Serviços Personalizados
Journal
Artigo
Indicadores
-
Citado por SciELO -
Acessos
Links relacionados
-
Similares em
SciELO
Compartilhar
Revista mexicana de fitopatología
versão On-line ISSN 2007-8080versão impressa ISSN 0185-3309
Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.42 no.1 Texcoco Jan. 2024 Epub 27-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2310-1
Scientific Articles
Establishment of an efficient protocol for in vitro disinfection of seeds of seven Agave spp. species
1 Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Fitomejoramiento. Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Carretera Toluca-Ixtlahuaca Km. 11.5. Campus Universitario “El Cerrillo”, C.P. 50200, Toluca, Estado de México, México.
Background.
Disinfection of Agave seeds is a crucial step in in vitro culture to prevent contamination, which can be caused by microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and viruses that can affect seedling growth and reduce seed germination rate. Therefore, proper seed disinfection is essential to ensure vigorous and healthy plant growth.
Objective.
Generate an efficient seed disinfection protocol in seven species of Agave; Agave marmorata, A. karwinskii, A. potatorum, A. angustifolia, A. cupreata, A. horrida and A. salmiana to reduce pollution levels.
Materials and methods
. A total of 12 disinfection treatments with disinfectants and different combinations were evaluated. The disinfectants used were; 3 % Hydrogen Peroxide for 24 h, Commercial Sodium Hypochlorite 5 % (v/v) for 5 min, Calcium Hypochlorite 8 % (w/v) for 15 min, Copper Sulfate 30 % (v/v) for 10 min, Mercury Chloride II 0.1 % (w/v) for 10 min. Before each treatment was tested, the seeds were pre-washed with liquid soap and subjected to the treatments, Subsequently, they were sown in DM medium and the percentage of germination and contamination for each treatment was evaluated weekly for a period of 30 days. Additionally, the contaminating microorganisms found were identified.
Results.
The best treatment for seed disinfection was 30 % copper sulfate (v/v) for 10 min, 0.1 % mercuric chloride II for 10 min and 3 % hydrogen peroxide for 24 h, obtaining 100 % disinfection.
Conclusion.
Four genera of fungi were identified: Monilinia sp., Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp., and Alternaria alternata, a bacterium; Bacillus sp., and a yeast, Schizosaccharomyces sp.
Keywords: Seeds; agave; disinfection methods; contamination; germination
Objetivo/Antecedentes
. La desinfección de las semillas de Agave es un paso crucial en el cultivo in vitro para prevenir la contaminación, la cual puede ser causada por microorganismos como bacterias, hongos y virus que pueden afectar el crecimiento de las plántulas y reducir la tasa de germinación de las semillas. Por lo tanto, la desinfección adecuada de las semillas es esencial para garantizar un crecimiento vegetal vigoroso y saludable. El objetivo principal de esta investigación fue: evaluar 12 tratamientos para generar un protocolo eficiente de desinfección in vitro en semillas de seis especies de Agave mezcalero y un pulquero con desinfectantes y combinaciones diferentes.
Materiales y Métodos.
Los desinfectantes utilizados fueron; Peróxido de Hidrógeno al 3 % por 24 h, Hipoclorito de Sodio comercial al 5 % (v/v) por 5 min, Hipoclorito de Calcio al 8 % (p/v) por 15 min, Sulfato de Cobre (PENTAMAX®) al 30 % (v/v) por 10 min, Cloruro de Mercurio II al 0.1 % (p/v) por 10 min.
Resultados.
Los microorganismos contaminantes identificados fueron cuatro géneros de hongos: Monilinia sp., Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp., y Alternaria alternata, una bacteria; Bacillus sp., y una levadura, Schizosaccharomyces sp.
Conclusión.
El mejor tratamiento para la desinfección de las semillas fue Peróxido de Hidrógeno al 3 % por 24 h en combinación con Sulfato de Cobre al 30 % (v/v) por 10 min y Cloruro de Mercurio II al 0.1 % (p/v) por 10 min, obteniendo un 100% de desinfección y logrando que germinaran todas las especies.
Palabras clave: Hongos; bacterias; métodos de desinfección; contaminación; germinación
Introduction
The Agave genus is one of Mexico’s most representative, with around 211 species, out of which 159 are found in Mexico, that is, 75.3 % of the total (García et al, 2019). Several products are obtained from these, such as foods, beverages, fibers and others (García, 2007). Their uses in Mexico are linked to the economic, social, cultural and environmental development of numerous populations. In recent decades, Agave has had an increasing social and economic rise due to its use in as raw material for the production of fermented and distilled alcoholic beverages such as pulque, mezcal and tequila. In Mexico, several species of wild agave are gathered to distil, with A. marmorata, A. karwinskii, A. potatorum, A. angustifolia, A. cupreata, A. horrida being the most noteworthy, and for the production of pulque, only one species is gathered: A. salmiana. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN’s) Red List and Mexico’s Secretariat for the Environment and Natural Resources (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales - SEMARNAT) Agave has become the target of over-gathering via illegal plundering. The lack of sexual propagation has reduced wild populations and threatened the genetic variability and structure in the cultivars, along with inflorescence usually being removed to ensure the accumulation of sugars in the plant hearts, eventually preventing the formation of seeds (Peña et al. 2006), which confirms the need to preserve the germplasm of these species in danger of extinction and threatened from seeds, using strategies based on the development and optimization of protocols for their disinfection and propagation in vitro.
The disinfection of agave seeds is a crucial step for the in vitro planting, since the success of the propagation systems depends largely on the control and prevention of contamination. Phytopathogens cause substantial losses of plant material in the production or research processes.
The purpose of disinfecting the seed is to remove contaminating microorganisms found in the seed coat and embryo, thus freeing the plants produced from bacteria and fungi related to the seeds. In addition to preventing contamination and diseases, the disinfection of Agave seeds can also improve germination rates, which is essential for the success of the in vitro planting of Agave, since a low germination rate can affect the efficiency and productivity of the in vitro planting process (Zurita et al., 2014; Flores et al., 2019) It is therefore important to follow adequate disinfection procedures to guarantee the success of the crop, improving the quality, safety, yield and conservation of the germplasm.|
Diverse seed disinfection protocols have recently been reported in species such as A. victoria reginae (Domínguez et al., 2008; Ramírez et al., 2008), A. fourcroydes (Monja, 2013), A. angustifolia (Arzate et al., 2016), A. marmorata (Álvarez et al., 2020) and A. tequilana (Delgado et al., 2021), in which most authors coincide in the use of ethanol and sodium hypochlorite and calcium. Nevertheless, there have been no reports on the use of mercury chloride (HgCl2), Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and fungicides in Agave, as well as the rate of contamination and the contaminating microorganisms found, which, in large percentages, raise the production costs, therefore an efficient disinfection protocol may help reduce these costs.
The aim of this study was to evaluate 12 treatments (Table 2) to generate an efficient in vitro disinfection protocol in six species of mezcal Agave (A. marmorata, A. karwinskii, A. potatorum, A. angustifolia, A. cupreata, A. horrida and a pulque A. salmiana), using five disinfectants that help widely disinfect: hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), commercial sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), calcium hypochlorite Ca(ClO)2, copper sulfate (CuSO commercial Product PENTAMAX®, mercury (II) chloride (HgCl2) and ethanol (C2H6O).
Materials and Methods
This study was carried out in the Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory, found in the Center for the Plant Breeding Research and Advanced Studies in the School of Agricultural Science, of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, “El Cerrillo” Campus, Toluca, State of Mexico.
Biological material. Mature seeds taken from seven agave seeds were used, gathered in different Mexican states in periods between 1 and 7 years, stored in a germplasm bank during their storage (Table 1).
Disinfection of the biological material. Twelve treatments with disinfectant solutions and different combinations (Table 2) plus a control (T0) were evaluated, selected based on reports obtained in the disinfection of seeds of other genera, which displayed acceptable results for disinfection (Flores et al., 2008; Billard et al., 2014; Tamayo et al., 2017; Campos et al., 2020; Zúñiga and Beauregard, 2020). The disinfectants used were hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at 3% for 24 h, commercial sodium hypochlorite (Cloralex® at 4 %) (NaClO) with a final concentration of 5 % v/v) for 5 min, calcium hypochlorite Ca(ClO)2 at 8 % (p/v) for 15 min,
Table 1 Agave species and seed collection data.
| Specie | Lugar of collect | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Agave horrida | Ocuilan, México | 2015 |
| Agave salmiana | Acambay, México | 2015 |
| Agave karwinskii | Oaxaca, México | 2017 |
| Agave potatorum | Oaxaca, México | 2017 |
| Agave marmorata | Oaxaca, México | 2017 |
| Agave angustifolia | Zacualpan, México | 2019 |
| Agave cupreata | Puebla, México | 2021 |
Table 2 Disinfection treatments evaluated in seven Agave species.
| Treatments | Disinfectants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuSO4 30 % v/v | HgCl2 al 0.1 % p/v | Ca(ClO)2 al 8 % p/v | NaClO al 5 % v/v | H2O2 al 3 % | |
| 0 | *Control treatment | ||||
| 1 | 15 min | ||||
| 2 | 5 min | ||||
| 3 | 15 min | 5 min | |||
| 4 | 24 h | ||||
| 5 | 10 min | 15 min | |||
| 6 | 10 min | 5 min | |||
| 7 | 10 min | 15 min | 5 min | ||
| 8 | 10 min | 24 h | |||
| 9 | 10 min | 10 min | 15 min | ||
| 10 | 10 min | 10 min | 5 min | ||
| 11 | 10 min | 10 min | 15 min | 5 min | |
| 12 | 10 min | 10 min | 24 h | ||
CuSO4= Copper sulfate; HgCl2 = Mercury (II) chloride; Ca (ClO)2 = Calcium hypochlorite; NaClO = Sodium hypochlorite; H2O2 = Hydrogen peroxide. *Control (Without disinfectants).
PENTAMAX® brand copper sulfate (CuSO4) at 30 % (v/v) for 10 min, mercury
(II) chloride (HgCl2) at 0.1 % (p/v) for 10 min. The 12 treatments were evaluated with 10 seeds per treatment (every seed was considered as one experimental unit), and for each treatment, three repetitions were considered, with a total of 390 seeds
being evaluated for every species (considering a control). The experiment was monitored every week for a 30-day period.
Initially, the seeds were placed in sterile, 50 mL Falcon tubes, and they were washed with 15 mL sterile osmosis water plus 1 mL of commercial detergent (Axión®) and two drops of Tween 20® for 15 minutes, and they were constantly shaken; after this time, they were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. Next, they were submerged in 15 mL of ethanol at 70 % (v/v) for one minute and rinsed twice with sterile distilled water. Later, the disinfection treatments were applied, the seeds were shaken constantly in all treatments and they were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water after every disinfectant was applied to eliminate the residues of disinfectants, except for the treatments with H2O2. Everything was carried out under aseptic conditions, inside a laminar flow hood.
Seed germination. After being disinfected, the seeds were planted in 100 mL culture jars, placing 10 seeds in every jar. In each jar, 20 mL of culture medium were added, with MS salts (Murashige and Skoog, 1962), supplemented with 30 gL-1 of sucrose, 0.5 gL-1 of activated charcoal, without plant growth regulators and gelled with 8 g L-1 of agar. The pH of the medium was adjusted at 5.7 and it was sterilized in an autoclave at 1.5 kg/cm2 of pressure and a temperature of 121.5 °C for 15 minutes. The cultures were incubated for 30 days in an incubation room with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and eight hours of darkness, with a light intensity of 18.83 µM m-2 s-1 at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C; a seed was considered germinated when the radicle was visible.
Identification of contaminating microorganisms found in the agave seeds. The contaminating microorganisms (fungi, bacteria and yeasts) found in the treatments that presented any contamination were isolated, they were planted in Petri dishes with a PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) medium for their isolation and purification and later sent to the Microbiology Laboratory of the Center for Research and Advanced Studies in Animal Health (Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Salud Animal - CIESA) of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico for their taxonomic identification, where the samples were replanted in a PDA medium and sabouraud agar at 25 ± 2 °C for 26 days, constantly monitored for their morphological identification, using lactophenol stains. For the identification of bacteria, the samples were planted in blood agar and TSA (Tryptone-Soy Agar) incubated at 36 °C and constantly monitored for 5 days.
Evaluated variables. In the 30 days of the experiment, the following variables were evaluated on a weekly basis:
Percentage of contamination of the seeds: ([Number of contaminated seeds * 100] / total number of seeds planted)
Percentage of germination of the seeds: ([Number of seeds that germinated * 100] / total number of seeds planted)
Days to germination: The average number of days to emergence of the radicle per seed in each species was registered.
Statistical analysis. The experimental design for this study had a total random distribution in a bifactorial arrangement with three repetitions. The data registered in the variables of seed contamination and germination underwent a simple classification Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mean comparison test (p<0.05) was performed using the Sofware InfoStat 2017 Sofware.
Results
The analysis of variance for contamination and germination revealed a determination coefficient of 0.78 and 0.97, respectively, indicating that the model used was adequate to explain the variability of these variables. Likewise, the coefficient of variation was 34 % for contamination and 103 % for germination, explaining the latter with extrinsic (treatments) and intrinsic factors (genetic-physiologic) of each seed and species and confirmed statistically with the registration of highly significant differences (p<0.01) in the species x treatments interaction, indicating that at least one treatment was enough for both variables (contamination and germination) in at least one species (Table 3).
Germination. When processing the germination data, the means tests displayed significant statistical differences (p<0.05) in the different treatments. The germination response was highly variable in the different treatments and independent for all
Table 3 Analysis of variance for the variables contamination and germination, evaluating 12 disinfection treatments and seven agave species.
| F.V | Contamination | Germination | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC | gl | CM | F | p-valor | SC | gl | CM | F | p-valor | |
| Species | 507.03 | 6 | 84.51 | 67.5 | <0.0001 | 187.11 | 6 | 31.18 | 11.2 | <0.0001 |
| Treatment | 1221.05 | 12 | 101.75 | 81.2 | <0.0001 | 235.34 | 12 | 19.61 | 7.01 | <0.0001 |
| Species x Treatment | 1999.25 | 72 | 27.77 | 22.2 | <0.0001 | 481.89 | 72 | 6.69 | 2.39 | <0.0001 |
| Error | 114 | 91 | 1.25 | 254.5 | 91 | 2.80 | ||||
| Total | 3841.34 | 181 | 1158.84 | 181 | ||||||
| R2=0.97 | CV= 34.29% | R2=0.78 | CV=103.17% | |||||||
SC: Sum of squares, gl: Degrees of freedom, CM: Mean squares, F: F calculated, CV: Coefficient of variation and R2: Coefficient of determination.
species, since each species responded in different ways and their germination times were also variable; for the most part, this variable was low (0 - 20 %) (Table 4).
Table 4 Means comparison for the variables contamination and germination in seven agave species, according to Tukey’s test (p<0.05).
| Treatments | A. salmiana DG (21d) | A. horrida (14d) | A. marmorata (8d) | A. potatorum (27d) | A. karwiskii (20d) | A. angustifolia (20d) | A. cupreata (14d) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | G | C | G | C | G | C | G | C | G | C | G | C | G | ||
| 0 | Sin ningún desinfectante | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C |
| 1 | NaOCl | 100 D | 0 C | 10 AB | 10 BC | 0 A | 80 AB | 0 A | 10 BC | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 80 AB | 0 A | 10 AB |
| 2 | Ca(ClO)2 | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 85 A | 100 D | 40 ABC | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 20 ABC |
| 3 | Ca(ClO)2/NaOCl | 0 A | 60 ABC | 0 A | 85 A | 100 D | 85 A | 0 A | 0 C | 100 AB | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 20 ABC |
| 4 | H2O2 | 0 A | 10 BC | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 70 ABC | 0 A | 85 A | 0 A | 0 C | 40 ABC | 20 ABC | 0 A | 10 BC |
| 5 | PM/ Ca(ClO)2 | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 10 BC | 0 A | 50 ABC | 80 CD | 0 C | 10.0 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 50 ABC |
| 6 | PM/NaOCl | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 80 AB | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 0 C | 50 BC | 0 C | 0 A | 85 A |
| 7 | PM/ Ca(ClO)2/NaOCl | 10.0 D | 0 C | 0 A | 20 ABC | 0 A | 10 BC | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 80 AB |
| 8 | PM/H2O2 | 0 A | 20 ABC | 100 D | 10 BC | 0 A | 10 BC | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 10 BC | 0 A | 10 ABC | 0 A | 0 C |
| 9 | PM/HgCl2/ Ca(ClO)2 | 0 A | 0 C | 10 AB | 10 BC | 0 A | 40 ABC | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 20 ABC | 30 AB | 0 C | 0 A | 80 AB |
| 10 | PM/HgCl2/NaOCl | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 30 ABC | 0 A | 10 BC | 0 A | 0 C | 0 A | 20 ABC | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 80 AB |
| 11 | PM/HgCl/Ca(ClO)2/NaOCl | 100 D | 20 ABC | 0 A | 30 ABC | 0 A | 20 ABC | 0 A | 10 BC | 40 ABC | 10 BC | 100 D | 0 C | 0 A | 80 AB |
| 12 | PM/HgCl2/H2O2 | 0 A | 50 ABC | 0 A | 30 ABC | 0 A | 90 A | 0 A | 30 ABC | 0 A | 20 ABC | 0 A | 85 A | 0 A | 80 AB |
T: Treatment, 0: Control; DG = Days to germination; from in vitro planting; C =Contamination; G=Gemination. Same letters indicate no significant differences
(p<0.05) between treatments.
However, the results coincide with those for the contamination variable. The only treatment that stimulated germination for the seven Agave species was treatment 12, where the percentage of germination for most of the species was above the other treatments, in A. marmorata (90 %), A. angustifolia (85 %), A. salmiana (50 %), A. horrida (30 %), A. potatorum (30 %), A. cupreata (30 %), and A. karwinskii (20 %). On the other hand, A. marmorata gave a better response, reaching an average of 90 % of germination, as well as being the earliest species, germinating 8 days after planting, thus turning out to be the species that statistically stood out from the rest (Table 4).
Nevertheless, despite the low percentage of germination for the other treatments (0- 20 %) none of the seedlings obtained displayed abnormalities in their germination and development, regardless of the treatment used and of the species (Figure 1).

Figure 1 A. salmiana seed germination. A) root emergence and elongation. (14 dap) B) Elongation of the plumule. (21 dap) C) Diferenciation of the root cotyledons and development. (30 dap) D) Full germination and development. (14-30 dap) E) Normal, completely developed A. salmiana seedlings. (50 dap); dap days after planting.
Identification of pathogens
Contamination. The Tukey’s test (p<0.05) determined that there are highly significant differences between all the treatments applied, since most treatments differentially reduced contamination in seeds. However, statistically, only one treatment was better than the rest (Treatment 12), in which contamination was reduced completely (100 %) for all the species studied, and which consisted of applying hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at 3 % for 24 h, PENTAMAX (PM) at 30 % (v/v) for 10 min and Mercury (II) chloride (HgCl2) al 0.1 % (p/v) for 10 min. In contrast with the above, the highest contamination levels were observed in the calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite treatments. It is worth pointing out that the contamination of Agave spp. seeds in the different treatments was mainly due to fungi and, less frequently, to bacteria (Table 4).
Identification of contaminating microorganisms. In general terms and for the first time, six genera of microorganisms were found which were related to the Agave seeds. The results of the taxonomic study for the six samples analyzed reveal four fungi genera (Monilinia sp., Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp. and Alternaria alternata), one bacterium (Bacillus sp.) and one yeast (Schizosaccharomyces sp.) (Figure 2). It is noteworthy that in the isolation of the contaminating species Aspergillus and Penicillium all species were displayed, whereas others were exclusive to some species. Schizosaccharomyces sp., was found in A. marmorata, Alternaria alternata in A. angustifolia and Monilinia sp., in A. horrida. Evaluating the efficiency of treatments on the control of the pathogens revealed that most treatments had an effective control over bacteria, yet it was deficient for

Figura 2 Bacterial and fungal strains found in the seeds of Agave spp. A) Schizosaccharomyces sp. B) Bacillus sp. C) Penicilllium sp. D) Alternaria alternata. E) Aspergillus sp. F) Monilinia sp.
fungi in comparison with the control treatment. However, H2O2 presented favorable results greater than the other treatments, even in one which used the disinfectant only (Table 5).
Table 5 Contaminant microorganisms found in the Agave seeds after applying the treamtnets.
| Treatments | A. salmiana | A. angustifolia | A. horrida | A. marmorata | A. potatorum | A. karwiskii | A. cupreata | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | B | L | H | B | L | H | B | L | H | B | L | H | B | L | H | B | L | H | B | L | ||
| 1 | Ca(ClO)2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
| 2 | NaOCl | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Ca(ClO)2/NaOCl | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | H2O2 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | PM/ Ca(ClO)2 | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||
| 6 | PM/NaOCl | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | PM/ Ca(ClO)2/NaOCl | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||
| 8 | PM/H2O2 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | PM/HgCl2/ Ca(ClO)2 | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | PM/HgCl2/NaOCl | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | PM/HgCl/Ca(ClO)2/NaOCl | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | PM/HgCl2/H2O2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
H: Fungi; B: Bacteria; L: Yeasts. X: Microorganisms found.
Discussion
Germination. The total germination percentages for most of the species were higher than those reported by Ramírez et al. (2016) for A. mapisaga (70 %) and A. angustifolia with 28 % germination. Additionally, the seeds of the seven Agave species displayed percentages of germination above 50 %, even in species with the most years of gathering, such as A. horrida and A. salmiana, coinciding with Castillo et al. (2022), who reported that A. victoriae reginae seeds were viable after one year of having been gathered and suggest that it is possible to store this species’ seeds for at least one year and have acceptable germination percentages. According to the results from this study, the seeds displayed a viability of over 50 % in storage in a germplasm bank for longer periods. However, for future studies, we suggest starting with the viability test with tetrazolium chloride, which will provide clarity in the viability obtained.
In addition, by analyzing the days of germination, it is possible to claim that the seeds displayed no latency, a typical characteristic of other Agave species (Freeman et al., 1977; Freeman, 1975). This lack of latency in evaluated seeds is similar to those reported by Peña et al. (2006) for A. salmiana seeds stored for two years and which had a lower latency than those planted in the same year of gathering.
Finally, in the treatments with no germination for any species, most notably the control treatment (T0), in which no species germinated, this may be attributed to the presence of fungi and bacteria (contamination), since the seeds affected by pathogenic fungi may display sclerotization, stromatization, decoloring, necrosis, rotting of the root, size reduction, abortion and inability to germinate (Ellis and Gálvez, 1980; Agarwal and Sinclair, 1987).
Contamination. In Agave, no specific data have been reported for the topic of disinfection. In this study, the lowest average number of contaminated seeds (0- 10 %) was displayed in treatments in which H2O2 was applied. However, when applying H O at 3 % for 24 h in combination with copper sulfate (PENTAMAX®) at 30 % for 10 min and mercury (II) chloride at 0.1 % for 10 min, the seeds were totally disinfected. In this genus, no similar results have been reported with these disinfectants. Nevertheless, Flores et al. (2019) obtained high levels of disinfection by applying H2O2 (3 % v/v) for 24 horas, shaking constantly. This may be due to the hydrogen peroxide exerting its oxidative activity with the production of free radicals, which produce oxidative damage on proteins and lipids in the cell membranes of the pathogens, confirming is bactericidal, viricidal and fungicidal abilities. When the H2O2 is shaken constantly, the oxygen demand is reduced, therefore H2O2 has a higher oxidation ability than chlorine or chlorine dioxide. In addition, its molecules leave no toxic residues when they release oxygen (CNIB, 2023; Rodríguez et al., 2009).
On the other hand, Bedoya et al. (2016) reported that the immersion of Aloysia triphylla leaves in HgCl2 at 0.2 % p/v for 5 minutes helped obtain over 80 % of viable, contamination-free explants. Regarding the disinfection with, Barney (2003) reduced the amount of endophytic fungi in Lepanthes rupestris or Lolium perenne seedlings by applying Propiconazol or Procloraz. In sum, all the disinfectants mentioned are efficient, although for agave, H2O2 combined with HgCl2 and copper sulfate is highly efficient to reduce seed contamination, helping obtain disinfections of 100% in the seven species evaluated.
An intermediate contamination level was achieved by applying Ca(ClO)2 and NaOCl, contrasting with results from other species. Martínez et al. (2003) obtained pathogen-free Agave victoriae reginae seeds using NaOCl as a disinfectant, which has been effectively proven aganst bacteria, viruses and fungi, since its dilution in water produces hypochlorous acid (HClO), which easily penetrates the cells of microorganisms and acts on its proteins and nucleic acids (Auccasi, 2016). Nevertheless, according to Lenntech (2008), in order to achieve a successful disinfection, a concentration must be applied that is adequate to the degree of infection of the pathogenic organisms. This coincides with Álvarez et al., (2008), who mention the adequate effectiveness of chlorine and ethanol as disinfectants in pathogenic bacteria, yet deficient against fungi and viruses.
Although the highest contamination levels were observed in seeds free of chemical solutions (control treatment), which displayed a complete contamination in the seeds, which may lead to deduce that washing the seed with running water and soap is not enough, chemical disinfectants must be applied to reduce the presence of pathogenic agents. Finally, comparing different species and solutions used, the results show the effectiveness of each one for Agave spp.
Identification of microorganisms. According to the National Agricultural Technology Insistute (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria - INTA, 2022), the three fungal genera can be classified into three functional group: field fungi (Fusarium and Trichoderma), storage fungi (Aspergillus and Penicillium) and generic contaminating fungi (Monilia and Rhizopus), each one with a particular origin and habitat.
Aspergillus and Penicillium are typical genera under storage conditions, with the ability to invade seeds and grains with a low moisture content, to grow in a wide range of temperatures and, with few exceptions, to infect before the harvest. They actively colonize the seeds, where they cause deterioration and reduce germination, via enzymatic principles and toxins (Howlett, 2006), thus confirming that the seeds which displayed an infestation with these genera did not germinate, being the main reason. In moringa seeds, the genus Aspergillus turned out to be the most versatile, since it was displayed the most frequently, being present in the moringa seed both internally and externally (Sabu et al., 2022). Information regarding Monilinia is scarce, since it has not been reported in Agave or other seeds. It lives mostly in humid areas and mainly attacks fruit trees, being the causal agent of brown rot (Malvárez et al., 2001). It behaves like a wound pathogen, since it infects fruits from lesions caused by insects and/or mechanical grazes (Zúñiga et al., 2011).
Alternaria alternata was found to have the highest incidence and exclusively in A. angustifolia. This pathogen is a saprophytic fungus and it is spread via spores in wind and the mobilization of infected seeds (DGSV, 2023). A. alternata causes diseases in several economically important plants such as broccoli, tomato, chili pepper, potato, citrus fruits, apple, etc. (Meena and Samal, 2019). Kurowski and Wysocka (2009) point out that A. alternata is commonly found as a contaminant in cereal grains and is the main fungal disease isolated in amaranth and oat seeds (Noelting et al., 2016; Leyva et al., 2014). However, there are no reports for A. angustifolia.
Finally, there are reports of the genera Bacillus sp. and Schizosaccharomyces sp. as beneficial agents, particularly Bacillus, which has been reported as one of the main microbial antagonism genera and as a biological control agent for agriculture. In addition, there have been reports of Agave as an endophytic agent that promotes plant growth and development (Beltran et al., 2014). However, in this investigation, both genera were found as contaminant saprophytic agents in Agave seeds, of which there are no reports in other seeds, which could open doors for future investigations.
Conclusions
The 12 treatments proposed were evaluated and the results show that treatment 12, consisting of hydrogen peroxide at 3 % for 24 h in combination with copper sulfate (PENTAMAX®) at 30 % (v/v) for 10 min and mercury (II) chloride at 0.1 % (p/v) for 10 min, was the best in the control of contaminating microorganisms found in the Agave spp. seeds, achieving a 100% disinfection rate and a germination of 20 to 90 %, depending on the species, therefore it is recommended for the disinfection of Agave spp. seeds.
For the first time in Agave seeds, the taxonomic identification of the contaminating microorganisms found was carried out, reporting four fungi (Penicilllium sp., Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus sp., Monilinia sp.), one bacterium (Bacillus sp.) and one yeast (Schizosaccharomyces sp.), out of which Alternaria alternata., Monilinia sp. and Schizosaccharomyces sp. were specific to para A. angustifolia, A. horrida and A. karwiski, respectively. In addition, the disinfecting agents that control them were also reported for the first time.
Acknowledgments
I thank the research team of the Laboratory of Laboratorio de Biología Molecular Vegetal of Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Fitomejoramiento, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, of the Universidad Autónoma del Estado del Estado de México for the support and guidance in the elaboration of this research work.
REFERENCES
Agarwal, V., Sinclair, J. (1987). Principles of seed pathology (2nd). India: CRC Press 176-166. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203710814 [ Links ]
Álvarez, A., Arzate, F., Martínez, M. y Martínez, V. (2020). Regeneración de plantas de Agave marmorata Roezl, por embriogénesis somática. Agroecosistemas tropicales y subtropicales 23(2). https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.3117 [ Links ]
Álvarez, M., Rodríguez, J. y García, R. (2008). Desinfección y selección de inóculo in vitro de Abies religiosa. Revista Chapingo serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 14, 11-14. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S200740182008000100002 [ Links ]
Arzate, F., Piña, E., Norman, M., Reyes, D., Guevara, S. y Vázquez, G. (2016). Regeneración de Agave angustifolia Haw. a partir de embriones somáticos encapsulados. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 39(4), 359-36. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S018773802016000400359 [ Links ]
Barney, D. (2003). Effects of light, surface sterilization, and fungicides on the germination of blackhuckleberry seeds. Small Fruits Review, 2, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1300/J301v02n02_06 [ Links ]
Bedoya, P., Sánchez, J., Bermúdez, G. y Ramírez, R. (2016). Estandarización de un protocolo de desinfección y establecimiento de cultivo in vitro de Aloysia tryphilla. Biotecnología en el Sector. http://dx.doi.org/10.18684/BSAA(14)38-46 [ Links ]
Beltrán, G., White, F., Prado, M., Prieto, R., Yamaguchi, F., Torres, S., Kato, J., Medeiros, G. y Mascio, D. (2014). Adquisición de nitrógeno en Agave tequilana a partir de la degradación de bacterias endófitas. Scientifics Report, (4). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06938 [ Links ]
Billard, C., Dalzotto, C. y Lallana, V. (2014). Desinfección y siembra asimbiótica de semillas de dos especies y una variedad de orquídeas del género Oncidium. Polibotánica, 38, 145-157. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S140527682014000200008&script=sci_abstract#:~:text=En%20la%20siembra%20asimbi%C3%B3tica%20de%20semillas%20de%20 orqu%C3%ADdeas%2C,Murashige%20y%20Skoog%20a%20la%20mitad%20de%20concentraci%C3%B3n [ Links ]
Campos, R., Marcela, A. y Campos, R. (2020). Establecimiento de un protocolo de desinfección y micropropagación in vitro de “caoba” Swietenia macrophylla King (Meliaceae). Arnaldoa, 27(1), 141-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.22497/arnaldoa.271.27107 [ Links ]
Castillo, R., Castillo, Q., Sáenz, C., Rueda, S. y Sáenz, R. (2022). Efectos del pretratamiento con Trichoderma y Bacillus en la germinación de semillas de Agave victoriae-reginae T. Moore. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 13(69), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v13i69.844 [ Links ]
Centro Nacional de Información Biotecnológica (CNBI) (2023). Peróxido de hidrógeno. Resumen del compuesto PubChem para CID 784. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Hydrogen-Peroxide. (consulta, marzo 2023) [ Links ]
Delgado, A., González, A., Santacruz, R., Folgado, R. y Portillo, L. (2021). Embriogénesis somática indirecta y criopreservación del cultivar de Agave tequilana Weber ‘Chato’. Plantas, 10(2): 249. [ Links ]
DGSV-DCNRF (2023). Mancha foliar y tizón del amaranto. Alternaria alternata. Sader-Senasica. Dirección General de Sanidad Vegetal-Dirección del Centro Nacional de Referencia Fitosanitaria. Ficha Técnica. Tecámac, Estado de México. 7 p. [ Links ]
Domínguez, R., González, J., Rosales, G., Quiñones, V., Delgadillo, D., Mireles, O. y Pérez, M. (2008). El cultivo in vitro como herramienta para el aprovechamiento, mejoramiento y conservación de especies del género Agave. Investigación y Ciencia, 41, 53-62. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67404109 [ Links ]
Ellis, M. y Gálvez, G. (1980). Problemas de producción del frijol: Enfermedades, insectos, limitaciones edáficas y climáticas de Phaseolus vulgaris. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), 301-314. [ Links ]
Flores, A., Romero, S., Pérez, M. y Pineda, O. (2019). Nolina parviflora, desinfección de semilla y su implicación en la conservación. Mitigación del daño ambiental agroalimentario y forestal en México, 5, 109-121. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338111207_Nolina_parviflora_desinfeccion_de_semilla_y_su_implicacion_en_la_conservacion [ Links ]
Freeman, C., Tiffany, S. y Reid, H. (1977). Germination responses of Agave lechuguilla, A. parryi, and Fouquieria splendens. The Southwestern Naturalist, 22(2), 195-204. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:87927711 [ Links ]
Freeman, C. (1975). Germination responses of a New Mexico population of Parry agave (Agave parryi Engelm. var. parryi) to constant temperature, water stress and pH. The Southwestern Naturalist, 20(1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3670012 [ Links ]
García, A. (2007). Los agaves de México. Ciencias, 87, 14-23. https://revistacienciasunam.com/es/48-revistas/revista-ciencias-87/285-los-agaves-de-mexico.html [ Links ]
García, A., Martínez, F. y Sandoval, D. (2019). Cuatro especies nuevas de Agave (Asparagaceae, Agavoideae) del sur de México. Acta Botánica Mexicana, 126, e1461. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm126.2019.1461 [ Links ]
Howlett, B. (2006). Secondary metabolite toxins and nutrition of plant pathogenic fungi. Current Opinion Plant Biology, 9(4), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.004 [ Links ]
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (2022). Importancia de la patología de semillas en el almacenamiento de granos. https://inta.gob.ar/documentos/importancia-de-la-patologia-de-semillas-en-el-almacenamiento-de-granos [ Links ]
Kurowski, T. y Wysocka, U. (2009). Fungal communities colonizing grain of hulled and naked oat grown under organic farming system. Phytopathologia, 54, 53-59. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:83362843 [ Links ]
Lenntech (2008). Hipoclorito de sodio. http://www.lenntech.com/espanol/Desinfeccion-del-agua/desinfectantes-hipoclorito-de-sodio.htm [ Links ]
Leyva, M., Cervantes, G., Villaseñor, M., Rodríguez, G., García, L. y Tovar, P. (2014). Diversidad de hongos en semilla de avena del Valle Central de México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 8, 1379-1385. https://cienciasagricolas.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/agricolas/article/view/1090/920 [ Links ]
Malvárez, G., Rodríguez, A., Aguilar, C., Silvera, E. y Mondino, P. (2001). Identificación de especies de Monilinia spp. en aislamientos obtenidos de Prunus spp. por PCR con Primers específicos. Agrociencia, 5(1), 48-53. http://www.fagro.edu.uy/~agrociencia/index.php/directorio/article/view/569/477 [ Links ]
Martínez, P., Ortega, L., Chávez, V. y Adios, R. (2003). Embriogénesis somática y organogénesis del Agave victoriae-reginae: Consideraciones para su conservación. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 74, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023933123131 [ Links ]
Meena, M. y Samal, S. (2019). Alternaria host-specific (HSTs) toxins: An overview of chemical characterization, target sites, regulation and their toxic effects. Toxicology Reports, 6, 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.06.021 [ Links ]
Monja, M. y Robert, M. (2013). Embriogénesis somática directa de Agave fourcroydes Lem. a través del cultivo de capa celular delgada. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol—Plant, 49, 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-013-9535-7 [ Links ]
Murashige, T. y Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473-497. [ Links ]
Noelting, M., Sandoval, M. y Molina, M. (2009). Revisión de las principales patologías que afectan al cultivo de amaranto en Argentina. Jornadas Amaranto La Plata 2009. 25. [ Links ]
Peña, V., Sánchez, U., Aguirre, R., Trejo, C., Cárdenas, E. y Villegas, M. (2006). Temperature and mechanical scarification on seed germination of maguey (Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dick). Seed Science & Technology, 34, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.06 [ Links ]
Ramírez, M., Borodanenko, A., Pérez, M., Salas, A., Nuñéz, P. y Ochoa, A. (2008). In vitro propagation of three Agave species used for liquor distillation and three for landscape. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 94, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9405-x [ Links ]
Ramírez, T., Peña, V., Aguirre, R., Reyes, A., Sánchez, U. y Valle, G. (2012). Seed germination temperatures of eight Mexican Agave species with economic importance. Plant Species Biology, 27, 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2011.00341.x [ Links ]
Rodríguez, M., García, R. y Muñoz, M. (2009). Obtención de un producto coagulante a partir de semillas de Moringa oleifera Lam., tropicalizada en Cuba. http://www.monografias.com/trabajos15/coagulante-moringa/coagulante-moringa.shtml [ Links ]
Sabu, A., Silva, A. y Sánchez, C. (2022). Fitopatógenos fúngicos asociados a semillas de moringa en el estado Monagas, Venezuela. Revista Científica la Calera, 22(39), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.5377/calera.v22i39.15094 [ Links ]
Tamayo, D., Perez, J. y Meneses, E. (2017). Evaluación de métodos para erradicar hongos endófitos de raíces en semillas de Brachiaria decumbens stapf. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias, 2, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.fac.cienc.v6n2.64691 [ Links ]
Zúñiga, J., Biurrun, R., Garnica, I., Lezaun, J. y Llorens, M. (2011). Las moniliosis. Navarra Agraria. https://www.navarraagraria.com/categories/item/710lasmoniliosis [ Links ]
Zúñiga, O. y Beauregard, Z. (2020). Evaluación de tres productos desinfectantes sobre semillas de maíz y cebada para la producción en la tecnología de Forraje Verde Hidropónico. Repertorio Científico, 23(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.22458/rc.v23i2.3180 [ Links ]
Zurita, V., Gómez, C., Atrián, M., Hernández, G., Granados, G., García, M., Salgado, G. y Sánchez, V. (2014). Establecimiento de un método eficiente de germinación in vitro y micropropagación del cirimo (Tilia mexicana Schlecht.) (Tiliaceae). Polibotánica, 38, 129-144. [ Links ]
Received: October 02, 2023; Accepted: November 29, 2023










texto em 


