SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.76 número2Arquitectura foliar de AnacardiaceaeLas provincias biogeográficas del Componente Mexicano de Montaña desde la perspectiva de los mamíferos continentales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados




Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO


Revista mexicana de biodiversidad

versión On-line ISSN 2007-8706versión impresa ISSN 1870-3453

Rev. Mex. Biodiv. vol.76 no.2 México dic. 2005


Taxonomía y sistemática


Phylogeny and revision of Erpobdelliformes (Annelida, Arhynchobdellida) from Mexico based on nuclear and mithochondrial gene sequences.

Filogenia y revisión de los Erpobdelliformes (Annelida, Arhynchobdellida) de México, con base en secuencias de ADN nuclear y mitocondrial.


Alejandro Oceguera-Figueroa,1 Virginia León-Règagnon,1* and Mark E. Siddall2

1Laboratorio de Helmintología Dr. Eduardo Caballero y Caballero, Instituto de Biología, UNAM. Apartado postal 70-153, 04510 México, D. F. México

2Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, N.Y. USA.

Recibido 22 mayo 2005; aceptado: 11 octubre 2005


Abstract. The phylogenetic relationships of the suborder Erpobdelliformes, a group of non-sanguivorous leeches, were investigated with the use of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, mitochondrial 12S rDNA and nuclear 18S rDNA. The resulting hypothesis indicates that Erpobdellidae and Salifidae are monophyletic and each other closest relatives. We detect, for first time in leeches, intra-specific variation of similar amount than inter-specific variation. We formally resurrect the name Erpobdella mexicana, proposed by Dugès for Mexican specimens, and recommend the use of the name Erpobdella ochoterenai rather than Erpobdella microstoma for Mexican specimens. We record an invasive species of the family Salifidae: Barbronia arcana in Mexico, representing the first record of the species outside Australia, first record of the family in Mexico and third in the New World.

Key words: Hirudinea, leeches, Erpobdellidae, Salifidae, Erpobdella,Barbronia, COI, 12S, 18S, México, Barcoding of life.

Resumen. Se estudian las relaciones filogenéticas del suborden Erpobdelliformes, un grupo de sanguijuelas no hematófagas de vertebrados, con base en secuencias de la subunidad I del citocromo c oxidasa del ADN mitocondrial, 12S ADNr del ADN mitocondrial y 18S ADNr del ADN nuclear. La hipótesis resultante señala que las familias Salifidae y Erpobdellidae son monofiléticas y hermanas entre sí. Se detecta por primera vez en sanguijuelas variación interespecífica de magnitud similar a la variación interespecífica. Formalmente se reslece el nombre empleado por Dugès: Erpobdella mexicana para las formas mexicanas, así como se argumenta sobre el uso del nombre Erpobdella ochoterenai en lugar de Erpobdella microstoma para las formas mexicanas. Se registra a una especie invasora de la familia Salifidae en México: Barbronia arcana, el cual constituye el primer registro de la especie fuera de Australia, primer registro de la familia en México y tercero en el continente americano.

Palabras clave: Hirudinea, sanguijuelas, Erpobdellidae, Salifidae, Erpobdella,Barbronia, COI, 12S, 18S, México, Código de Barras genético.


Erpobdelliform leeches are macrophagous predators of aquatic invertebrates including arthropods, mollusks and annelids, having abandoned the blood feeding habits of their ancestors (Siddall and Burreson, 1998; Apakupakul et al., 1999; Trontelj et al., 1999; Borda and Siddall, 2003). Members of the Erpobdellidae Blanchard, 1894, common in North America and Europe, are characterized by their possession of multiple testisacs per segment. The other family of erpobdelliforms, Salifidae Johansson, 1910, are common in Asia, Africa and Australia, and typically are characterized by their possession of pharyngeal stylets, few testisacs per somite, gastropore and/or post-cephalic eyespots (Sawyer, 1986). Genera in Erpobdellidae (Erpobdella, Dina, Mooreobdella, Trocheta, Nephelopsis, Motobdella and Croatobranchus) were eslished principally on annulation pattern, presence or absence of preatrial loops in the male reproductive system, presence or absence of gastric caeca and of body appendages. Recent phylogenetic studies based on morphology and DNA sequence data showed that a radical revision of the family was required because the morphological characters used to distinguish groups are not informative with respect to phylogenetic affinities (Trontelj and Sket, 2000; Siddall, 2002). For this reason, Siddall (2002) formally synonymized all the genera of Erpobdellidae with Erpobdella. Molecular and morphological phylogenetic analysis of Arhynchobdellidae (Borda and Siddall, 2003) confirmed the sister relationship between Erpobdellidae and Salifidae, although a single 18S rDNA sequence of Barbronia weberi was available to represent the family Salifidae.

In Mexico, three erpobdellid species have been found: Erpobdella triannulata Moore, 1908; Erpobdella ochoterenai (Caballero, 1932), described as Herpobdella (sic) ochoterenai, transferred to the genus Mooreobdella by Sawyer and Shelley (1976) due the absence of preatrial loops in the male reproductive system, and later transferred to Erpobdella by Siddall (2002). López-Jiménez (1985) considered that Erpobdella ochoterenai should be considered as a junior synonym of Mooreobdella microstoma, criteria followed by Badillo-Solís et al. (1998); and finally, Erpobdella punctata (Leidy, 1870). Mexican specimens of E. punctata were described as Nephelis mexicana Dugès 1876. Specimens of Nephelis mexicana were deposited in the United States National Museum and in the Musée d´Histoire Naturelle of Paris. Moore (1898) studied specimens of the first collection and considered that Nephelis mexicana is synonym of Dina quadristriata. Soos (1966) considered both: Nephelis mexicana and Dina quadristriata as synonyms of Dina lineata. Ringuelet (1976) revised the material from both collections and concluded that Mexican specimens correspond to Erpobdella punctata and latter named them as Erpobdella punctata mexicana (Ringuelet, 1981). The subspecific status of Mexican specimens is based on the presence of a curve of each ejaculatory duct previous to the respective cornua (horn, seminal vesicle). Oka (1932) recorded Herpobdella lineata and Herpobdella octoculata from Mexico but Caballero (1937) considered both records as Herpobdella punctata.

No native salifid species is known to occur in Mexico, but recently, Barbronia weberi (Blanchard, 1897), an invasive leech from Asia, was recorded in Brazil and USA (Pamplin and Rocha, 2000; Rutter and Klemm, 2001). The aim of this study is to investigate the taxonomic validity and phylogenetic affinities of Mexican Erpobdelliformes using molecular data.

Material and methods

We collected specimens from ten localities from 2003 to 2005, belonging to four species of Erpobdelliformes (Scientific Collecting License FAUT0056 to VLR). All specimens were found attached to submerged rocks and plants, collected by hand and fixed in 4% formalin or 96% ethanol, stored in 70% ethanol. Voucher specimens are deposited in the "Colección Nacional de Helmintos" (CNHE), Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. We re-analysed the phylogenetic relationships of Erpobdelliformes with the newly collected material, using sequences of two mitochondrial and one nuclear gene. Sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, mitochondrial 12S and nuclear 18S rDNA of ten specimens from Mexico were generated in the present study. Sequences from 13 species of Erpobdelliformes from previous phylogenetic analyses were included in the present analyses. Outgroup taxa were selected based on previous phylogenetic hypotheses (Siddall, 2002; Borda and Siddall, 2003); they comprise species of the Hirudiniformes (Cylicobdella coccinea, Haemopis sanguisuga, Macrobdella decora)and Americobdella valdiviana ( Table 1 ).

DNA extraction and purification. Specimens were stored in 100% ethanol until used for DNA extraction. Tissue from the caudal sucker was used in order to minimize the possibility of contamination from prey DNA found in the gastric and intestinal region. Standard phenol-chloroform extraction methods were used to recover DNA from specimens. Laboratory protocols followed Hillis et al. (1996) and Palumbi (1996).

Nuclear and mithochondrial DNA sequence amplification. PCR amplifications of nuclear 18S rDNA, mitochondrial 12S rDNA and partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) were used for the molecular phylogenetic study. To obtain 18S rDNA fragments, the primers pairs "AL","CY" and "BO" were used yielding three overlapping double stranded DNA fragments of approximately 600 base pairs (bp) each. (Apakupakul et al., 1999). Primers used to amplify 18S rDNA, 12S and COI are shown in Table 2. Amplification reactions contained 0.625 units of Amplificasa (Biogenica), 2.5 µl of 10X buffer, 1.5 mM of magnesium chloride 20X, 2 mM of each dNTP (8 mM total), 1 µm of each primer, 1 µm of template and distilled, sterilized water to 25 µl. Reactions were accomplished with thermocycler Mastercycler® gradient 5331 (Eppendorf Scientific).

The following amplification protocols were used: 18S-heated to 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C (15 s), 44 °C (20 s), and 70 °C (90 s) and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min; 12S-heated to 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C (1 min), 52 °C (1 min), and 70 °C(1 min) and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min; and COI heated to 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 15 cycles of 94 °C (45 s), 47 °C (45 s), and 72 °C (45 s), then 25 cycles of 94 °C (20s), 45 °C (20 s), and 72 °C (30 s) and final extension at 72 °C for 6 min. The QIAquick PCR Purification Kit protocol (Qiagen) was used to purify amplification products.

DNA sequencing. Amplification products were sequenced in both directions. Each 10µl sequencing reaction mixture included 2µl BigDye (Applied Biosystems), 2µl of Dye ‘extender‘ buffer (1 M Tris, pH 9; 25 mM MgCl2), 0.25 µl of 10 µM primer and 3 µl of gene amplification product. Samples were sequenced in a thermocycler Mastercycler® gradient 5331 (Eppendorf Scientific). Samples were purified in Centrisep Spin Columns (Princeton separations) and electrophoresed in an ABI Prism 310 sequencer.

DNA sequence alignment. Sequence of complementary strands were edited and reconciled with Sequence Navigator (Bioedit). Alignments of the 18S rDNA and 12S rDNA gene sequences were acomplished using Clustal W. 18S sequences vary from 1804 to1859 bp, the resulting alignment was 1888 positions. 12S rDNA sequences vary from 334 to 367 bp, the resulting alignment was 381 positions. Alignment of 649 bp of COI was done by eye across all taxa because there were no insertions or deletions.

Phylogenetic analyses. Parsimony analyses were performed using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2000). Heuristic search used 1000 replicates of random taxon addition and tree-bisection-reconnection branch swapping. All charachters were unweighted and non-additive. Bootstrap values were obtained with PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2000). AutoDecay ver. 4.0 (Eriksson, 1998) was used to calculate Bremer support values (Bremer, 1988). Consistency and retention indices were calculated with PAUP* (Swofford, 2000).


Material examined. Four leeches from Laguna Texhuil, Xochimilco, Mexico City (CNHE 5328), 28 July 2004; 5 specimens from Totolcingo lake, Tlaxcala (CNHE 5326), 22 August 2002; 13 specimens from Ameca River, Jalisco (CNHE 5327), 19 September 2002; 79 specimens from Ameca River, near La Vega dam, Jalisco (CNHE 5325), 9 November 2003. Each specimen with one pair of labial eyespots and two pairs of bucal eyespots. A mid-dorsal black line along the body occurs in almost all cases; in some specimens, an additional pair of marginal lines along the body are visible. Male gonopore on XII b2/a2, but in some specimens are displaced to b2. Female gonopore between somites XII and XIII. Three or three and a half annuli between gonopores. Male reproductive system without preatrial loops. This suite of morphological features is consistent with Caballero´s (1932) description of Herpobdella ochoterenai.

Nine leeches from Atlangatepec lake, Tlaxcala (CNHE 5323), 21 August 2002. Six specimens from Parque Nacional Fuentes Brotantes, Tlalpan, Mexico, D. F. (CNHE 5324), 8 April 2004. Four leeches from La Olla dam, Guanajuato (CNHE 4702, 5354), 6 February 2003. Each specimen with one pair of labial eyespots and two pairs of bucal eyespots. One pair of paramedian dorsal black lines. Male gonopore on somite XII b2/a2, Female gonopore on XII b5/b6. Two annuli between gonopores. Male reproductive system provided with a preatrial loop to ganglion XI and a curve of each ejaculatory duct previous to the respective cornua. This suite of morphological features is consistent with the description of Dugès of Nephelis mexicana.

Four leeches from Catemaco Lake, Veracruz (CNHE 5330), 9 August 2002. Five leeches from El Espino, Tabasco (CNHE 4701, 5355). Each specimen with one pair of labial eyespots and two pairs of bucal eyespots. A wide mid-dorsal black line along the body occurs and an additional pair of marginal lines along the body are visible in specimens from Veracruz. Specimens from Tabasco, with one pair of paramedial dorsal black lines. Male gonopore on somite XII b1/b2. Female gonopore on XII b5/b6. Three annuli between gonopores. Male reproductive system provided with a preatrial loop to ganglion XI. This suite of morphological features is consistent with Moore´s (1908) description of Erpobdella triannulata and redescription by López-Jiménez (1985).

Three leeches form Amacuzac River, Morelos (CNHE 5342), 14 September 2003. Each specimen with one pair of labial eyespots and two pairs of bucal eyespots. One pair of diffused marginal dark lines. Two copulatory pores on X/XI and XIII/XIV respectively. Male gonopore on somite XII b 1. Female gonopore on XII/XIII. Without pharyngeal stylets. A pair of lateral postcaeca in the posterior part of the caeca. This suite of morphological features is consistent with the redescription of Barbronia arcana of Govedich et al. (2002)

Molecular data. Genetic divergence among distant populations (> 500 km) of E. ochoterenai ranges between 8.6-11.6 in COI, 0.2-0.3% in 18S and 4.7-9.4% in 12s, while divergence among sequences of sister species, easily distinguishable based on morphological characters, like Erpobdella punctata and E. melanostoma, is 14.2% in COI, 0.8% in 18s and 5.5% in 12s. The same phenomenon is observed among populations (separated > 150 km from each other) of E. mexicana (divergence ranging from 4.2-11.9% in COI, 0-0.2% in 18s and 4.1-10.5% in 12s).

Parsimony analysis of 649 nucleotides of COI resulted on a single tree of 1236 steps, CI= 0.38 and RI=0.34. This unique tree failed to recognize the monophyly of Erpobdelliformes. Parsimony analysis of 18S rDNA alone (1888 characters) resulted in 97 equally most-parsimonious trees, each of which had 720 steps; CI=0.74; RI=0.76. The strict consensus of the 97 trees recognized the major groups of Erpobdelliformes, but showed no resolution in terminal taxa. Parsimony analysis of 12S rDNA alone resulted in 3 trees, of 699 steps, CI=0.57 and RI=0.34. The strict consensus of those trees recognized the major groups of Erpobdelliformes. Parsimony analysis of all available data, 2918 characters from the three molecular data sets yielded one most-parsimonious tree (Figure 1); 2720 steps long, CI=0.52 and RI=0.52.



The result of the phylogenetic analysis of Erpobdelliformes from Mexico based on two mitochondrial and one nuclear gene sequences, using Americobdella valdiviana and three Hirudiniformes as outgroups, support the phylogenetic results of Siddall (2002) and Borda and Siddall (2003). These authors found two clades of North American erpobdellids, one of them bearing two pairs of labial eyespots, while species included in the other present only one pair, a plesiomorphic condition for Erpobdelliformes. Mexican Erpobdellidae, which also exhibit one pair of labial eyespots, group within the later (Figure 1), previously the genus Mooreobdella, but for which there is no obvious morphological synapomorphy (Siddall, 2002).

Three samples of Erpobdella punctata mexicana from Mexico included in this analysis appear in a single strongly supported clade, separated from Erpobdella punctata from Canada, that appears as the sister species of E. melanostoma. Based on this, there is no reason to consider Mexican specimens as a synonym or subspecies of E. punctata. We formally resurrect the specific epithet mexicana of Dugès to the Mexican specimens: Erpobdella mexicana (Dugès, 1876). Even though E. mexicana and E. punctata are very similar in the presence of one pair of labial eyespots, two annuli between gonopores and preatrial loops in the male reproductive system, E. mexicana is easily distinguishable based on the presence of a curve in each ejaculatory duct anterior to the respective cornua. According to our results, previous records of E. punctata from Mexico must be transferred to E. mexicana. However, records of Oka (1932) considered to be Herpobdella punctata by Caballero (1937) have to be re-evaluated; Oka argued that his Herpobdella lineata and H. octoculata each have three annuli between gonopores, which clearly is not the condition of H. mexicana. Therefore, those records should be considered as Erpobdella ochoterenai, the species that Caballero described five years earlier (Caballero, 1932).

The four samples of Erpobdella ochoterenai from different localities of Mexico appear in a single strongly supported clade. The sister relationship between E. ochoterenai (without preatrial loops in the male reproductive system), with Erpobdella costata (presenting preatrial loops), confirms the poor systematic value of this morphological character. Other species without preatrial loops include: Erpobdella melanostoma. E. bucera and E. lineata, none of which group together.

As noted before (Sawyer and Shelley, 1976; Klemm, 1982), E. ochoterenai is difficult to distinguish from Erpobdella microstoma from USA because both species show three annuli between gonopores and lack preatrial loops in the male reproductive system. López-Jiménez (1985) suggested that Erpobdella ochoterenai should be a junior synonym of E. microstoma. Revision of Mexican specimens revealed that a mid-dorsal black line along the body occurs in almost all cases, even in fixed specimens. In some specimens, an additional pair of marginal lines along the body are visible. Moore´s original description of Erpobdella microstoma states "Not one of many examples of both young and old shows any pigment. This would indicate that during life they are red, the color of the blood showing through the integuments" (Moore, 1901). In a more recent account of USA leeches, Klemm (1982) argued that E. microstoma lacks black pigments. Despite no molecular data of E. microstoma being available to compare with mexican specimens, the use of the name E. ochoterenai for Mexican forms is strongly recommended.

Erpobdella triannulata is represented in this analysis by two samples that appear together in a clade with high bootstrap and Bremer values. Erpobdella triannulata is the member of the family that shows the most southern distribution and appears basal in the same clade with E. costata from Georgia and E. ochoterenai from Mexico. Bootstrap and Bremer support values are very low in basal branches of this clade, making any biogeographical interpretation premature. Also, geological history of Mexican territory has been very complex, producing extremely complicated biogeographic patterns (Marshall and Liebherr, 2000; Brooks, 2005). Additional samples from a wider geographical representation, especially those from the Southwestern United States, like those of the genus Motobdella (Davies et al., 1985; Govedich et al., 1998), are needed in order to clarify the biogeographic history of this group.

Based on the available data, it is impossible to distinguish if the large amount of genetic divergence among populations of Erpobdella mexicana and E. ochoterenai corresponds to intraspecific variation or if they are in fact cryptic species complexes; the ultimate determination of which may have substantial implications for ongoing efforts in DNA barcoding of the world's leech fauna (e.g., Siddall and Budinoff, 2005; DeSalle et al., 2005). Sampling of additional populations of these species is needed in order to clarify this question. Notably, sequence information is known only for single specimens of the taxa previously investigated by Siddall (2002) and by Trontelj and Sket (2000). Whether this degree of intraspecific variability in Erpobdelliformes is a general characteristic of the group would be revealed by more extensive sampling of multiple populations of other species in the genus. Species delimitation and identification on the basis of DNA-barcodes, typically relying on the CO-I locus, are predicated on there being a marked disparity between intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation. As such, barcode of life initiatives must be wary of conditions where that disparity is absent. A case already is known from leeches, where there is a lack of intraspecific genetic distance among species of Theromyzon (Siddall et al., 2005). Herein, we are seeing a case where apparently interspecific and intraspecific genetic distances are of similar magnitude for species of Erpobdella (Fig. 1). Notably, and unlike the DNA barcode-based delimitation of species of Astrapes (Lepidoptera) in Area Guanacaste, Costa Rica (Hebert et al., 2004), our evaluation of Mexican Erpobdella species has considered a much larger geographic range (> 500 km). It is necessary to explore the entire distribution range of these taxa in a continuous manner to ensure that resulting discontinuities are in fact delimiting cryptic species and are not artifacts of discontinuous sampling.

Because only species of Erpobdellidae are distributed naturally in the New World, preliminary comparisons of specimens from Amacuzac River in Morelos were done only with members of this family, but clear morphological differences were detected, like one pair of accessory copulatory pores in the ventral mid-line, one anterior and one posterior to the male and female gonopores. A salifid species, Barbronia weberi Blanchard, 1897 from India also presents accesory copulatory pores and is well known as a widespread invasive species in all continents (Moore, 1946; Mason, 1976; Pamplin and Rocha, 2000; Rutter and Klemm, 2001; Govedich et al., 2002). A detailed analysis of internal morphology revealed some differences between our specimens and Barbronia weberi. Our specimens present a pair of crop caeca and lack pharyngeal stylets, contrary to B. weberi that lacks crop caeca and presents pharyngeal stylets. These characteristics make our specimens identical to Barbronia arcana from Australia. The position of Barbronia arcana in the cladogram, as sister species of Barbronia weberi, confirms the morphological observations. The current distribution of B. arcana in Mexico is unknown, however, specimens were found in the northern Balsas River tributary. Balsas River drains into the Pacific Ocean (Tamayo and West, 1964). Based on known ecological characteristics of B. weberi, like rapid growth and the ability of adults and cocoons to be transported by aquatic plants (Govedich et al., 2003), we can expect that B. arcana could be dispersed in almost all the Balsas River. Obviously, this remains to be confirmed. This is the first record of Barbronia arcana outside Australia and the third record of the family Salifidae in the New world. The position of B. arcana in the cladogram corroborate the sister relationship between Erpobdellidae and Salifidae and the monophyly of the Suborder Erpobdelliformes. Additional samples from a wider taxonomic representation of Salifidae, are needed in order to establish the phylogenetic relationships of this group.

Geographic distributions of clades of erpobdelliform leeches reflect vicariance patterns seen for other non-blood-feeding leeches in the family Glossiphoniidae (Siddall et al., 2005). Specifically, there is a pair North American / Eurasian sister group relationships in the genus Erpobdella represented, on the one hand, by E. dubia and E. obscura sister to the Eurasian E. octoculata group, and on the other hand, the European E. lineata and E. mestrovi sister to the North American remainder of the genus. Notably too, more basal lineages of Erpobdelliformes retain a distribution restricted to Gondwanan continents (with the exception of recent introductions of B. weberi). Taken together these patterns imply an origin of the genus Erpobdella following the opening of the Tethys (~175 Mya) with simultaneous isolation of North American and European taxa with the rifting of Laurasia and the opening of the North Atlantic (~100 Mya).


We thank Florencia Bertoni-Ruiz, Elisa Cabrera-Guzmán, Yssel Gadar-Aguayo, Lorena Garrido, Serapio López-Jiménez, Elizabeth Martínez-Salazar, Rosario Mata-López, Ricardo Paredes, Rogelio Rosas-Valdés, Luis Zambrano and Victoria Contreras for their field assistance. Laura Márquez assisted in the sequencing of samples. Frederic Govedich provided us with valuable literature. This study was partially funded by CONACyT and DGEP in the form of a graduate scholarship to AOF, by NSF 0102383 to J. Campbell (UTA) and VLR, by NSF 0119329 to MES and with the generous support of the Richard Lounsbery Foundation.


Apakupakul, K., M. E. Siddall, and E. M. Burreson. 1999. Higher level relationships of leeches (Annelida: Clitellata: Euhirudinea) based on morphology and gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 350-359.         [ Links ]

Badillo-Solís, A., R. Pérez-Rodríguez, and R. Lamothe-Argumedo. 1998. Taxonomía e importancia ecológica de las "sanguijuelas" (Annelida:Hirudinea) en tres embalses del estado de Tlaxcala. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 48: 57-64.         [ Links ]

Borda, E. and M. E. Siddall. 2003. Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30:213-225.         [ Links ]

Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.         [ Links ]

Brooks, D. R. 2005. Historical biogeography in the age of complexity: expansion and integration. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76: 79-94.         [ Links ]

Caballero, y C. E. 1932. Herpobdella ochoterenai, nov. sp. Caballero. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 3:33-39.         [ Links ]

Caballero, y C. E. 1937. Hirudíneos del Valle del Mezquital, Hgo. XII. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 8: 181-188.         [ Links ]

Davies, R. W., R. N. Singhal, and D. W. Blinn. 1985. Erpobdella montezuma (Hirudinoidea: Erpobdellidae), a new species of freshwater leech from North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:965-969.         [ Links ]

DeSalle, R., M. G. Egan, and M. E. Siddall. 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 360: 1905-1916         [ Links ]

Eriksson, T. 1998. AutoDecay ver. 4.0 (program distributed by the author). Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm.         [ Links ]

Govedich, F. R., B. A. Bain, M. Burd, and R. W. Davies. 2003. Reproductive biology of the invasive Asian freshwater leech Barbronia weberi (Blanchard, 1897). Hydrobiologia 510: 125-129.         [ Links ]

Govedich, F. R., B. A. Bain, and R. W. Davies. 2002. First record of the Asian freshwater leech Barbronia weberi (Blanchard, 1897) (Euhirudinea: Erpobdellidae) in Australia. The Victorian Naturalist 119:225-226.         [ Links ]

Govedich, F. R., D. W. Blinn, P. Keim, and R. W. Davies. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of three genera of Erpobdellidae (Hirudinoidea), with a description of a new genus, Motobdella, and species, Motobdella sedonensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 2164-2171.         [ Links ]

Hebert, P. D., E. H. Penton, J. M. Burns, D. H. Janzen, and W. Hallwachs. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 14812-14817.         [ Links ]

Hillis, D. M., B. K. Mable, and Moritz, C. 1996. Nucleic Acids IV: Sequencing and cloning. In Molecular Systematics, D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable (eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. p. 321-383.         [ Links ]

Klemm D. J. 1982. Leeches (Annelida: Hirudinea) of North America. United States Environmental Protection Agency 600/3-82-025. 177 p.         [ Links ]

López-Jiménez, S. 1985. Estudio Taxonómico de algunos hirudíneos de México. Tesis de Licenciatura, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México, D. F. 182 p.         [ Links ]

Marshall, C. J. and J. K. Liebherr. 2000. Cladistic biogeography of the Mexican transition zone. Journal of Biogeography 27: 203-216.         [ Links ]

Mason, J. 1976. Studies on the freshwater and terrestral leeches of New Zealand. 2. Orders Gnathobdelliformes and Pharyngobdelliformes. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 6: 255-276.         [ Links ]

Moore, J. P. 1898. The Leeches of the U.S. National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 21:543-563.         [ Links ]

Moore, J. P. 1901. The Hirudinea of Illinois. Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History Bulletin 5:479-547.         [ Links ]

Moore, J. P. 1908. The leeches of Lake Amatitlan. In The Zoology of lakes Amatitlan and Atitlan, Guatemala, with special reference to ichtyology. S. E. Meek (ed.) Field Columbian Museum. Zoological Series 7: 199-201.         [ Links ]

Moore, J. P. 1946. Leeches (Hirudinea) from the Hawaiian Islands, and two new species from the Pacific region in the Bishop Museum Collection. Occasional Papers of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum 18: 171-191.         [ Links ]

Oka, A. 1932. Hirudinées Extraeuropeennes du Musée Zologique Polonais. Annales Musei Zoologici Polonici 9: 313-328.         [ Links ]

Pamplin, P. and O. Rocha. 2000. First report of Barbronia weberi (Hirudinea: Erpobdelliformes: Salifidae) from South America. Revista de Biología Tropical 48: 723.         [ Links ]

Palumbi, S. R. 1996. Nucleic Acids II: The Polymerase Chain Reaction. In Molecular Systematics, D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable (eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. p. 205-247.         [ Links ]

Ringuelet, R. A. 1976. Los caracteres endosomáticos de Haementeria officinalis de Filipi, diagnosis del género y un estudio de antiguos ejemplares de Nephelis mexicana Dugès, 1876 (Hirudinea). Limnobios 1: 164-166.         [ Links ]

Ringuelet, R. A. 1981. Clave para el reconocimiento de los hirudíneos de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 52:89-97.         [ Links ]

Rutter, R. P. and D. J. Klemm. 2001. The presence of an Asian leech, Barbronia weberi, in a home aquarium in South Florida (Hirudinea: Salifidae). Florida Scientist 64: 216-218.         [ Links ]

Sawyer, R. T. 1986. Leech Biology and Behavior. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1065 p.         [ Links ]

Sawyer, R. T. and R. M. Shelley. 1976. New records and species of leeches (Annelida: Hirudinea) from North and South Carolina. Journal of Natural History 10: 65-97.         [ Links ]

Siddall, M. E. 2002. Phylogeny of the leech family Erpobdellidae (Hirudinea: Oligochaeta). Invertebrate Systematics 16:1-16.         [ Links ]

Siddall, M. E. and R. B. Budinoff. 2005. DNA-barcoding evidence for widespread introductions of a leech from the South American Helobdella triserialis complex. Conservation Genetics 6:467-472.         [ Links ]

Siddall, M. E., R. B. Budinoff, and E. Borda. 2005. Phylogenetic evaluation of systematics and biogeography of the leech family Glossiphoniidae. Invertebrate Systematics 19:105-112.         [ Links ]

Siddall, M. E. and E. M. Burreson. 1998. Phylogeny of leeches (Hirudinea) based on motochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 156-162.         [ Links ]

Soos, A. 1966. Identification key to the leech (Hirudinoidea) genera of the world, with a catalogue of the species. III. Family: Erpobdellidae. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 12: 371-407.         [ Links ]

Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.         [ Links ]

Tamayo J. L. and R. C. West. 1964. The Hydrography of Middle America. In Handbook of Middle American Indians. Vol I. Natural Environments and Early Cultures. R. West (ed.). University of Texas Press. Austin. p. 84-121         [ Links ]

Trontelj, P. and B. Sket. 2000. Molecular re-assessment of some phylogenetic, taxonomic and biogeographic relationships between the leech genera Dina and Trocheta (Hirudinea: Erpobdellidae). Hydrobiologia 438: 227-235.         [ Links ]

Trontelj, P., B. Sket, and G. Steinbrük. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of leeches: Congruence of nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA data sets and the origin of bloodsucking. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 37:141-147.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons