SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número2Cicadélidos portadores de begomovirus en el cultivo de jamaica (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.)Primer reporte del género Colletotrichum spp. en frutos de pimienta gorda (Pimenta dioica) en Veracruz, México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de fitopatología

versão On-line ISSN 2007-8080versão impressa ISSN 0185-3309

Rev. mex. fitopatol vol.36 no.2 Texcoco Mai./Ago. 2018

https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.1708-5 

Phytopathological notes

Diagramatic scale for quantification of rust severity in teak leaves

Leila Cristiane-Delmadi1  * 

Cristiane de Pieri2 

Alex Sander-Porcena2 

Edson Luiz-Furtado2 

1Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMAT, Rua São Jorge, 586 - Casa 04, Bairro Cavalhada, CP. 78200-000, Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brasil

2Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” - UNESP , Campus de Botucatu, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Departamento de Produção Vegetal, CP. 18610-307, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brasil.


Abstract

Teak (Tectona grandis) rust, caused by the fungus Olivea tectonae, has been present in several regions of Brazil in severe cases that lead to the premature fall of the leaves and even the death of the plant. However, there is still no standard method for assessment of disease severity in the field. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a diagrammatic scale to quantify the rust severity in leaves of teak. The diagrammatic scale was developed based on disease severity encompassing 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80% of the leaf area with rust symptom. The scale was validated by 10 raters, who analyzed 50 leaves with a range of disease severity, without and with diagrammatic scale as an assessment aid. The raters presented differences in the perception of the severity levels of the disease. With the adoption of the diagrammatic scale all the raters improved the accuracy of the estimates, there was a reduction in the absolute errors and good estimates of repeatability. The proposed diagrammatic scale is suitable for the evaluation of the rust severity in teak leaves, being able to provide accuracy and repeatability of estimates.

Key words: Tectona grandis; Olivea tectonae; disease assessment

Resumen

La roya de la teca (Tectona grandis), causada pelo fungo Olivea tectonae, se ha presentado en varias regiones de Brasil en casos graves que conducen a la caída prematura de las hojas e incluso la muerte de la planta. Sin embargo, todavía no existe un método estándar para la evaluación de la severidad de la enfermedad en el campo. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar y validar una escala diagramática para cuantificar la severidad de la roya en hojas de teca. La escala diagramática se desarrolló en función de la severidad de la enfermedad que abarca 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 y 80% del área foliar con síntomas de roya. La escala fue validada por 10 evaluadores, que analizaron 50 hojas con un rango de severidad de la enfermedad, sin y con escala diagramática como ayuda de evaluación. Los evaluadores presentaron diferencias en la percepción de los niveles de severidad de la enfermedad. Con la adopción de la escala diagramática todos los evaluadores mejoraron la precisión de las estimaciones, hubo reducción en los errores absolutos y buenas estimaciones de repetitividad. La escala diagramática propuesta es adecuada para la evaluación de la severidad de la roya en las hojas de teca, siendo capaz de proporcionar precisión y repetitividad das estimativas.

Palabras clave: Tectona grandis; Olivea tectonae; evaluación de enfermedad

The Brazilian forestry sector has a great potential for growth due to lower costs, production cycles, a higher productivity, and the variables that are less active to fluctuations in the finance market. Brazil has all competitive advantages of other countries in the forestry sector, due to its favorable natural conditions, scientific advances, and the entrepreneurial spirit, which results in a high growth potential (AMATA, 2009; ABRAF, 2013). A species that has stood out in the forestry sector, and particularly in the foreign market, is the teak (Tectona grandis), originally from India, Myanmar, Thailand and Laos. It is species that flourishes in humid tropical climates with summer rains and dry winters. In Brazil, the teak grows best in areas with average annual rainfalls ranging between 1250 and 2500 mm and with an average temperature of 24 °C. A dry period of three to five months favors the quality of the wood ( Cáceres Florestal, 1997; EMBRAPA, 2007).

Various studies indicate that the teak has presented pathologies in Brazilian and international plantations. These diseases worry producers of this crop throughout the country, particularly, teak rust, given its aggressiveness (Pieri et al., 2011). The disease presents yellow and powdery-looking pustules on the surface of the underside, and a premature defoliation takes place in all phenological phases of the culture, reducing the speed of growth of the plant, causing a reduction of the photosynthetic rate, and consequently impacting the rate of wood production (Arguedas-Gamboa, 2004).

This disease was first reported in the American continent in Panama, in November 2003; later, in Costa Rica in January 2004 (Arguedas-Gamboa, 2004); in Ecuador in September, and in Mexico in December 2005 (NAPPO, 2005). In 2005, it was reported in Colombia (Céspedes and Yepes, 2007), and in 2006, in Cuba (Pérez et al., 2008). The first report of this disease in Brazil took place in 2009 and was later verified in several municipal areas of different Brazilian states (Pieri et al., 2011).

The appropriate methods for the evaluation of the disease must allow a greater degree of accuracy, precision and repetitiveness, therefore such methods vary depending on the causal agents of the disease (Berger, 1980). Severity is the variable used in the case of foliar diseases and the quantification of this variable is crucial for subsidizing different actions in agriculture, such as epidemiological studies, evaluations of control strategies, selecting resistant genotypes and carrying out tests with agrochemical products (Campbell and Madden, 1990). The evaluation of severity is normally carried out in a subjective manner through visual analyses, and therefore the diagrammatic scales have become an important tool in these studies (Kranz, 1988; Nutter Jr. et al., 2006). Scales are used in the normalization of the visual estimation; therefore, the evaluation is more precise and accurate between evaluators and it reduces errors in visual estimations (Campbell and Madden, 1990).

Some of the most important characteristics in a diagrammatic scale are the ease of use, applicability in the face of a large variety of conditions with reproducible results, and the existence of intervals that represent all the stages of development of the disease (Berger, 1980; Bergamin Filho and Amorim, 1996).

Proposing a standardized system to orient the evaluation of the severity of a particular disease is an important responsibility, since, if the system is deficient, the cost of its use may be higher than the benefits obtained with its use (Leite and Amorim, 2002; Nutter Jr. and Schultz, 1995). However, a standardization of the disease evaluation methodology is highly desirable, since it helps compare results obtained in different institutions and locations (Bergamin Filho and Amorim, 1996).

The aim of this study, therefore, was to develop and validate a diagrammatic scale to quantify teak rust in the field.

In order to do this, 200 adult teak leaves, aged 10 years, were gathered in an experimental field in the Hacienda Lageado - UNESP/FCA (Botucatu, São Paulo, Brasil) in the Tropical Flora company (Garça, São Paulo, Brasil), all of which presented different levels of damage due to rust; they were collected along with healthy leaves.

Each leaf was evaluated according to the proportion of the diseased area and the real severity of the disease, as a percentage. The healthy and affected areas were determined in RGB (red, green, blue) based on the methodology described by Masson et al. (2008). Later, the intermediate levels of the scale of severity were determined according to the Weber-Fechner law (Horsfall and Barratt, 1945).

The scale was validated by 10 evaluators, who analyzed 50 digital images of adult teak leaves, both healthy and with symptoms of rust at different levels of severity. The evaluators had different levels of experience, some with previous knowledge of a scale, and others without experience or knowledge.

Each image of a leaf was projected for the evaluators using Power Point for 30 seconds in two stages: the first observation was performed without the use of a diagrammatic scale; the evaluators carried out the evaluation by placing a value, expressed as a percentage, in a previously established format. In the second stage, the evaluators received a new format along with the diagrammatic scale for reference. The images of the 50 teak leaves were projected for their evaluation against the scale.

Using the information obtained from the evaluations with and without scales, we determined the precision of the estimations obtained by calculating the coefficient of determination of the accuracy and the variance of absolute errors. A simple linear regression analysis was carried out, considering the real severity as the independent variable and the estimated severity, as the dependent variable. The precision of the estimations was evaluated using the precision or determination coefficient (r²) and the variance of the absolute errors (estimated severity minus real severity) (Kranz, 1988; Nutter Jr. et al., 1993).

The diagrammatic scale of teak rust presented seven severity levels, base don the distribution of the sample: N0 = 0% (no symptoms or signs); N1 = 2.5%; N2 = 5%; N3 = 10%; N4 = 20%; N5 = 40%; N6 = 80%, exponentially, according to the Weber-Fechner law, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Diagrammatic scale for the evaluation of the severity of teak rust cause by the fungud Oliveae tectonae. Values in percentages of leaf area with symptoms.  

In the validation of the diagrammatic scale, the 10 evaluators presented differences in the perception of the severity levels of the disease. The evaluators presented a good accuracy, with and without scales, due to the estimated severity values being near the real values. Absolute errors decreased when the diagrammatic scale was used as an aid for evaluation (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Statistical validation of the diagrammatic scale to assess teak rust severity. Evaluators 5 and 7 where selected to represent the linear regression analysis between actual and estimated severity with and without using the diagrammatic scale. Those evaluators had the lowest and highest precision (r2), respectively.  

The evaluators displayed adequate estimations for repetitiveness, which can be viewed in the results of the regression between the first and second evaluation (with and without a scale). Due to the proximity of the estimated severity values and the real intensity values, the validation obtained very promising results (Figure 2).

The severity estimated using the scale and the regression lines obtained between the actual value and the estimation (continuous line) of rust in adult teak leaves are shown in Figure 2. The intercept (a) and slope coefficients (b) and determination r², obtained in the regressions between the real and the estimated, with and without the use of a diagram, are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Intercept (a), slope (b) and determination coefficient (r²) obtained with simple linear regression between real values and estimations of teak rust severity for ten evaluators with and without using the diagrammatic scale. 

Evaluadores

Escala

Coeficientes

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

Media

Sin

a

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

b

0.05

0.12

0.07

0.04

0.18

0.11

0.06

0.07

0.01

0.17

0.09

r2

0.89

0.87

0.87

0.86

0.82

0.92

0.95

0.87

0.91

0.86

0.88

Con

a

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

b

0.04

0.11

0.02

0.03

0.24

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.09

0.06

r2

0.93

0.91

0.93

0.93

0.88

0.97

0.97

0.93

0.94

0.92

0.93

There was a reduction in the absolute errors when the diagrammatic scale was used as an aid for evaluation (Figure 2).

With the adoption of the diagrammatic scale proposed, all evaluators improved the precision of the estimations (r²=0.93) in comparison with the result obtained without the use of the scale (r²=0.88).

Similar values between the estimated and real valued determine the accuracy of the evaluations. Precision is a factor to consider in the validation of a diagram scale, and it is defined as the precision o fan operation that supposed rigor and accuracy. Precision can be evaluated by determining the coefficient of regression analysis, which must be near to 1, and by the variation of absolute error (difference between estimated and real severity) (Bergamin Filho and Amorim, 1996).

The difference between evaluators in the quantification of teak rust confirms observations by Nutter Jr. and Schultz (1995) regarding the variation in the ability between individuals to discriminate disease levels. The quality of the disease estimation is not only influenced by stimuli and psychological answers but can also be affected by factors such as the complexity of the sampling unit, size and shapes of the lesions, color and number of lesions in the sampling unit (Kranz, 1988), fatigue and difficulty of concentration on the task (Shokes et al., 1987).

The improvement in the accuracy of the estimations of the severity of rust in teak leaves with the use of the diagrammatic scale is similar to the results obtained in several studies carried out earlier, involving other pathosystems (Del Ponte et al., 2017).

Even without the use of the diagrammatic scale, evaluators presented good levels of accuracy in the estimations, similar to the one confirmed in the validation of diagrammatic scales for rust in coffee (Capucho et al., 2011), sugarcane (Klosowski et al., 2013), bean (Godoy et al., 1997) , soybean (Godoy et al., 2006) and grapevine (Angelotti et al., 2008), and may be a result of the ease of evaluation of the severity of the disease, due to the size of the rust pustules on leaves.

The evaluators presented certain levels of absolute errors in the estimations, even with the use of the diagrammatic scale. However, according to statements by Stonehouse (1994), the presence of some level of error in the evaluations may be compensated by the speed and standardization that result from the use of diagrammatic scales. Likewise, as in most disease severity quantification methods, the use of diagrammatic scales is subjected to a certain degree of subjectivity, which can be minimized by training the evaluators (Nutter Jr. and Schultz, 1995; Nutter et al., 2006).

The improvement in the repeatability of the disease severity estimations, as obtained in this study with the use of the diagrammatic scale, is important in developing standard disease evaluation methods, since it indicates that evaluations performed in different moments by a same evaluator presents a higher level of accuracy (Campbell and Madden, 1990).

The diagrammatic scale proposed and validated in this study serves various items listed in a recent article (Del Ponte et al., 2017) on the best practices for conducting and validating diagrammatic scales to quantify plant diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagrammatic scale proposed is adequate for the evaluation of the severity of rust in teak leaves, since it is able to provide accuracy and repeatability of the estimations. This standard procedure may be highly valuable for applying in field surveys, in epidemiological Studies, and the evaluation of disease control measures.

LITERATURA CITADA

ABRAF, Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Florestas Plantadas. 2013. Anuário estatístico da ABRAF 2013 - Ano base 2012. Disponible en línea: http://www.ipef.br/estatisticas/relatorios/anuario-abraf13-br.pdf (consulta, agosto 2017). [ Links ]

AMATA. 2009. Mercado de bosques plantados. São Paulo, Brasil. Disponible en línea: http://www.amatabrasil.com.br/download-arquivo?id=588 (consulta, julio 2017). [ Links ]

Angelotti F, Scapin CR, Tessmann DJ, Vida JB, Oliveira RR and Canteri MG. 2008. Diagrammatic scale for assessment of grapevine rust. Tropical Plant Pathology 33:439-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-56762008000600006 [ Links ]

Arguedas-Gamboa M. 2004. La roya de la teca Olivea tectonae (Rac.): consideraciones sobre su presencia en Panamá y Costa Rica. Revista Forestal 1:1-16. Disponible en línea: http://revistas.tec.ac.cr/index.php/kuru/article/view/600/2818Links ]

Bergamin Filho A y Amorim L. 1996. Doenças de Plantas Tropicais: Epidemiologia e Controle Econômico. Agronômica Ceres. São Paulo, Brasil. 299p. [ Links ]

Berger RD. 1980. Measuring disease intensity. Pp: 28-31. In: Teng PS and Krupa SV (eds.). Crop Loss Assessment Which Constrain Production and Crop Improvement in Agriculture and Forestry. University of Minnesota Press. St. Paul, USA. 269p. [ Links ]

Cáceres Florestal. 1997. Manual do cultivo da teca. Disponible en línea: http://www.caceresflorestal.com.br/Manual_do_cultivo_da_teca-Caceres_Florestal.pdf (consulta, mayo 2017). [ Links ]

Campbell CL and Madden LV. 1990. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. Jonh Wiley & Sons. New York, USA. 532p. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300051890 [ Links ]

Capucho AS, Zambolim L, Duarte HSS and Vaz GRO. 2011. Development and validation of a standard area diagram set to estimate severity of leaf rust in Coffea arabica and C. canephora. Plant Pathology 60:1144-1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02472.x [ Links ]

Céspedes PB y Yepes MS. 2007. Nuevos registros de royas (uredinales) potencialmente importantes en Colombia. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía de Medellín 60:3645-3655. DOI: 10.15446/rfnam [ Links ]

Del Ponte EM, Pethybridge SJ, Bock CH, Michereff SJ, Machado FJ and Spolti P. 2017. Standard area diagrams for aiding severity estimation: scientometrics, pathosystems and methodological trends in the last 25 years. Phytopathology 107:1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-17-0069-FI [ Links ]

EMBRAPA, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. 2007. Sistema de produção de teca para o Estado de Rondônia. Disponible en línea: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/698944/1/spteca.pdf (Consulta, febrero 2016). [ Links ]

Godoy CV, Carneiro SMTPG, Iamauti MT, Pria MD, Amorim L, Berger RD and Bergamin Filho A. 1997. Diagrammatic scales for bean diseases: development and validation. Journal of Plant Disease and Protection 104:336-345. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/525b/8b3e232bd5781f9b4f670c98e5f376779d2e.pdfLinks ]

Godoy CV, Koga LJ and Canteri MG. 2006. Diagrammatic scale for assessment of soybean rust severity. Fitopatologia Brasileira 31:63-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-41582006000100011 [ Links ]

Klosowski AC, Ruaro L, Bespalhok Filho JC y May De Mio LL. 2013. Proposta e validação de escala para a ferrugem alaranjada da cana-de-açúcar. Tropical Plant Pathology 38:166-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-56762013000200012 [ Links ]

Kranz J. 1988. Measuring plant disease. Pp: 35-50. In: Kranz J and Rotem J. (eds.). Experimental Techniques in Plant Disease Epidemiology. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg: Germany. 299p. [ Links ]

Leite RMVBC y Amorim L. 2002. Elaboração e validação de escala diagramática para mancha de Alternaria em girassol. Summa Phytopathologica 28:14-19. [ Links ]

Horsfall JC and Barratt RW. 1945. An improved grading system for measuring plant diseases. Phytopathology 35:665. [ Links ]

NAPPO, North American Plant Protection Organization. 2005. Pest Alert - Detección de la roya de la teca (Olivea tectonae), (Rac.) Thirum. Chaconiaceae, en el município de Las Choapas, Veracruz, México. Disponible en línea: http://www.pestalert.org/espanol/oprDetail.cfm?oprID=142&keyword=Olivea%20tectonae (consulta, Febrero 2016). [ Links ]

Nutter Jr. FW, Esker PD and Coelho Netto RA. 2006. Disease assessment concepts and the advancements made in improving the accuracy and precision of plant disease data. European Journal of Plant Pathology 115:95-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-1230-z [ Links ]

Nutter Jr. FW and Schultz PM. 1995. Improving the accuracy and precision of disease assessments: selection of methods and use of computer-aided training programs. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17:174-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060669509500709 [ Links ]

Nutter Jr. FW , Gleason ML, Jenco JH and Christians NC. 1993. Assessing the accuracy, intra-rater repeatability, and inter-rater reliability of disease assessment systems. Phytopathology 83:806-812. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-83-806 [ Links ]

Pérez M, López MO and Marti O. 2008. Olivea tectonae, leaf rust of teak, occurs in Cuba. New Diseases Reports 17:32. Disponible en línea: http://www.ndrs.org.uk/article.php?id=017032Links ]

Pieri C, Passador MM, Furtado EL y Carvalho Júnior AA. 2011. Ferrugem da teca (Olivea neotectonae): novas ocorrências no Brasil e revisão do nome específico. Summa Phytopathologica 37:199-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-54052011000400006 [ Links ]

Shokes FM, Berger RD, Smith DH, Rasp JM. 1987. Reliability of disease assessment procedures: a case study with late leafspot of peanut. Oléagineux 42:245-251. [ Links ]

Stonehouse J. 1994. Assessment of Andean bean diseases using visual keys. Plant Pathology 43:519-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1994.tb01586.x [ Links ]

Received: August 23, 2017; Accepted: April 26, 2018

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons