SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número4Uso de algoritmos de aprendizaje automático para la detección de trastornos neurocognitivos preexistentes en adultos hospitalizados con COVID-19: un estudio de clasificaciónVariabilidad clínica en el síndrome de la persona rígida: una revisión sistemática de presentaciones atípicas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de neurociencia

versión On-line ISSN 2604-6180versión impresa ISSN 1665-5044

Rev. mex. neurocienc. vol.27 no.4 Ciudad de México jul./ago. 2026  Epub 20-Ago-2026

https://doi.org/10.24875/rmn.25000050 

Review articles

Traumatic axonal injury: a review

Daño axonal traumático: una revisión

Laura A. Mendoza-Larios1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-528X

Ana L. Calderón-Garcidueñas2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-3825

Xóchitl Arreola-Guillén1 

Fernando García-Dolores1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-1877

1Forensic Medicine, Instituto de Servicios Periciales y Ciencias Forenses

2Department of Neuropathology, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Manuel Velasco Suárez. Mexico City, Mexico


Abstract

A systematic review of current concepts was conducted to determine the focus of published articles. A systematic review was conducted using the keywords "Traumatic axonal injury (TAI)." The PubMed database was searched from January 2023 to October 2024. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. TAI is a common pathology in traumatic brain injury. However, this diagnosis is generally not considered, except in its severe form, in a patient without specific or localized brain lesions, who is in a coma at the scene. In this review, articles on imaging studies and biomarkers constituted 55% of the publications. Neuropathological studies accounted for only 9%. It is necessary to perform postmortem histopathological examinations of patients with acute and chronic TAI to compare the findings with the results of controlled animal experiments. Research into the extent of neuronal and axonal damage and its chronology will allow a better understanding of the pathophysiology. This knowledge is essential for determining therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Traumatic axonal injury; Diagnosis; Biological markers; Neuropathology

Resumen

Se realizó una revisión sistemática de los conceptos actuales sobre la lesión axonal traumática (TAI) para determinar el enfoque de los artículos publicados. Se utilizaron las palabras clave "Traumatic axonal injury" y la base de datos PubMed para el periodo comprendido entre enero de 2023 y octubre de 2024. Se emplearon las directrices PRISMA. La TAI es una patología común en el daño traumático cerebral. Sin embargo, este diagnóstico generalmente no se considera, excepto en la forma grave, en pacientes sin lesiones cerebrales específicas o localizadas que se encuentran en coma en el lugar de los hechos. En esta revisión, los artículos sobre estudios de imagen y biomarcadores constituyeron el 55% de las publicaciones, mientras que los estudios neuropatológicos representaron solo el 9%. Es necesario realizar exámenes histopatológicos post mortem de pacientes con TAI aguda y crónica para comparar los hallazgos con los resultados de experimentos controlados en animales. La investigación sobre la extensión del daño neuronal y axonal y su cronología permitirá comprender mejor la fisiopatología. Este conocimiento es fundamental para determinar dianas terapéuticas.

Palabras clave: Daño axonal traumático; Diagnóstico; Marcadores biológicos; Neuropatología

Introduction

Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is a mechanical disruption of neuronal axon cytoskeleton resulting in proteolysis, swelling, and molecular changes secondary to traumatic blunt injury to the brain1. In this context, it may present as a single brain injury in a traumatized patient, or accompany localized brain injuries, such as hematomas, lacerations, etc.,1.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health problem and has the highest incidence of all common neurological disorders. The TBI population-based incidence annual rates reported by the first Lancet Neurology Commission on TBI were 811/100,000 in New Zealand, and 979/100,000 in North America; hospital discharge rates in the European Union were 287.2/100 000 people/year.2 The mortality rate is equally as worrying as the years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability. In Europe, each TBI death is associated with 24 YLLs.2 Although there are no global statistics on TAI, it is known that 60% of patients with severe TBI have TAI; patients with severe TBI and TAI have a mortality rate of 16%.2

In the United States, over 1.5 million cases of TBI are reported annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Glasgow coma scale (GCS), classifies TBI in mild (13-15), moderate (9-12), and severe (< 8) injury.3 TAI affects the white matter tracts in the brain, and the manifestations that clinically affected patients may present range from the minimal to being in a comatose state. Our goal was to make a review of TAI, to provide the current concepts in this topic, familiarize the physician with this pathology and analyze the type and focus of the published articles.

Materials and methods

For this review, only the search terms "Traumatic axonal injury" were used. PubMed databases were screened from January 2023 to October 2024. All articles published during the selected period were included for review, provided that at least the abstract was in English. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were employed (Fig. 1). The inclusion criteria were: articles focused on TAI in humans and animals. The exclusion criteria were: focus on TBI but not TAI, and duplicated articles. The search in PubMed with these keywords provided 401 articles in the period studied. In spite of the search terms, most of these articles focused on different types of brain trauma, not specifically on TAI.

Figure 1 Flowchart diagram of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) review on traumatic axonal injury. 

Articles were excluded by two of us (ALCG, FGD) by title or by review of the abstract, because they did not refer to the subject (n = 66) or they were repeated (n = 3). Of the remaining 332 articles, 24 referred to experimental TBI, but not to TAI, and were eliminated. From the remaining 308 articles, 264 were excluded; 149 of them because they referred to TBI but not to TAI in humans. The remaining articles referred to TBI but not to TAI in animals. After discarding those articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 44 papers were included in this review (Fig. 1).3-47

This initial review was conducted independently by both authors, and those articles that were excluded by one author but not the other, were subsequently re-evaluated until an agreement was reached based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

The articles published on TAI, in the period analyzed, were mostly reviews (n = 16), clinical observational studies (n = 18), postmortem studies (n = 4), case reports (n = 3), experimental studies in animals (n = 2), and a clinical experimental pilot study (n = 1).

TBI is a global public health problem. Although it affects between 800 and 1200 people/100,000, not all require hospitalization. The manifestations of TBI are multiple. The patient may have experienced a concussion or become comatose, with lesions that include fractured skull bones, dural laceration, epidural and subdural hematomas, subarachnoid hemorrhage, parenchymal hematomas, contusion, laceration and cerebral infarction. A common but not always recognized TBI is TAI.4

Pathophysiology

Damage is initiated by the tearing of axons in the brain white matter, usually due to a blunt trauma.3,4 It conditions a series of changes at the cellular level that magnify the damage, including alteration in ionic flow, especially of calcium; cytoskeletal disorganization; actin-spectrin complex degradation; alteration in neurofilament structure; mitochondrial damage; oxidative stress, and activation of apoptosis. Axonal transport disruption is evident after 24 h post-injury associated to deposit of amyloid protein pre-cursor (APP).4 Depending of the trauma intensity, petechial hemorrhages are also present in moderate-to-severe TAI, as a consequence of rapid acceleration and deceleration forces with damage of the capillaries, constituting the "micro-bleeds," an indirect marker of TAI.5

Clinical diagnosis and diagnostic imaging

How is TAI clinically suspected in a trauma patient? It is necessary to evaluate clinical and imaging characteristics. The severe form of TAI is considered in a patient with head trauma without demonstrable mass lesion but with a low GCS score (≤ 8) for more than 6 h, plus findings of multiple small white matter lesions in the grey-white matter junction.6 When a patient arrives at a shock-trauma room, the Glasgow scale is applied, which gives a quick idea of the severity of brain damage by evaluating three parameters: (A) Eye Opening (E): 4-spontaneous, 3-to voice, 2-to pain, 1-none; (B) Verbal response (V): 5-normal conversation, 4-oriented conversation, 3-words, but not coherent, 2-no words, only sounds, 1-none, and (C) Motor response (M): 6-normal, 5-localized to pain, 4-withdraws to pain, 3-decorticate posture, 2-decerebrate. A score of 13-15 is considered mild; 9-12 moderate, and ≤ 8, severe brain damage.6

Clinical severity of TAI correlated with three grades of progressive and cumulative damage: Grade 1, white matter injury of cerebral hemispheres; Grade 2, focal injury in the corpus callosum; Grade 3, lesion in the brainstem6. Even concussions may be associated with TAI. A concussion is a transient disturbance of brain function, usually < 15 minutes, secondary to mild TBI. Concussion studies in animal models and human subjects have shown TAI histopatologically.7 TAI causes disruption of brain functional networks.8 Although the computed tomography scan (CTS) is usually the first study available in patients with TBI, it has a low sensitivity for the detection of non-hemorrhagic lesions in the white matter, which constitute 80-90% of the lesions in TAI.9,10 However, it is possible to identify small, non-expansive hemorrhagic lesions in the white-grey matter, intraventricular blood and cerebral edema.10 In the initial CTS of a TBI patient, 24 h after the event, the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage and/or blood in the interpeduncular cistern is associated with a severe TAI, and this severity increases with the number of affected ventricles. This is explained because the corpus callosum and brain stem, located in the midline, are closely related to the ventricles. The forces involved that produce disruption and axonal rupture in these structures also produce vascular damage to small vessels, which conditions variable degrees of intraventricular hemorrhage and laminar subarachnoid hemorrhage in the midline, in the interhemispheric and peri-mesencephalic regions.10

Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cases of TAI observed increase with the degree of severity of TBI, being 6% in mild cases, 70% in moderate, and 95% in severe cases.9 In fact, a Trondheim TAI-MRI grading (grades 1-5) has been proposed with bilateral TAI in mesencephalon or thalami, and bilateral TAI in pons as the worst grades.9

When the Mean Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) score, Injury Severity Scale, and admission GCS were used to evaluate patients with TAI, the results were similar; there was an association between TAI neuroanatomic injury pattern and neurologic recovery timing. This time was shorter in patients with grade 1-TAI, versus grades 2 and 3.11

Even in young subjects (≤ 24 years) with a diagnosis of mild BTI (13-15 GCS), the presence of involvement of the corpus callosum in the initial CTS is a poor prognostic factor for total recovery after 1-year post-TBI.12

CTS and MRI are used in the acute and also in the subacute and chronic phases to evaluate TAI.13,14 MRI lesion distribution maps have shown a higher frequency of TAI in the posterior corpus callosum; TAI in the splenium, mesencephalon, and pons is associated with poor outcome.14,15

Assessment of white matter integrity by diffusion MRI tractography is able to quantify white matter microstructure in vivo.16 This technique has given evidence that the pre-motor, temporal, and parietal sections of the corpus callosum are the most commonly damaged tracts.16 In TAI, the corpus callosum may show intraventricular hemorrhage on the initial CT study. Later on, post-traumatic corpus callosum damage can be evaluated by MRI sequences. Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractography, a significant decrease in the number of corpus callosum fibers is reported, compared with those in healthy control patients.17

Imaging has taken on a very important role in the diagnosis and prognosis of TAI.18 The incorporation of artificial intelligence is already increasing diagnostic accuracy, and improvements in diagnosis are expected in the short term.48

Biomarkers

In cases of TBI and TAI, outcome predictive biological markers are required.19 In recent years, various biomarkers have been suggested in the diagnosis and prognosis of TAI, including tau protein, β-Amyloid precursor protein, S-100β, neurofilaments, myelin basic protein, neuron-specific enolase, hemopexin, peripherin, the neuronal protein ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (these past two, included in the test Brain Trauma Indicator™).20 Two axonal proteins, neurofilament-light chain (NF-L) and phosphorylated neurofilament-heavy chain (pNF-H), have a serum level peak at day 20-30 post-moderate-severe TBI, and this finding is associated with patient outcomes and disability.21 NF-L is a not specific-disease biomarker of axonal damage.22 However, some authors have found that, in patients with initially moderate/severe TBI, persistently high NF-L levels are associated with worse outcome after TBI, reflecting ongoing brain injury.23 Furthermore, it seems that early levels of plasma NF-L may associate with the presence of TAI at a later phase of TBI, evaluated by DTI measurements of TAI.24 Neurofilaments are biomarkers of neuro-axonal damage in several neurological disorders, from multiple sclerosis to TBI.25 The usefulness of neurofilaments as a marker in TAI is still in process.25

Neuron-specific enolase, a glycolytic enzyme, is not normally present in extracellular fluids.26 If neuronal damage is suspected, its serum levels should be determined within 12-24 h post-injury. In adults, levels > 9 μg/L and, in children, levels > 15 μg/L within 24 h suggest poor prognosis when combined with CTS abnormalities.26

Peripherin is a class III-intermediate filament located in the axonal tract throughout the whole brain. In experimental animals and in humans, axonal injuries with peripherin inclusion are observed post-TBI. Furthermore, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and plasma levels are elevated at the early phase post-TBI. Hence, its usefulness as a biomarker in TAI is being investigated.27

Microtubule-associated protein tau is found to be hyperphosphorylated (p-tau) in injured axons and has been studied as a biomarker for brain injury and TAI. In rats with severe spinal cord injury at T8, the presence of p-tau in damaged axons showed a similar time course and distribution pattern to β-APP, a biomarker of axonal injury.28

Two glial biomarkers, the GFAP and the S100 protein, have been studied. GFAP is an intermediate filament protein (half-life of 24-48 h); its serum levels measured within 24 h post-injury are 10 times higher in CTS-positive patients than in CTS-negative patients.29 After TBI, serum levels of NF-L and GFAP seem to be associated with progression of brain atrophy,29 and early, persistently-elevated serum NF-L levels are associated with a worse outcome.29

On the other hand, S-100b has been associated with neuroinflammation and oxidative stress post-TBI because it induces microglia migration and activation through the S-100/ICaBP-type calcium-binding domain.30 Neurogranin has also been evaluated as a marker of TAI in rats.31 UCH-L1 is a protein found in the cytoplasm of neurons. There is an increased serum level after TBI.32

Biomarker research in TAI is ongoing (Table 1).20-22,26-33 There are no biomarkers yet approved for routine clinical use, because the determination in different matrices (CSF, blood, plasma) is not yet sufficiently standardized. Combining several biomarkers in CSF and blood, as well as image analysis, is expected to improve accuracy and help predict outcomes in TAI.30,32

Table 1 Biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis in TAI 

References Marker Characteristics
Zhang et al.,20 2024 UCH-L1 Deubiquitinating enzyme. Regulates target protein degradation primarily in neurons and neuroendocrine cells in the brain. It is also a neuronal antioxidant
Zhang et al.,20 2024 S100b S100 proteins form a family characterized by having two calcium-binding sites. They are expressed in astrocytes, Schwann cells, melanocytes, adipocytes, macrophages, and chondrocytes. S100β is a calcium sensor protein that regulates cellular energy metabolism by controlling the phosphorylation of protein kinase C and calmodulin and ribonucleic acid synthesis
Wang et al.,21 2024 NF Neuronal intermediate filament, three subtypes based on molecular weight: light chain (NF-L), medium chain, and heavy chain. Structural role in the axonal cytoskeleton. Involved in the transport and docking of mitochondria, and intracellular signaling and transcription. It regulates large fast-conducting neurons' radial growth
Coppens et al.,22 2023 NF Neuronal intermediate filament, three subtypes based on molecular weight: light chain (NF-L), medium chain, and heavy chain. Structural role in the axonal cytoskeleton. Involved in the transport and docking of mitochondria, and intracellular signaling and transcription. It regulates large fast-conducting neurons' radial growth
Kim and Kim26 2024 NSE Cell-specific isoform (neurons and neuroendocrine cells) of enolase, a glycolytic enzyme. Role in glucose metabolism and adenosine triphosphate production. Half-life 24 h
Fang et al.,27 2023 Peripherin A class III-intermediate filament is predominantly expressed in the peripheral nervous system. Interacts with neurofilaments and kinases, influencing cytoskeletal dynamics and neuronal function
Caprelli et al.,28 2018 Tau Structural element of the axonal cytoskeleton. It maintains the stability of microtubules and coordinates the movement of molecules along the microtubules. After TBI, acetylated tau accumulates in the blood and plays a role in the acute phase of secondary brain injury, leading to axonal degeneration and neurological impairment
Shahim et al.,29 2024 GFAP Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in a type III intermediate filament and structural protein of astrocytes and ependymal cells. It plays a role in cellular homeostasis, neurotransmitter regulation, and synaptic function. In TBI, GFAP is upregulated as part of astrogliosis
Zhang et al.,30 2024 α-II spectrin Cytoskeletal protein located in neurons and highly concentrated in axons and presynaptic terminals. A rise in α-II spectrin degradation is an early indication of calpain and caspase-3 action linked to cell necrosis
Zhang et al.,30 2024 miRNAs (miR21, miR16, miR92) miRNAs are non-coded, small-sized (20 nucleotides), hairpin-like structures involved in the post-transcriptional silencing of messenger RNA (mRNA) and downregulation protein synthesis
Levels 3 times higher, in the brain of patients that die from TAI
Baskurt et al.,31 2024 Neurogranin Neurogranin is a calmodulin-binding protein participating in the protein kinase C signaling pathway that controls long-term potentiation (LTP). Its expression has been corroborated in the brain, aortic endothelial cells, and cardiomyocytes
Castaño-Leon et al.,32 2022 GFAP, t-Tau, UCH-L1, and NfL Combination of biomarkers to assess prognosis
Sharma et al.,33 2023 Amyloid precursor protein (APP) Membrane protein expressed in neurons. APP is involved in forming synapses and neuronal transport

TBI: traumatic brain injury; TAI: traumatic axonal injury.

Neuropathology

In TAI, there are three main findings: (1) different degrees of axonal damage (axonal swellings, axonal bulbs),33 (Figs. 1 and 2), (2) Vascular damage (hemorrhages covering the vessel and adjacent tissue and perivascular ring hemorrhages with dilated axons between the hemorrhage and the vessel),33 (Figs. 3-5) Hypoxic-ischemic changes (acidophilic degeneration of neurons), as well as perivascular infarcts with accumulations of macrophages.33 Based on these parameters, a histological grading system has been proposed in sections stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).33

Figure 2 TAI in a 27-year-old motorcyclist. Left: pons. Eosinophilic axonal tracts with bulbous dilations (arrows) are observed in a longitudinal section. ×100, LFB-H&E. Right: high magnification of a central blood vessel (BV) surrounded by hypertrophic stellar astrocytes (A). Axonal spheroids (arrows) are visible inside the hemorrhagic ring (H). ×400, LFB-H&E (Autopsied case at our Institute). H&E: Hematoxylin and Eosin. 

Figure 3 Neurohypophysis shows axonal spheroids (arrows). Left: H&E, ×100; Close-up of a vessel in the thalamus showing numerous perivascular axonal spheroids with loss of myelin (arrows). Loss of continuity is observed in the vessel wall (short arrow) and some extravasated inflammatory cells are observed. Right: LFB-H&E, ×400. H&E: Hematoxylin and Eosin. 

Figure 4 Left: axons (A) are observed in cross-section that show dilation and eosinophilia, as well as thinning and/or loss of the myelin sheath (arrows). Pons, luxol-fast-blue and hematoxylin, ×400. Right: few remaining myelin sheaths are observed, which stain blue with LFB&H (arrows), as well as numerous axonal bulbs devoid of their sheath (A). Putamen, ×100. H&E: Hematoxylin and Eosin. 

Figure 5 Parenchymal hemorrhage patterns Left: pons. The parenchymal hemorrhage (H) completely obscures the vessel. Numerous dilated eosinophilic axons are identified (arrows). LFB-H&E ×50. Right: pons. A blood vessel (BV) is centrally observed. A hemorrhagic ring is identified. Between this ring and the vessel, numerous dilated axons measuring between 3 and 50 microns are observed (arrows). LFB-H&E, ×100. H&E: Hematoxylin and Eosin. 

A case of severe TAI, autopsied at our Institute (Figs. 2-5), with 5-day survival after trauma, is illustrated, showing diffuse axonal damage (Fig. 2), including involvement of the neurohypophysis (Fig. 3). The patient was unconscious on scene, with a Glasgow score of 8, and apart from the edema and parenchymal hemorrhages, there were no other injuries to the skull and brain. On the 5th day after the accident, the loss of the myelin sheath was evident in many of the dilated axons (Fig. 4). Axonal damage was evident on H&E stain and two types of hemorrhage were observed; one which completely obscured the vessel and the ring hemorrhages, where numerous spheroids were seen between the blood vessel and the hemorrhagic ring (Fig. 5).

A useful marker for postmortem evaluation of TAI is amyloid β protein, which is deposited in damaged axons within 30-40 min after trauma. Aβ peptides are cleaved from the APP, a membrane protein with a membrane-spanning domain, an extracellular glycosylated N-terminus and a cytoplasmic C-terminus, expressed in the synapses of neurons.34 It is not specific to trauma, but its presence implies axonal damage.

Hemorrhages in the corpus callosum are a marker of primary vascular injuries in TAI. Hemorrhage per rhexin refers to that caused by the rupture of a blood vessel, often due to mechanical force. In TAI, hemorrhagic lesions are small (4 × 0.8 mm), elongated, and in clusters.35

Generally, autopsies performed in forensic medical services are of individuals who either died instantly during the accident or survived a few hours or days. In these acute cases, excluding contusions and hypoxic-ischemic changes, the damage is predominantly axonal and vascular. However, there is a report of αb-crystallin-positive balloon neurons predominantly in the anterior cingulate, in three subjects with severe TAI who survived 5-10 weeks. These neurons were reminiscent of the phenomenon of chromatolysis.36

In this review on TAI, only four articles focused on neuropathology were found. The chronology of the lesions is important in acute and chronic states of this pathology. The sequence of events that occur in the different brain regions involving neurons, glia, and blood vessels is also important to understand the pathophysiology. Finally, neuropathological studies in humans are very valuable for comparing with the results of experimental studies in other species. It would be useful to apply this knowledge in the acute therapy and in the prevention of sequelae.

Initial diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prognosis

The initial evaluation of patients with TAI is very important. Although hemorrhage from the corpus callosum is generally associated with TBI and severe TAI, there are reports of such hematomas in children with concussion after minor blows.37 On the other hand, even TAI patients with favorable outcome may present different domains of cognitive impairment.38 Therefore, in TBI patients, a rapid and complete evaluation is of the outmost importance at admission to implement the best treatment.2

90% of the 4 million TBIs occurring in the world are mild or concussions,39 however, there are many health consequences of TBIs: disruptive behavior disorders in girls and boys,40 sleep disturbances,41 increased risk of developing Alzheimer's Disease,42 Parkinson's Disease, chronic traumatic encephalopathy with memory loss, aggression, confusion, depression, impaired judgment, difficulty controlling impulses, fatigue, anxiety disorders, headaches/migraines or vestibulo-ocular problems, and a nearly-doubled risk of suicide.43

In patients who survive and are admitted to a hospital, TAI findings and prognosis will depend on the severity of the initial insult based on the GCS on admission (mild, moderate, or severe injury) and the survival time.2

After a BTI, the situational diagnosis is important to determine therapeutic behaviors. In addition to the GCS, there are other evaluation models that can help predict an unfavorable evolution in the following 6 months, such as the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) models; or in the prediction of mortality, such as TRISS, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury, and IMPACT models.44

Supportive measures and ventilatory support, a surgical team to resolve concomitant problems, and having an intensive therapy unit for patients with shock-trauma are essential to ensure comprehensive, rapid, and effective medical care. Once the patient is stabilized, early physical therapy is highly recommended.45

In the acute phase, some medications have been tested, such as amantadine, which have demonstrated their usefulness in improving the cognitive disability associated with severe trauma.46 Even the mildest TAI injuries, such as concussion, require early rehabilitation and determining when it is appropriate to return to daily activities.47 The summary by topic of the articles analyzed can be found in table 2.

Table 2 Articles included in the review 

No. of paper References Main concepts Article type
TAI general review
1 3 General concepts of TBI and TAI Review
Physiopathology
2 4 Cytoskeletal and axolemmal changes in TAI.: Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) accumulation, neurofilament alterations, calpain-mediated spectrin degradation, and sodium channel (NaCh) pathology Review
3 5 Different techniques needed to identify axonal lesions and to understand lesion mechanisms Review
Clinical diagnosis and diagnostic imaging
4 6 TBI and TAI Review
5 7 Diagnosis of TAI in patients with concussion Mini-review
6 8 Study of brain functional networks and cognitive impairment Retrospective case-control study. MRI
7 9 Improvement of the TAI grading system to reflect the outcome. MRI-Glasgow Outcome Scale Prospective clinical and imaging study
8 10 CTS-MRI in pediatric patients with TAI Review
9 11 Systematic review and consensus process for inclusion of biological markers, including MRI, in patients with TAI Systematic review
10 12 Global outcome in patients with TBI-TAI based in CTS and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE). Young adults and pediatrics Prospective clinical and imaging study
11 13 Use of MRI in the acute phase of TAI/TBI Review
12 14 The severity and location of TAI are associated with functional outcomes Prospective cohort study Clinical and MRI
13 15 To determine the spatial distribution of TAI lesions on different MRI sequences and its associations to outcome with use of lesion mapping Prospective cohort study Clinical and MRI
14 16 Use of an automated tractography pipeline to detect and quantify TAI Case-control study Diffusion MRI tractography
15 17 Follow-up of 2 cases with traumatic intraventricular hemorrhage on admission CT and long-term corpus callosum impairment detected on MRI Case reports
16 18 TAI classification to evaluate short-term prognosis in 19 patients Retrospective study of case series
Biomarkers
17 20 Review of the 2022 research production in TBI, including biomarkers Review
18 21 Review of the molecular biomarkers of TAI Review
19 22 Serum NF-L levels were associated with global patient outcomes and disability after moderate-severe TBI Multicenter study Two clinical cohorts
20 23 Review on neurofilament-light biomarker Review
21 24 Persistently elevated NF-L levels were associated with worse outcome after TBI Prospective clinical and biomarker study
22 25 To investigate the association between admission levels of plasma NF-L with white matter integrity, measured using DW-MR images 3 months from the injury Prospective cohort study. Case and controls
23 26 Current value and potential clinical applications of neurofilaments as a biomarker of neuro-axonal damage in a range of neurological disorders, including TAI Review
24 27 Review in biomarkers in TAI, including NSE Review
25 28 To determine whether peripherin can be useful as a biomarker in TAI Experimental study Mice
26 30 NfL and GFAP as biomarkers of progressive neurodegeneration in TBI Case and control study in humans (cross-sectionally longitudinal
27 31 Review of biomarkers in TAI, including S-100b Review
28 32 The article provides an impression of serum and CSF NRGN levels in a rat DAI model in consecutive time periods Experimental study Rats
29 33 The prognostic utility of the biomarkers Prospective, observational study
Neuropathology
30 34 To study the post-mortem axonal changes and develop a grading system to identify DAI on the basis of histopathological and immunoreactive β-amyloid precursor protein Prospective study. Postmortem study
31 35 The study compared the characteristics of head injury cases with (n = 17) and without dTA (n = 40). Retrospective study Postmortem study
32 36 To describe the vascular changes in the corpus callosum in acute cases of TAI Retrospective study Postmortem study
33 37 To describe ballooned neurons in TAI Case reports Postmortem study
Initial diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prognosis
34 38 To describe a trivial trauma causing a well-defined corpus callosal hematoma Case report
35 39 To analyze the functional status of nine cognitive domains in 79 patients with TAI at 6 months after injury Prospective cohort study
36 40 Summarize the symptomatology and current diagnostic parameters of mTBI, and pre-clinical concussion models of axonal damage, and examine new therapeutic targets under investigation Review
37 41 Children with DBDs were more likely to have sustained TBIs that were associated with additional, sex-specific alterations of white matter microstructure Comparative study, case and controls
38 42 Axonal injury, specifically to the left anterior internal capsule, is robustly associated with sleep disturbances in multiple TBI populations Comparative study Two cohorts
39 43 Patients after TBI had abnormal brain atrophy involving the corpus callosum and other WM tracts, including corticospinal tracts, in a pattern that was specific and distinct from AD and aging Comparative longitudinal study Two groups
40 44 Individuals with TBI had higher rates of suicide attempt Nationwide cohort study
41 45 Testing different scales used in the evaluation of TAI to predict mortality at 14 days and 6 months, and unfavorable outcomes at 6 months Prospective cohort study
42 46 Early physiotherapy exercises help patients achieve their highest level of functional independence and also enhance their quality of life Case report
43 47 In patients with severe TBI, amantadine use in the acute post-injury period may be associated with an improvement in cognitive disability Prospective, clinical- experimental study
44 48 Consensus-based protocols to conduct clinical exams in concussion are provided. Appropriate therapeutic and rehabilitation measures are also reviewed Review

MRI: magnetic resonance image; TBI: traumatic brain injury; TAI: traumatic axonal injury; CSF: cerebral spinal fluid; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; CT: computed tomography.

Limitations

Using only one database (PubMed) may limit the type and number of articles found. Not all peer-reviewed scientific articles are found in PubMed and its MEDLINE database. PubMed does not include grey literature, such as doctoral theses, which are generally very current and detailed. Since PubMed focuses primarily on biomedical literature, it is less useful for interdisciplinary topics. Not all articles are available in full for free.

Conclusion

TAI is a relatively common pathology in subjects with brain trauma, but unless it is a patient without specific or localized brain injuries, who was found unconscious at the scene, this diagnosis is generally not considered in trauma patients. When it is considered, it is generally in severe cases of TAI. With the development of imaging, this entity is rarely documented histologically in forensic autopsies, as we were able to verify in this review. This fact represents a loss of valuable information that would be very useful to compare to and to strengthen the information obtained in animal models. It is necessary to study this entity in forensic protocols of polytraumatized patients. The postmortem histological examination using H&E and immunohistochemistry in a TBI patient with TAI will provide us with realistic information on the extent of damage at the axonal level, and will help to identify and understand the damage mechanisms and morphological alterations at different stages after a traumatic event.

REFERENCES

1. Bruggeman GF, Haitsma IK, Dirven CM, Volovici V. Traumatic axonal injury (TAI): definitions, pathophysiology and imaging-a narrative review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021;163:31-44. [ Links ]

2. Maas AI, Menon DK, Manley GT, Abrams M, Åkerlund C, Andelic N, et al. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21:1004-60. [ Links ]

3. Mesfin FB, Gupta N, Hays Shapshak A, Taylor RS. Diffuse axonal injury. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/nbk448102 [ Links ]

4. Krieg JL, Leonard AV, Turner RJ, Corrigan F. Identifying the phenotypes of diffuse axonal injury following traumatic brain injury. Brain Sci. 2023;13:1607. [ Links ]

5. Delteil C, Manlius T, Bailly N, Godio-Raboutet Y, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Tuchtan L, et al. Traumatic axonal injury: clinic, forensic and biomechanics perspectives. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2024;70:102465. [ Links ]

6. Ginsburg J, Huff JS. Closed head trauma. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/nbk557861 [ Links ]

7. Jang SH, Byun DH. Hidden truth in cerebral concussion-traumatic axonal injury: a narrative mini-review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10:931. [ Links ]

8. Li J, Shu Y, Chen L, Wang B, Chen L, Zhan J, et al. Disrupted topological organization of functional brain networks in traumatic axonal injury. Brain Imaging Behav. 2024;18:279-91. [ Links ]

9. Moen KG, Flusund AH, Moe HK, Andelic N, Skandsen T, Håberg A, et al. The prognostic importance of traumatic axonal injury on early MRI: the Trondheim TAI-MRI grading and quantitative models. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:8015-29. [ Links ]

10. Branson HM, Martinez-Rios C. Conventional MR imaging in trauma management in pediatrics. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2023;33:251-60. [ Links ]

11. Bagg MK, Hellewell SC, Keeves J, Antonic-Baker A, McKimmie A, Hicks AJ, et al. The Australian traumatic brain injury initiative: systematic review of predictive value of biological markers for people with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2024;42:2116-37. [ Links ]

12. Riemann L, Mikolic A, Maas A, Unterberg A, Younsi A, Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Investigators and Participants. Computed tomography lesions and their association with global outcome in young people with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2023;40:1243-54. [ Links ]

13. Diouf A, Machnowska M. Conventional MR imaging in trauma management in adults. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2023;33:235-49. [ Links ]

14. Almeida-Vieira RC, Zumerkorn-Pipek L, Vieira De Oliveira D, Silvia-Paiva W, Cardoso de Sousa RM. The relationship between injury characteristics and post-traumatic recovery after diffuse axonal injury. Biomedicines. 2024;12:311. [ Links ]

15. Flusund AH, Bø LE, Reinertsen I, Solheim O, Skandsen T, Håberg A, et al. Lesion frequency distribution maps of traumatic axonal injury on early magnetic resonance imaging after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury and associations to 12 month outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2024;41:1901-13. [ Links ]

16. Maffei C, Gilmore N, Snider SB, Foulkes AS, Bodien YG, Yendiki A, et al. Automated detection of axonal damage along white matter tracts in acute severe traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;37:103294. [ Links ]

17. Angelova P, Kehayov I, Ordonez-Rubiano EG, Figueredo LF, Zlatareva D. Long-term tractography evaluation of corpus callosum impairment after severe traumatic brain injury in patients with isolated intraventricular hemorrhage on admission CT: two illustrative cases and a literature review. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023;19:249-57. [ Links ]

18. El-Abtah ME, Kashkoush A, Petitt JC, McMillan A, Hu S, Finocchiaro R, et al. Diffuse axonal injury pattern predicts timing of in-hospital neurologic recovery: a retrospective case series. World Neurosurg. 2023;177:e460-5. [ Links ]

19. Priemer DS, Perl DP. Neurotrauma: 2023 update. Free Neuropathol. 2023;4:4-14. [ Links ]

20. Zhang Y, Li Z, Wang H, Pei Z, Zhao S. Molecular biomarkers of diffuse axonal injury: recent advances and future perspectives. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2024;24:39-47. [ Links ]

21. Wang KK, Barton DJ, McQuillan LE, Kobeissy F, Cai G, Xu H, et al. Parallel cerebrospinal fluid and serum temporal profile assessment of axonal injury biomarkers neurofilament-light chain and phosphorylated neurofilament-heavy chain: associations with patient outcome in moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2024;41:1609-27. [ Links ]

22. Coppens S, Lehmann S, Hopley C, Hirtz C. Neurofilament-light, a promising biomarker: analytical, metrological and clinical challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:11624. [ Links ]

23. Tuure J, Mohammadian M, Tenovuo O, Blennow K, Hossain I, Hutchinson P, et al. Late blood levels of neurofilament light correlate with outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2024;41:359-68. [ Links ]

24. Hossain I, Mohammadian M, Maanpää HR, Takala RS, Tenovuo O, Van Gils M, et al. Plasma neurofilament light admission levels and development of axonal pathology in mild traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurol. 2023;23:304. [ Links ]

25. Khalil M, Teunissen CE, Lehmann S, Otto M, Piehl F, Ziemssen T, et al. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders - towards clinical application. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20:269-87. [ Links ]

26. Kim DS, Kim GW. Biofluid-based biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: a narrative review. Brain Neurorehabil. 2024;17:e8. [ Links ]

27. Fang T, Yue L, Longlong Z, Longda M, Fang H, Yehui L, et al. Peripherin: a proposed biomarker of traumatic axonal injury triggered by mechanical force. Eur J Neurosci. 2023;58:3206-25. [ Links ]

28. Caprelli MT, Mothe AJ, Tator CH. Hyperphosphorylated tau as a novel biomarker for traumatic axonal injury in the spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35:1929-41. [ Links ]

29. Shahim P, Pham DL, Van Der Merwe AJ, Moore B, Chou YY, Lippa SM, et al. Serum NfL and GFAP as biomarkers of progressive neurodegeneration in TBI. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20:4663-76. [ Links ]

30. Zhang H, Wang J, Qu Y, Yang Y, Guo ZN. Brain injury biomarkers and applications in neurological diseases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024;138:5-14. [ Links ]

31. Baskurt O, Aydin S, Avci I, Ozay Nayir P, Aydin MV. Evaluation of neurogranin levels in a rat model of diffuse axonal injury. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2024;84:80-8. [ Links ]

32. Castaño-Leon AM, Sánchez Carabias C, Hilario A, Ramos A, Navarro-Main B, Paredes I, et al. Serum assessment of traumatic axonal injury: the correlation of GFAP, t-Tau, UCH-L1, and NfL levels with diffusion tensor imaging metrics and its prognosis utility. J Neurosurg. 2022;138:454-64. [ Links ]

33. Sharma M, Subramaniam A, Sengar K, Suri V, Agrawal D, Chakraborty N, et al. Pathological spectrum and b-APP immunoreactivity as a diagnostic tool of diffuse axonal injury following traumatic brain injury: a novel classification. J Lab Physicians. 2023;15:399-408. [ Links ]

34. Viitasalo V, Laakko E, Hakkarainen AJ, Oura P. Background characteristics and neuropathology findings of medico-legal autopsy cases with and without b-amyloid precursor protein positive diffuse traumatic axonal injury. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2024;70:102495. [ Links ]

35. Koludarova EM, Tuchik ES, Zorikov OV. Primary injuries of corpus callosum vessels in craniocerebral injuries. Sud Med Ekspert. 2023;66:37-40. [ Links ]

36. Michaud J, Plu I, Parai J, Bourgault A, Tanguay C, Seilhean D, et al. Ballooned neurons in semi-recent severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11:37. [ Links ]

37. Patnaik A, Sekar A, Sujana B. Corpus callosal hematoma by a trivial trauma causing concussion with "blood at the center" radiological sign. World Neurosurg. 2024;182:7-11. [ Links ]

38. Chen W, Yao C, Li S, Huang H, Zhu Z, Chen R, et al. Cognitive impairment in diffuse axonal injury patients with favorable outcome. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1077858. [ Links ]

39. Bielanin JP, Metwally SA, Paruchuri SS, Sun D. An overview of mild traumatic brain injuries and emerging therapeutic targets. Neurochem Int. 2024;172:105655. [ Links ]

40. Guberman GI, Theaud G, Hawes SW, Ptito A, Descoteaux M, Hodgins S. White matter microstructure, traumatic brain injury, and disruptive behavior disorders in girls and boys. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1391407. [ Links ]

41. Tinney EM, España-Irla G, Warren AE, Whitehurst LN, Stillman AM, Hillman CH, et al. Axonal injury, sleep disturbances, and memory following traumatic brain injury. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024;11:2314-26. [ Links ]

42. Graham NS, Cole JH, Bourke NJ, Schott JM, Sharp DJ. Distinct patterns of neurodegeneration after TBI and in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19:3065-77. [ Links ]

43. Ineson KM, Erlangsen A, Nordentoft M, Benros ME, Madsen T. Traumatic brain injury and risk of subsequent attempted suicide and violent crime. Psychol Med. 2023;53:4094-102. [ Links ]

44. De Cassia Almeida Vieira R, De Sousa RM, Paiva WS, Pipek LZ, De Oliveira DV, Godoy DA, et al. Predicting outcomes in patients with diffuse axonal injury: external validation of the widely used prognostic instruments. Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95:382-90. [ Links ]

45. Dangare MS, Saklecha A, Harjpal P. A case report emphasizing an early approach in a patient with diffuse axonal injury. Cureus. 2024;16:e52750. [ Links ]

46. Tracy BM, Srinivas S, Nahum KD, Wahl WL, Gelbard RB. The effect of amantadine on acute cognitive disability after severe traumatic brain injury: an institutional pilot study. Surgery. 2024;175:907-12. [ Links ]

47. Oesterschlink J, Reinsberger C. Kopfverletzungen: was der teamarzt wissen sollte. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024;53:415-9. [ Links ]

48. Orenuga S, Jordache P, Mirzai D, Monteros T, Gonzalez E, Madkoor A, et al. Traumatic brain injury and artificial intelligence: shaping the future of neurorehabilitation-a review. Life (Basel). 2025;15:424. [ Links ]

FundingThe authors declare that this work was carried out with the authors' own resources.

Ethical considerations

Protection of human subjects and animals. The authors declare that no experiments on humans or animals were performed for this research.

Confidentiality, informed consent, and ethical approval. The authors have obtained approval from the Ethics Committee for the analysis of routinely collected and anonymized clinical data; therefore, individual informed consent was not required. Relevant ethical recommendations have been followed.

Declaration on the use of artificial intelligence. The authors declare that no generative artificial intelligence was used in the writing or creation of the content of this manuscript.

Received: July 13, 2025; Accepted: November 11, 2025

* Correspondence: Ana L. Calderón-Garcidueñas E-mail: ana.calderon@innn.edu.mx

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license