so indicated it8. In several studies, the administration of progesterone during the follicular wave timing and throughout ovulatory follicle maturation has improved PR10,20,21. In addition, cows that are cycling and have a corpus luteum (CL) at the time of the first injection of GnRH have PR greater than cows in anestrus7,22; however, in the present study the cows that received progesterone showed similar PR. The cause of this result is unknown, but some possibilities are exposed in the following paragraphs.

The time of dominance of the ovulatory follicle in Ovsynch programs affects the PR. The ovulation of very small follicles, i.e. follicles that reach the dominance very near the time of the induction of luteal regression, can produce low estradiol concentrations and increase premature regression of the CL of the subsequent estrus cycle (short luteal phase) and loss of pregnancies23-25. On the other hand, the ovulation of follicles with long periods of dominance (too large follicles) also affect the PR, possibly because released oocytes are less competent to develop viable embryos26-28. In protocols of fixed-time insemination in beef cattle10,25,29, the reduction of the period of dominance of the follicle ovulation through the decrease of 2 d between the first injection of GnRH and the administration of PGF2α (7 vs 5 d) in conjunction with the elongation of the proestrus resulted in best PR. The absence of improvement of the PR observed in this study probably lies in that the period between the administration of PGF2α and the induction of ovulation with the second injection of GnRH was 56 h while in the cited studies it was 72 h. This temporary difference may have influenced the characteristics of the ovulatory follicle, giving as a result an ovulation of a small follicle, which is associated with PR reduction25,30.

On the other hand, a disadvantage of reducing the period between the first injection of GnRH and PGF2α (5 d) administration, is that the CL after ovulation induced with GnRH is resistant to the effect of PGF2α 11,12,31. Even in the basic program of Ovsynch whereby after 7 d between GnRH and PGF2α, failure in luteolysis in a range of 5 to 30 % has been observed (incomplete luteolysis)6,32, causing cows to present suprabasal concentrations of progesterone at the time of insemination. Thus, progesterone concentrations above 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL at the time of insemination are associated with low pregnancy rates32. Treatment with two injections of PGF2α with difference of 8 h, or a single injection with a double dose of PGF2α in cows with a CL (with the same days as in the present study) has been evaluated, and in both cases the luteolysis was incomplete31. Although in the present study the cows from the PRID5d group received two injections of PGF2α 24 h apart, it cannot be ruled out that a luteolysis failure has prevented the cows of this group to show a PR increase.

It is also possible, that the absence of a positive effect of the progesterone is because this hormone supplementation favors PR, especially in cows that have not yet started postpartum ovarian activity2,33. In the present study, the proportion of cows showing estrus after PGF2α injection prior to timed artificial insemination program was similar between groups (77 vs 78 %; Ovsynch and PRID5d, respectively), which indicates that a high proportion of them was cycling and would have, hypothetically, a CL at the beginning of the Ovsynch program. In these circumstances, the effect expected for by the addition of progesterone in the synchronized protocol might be irrelevant. It should be noted that in timed artificial insemination programs in anestric beefs cows, the inclusion of progesterone enhances PR in both, Bos taurus10 and Bos indicus34.

The PR in both treatments is consistent with that obtained in similar synchronization programs17,33 or when cows are inseminated after estrous detection18,19. However, the proportion of pregnant cows of the total eligible to inseminate (pregnancy rate) was twice in the programs evaluated in comparison with the that obtained in contemporary inseminated cows when they were detected in estrus (spontaneous or induced) with PGF2α. In the present study, 40 % of the contemporary cows eligible to inseminate were detected in estrus and were served, while 100 % of cows in the evaluated protocols were inseminated. With these data, the pregnancy rate in the experimental groups was 24 % vs 12 % in contemporary cows (this was estimated considering PR of 30 % and 40 % efficiency in estrus detection). It is noteworthy that the pregnancy rate in Mexico varies from 12 to 15 % and is similar to that observed in the United States2,3. This difference in the pregnancy rate could economically justify the fixed-time insemination programs. In a study done in Mexico in 201135, using Monte Carlo methodology36 estimated the economic consequence of changes in the pregnancy rate and found that for every percentage point that it increases in the range of 15 to 20 %, generates an additional income of $748.00 Mexican pesos per cow per year.

Something that should be highlighted in this study is that milk production did not affect the PR. In the past 30 yr there has been an association between the increase in milk production and the decrease of the PR37, although this is not necessarily true. Lopez-Gatius et al38 found that cows that produced more milk (>50 kg) on d 50 postpartum were most fertile. Although a result similar to the above38 was not found in the present study, neither there was not a decrease in the PR in cows that produced more than 40 kg of milk compared to those that produced less than 40 kg.

In the present study, primiparous cows had similar PR to multiparous (31 vs 20 %, respectively, P=0.21), which contrasts with other studies19,38, probably by the few number of observations.

The type of puerperium did not affect the PR, which is different to that found in other studies, in which the cows that had any uterine postpartum pathology were less fertile in the first service than cows with a normal puerperium3. The cause of this result is unknown, but it can be speculated that it is related to the clinical management of the cows with abnormal puerperium, since in addition to receiving the respective drug treatments, they were subjected to systematic PGF2α injection every 14 d from the d 32 post-partum (presincronization). Thus, luteolysis and estrus favored the removal of uterine infections and could avoid its negative effect on the PR of the first service39.

Conclusions and implications

It is concluded that the PR was similar among the cows inseminated with a common Ovsynch program or by using an Ovsynch program which includes 5 d of progesterone and the reduction of 7 to 5 d between injection of GnRH and PGF2α.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by the project IN219811-3 of the National Autonomous University of Mexico. The authors are grateful to the owner of the Rancho Montoro (Aguascalientes, Mexico) support and Ceva Animal Health, Mexico for the donation of the hormonal products.

REFERENCES

1. Pursley JR, Kosorok MR, Wiltbank MC. Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:301-306. [ Links ]

2. Wiltbank MC, Pursley JR. The cow as an induced ovulator: timed AI after synchronization of ovulation. Theriogenology 2014;81:170-185. [ Links ]

3. Hernández-Cerón J, Gutiérrez CG. Factores asociados con la infertilidad en la vaca lechera en sistemas intensivos de producción. Cienc Vet 2007;10:71-91. [ Links ]

4. Alnimer MA, Tabbaa MJ, Ababneh MM. Applying variations of the Ovsynch protocol at the middle of the estrus cycle on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows during summer and winter. Theriogenology 2009;72:731-740. [ Links ]

5. Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Donadeu FX, Bergfelt DR. Mechanism of follicle deviation in monovular farm species. Anim Reprod Sci 2003;78:239-257. [ Links ]

6. Gumen A, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC. Follicular size and response to Ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:3184-3194. [ Links ]

7. Bisinotto RS, Chebel RC, Santos JE. Follicular wave of the ovulatory follicle and not cyclic status influences fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:3578-3587. [ Links ]

8. Bisinotto RS, Ribeiro ES, Martins LT, Marsola RS, Greco LF, Favoreto MG, et al. Effect of interval between induction of ovulation and artificial insemination (AI) and supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:5798-5808. [ Links ]

9. Wiltbank MC, Souza AH, Carvalho PD, Bender RW, Nascimento AB. Improving fertility to timed artificial insemination by manipulation of circulating progesterone concentrations in lactating dairy cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev 2012;24:238-243. [ Links ]

10. Bridges GA, Helser LA, Grum DE, Mussard ML, Gasser CL, Day ML. Decreasing the interval between GnRH and PGF2α from 7 to 5 days and lengthening proestrus increases timed-AI pregnancy rates in beef cows. Theriogenology 2008;69:843-851. [ Links ]

11. Santos JEP, Narciso CD, Rivera F, Thatcher WW, Chebel RC. Effect of reducing the period of follicle dominance in a timed artificial insemination protocol in reproduction of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:2976-2988. [ Links ]

12. Ribeiro ES, Bisinotto RS, Favoreto MG, Martins LT, Cerri RLA, Silvestre FT, et al. Fertility in dairy cows following presynchronization and administering twice the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α as one or two injections in the 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol. Theriogenology 2012;78:273-284. [ Links ]

13. Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Cunha AP, Araújo RR, Wiltbank MC. Double-Ovsynch in high-producing dairy cows: Effects on progesterone concentrations and ovulation to GnRH treatments. Theriogenology 2013;79:159-164. [ Links ]

14. McDougall S, Compton C. Reproductive performance of anestrous dairy cows treated with progesterone and estradiol benzoate. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:2388-2400. [ Links ]

15. NRC. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised edition. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2001. [ Links ]

16. SAS.SAS User‘s Guide: Statistic (Version 9.3). Cary NC, USA Inst. Inc., 2010. [ Links ]

17. Meléndez P, Gonzalez G, Aguilar E, Loera O, Risco C, Archbald LF. Comparison of two estrus-synchronization protocols and timed artificial insemination in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:4567-4572. [ Links ]

18. Flores JOA, Roque VCI, López OR, Benítez SS, Oropeza AMA, Hernández-Cerón J. Porcentaje de concepción en vacas lecheras tratadas con progesterona cinco días después de la inseminación. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2013;4:507-514. [ Links ]

19. Orozco M, Gutierrez CG, Lopez OR, Aguilar C, Roque VCI, Hernandez-Cerón J. Oestral response and fertility in dairy cows treated with progesterone for 6 days prior to oestrus synchronization with prostaglandin F2α [abstract]. Reproduction Fertil Develop 2014;26:118. [ Links ]

20. Stevenson JS, Pursley JR, Garverick Ha, Fricke PM, Kesler DJ, Ottobre JS, et al. Treatment of cycling and noncycling lactating dairy cows with progesterone during ovsynch. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:2567-2578. [ Links ]

21. Wiltbank MC, Souza AH, Giordano JO, Nascimento AB, Vasconcelos JM, Pereira MHC, et al. Positive and negative effects of progesterone during timed AI protocols in lactating dairy cattle. Anim Reprod 2012;9:231-241. [ Links ]

22. Stevenson JS, Tenhouse DE, Krisher RL, Lamb GC, Larson JE, Dahlen CR, et al. Detection of anovulation by heatmount detectors and transrectal ultrasonography before treatment with progesterone in a timed insemination protocol. J Dairy Sci 2008;91:2901-2915. [ Links ]

23. Vasconcelos JLM, Sartori R, Oliveira HN, Guenther JG, Wiltbank MC. Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate. Theriogenology 2001;56:307-314. [ Links ]

24. Perry GA, Smith MF, Lucy MC, Green JA, Parks TE, MacNeil MD, et al. Relationship between follicle size at insemination and pregnancy success. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:5268-5723. [ Links ]

25. Dadarwal D, Mapletoft RJ, Adams GP, Pfeifer LFM, Creelman C, Singh J. Effect of progesterone concentration and duration of proestrus on fertility in beef cattle after fixed-time artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2013;79:859-866. [ Links ]

26. Vasconcelos JLM, Silcox RW, Rosa GJM, Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 1999;52:1067-1078. [ Links ]

27. Bleach EC, Glencross RG, Knight PG. Association between ovarian follicle development and pregnancy rates in dairy cows undergoing spontaneous oestrous cycles. Reproduction 2004;127:621-629. [ Links ]

28. Cerri RLA, Rutigliano HM, Bruno RGS, Santos JEP. Progesterone concentration, follicular development and induction of cyclicity in dairy cows receiving intravaginal progesterone inserts. Anim Reprod Sci 2009;110:56-70. [ Links ]

29. Kasimanickam R, Day ML, Rudolph JS, Hall JB, Whittier WD. Two doses of prostaglandin improve pregnancy rates to timed-AI in a 5-day progesterone-based synchronization protocol in beef cows. Theriogenology 2009;71:762-767. [ Links ]

30. Bridges GA, Mussard ML, Burke CR, Day ML. Influence of the length of proestrus on fertility and endocrine function in female cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;117:208-215. [ Links ]

31. Nascimento AB, Souza AH, Keskin A, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Lack of complete regression of the day 5 corpus luteum after one or two doses of PGF2α in nonlactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology 2014;81:389-395. [ Links ]

32. Souza AH, Gümen A, Silva EPB, Cunha AP, Guenther JN, Peto CM, et al. Supplementation with estradiol-17β before the last gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection of the ovsynch protocol in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:4623-4634. [ Links ]

33. Bisinotto RS, Ribeiro ES, Lima FS, Martinez N, Greco LF, Barbosa LFSP, et al. Targeted progesterone supplementation improves fertility in lactating dairy cows without a corpus luteum at the initiation of the timed artificial insemination protocol. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:2214-2225. [ Links ]

34. Sales JNS, Carvalho JBP, Crepaldi GA, Soares JG, Girotto RW, Maio JRG, et al. Effect of circulating progesterone concentration during synchronization for fixed-time artificial insemination on ovulation and fertility in Bos indicus (Nelore) beef cows. Theriogenology 2015;83:1093-1100. [ Links ]

35. Rios MJA, Hernández-Cerón J, López DCA, Trueta SR. Estimación de la utilidad por vaca al año de acuerdo con los cambios en la tasa de preñez en hatos lecheros en sistemas de producción intensiva [resumen]. Congreso Nacional de Buiatría. 2011:286. [ Links ]

36. Bruijnis MRN, Hogeveen H, Stassen EN. Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:2419-2432. [ Links ]

37. Lucy MC. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? J Dairy Sci 2001;84:1277-1293. [ Links ]

38. López-Gatius F, García-Ispierto I, Santolaria P, Yániz J, Nogareda C, López-Béjar M. Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2006;65:1678-1689. [ Links ]

39. Kasimanickam R, Duffield TF, Foster RA, Gartley CJ, Leslie KE, Walton JS, et al. The effect of a single administration of cephapirin or cloprostenol on the reproductive performance of dairy cows with subclinical endometritis. Theriogenology 2005;63:818-830. [ Links ]

Received: December 09, 2014; Accepted: January 22, 2015

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons